I used to have issues with my stomach pH being below seven, but after trying some lye, I'm back at a nice alkaline 14, which has cured my stomach ulcers!
It is illogical to assume that making people aware of communicative failures in science is done for the sake of clout. Making people aware of a failure in public science communication is a good and responsible thing, even after the event.
It is reasonable to still share the comic because the overall point is valid—even if he already apologized—both because sharing knowledge is good, and because the choice of whether to still watch Hank after his apology is individual; just because you and I forgive him doesn't make it unfair not to trust him as a result of this (I take the stance that I will continue to watch his content as long as he does not repeat this mistake: forgiveness is not permission, after all).
To use his failing as an example of this negative behavior, or to make the choice not to watch his content because of his AI use, is fair. To assume sharing the fact that he did and a resultant choice of the comic author (to not watch that one tainted video, which I also will not watch) were for clout is not fair or reasonable.
Imagine two onions... Heck, imagine three onions.
Save yourself from that first bit by using GNU/Linux.
Yes, I would hate it an equal amount. Although it already does, no?
Agreed.
What about those with both? :)
I've heard talk of incorporating the color bleen into the rainbow flag used for Pride, since it's a color we somehow missed.
I used to have issues with my stomach pH being below seven, but after trying some lye, I'm back at a nice alkaline 14, which has cured my stomach ulcers!
Tampax has a Flamin' Hot flavor that really helps for me.
Lots of people have boundaries about sex before marriage for moral reasons. That doesn't make them insane.
If they try to force you into doing the same, that makes them assholes.
Sure.
Dictatorship is always wrong. Fidel was a dictator. There is no earthly absolution for the sin of absolute power.
Whether that's true depends on one's job.
Some work is solo work.
So, too much text. Also, he was a dictator, and there is no earthly absolution for such a sin.
Piss off with the AI slop.
It is illogical to assume that making people aware of communicative failures in science is done for the sake of clout. Making people aware of a failure in public science communication is a good and responsible thing, even after the event.
It is reasonable to still share the comic because the overall point is valid—even if he already apologized—both because sharing knowledge is good, and because the choice of whether to still watch Hank after his apology is individual; just because you and I forgive him doesn't make it unfair not to trust him as a result of this (I take the stance that I will continue to watch his content as long as he does not repeat this mistake: forgiveness is not permission, after all).
To use his failing as an example of this negative behavior, or to make the choice not to watch his content because of his AI use, is fair. To assume sharing the fact that he did and a resultant choice of the comic author (to not watch that one tainted video, which I also will not watch) were for clout is not fair or reasonable.
There is a difference between hating him and holding him accountable.
Ah, good.
OpenRC