Yeeeeeah.... I'm gonna need you to pair this outfit with a coffee mug and post it to one of the gone wild coffee subs. Thanks Jilanico, good seein' ya.
I worked at the Overstock home office back in the day. Patrick Byrne was nuts long before he hitched his wagon to Trump, and did way too many drugs in the office.
I need to correct myself. The messages would be admissible either way having nothing to do with hearsay. The messages are direct, documented evidence on their phones. As you pointed out the statements made (or not made) in the car, absent video, audio, or a third party, could only have been available from the 2 parties statements and therefore needed both parties to be available in court to be entered.
No. Hearsay is when person A claims person B made a statement when person B is not available in court to be cross examined. The messages were admitted as evidence and were a main point in the defenses' argument. They were admissible because the messages were between the 2 parties to the lawsuit, therefore both were available to be questioned.
"Ward consistently maintained that the encounter was "wholly consensual". His defense highlighted that the two exchanged friendly messages afterward and that the woman gave no indication she wanted to leave the vehicle during their interaction."
When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade! Make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons! What am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager!
Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons! Do you know who I am? I'm the man whose gonna burn your house down - with the lemons!
You should read the guy's explanation. It legitimately seems like an honest mistake, but given his work was specifically geared towards avoiding a situation like that I'm not surprised he was let go.
Holy shit it's Rob Beckett! I couldn't recognize him at first without seeing the teeth.
Yeeeeeah.... I'm gonna need you to pair this outfit with a coffee mug and post it to one of the gone wild coffee subs. Thanks Jilanico, good seein' ya.
Well I had a big lunch, my insulin pump couldn't keep up.
I worked at the Overstock home office back in the day. Patrick Byrne was nuts long before he hitched his wagon to Trump, and did way too many drugs in the office.
I need to correct myself. The messages would be admissible either way having nothing to do with hearsay. The messages are direct, documented evidence on their phones. As you pointed out the statements made (or not made) in the car, absent video, audio, or a third party, could only have been available from the 2 parties statements and therefore needed both parties to be available in court to be entered.
No. Hearsay is when person A claims person B made a statement when person B is not available in court to be cross examined. The messages were admitted as evidence and were a main point in the defenses' argument. They were admissible because the messages were between the 2 parties to the lawsuit, therefore both were available to be questioned.
"Ward consistently maintained that the encounter was "wholly consensual". His defense highlighted that the two exchanged friendly messages afterward and that the woman gave no indication she wanted to leave the vehicle during their interaction."
WE'RE NUMBER ONE! WE'RE NUMBER ONE!
When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade! Make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons! What am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager! Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons! Do you know who I am? I'm the man whose gonna burn your house down - with the lemons!
That different show is more Star Trek than several Star Trek shows.
Post this to one of the 3d printing subs and wait.
I blame low blood sugar.
I specifically didn't because I figured seeing the name of the movie might be enough to figure out what I was attempting not to spoil.
Oh agreed 100%, it was perfect thematically, it had the intended effect of making me yearn for more stories with her.
Of side characters I wish we could have had more stories about she is second on my list after Ro Laren.
So I said... to my dad. Hey Pops. What's with... the child labor laws. In New York.
Spoiler alert for a 21 year old movie:
Lord of the Rings: wears no helmet, lives. ::: spoiler spoiler V for Vendetta: never takes mask off, dies. :::
Yeah the math checks out.
You should read the guy's explanation. It legitimately seems like an honest mistake, but given his work was specifically geared towards avoiding a situation like that I'm not surprised he was let go.
I like how the green is slowly seeping into the lemon. Also I'm amused they went to the trouble to make a green drink... then didn't use a lime?