Cronization

u/Cronization@lemmy.world
0 posts · 33 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

on [Mimi] Wishes. [12] · c/comicstrips · 13 pts · 26d

Here's a brief overview for you, then:

Last time on Dragon Ball Z! HHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Next time on Dragon Ball Z! HHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/videos · 48 pts · 67d

That other train that passed had a clear track, and they were waiting their turn on a side rail to use the track the other train was coming the opposite way on. Many many places only have one set of rails, there ain’t two-way traffic everywhere. You probably don’t want two million-ton vehicles to smash into each other in the middle of a wildfire.

https://lemmy.zip/comment/27668336

on Americans Be Like: · c/comicstrips · 8 pts · 186d

I'm not who you replied to but I have a similar view.

For me, it's not "you didn't vote, so you support Trump", it's "you didn't vote, which says you were fine with any of the available candidates, how they presented themselves, and their plans for this nation. You were fine with any of them being President." Anybody who was fine with Trump being President gets criticism from me.

Hell, I give more credit to somebody who put a write-in vote for "my cat: Sir Fluffykins, esq. III" because at least that person would make their voice heard that no candidate was acceptable.

That math ain't mathing.

Assuming a "long drive" is at least 200 miles and most of the trip is on a highway without a lot of slow spots, you should save much more than 20 minutes a year regularly going 15 mph over.

With a lower highway speed limit of 60 mph, going 15 over will put you at 75 mph. In an hour, you're 15 miles further down the road going 75 than 60 and it will take you 15 more minutes going 60 to get to that same spot.

Specific conditions will change the numbers, obviously. I'd consider both a few hundred mile drive and driving through NYC during rush hour to be long drives and they'll have vastly different stats. By all means leave earlier but that Speedr app seems like it's mathing wrong.

Your asterisk example is correct. For those less fluent: The "ch" in "chore" is the same as in "choice" and the "ch" in "chasm" is the same as "chord".

Which is yet another example that english is really just three languages in a trench coat that mugs other languages in dark alleys for spare syntax.

on Here it comes · c/politicalmemes · 11 pts · 357d

Having links to back up your claims would go a long way to convincing people. Otherwise your words are just you yelling at clouds and hoping somebody will listen.

on Nobodywantstoworkanymore!! · c/memes · 5 pts · 1y

What I'm reading from the role combination is that he made apps, gave updates to managers, taught people how to use the apps, helped them when they had issues, and was the one that ordered alcohol for the office after drinking it all due to the previous.

on Anon conserves power · c/greentext · 3 pts · 1y

Those people bombing hospitals are also evil. Stopping them from bombing hospitals wont stop babies from getting cancer. There can be (and are) multiple evil things and beings in life.

You seem to have forgotten the context of the comment chain. The grandparent comment of your comment that I replied to said that if Christ returned, the commenter would instantly convert. Christ returning would strongly imply that Christianity is correct. In Christianity, God is all knowing (omniscient) and all powerful (omnipotent). Being such a powerful god, if He doesn't stop babies from getting cancer in the first place, He is either evil or impotent.

on Anon conserves power · c/greentext · 4 pts · 1y

Babies get cancer. That's not humans choosing evil. If there is a god that created a baby just to get cancer and die before age 3, that god is evil.