From reading the article it sounds like they get constant accusations from people who don't do even the minimum effort to look into it. If you have to separately defend yourself to 1000 different people because they are all to lazy to read the info you have already published, it becomes unreasonable.
I don't really see anything here arguing that AI generated works are copyrightable. It would probably help if the article actually mentioned what it was in response to, because that's a pretty important thing to just gloss over. But it sounds to me like it's saying that copyright protections don't need to be strengthened even more than they already are, just because companies are afraid that they will make less profits because of ai existing.
What exactly define a "recap"? I was looking at one of the channels in question, and I basically saw entire episodes posted, just with commentary over them. I would expect a recap to be a summary, not the whole thing.
I don't believe that's possible. Swapping the corners will also change some edges. If you ultimately end up with just 2 edges swapped, that is known as the parity case, and there is a way to fix it.
Maybe I'm out of the loop, but shortly after Google announced this didn't they backtrack and say they will let you install unapproved apps after changing a setting and waiting 24 hours?
For Gameboy, there should be no difference in loading time for an emulator or the original system. The roms are only a few MB in size, and get loaded fully into ram. The initial loading is probably well under 1 second.
On the official system you will see a short Gameboy advance logo animation. I don't know if the emulator strips that out or not.
Cartridge games were always fast to start. There are essentially no loading times on them, just maybe some logos that you would have to wait through. CD based systems are what introduced the concept of loading times to console gamers, because cds read data from the disk at a massively slower speed than a cartridge.
I got fed up and unsubscribed from communities like asklemmy just yesterday, because it was constantly just stupid topics. In a lot of cases the title would propose a question and the body of the message would already have a multiple paragraph long answer.
My takeaway from the article is that these "costs" are what it would have cost to actually license the use of a celebrity for every random ai social media post.
Basically the same copyright math they have been using for years, where every pirated copy of something is a loss of the full msrp.
I have a blink camera, not a doorbell camera, but just a regular outdoor camera that I have near the front door. The batteries in it lasted nearly a year before they needed replacing. Curious how long it was lasting in your doorbell camera? I would expect it to be similar unless it's basically recording constantly or something.
From reading the article it sounds like they get constant accusations from people who don't do even the minimum effort to look into it. If you have to separately defend yourself to 1000 different people because they are all to lazy to read the info you have already published, it becomes unreasonable.
I don't really see anything here arguing that AI generated works are copyrightable. It would probably help if the article actually mentioned what it was in response to, because that's a pretty important thing to just gloss over. But it sounds to me like it's saying that copyright protections don't need to be strengthened even more than they already are, just because companies are afraid that they will make less profits because of ai existing.
So instead of the video doorbell, use a simple camera. Then people knock on the door and you still have security footage without all the nonsense.
What exactly define a "recap"? I was looking at one of the channels in question, and I basically saw entire episodes posted, just with commentary over them. I would expect a recap to be a summary, not the whole thing.
Is consent required when the flock cameras record you?
I don't believe that's possible. Swapping the corners will also change some edges. If you ultimately end up with just 2 edges swapped, that is known as the parity case, and there is a way to fix it.
Maybe I'm out of the loop, but shortly after Google announced this didn't they backtrack and say they will let you install unapproved apps after changing a setting and waiting 24 hours?
For Gameboy, there should be no difference in loading time for an emulator or the original system. The roms are only a few MB in size, and get loaded fully into ram. The initial loading is probably well under 1 second. On the official system you will see a short Gameboy advance logo animation. I don't know if the emulator strips that out or not.
Cartridge games were always fast to start. There are essentially no loading times on them, just maybe some logos that you would have to wait through. CD based systems are what introduced the concept of loading times to console gamers, because cds read data from the disk at a massively slower speed than a cartridge.
Well, it's a good thing that AI is being used to fix tons of bugs and potential exploits before it comes to that, isn't it?
The segment seemed ok at first. Then it just kept going and going and going.
Did someone think that putting "1.6 million dozen" in the headline actually makes the number somehow easier to comprehend? It's over 19 million.
Well this sucks. This game looks awesome, but I guess it's coming off of the wishlist.
No, this applies to the old mp4 codecs like xvid/divx. Mpeg4 AVC is still patented in some jurisdictions.
Open source ai is doing well. Mozilla integrating the models directly into it's browser doesn't really do anything to help them.
I got fed up and unsubscribed from communities like asklemmy just yesterday, because it was constantly just stupid topics. In a lot of cases the title would propose a question and the body of the message would already have a multiple paragraph long answer.
Paywalled
The artist knew what he was doing with that nose.
My takeaway from the article is that these "costs" are what it would have cost to actually license the use of a celebrity for every random ai social media post.
Basically the same copyright math they have been using for years, where every pirated copy of something is a loss of the full msrp.
I have a blink camera, not a doorbell camera, but just a regular outdoor camera that I have near the front door. The batteries in it lasted nearly a year before they needed replacing. Curious how long it was lasting in your doorbell camera? I would expect it to be similar unless it's basically recording constantly or something.