And a refund wouldn't compensate my time wasted trying to beat the level (personal experience), or the time wasted figuring out why it was unbeatable when I was doing the level better than what was shown in video tutorials. It also wouldn't compensate for the hassle of having to switch back to Windows (for false promises from LiGNUts), or transferring a save.
Even using Valve's hardware (steam deck), users cited spending more time just getting games to work than actual playing. Gamers didn't ask for an alternate hobby.
Don't really care to read coping. Paying a premium for a graphics card to run 15% sub par and trying to justify it by making sacrifices is pretty pathetic.
Yes, typically unprofessional benchmarks are used by LiGNUts because a professional doesn't tailor the benchmark to the OS. It's like how in the browsers sub on Reddit, Brave would use a low karma account to stage a poll where Brave couldn't lose on a weekly basis. This kind of propaganda is loved by LiGNUts and rewarded with Karma or upvotes.
This kind of crap also happened when Elden Ring came out. You could jump through hoops to apply a patch to make run better than Windows for about a month. The official patch came out and changed things, but LiGNUts continue to inform people that it performed better on Linux.
I was an Arch user, with DWM and 12 manually installed patches with Elden Ring at the time. Even I didn't bother jumping through those ridiculous hoops.
You're misleading people with this propaganda and it's only going to backfire into more and more people hating Linux. People I met IRL used to not even know what Linux was, now I hear things like 'yeah, I've heard of it; not a fan' type comments. -If that's what you want, keep it up.
Compare at recommended specs. Linux takes specific and pretty consistent performance hits for DX11; 0-5%, and DX12; 5-15% when the hardware isn't tailored.
The vocal minority mainly. The Linux advocates that are historically "new tech-phobic" until Linux, Linus, or RMS does it. The anti-AI fervor has quelled since Linus's announcement about it for example.
KDE serves a purpose that many LiGNUts aren't even aware of. They prioritize features an innovation over a polished product. It's funny to watch them suggest Plasma after ridiculing something for being buggy.
They're not that different. That's an excuse to divert from its technical failures. The project to fix that 'problem' has died last I knew for a reason (it wasn't a real problem).
The same types suggesting that crap are the ones that would point to Krita which is wildly different.
Linux is used primarily due to the propaganda and available admins. Large networks like Netflix depend on BSD. You're the first in years that has contested what BSD is generally regarded as better for. You're literally disagreeing with what even your fellow Linux advocates would agree on about BSD. -Not that there isn't misinformation about Linux so there could be about BSD, but you're also not showing any evidence either.
You go happily run a grocery store with a 'free food' stand/bank across the street that survives due to government grants, legal interference and exploitation of unpaid / low paid workers.
Richard Stallman started GPL to exact revenge on his peers in an attempt to destroy their careers.
No, if it didn't exist, we'd have better competition for Windows. It's too self-limiting with its unstable ABI/API, and commie GPL. BSD is freer and has better load handling, efficiency, networking stack, security, cohesiveness, documentation, etc. And then there's all the OSes that were promising that Linux squashed by idiots saying 'we can do that in Linux' when Linux is flawed at its foundation. -Haiku for example is made for less robust hardware and is much better than Linux for it, but LiGNUts only see Linux.
Linux is destroying the industry. If you hate Microsoft: hate Linux because Linux is the best possible competition scenario it could have. Google is far worse than Microsoft though, and they were enabled by Linux.
And a refund wouldn't compensate my time wasted trying to beat the level (personal experience), or the time wasted figuring out why it was unbeatable when I was doing the level better than what was shown in video tutorials. It also wouldn't compensate for the hassle of having to switch back to Windows (for false promises from LiGNUts), or transferring a save.
Even using Valve's hardware (steam deck), users cited spending more time just getting games to work than actual playing. Gamers didn't ask for an alternate hobby.
Don't really care to read coping. Paying a premium for a graphics card to run 15% sub par and trying to justify it by making sacrifices is pretty pathetic.
Yes, typically unprofessional benchmarks are used by LiGNUts because a professional doesn't tailor the benchmark to the OS. It's like how in the browsers sub on Reddit, Brave would use a low karma account to stage a poll where Brave couldn't lose on a weekly basis. This kind of propaganda is loved by LiGNUts and rewarded with Karma or upvotes.
This kind of crap also happened when Elden Ring came out. You could jump through hoops to apply a patch to make run better than Windows for about a month. The official patch came out and changed things, but LiGNUts continue to inform people that it performed better on Linux.
I was an Arch user, with DWM and 12 manually installed patches with Elden Ring at the time. Even I didn't bother jumping through those ridiculous hoops.
You're misleading people with this propaganda and it's only going to backfire into more and more people hating Linux. People I met IRL used to not even know what Linux was, now I hear things like 'yeah, I've heard of it; not a fan' type comments. -If that's what you want, keep it up.
Compare at recommended specs. Linux takes specific and pretty consistent performance hits for DX11; 0-5%, and DX12; 5-15% when the hardware isn't tailored.
On very specific hardware (clickbait headline)
Yeah, but another thing in common with them. - thinking their anecdotes matter.
The vocal minority mainly. The Linux advocates that are historically "new tech-phobic" until Linux, Linus, or RMS does it. The anti-AI fervor has quelled since Linus's announcement about it for example.
KDE serves a purpose that many LiGNUts aren't even aware of. They prioritize features an innovation over a polished product. It's funny to watch them suggest Plasma after ridiculing something for being buggy.
Even Linus Torvalds would tell you that it's a bad thing, and there are many problems that arise from creating derivative distros.
Like Pewdiepie, they simply know how to game the algorithm.
Destroys the argument of linux being free.
They're not that different. That's an excuse to divert from its technical failures. The project to fix that 'problem' has died last I knew for a reason (it wasn't a real problem).
The same types suggesting that crap are the ones that would point to Krita which is wildly different.
You could've simply used Windows huh?
One man's trash is another's treasure.
Linux is used primarily due to the propaganda and available admins. Large networks like Netflix depend on BSD. You're the first in years that has contested what BSD is generally regarded as better for. You're literally disagreeing with what even your fellow Linux advocates would agree on about BSD. -Not that there isn't misinformation about Linux so there could be about BSD, but you're also not showing any evidence either.
You mean destroying careers of peers because of Stallman vendetta.
You go happily run a grocery store with a 'free food' stand/bank across the street that survives due to government grants, legal interference and exploitation of unpaid / low paid workers.
Richard Stallman started GPL to exact revenge on his peers in an attempt to destroy their careers.
No, if it didn't exist, we'd have better competition for Windows. It's too self-limiting with its unstable ABI/API, and commie GPL. BSD is freer and has better load handling, efficiency, networking stack, security, cohesiveness, documentation, etc. And then there's all the OSes that were promising that Linux squashed by idiots saying 'we can do that in Linux' when Linux is flawed at its foundation. -Haiku for example is made for less robust hardware and is much better than Linux for it, but LiGNUts only see Linux.
Linux is destroying the industry. If you hate Microsoft: hate Linux because Linux is the best possible competition scenario it could have. Google is far worse than Microsoft though, and they were enabled by Linux.
yeah, the one that can actually make points and not have to resort to anecdotes, personal attacks, brigading, and debunked propaganda.
cool anecdote bro