Is that a fucking threat

630 points · 21 comments · view on lemmy.world

21 Comments

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 146 pts · 329d (8 replies)

Here:

🟨πŸŸ₯πŸŸ¦πŸŸ«πŸŸ©β¬›πŸŸͺ⬜🟧🟦🟩πŸŸ₯ πŸŸͺ🟨🟧🟩⬜🟦πŸŸ₯πŸŸ«πŸŸ§β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸͺ πŸŸ₯πŸŸ§πŸŸ¦πŸŸ«πŸŸ©β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸͺ⬜🟦🟩πŸŸ₯ ⬜🟩🟦🟨πŸŸͺ🟧πŸŸ₯πŸŸ«β¬›πŸŸ§πŸŸͺ🟨 🟫🟦πŸŸ₯πŸŸ©β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸͺ⬜🟧🟦πŸŸ₯🟩

some extra pixels I just had laying around. You need them more than I do.

chellomere@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 329d

thank

Credibly_Human@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 329d (5 replies)

This is great. Where did you find this?

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 329d (4 replies)

Oh I've got pixels laying around all over the place. Just scooped up a few into a pile.

BootLoop@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 329d (3 replies)

Some people don't appreciate how hard it was to shovel pixels back in the day.

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 329d (2 replies)

We had to go to a "Radio Shack" and get our pixels one at a time.

MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 329d (1 reply)

Why didn't you just cultivate your pixels from the fertile soil as God intended?

The times in the pixel fields were hard, my pa lost his arm in a pixel thresher. But it was honest work.

CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 329d

Wow what luxuries! Soil and machines! Back in our day we had to harvest the pixels from our own asses!

jol@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 326d

BootLoop@sh.itjust.works · 55 pts · 329d (6 replies)

Dang, there's so few pixels you can hardly tell the two faces change on the Seinfeld guy.

wewbull@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 329d (5 replies)

I'm pretty sure it's Fat Albert.

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 329d (4 replies)

It’s the guy from Full House.

AtariDump@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 329d (3 replies)

No, no. It’s the neighbor from Family Matters

Deconceptualist@leminal.space · 6 pts · 329d (2 replies)

Looks like clay, so I thought it was Gumby.

BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 329d (1 reply)

I think it’s Wil Wheaton.

Snowpix@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 329d

Definitely Ned Flanders.

leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 23 pts · 329d (2 replies)

Correlation doesn't imply causation... but in this case it probably does, let's be frank.

Cronization@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 329d (1 reply)

Can I be Paul, instead?

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 329d

Only if I can be Wiggly Pete

CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de · 13 pts · 329d
Kyrgizion@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 329d

It's a promise