That was primarily about the ability to provide food. The same scientists back then would have said we can't even reach this population level while eating meat.
They were correct until we advanced agricultural science and found ways to more than double our food production.
It's part of the reason the founding fathers set up a representative democracy. They saw the tendency for leaders to lose their heads, and didn't want to put themselves in that position.
A little of each. There were 11 people in the US to deal with exactly this kind of thing. That team has been cut to three.
I'm sure there are other issues. Taylor Farms visiting the White House likely didn't help.
I suspect a functioning government would have been better at tracing the source. I think we still aren't sure? Maybe some lettuce and could be another source.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Anyone with two brain cells would understand the context. There were no brain cells in here. It was a surveillance state listening in on a private conversation.
People need the ability to snitch when appropriate. People need to be the deciding factor. Not some algorithm watching you at all times.
Standardized testing is great for math and reading and very basic science.
The criticism is that it makes teachers "teach to the test". And that's very true. But if the kids aren't fucking getting it, that's a problem regardless of whether we have the tests or not. Getting rid of the tests just hides the problem.
It's not too dissimilar from this administration's ideas to kill climate change data.
You ignore the immense pressure he was under by Republicans at the time. Any precautions were terribly unpopular among half the country and in the White House.
Hey, that's how we got to our current situation!
There's that one that just got suspended without pay and sued for ratting out the LAPD's sexism, racism, and general corruption.
He's technically still a cop, right?
That was primarily about the ability to provide food. The same scientists back then would have said we can't even reach this population level while eating meat.
They were correct until we advanced agricultural science and found ways to more than double our food production.
It doesn't even taste that bad. It's just... revolting in a very non-obvious way. I can't even tell you why it's bad. But it is.
How the fuck is this supposed to help?
Instead of just giving in, like you, she's fighting to keep it.
It's part of the reason the founding fathers set up a representative democracy. They saw the tendency for leaders to lose their heads, and didn't want to put themselves in that position.
A judge could order similar though.
A little of each. There were 11 people in the US to deal with exactly this kind of thing. That team has been cut to three.
I'm sure there are other issues. Taylor Farms visiting the White House likely didn't help.
I suspect a functioning government would have been better at tracing the source. I think we still aren't sure? Maybe some lettuce and could be another source.
We should really have a camera on you right now to see if you're doing anything dangerous, illegal, or inappropriate.
Are you referring to the teacher or yourself?
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Anyone with two brain cells would understand the context. There were no brain cells in here. It was a surveillance state listening in on a private conversation.
People need the ability to snitch when appropriate. People need to be the deciding factor. Not some algorithm watching you at all times.
Not shit enough for a shitpost.
HBO's The Leftovers.
Drill baby drill!
Standardized testing is great for math and reading and very basic science.
The criticism is that it makes teachers "teach to the test". And that's very true. But if the kids aren't fucking getting it, that's a problem regardless of whether we have the tests or not. Getting rid of the tests just hides the problem.
It's not too dissimilar from this administration's ideas to kill climate change data.
Not that I'm disagreeing, but this isn't a sufficient sample size.
These are all from the same root cause. If you said "rich under Trump" it'd be more accurate.
Bad for profits though. The sun is too free. How are they supposed to make money on this?
Well, the "deal" was the US gives $300 billion, Israel leaves Lebanon, and in return Iran will waive 14b in strait passage ransoms over two months.
So many ways it's idiotic. I have to assume Trump was expecting 10% of that 300b.
You sound like someone who's okay with people dying, but not stuff getting destroyed.
Just put your devices on a subnet that doesn't have Internet access.
You ignore the immense pressure he was under by Republicans at the time. Any precautions were terribly unpopular among half the country and in the White House.