Sentences like "It is exploited in attempts to strangle development of atomic energy, the cleanest, safest and practically inexhaustible means to meet the worlds energy needs" or retelling of the events from his perspective or constant self citation make it a definitive opionion piece.
And I looked at random papers that cited this paper. Some are not even listed anymore and most others I randomly selected (~20) cited the paper for random facts ("release of around 70 tons of nuclear fuel", "radioresistant microbes can tolerate a high radiation incidence", "many of these communities have not, and will not, be repopulated due to the current radiation") or outright contradicted the paper ("[his] assumptions [about cancer incidence] are in conflict with observations from Russia...").
The amount of citations a paper has is absolutely useless information without context to whether the citations support/contrast or are incidental
Sooo you base this on an opinion piece disguised as journal article in a low impact journal by a guy that has, let's say interesting views on radiation damage and global warming.
I gave a delivery service a bad review once because they didn't deliver my food, said they would reimburse me and that didn't happen either.
The owner had the review removed as "false accusations" so I provided google with the chat in which the owner apologised for the missing delivery and offer me a voucher. Still got deleted because of "false accusations".
There are even more reviews popping up from other people that didn't get their food. They also get deleted.
Wir hatten unserer Security auf einem Festival die Anweisung gegeben "Keine Hakenkreuze erlaubt", was dazu geführt hat, dass Leute mit patches mit durchgestrichenen Hakenkreuzen nicht aufs Gelände gelassen wurden...
Teilweise werden da einfach nur komplett stumpf Anweisungen befolgt ohne ein kleines bisschen nachzudenken
In my limited knowledge it randomly generates a number and if this number can be cleanly divided by 6 it deletes everything on the system (and the system itself). If not it prints 'lucky boy'.
So basically the nerd version of russian Roulette. But with higher stakes
In meiner Stadt gibt es mailverteiler die immer aktuelle Infos zu Demos/Events/etc teilen.
Es gibt hier aber auch eine recht große linke Szene.
Ansonsten über linke Kanäle auf Mastodon (oder wenns sein muss auch Instagram, da sind die FFF sehr aktiv).
Vielleicht einfach mal bei den Grünen/Linken in deiner Stadt vorbeigucken, die kennen bestimmt entsprechende Angebote
Watched Disclosure Day, was disappointing. Like a movie Spielberg wanted to do since the 80s but only got around to it now and didn't update the story. Lot of plotholes.
Resurrection (Bi Gan) was a confusing experience going in blind but I liked it.
Power ballad was all right. More of a nothing-to-watch Couch film
But you could sell a disk (as long as it doesn't need an activation code) which is one of the good things about consoles (said by people that have consoles)
Sentences like "It is exploited in attempts to strangle development of atomic energy, the cleanest, safest and practically inexhaustible means to meet the worlds energy needs" or retelling of the events from his perspective or constant self citation make it a definitive opionion piece.
And I looked at random papers that cited this paper. Some are not even listed anymore and most others I randomly selected (~20) cited the paper for random facts ("release of around 70 tons of nuclear fuel", "radioresistant microbes can tolerate a high radiation incidence", "many of these communities have not, and will not, be repopulated due to the current radiation") or outright contradicted the paper ("[his] assumptions [about cancer incidence] are in conflict with observations from Russia...").
The amount of citations a paper has is absolutely useless information without context to whether the citations support/contrast or are incidental
Sooo you base this on an opinion piece disguised as journal article in a low impact journal by a guy that has, let's say interesting views on radiation damage and global warming.
Bestimmt eine linke Terrorzelle
I gave a delivery service a bad review once because they didn't deliver my food, said they would reimburse me and that didn't happen either.
The owner had the review removed as "false accusations" so I provided google with the chat in which the owner apologised for the missing delivery and offer me a voucher. Still got deleted because of "false accusations".
There are even more reviews popping up from other people that didn't get their food. They also get deleted.
Google reviews are worth shit.
In dem Kontext eher weniger. War ein linksorientiertes politisches Festival
Wir hatten unserer Security auf einem Festival die Anweisung gegeben "Keine Hakenkreuze erlaubt", was dazu geführt hat, dass Leute mit patches mit durchgestrichenen Hakenkreuzen nicht aufs Gelände gelassen wurden...
Teilweise werden da einfach nur komplett stumpf Anweisungen befolgt ohne ein kleines bisschen nachzudenken
Slaps roof of drive
look at how much Linux this bad boy can fit
Why does the medival market scene look like it's shot in front of a greenscreen
My identification app tells me it's with 99% certainty a broad-bordered bee hawk-moth
Wild name :D
Or just chuck them in completely
But wouldn't that double the invincibility and cancel out so you get a guy that can be harmed everywhere except the heel?
I guess you're in a call and get an other call. Your options are:
End call one, accept the new call
Decline the new call
Put call one on hold and accept the new call
So oft bis es durch kommt
In my limited knowledge it randomly generates a number and if this number can be cleanly divided by 6 it deletes everything on the system (and the system itself). If not it prints 'lucky boy'.
So basically the nerd version of russian Roulette. But with higher stakes
In meiner Stadt gibt es mailverteiler die immer aktuelle Infos zu Demos/Events/etc teilen. Es gibt hier aber auch eine recht große linke Szene. Ansonsten über linke Kanäle auf Mastodon (oder wenns sein muss auch Instagram, da sind die FFF sehr aktiv).
Vielleicht einfach mal bei den Grünen/Linken in deiner Stadt vorbeigucken, die kennen bestimmt entsprechende Angebote
Mein Papa sagt immer "Wer Hirn hat schützt's"
Watched Disclosure Day, was disappointing. Like a movie Spielberg wanted to do since the 80s but only got around to it now and didn't update the story. Lot of plotholes.
Resurrection (Bi Gan) was a confusing experience going in blind but I liked it.
Power ballad was all right. More of a nothing-to-watch Couch film
I know people that store smaller items in fishhook storage boxes. Like briefcases with a lot of small compartments
But you could sell a disk (as long as it doesn't need an activation code) which is one of the good things about consoles (said by people that have consoles)
While true, it's an amazing remake and definitely worth 6 bucks