Completely agree. I was personally a little annoyed at this usage. There can actually be consequences for some people to have a very sudden, loud, intrusive noise.
I don’t reckon it’s popular. We’ve known for years that “slams” is a sign of a disappointing article, but maybe we’re all actually starting to internalise it now, so now we need to mix up the headlines to keep engagement.
Completely agree. There's lots of things we haven't tried yet. Centralizing control is always the first idea and never in the best interests of the public.
I don’t know how much they’re actually doing to surpass the West tbh. A lot of the success relies on distilling closed models, and running the models cheaper with almost comparable effectiveness. If the Chinese are showing that such profit/investment strategies in closed models are weak and can be easily decimated by a competitor, what motivation would they have to adopt one?
I’d personally argue operating outside of the law disqualifies you from being a good businessman. If I can win a game of chess by moving the pieces when you’re not looking, am I a grandmaster?
Same with business. Using privileges and loopholes that other people don’t have access to is not being good at business.
The same way having your father loan you a million dollars disqualifies you. I can beat Mo Farah if I run a shorter race, who’s the better runner?
Finally! Now we're getting to the real issues
Completely agree. I was personally a little annoyed at this usage. There can actually be consequences for some people to have a very sudden, loud, intrusive noise.
I don’t reckon it’s popular. We’ve known for years that “slams” is a sign of a disappointing article, but maybe we’re all actually starting to internalise it now, so now we need to mix up the headlines to keep engagement.
I’m not trans. This also didn’t cross my mind
So not a first then
Completely agree. There's lots of things we haven't tried yet. Centralizing control is always the first idea and never in the best interests of the public.
I absolutely agree. Though, there’s still value in having good, irrefutable data that the government didn’t listen.
I absolutely agree. Though, there's still value in having good, irrefutable data that the government didn't listen.
You’re right. It would be unethical.
Yes please, shaken not stirred
I don’t know how much they’re actually doing to surpass the West tbh. A lot of the success relies on distilling closed models, and running the models cheaper with almost comparable effectiveness. If the Chinese are showing that such profit/investment strategies in closed models are weak and can be easily decimated by a competitor, what motivation would they have to adopt one?
The UK considered having a stern word at absolute best.
I think you’ve perfectly described modern life
I mean, if you look real close it’s actually the picture they’re looking at
Damn… I really wanted to believe
This is probably unpopular so upvoted. But It should be more unpopular :/
That’s not true. It could have been a Windows laptop, don’t forget.
WHO THE FUCK CARES ABOUT TONY BLAIR’S THINK TANK
I’d personally argue operating outside of the law disqualifies you from being a good businessman. If I can win a game of chess by moving the pieces when you’re not looking, am I a grandmaster?
Same with business. Using privileges and loopholes that other people don’t have access to is not being good at business.
The same way having your father loan you a million dollars disqualifies you. I can beat Mo Farah if I run a shorter race, who’s the better runner?
Business man? Nah, that’s like saying someone’s “lucky” for playing in a rigged casino.
He’s a great fraud.