It's not circular, but it is unclear under which conditions and when Anthropic will pay for the servers, as they don't have enough money right now. The article says that they intend to lease some of the servers, but also that AMD will provide a "financial backstop". It seems to me AMD is taking all the risk to get a foothold in the industry.
How about "does it address a developing market that grows exponentially or does it require a societal standstill to satisfy the conservative views of a dying generation"
It's because of competition. Someone else will find a way to produce your product faster, better or more of it at the same costs, with less people, using new technology which requires a higher turnover but has fewer costs, and you will lack capital to invest in that machine to make your business competitive again. Even if you do have it, there are now two companies with that machine who invested capital and require a higher turnover, but the market is limited and one of you, if not both, will fail to bring in the return on the investment, let alone make enough money to invest in the next machine. That effect can be seen all the time, the current best example in Europe is the automotive industry, the next one will be giga factories, AI data centers.
The business model is armament. Future warfare uses land and air drones and they require network access, which Starlink provides and they're much more difficult to jam than ground-based network facilities.
They aren't writing any of that, they explainer box below says
Einordnung: Im Gegensatz zu den anderen Beispielen in dieser Broschüre ist im vorliegenden Fall der Interpretationsspielraum, ob oder inwiefern hier antisemitischer Gehalt vorhanden ist, deutlich größer.
Die folgende Analyse zeigt, dass dieses Fallbeispiel aufgrund seiner Bildsprache sowohl als legitime Kritik als auch als antisemitisch verstanden werden kann.
Translation:
Context: Unlike the other examples in this brochure, in this case there is significantly more room for interpretation regarding whether or to what extent anti-Semitic content is present.
The following analysis shows that, due to its visual language, this case study can be interpreted as both legitimate criticism and as anti-Semitic.
Also, don't equate the German government to its intelligence service, it's more complicated than that.
I'm not an expert, but I think Marx would argue that all commodities should be under the power of society, the working class should decide what to do with it. Not different to any other rules over the land before.
The difference is, whether it is used for consumption or as means of production. If it's used for division of labor and creates surplus, it's means of production. Some things can be used as both, but not at the same time.
Land and natural resources are seen as commodities and have different properties in Marx' theories.
This is how Balenciaga does marketing and all of you are falling for it.
Salt. The condiment basil and thyme never could replace.
There's little use for these in summer anyway
Also skin colour, body type and, see above, gender.
It's not circular, but it is unclear under which conditions and when Anthropic will pay for the servers, as they don't have enough money right now. The article says that they intend to lease some of the servers, but also that AMD will provide a "financial backstop". It seems to me AMD is taking all the risk to get a foothold in the industry.
There are only photoshopped pictures of trump on foxnews.com, not a single plausible straight photograph
How about "does it address a developing market that grows exponentially or does it require a societal standstill to satisfy the conservative views of a dying generation"
She could play Kriemhild / Guðrún.
You can't make such a statement about a whole generation without referring to a large cohort study.
It's because of competition. Someone else will find a way to produce your product faster, better or more of it at the same costs, with less people, using new technology which requires a higher turnover but has fewer costs, and you will lack capital to invest in that machine to make your business competitive again. Even if you do have it, there are now two companies with that machine who invested capital and require a higher turnover, but the market is limited and one of you, if not both, will fail to bring in the return on the investment, let alone make enough money to invest in the next machine. That effect can be seen all the time, the current best example in Europe is the automotive industry, the next one will be giga factories, AI data centers.
Rewriting all code after everyone has been using AI tools to break it doesn't sound any better than writing good code now, be it with or without LLMs.
Holy shit I did not know about that Furr guy
The business model is armament. Future warfare uses land and air drones and they require network access, which Starlink provides and they're much more difficult to jam than ground-based network facilities.
Out of curiosity, it says 4 something p.m. - is that his local timezone or mine?
They aren't writing any of that, they explainer box below says
Translation:
Also, don't equate the German government to its intelligence service, it's more complicated than that.
sOmEtHiNG ate the Dinosaurs!!1
was it fungi and bacteria?
yes 😔
I'm not an expert, but I think Marx would argue that all commodities should be under the power of society, the working class should decide what to do with it. Not different to any other rules over the land before.
I meant like proposing to criminalise something that is obviously guaranteed by the constitution. They do that all the time.
Yes we do, that doesn't prevent conservatives and nazis from saying stuff like that. They're shifting the Overton window.
The difference is, whether it is used for consumption or as means of production. If it's used for division of labor and creates surplus, it's means of production. Some things can be used as both, but not at the same time.
Land and natural resources are seen as commodities and have different properties in Marx' theories.