+1 for mbin. The dev(s?) doesn't seem to be as problematic as the Lemmy dev and it federates with a whole range of fediverse systems. The only real complaints I had with it turned out to be me misunderstanding how it works (for instance not noticing that some of the stuff on my feed is Peertube since it's just really well integrated), so now that I understand that, I'm extremely happy with it.
Hot take: biometrics are often criticized for being less secure, but that ignores the deficiencies of passwords. Especially on phones, it's very doable to look over someone's shoulder while they're unlocking their phone or do the same with a camera. You can't do that with a fingerprint, at least not nearly as easily.
And yes, I understand that in the US (amongst others?) the legal situations with passwords and biometrics are different, but IMO that's more of a legal question, and not everyone lives in the US.
Android also has an "emergency lockdown" option, which disables biometrics for unlocking your phone - or you can shut it down (worst case scenario force shut down with a long hold on the power button) to get it into a BFU state, which is much harder to crack.
There are permissive licenses, and then there are copyleft licenses. Permissive licenses go in the direction of "do whatever the fuck you want". Copyleft licenses are more like "use it for whatever the fuck you want but if you change it give it back to everyone else with the same conditions". The people who have projects with copyleft licenses are the ones who are (rightfully) pissed about their projects being used to train AI.
I would argue this is where carbon capture should come in. But before you slam the downvote button...
What carbon capture is being hailed as a solution for is exactly the wrong use. Carbon capture is currently being seen as a way to continue polluting because - "hey, look, we're pumping carbon into the air but where taking it out of the air elsewhere, making it net zero". Essentially, it's being used as an excuse to not reduce or eliminate emissions, which just pushes us down the path we're on.
IMO, carbon capture does have a use - to try to fix what we've already fucked up. We've done a lot of damage with fossil fuels, and we'll never really get to the "before times". But we can use carbon capture to try and fix what little we can.
Why does this have a "a glass of wine a day is healthy" vibe?
Like, don't get me wrong, I'm not against people drinking coffee (who am I to criticize, I enjoy my alcohol), it just sounds like one of these studies that is made to counteract someone's guilty conscience.
To take control of (something) without permission or authorization and use it for one's own purposes: dissidents who hijacked the town council; spammers who hijacked a computer network.
She seems to have hijacked/taken control of the passengers' attention. She didn't take control of the plane. Very, very important difference.
No, this is not normal, and never should be. I know of no country where politicians of the ruling party are still trying to nail their former secretary of health to the wall with absolutely insane arguments and even trying to throw him in jail.
And if a mountain of death threats is not a personal consequence, I don't know what is.
I have to be fair, though: that apology was one of the most decent public apologies I've seen in the last while (OK, I get it, it's a low bar, but still). Full admission that it was wrong (no "sorry if you didn't like it" bullshit), no blaming it on someone else, no trying to say "it wasn't really that bad". The only thing I find questionable is that some facts don't add up.
Das ist das Problem, was wir im linken Bereich haben.
Überlegt sich einer, ob er links ist, und quatscht mit einem Linken.
"Ich denke Mal schon eher, dass ich links bin. Immerhin bin ich für Arbeiterrechte, Gleichberechtigung und höhere Steuern für Reiche."
"Na ja, was sagst du zur gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe?"
"Soll doch jeder heiraten können, wen er will..."
"Und wie siehst du das mit dem Mindestlohn?"
"Finde ich aktuell zu niedrig, da kann man nicht unbedingt davon leben."
"Und wie stehst du zur staatlichen Förderung von Menstruationsprodukten?"
"Ist durchaus sinnvoll, Frauen können ja nichts daf-..."
"WAS?? Dir ist schon klar, dass es TRANS-MÄNNER gibt ODER!?! Die können auch menstruieren!!! Deine Sprache ist TOTAL diskriminierend!!! Ich WUSSTE es, dass du ein Nazi bist!!!"
Später quatscht er mit einem rechten.
"Nein, ich bin nicht rechts. Ich sehe, wozu das rechte in der Geschichte geführt hat und das möchte ich nicht nochmal haben."
"Mensch, darum geht es ja doch nicht. Es geht doch um unser Land! Unser Volk! Unsere Kultur! Schau Mal, die Ausländer bauen quasi eigene Städte und wollen sich gar nicht integrieren!"
"Na ja, so grundsätzlich kann man das nicht sagen. Ja, es gibt ein paar Kandidaten die keine Glanzbeispiele für Integration sind, aber..."
"Na siehste! Es geht doch nur um die schlechten Ausländer, mach dir keine Sorgen. Aber du hast ein Problem damit, wenn Ausländer nicht das Deutsche übernehmen! Brudi, ich sag's doch, du gehörst zu uns! Keine Sorge wegen den anderen Sachen, gib dem noch ein halbes Jahr und wir bringen dir noch bei, wie man Juden hasst."
(Konzept geklaut von einem englischen Komiker dessen Namen ich vergessen habe)
Depends on where you launch it from. If you launch it from the end, that would happen. But if you were to launch it from the beginning of the loop you could give it the proper inertia for it to be able to go through the loop.
The irony is: the original theory of capitalism (in contrast with the clusterfuck that we have now) was based on the idea that competition breeds innovation - because those who didn't innovate would go out of business due to being surpassed by the others.
OK then.
"Come to the fediverse, we have what they have and more"
I think you forgot the /s
+1 for mbin. The dev(s?) doesn't seem to be as problematic as the Lemmy dev and it federates with a whole range of fediverse systems. The only real complaints I had with it turned out to be me misunderstanding how it works (for instance not noticing that some of the stuff on my feed is Peertube since it's just really well integrated), so now that I understand that, I'm extremely happy with it.
Hot take: biometrics are often criticized for being less secure, but that ignores the deficiencies of passwords. Especially on phones, it's very doable to look over someone's shoulder while they're unlocking their phone or do the same with a camera. You can't do that with a fingerprint, at least not nearly as easily.
And yes, I understand that in the US (amongst others?) the legal situations with passwords and biometrics are different, but IMO that's more of a legal question, and not everyone lives in the US.
Android also has an "emergency lockdown" option, which disables biometrics for unlocking your phone - or you can shut it down (worst case scenario force shut down with a long hold on the power button) to get it into a BFU state, which is much harder to crack.
Source?
There are permissive licenses, and then there are copyleft licenses. Permissive licenses go in the direction of "do whatever the fuck you want". Copyleft licenses are more like "use it for whatever the fuck you want but if you change it give it back to everyone else with the same conditions". The people who have projects with copyleft licenses are the ones who are (rightfully) pissed about their projects being used to train AI.
Not even $100 million. $100 million worth of compute power. Kind of disappointing, I would have rather seen a criminal investigation.
I would argue this is where carbon capture should come in. But before you slam the downvote button...
What carbon capture is being hailed as a solution for is exactly the wrong use. Carbon capture is currently being seen as a way to continue polluting because - "hey, look, we're pumping carbon into the air but where taking it out of the air elsewhere, making it net zero". Essentially, it's being used as an excuse to not reduce or eliminate emissions, which just pushes us down the path we're on.
IMO, carbon capture does have a use - to try to fix what we've already fucked up. We've done a lot of damage with fossil fuels, and we'll never really get to the "before times". But we can use carbon capture to try and fix what little we can.
I mean, that's the point of the article - it's going to get much worse than this.
Why does this have a "a glass of wine a day is healthy" vibe?
Like, don't get me wrong, I'm not against people drinking coffee (who am I to criticize, I enjoy my alcohol), it just sounds like one of these studies that is made to counteract someone's guilty conscience.
She seems to have hijacked/taken control of the passengers' attention. She didn't take control of the plane. Very, very important difference.
No, this is not normal, and never should be. I know of no country where politicians of the ruling party are still trying to nail their former secretary of health to the wall with absolutely insane arguments and even trying to throw him in jail.
And if a mountain of death threats is not a personal consequence, I don't know what is.
Yeah, that's essentially what I was referring to with the bit about facts not adding up.
I have to be fair, though: that apology was one of the most decent public apologies I've seen in the last while (OK, I get it, it's a low bar, but still). Full admission that it was wrong (no "sorry if you didn't like it" bullshit), no blaming it on someone else, no trying to say "it wasn't really that bad". The only thing I find questionable is that some facts don't add up.
Das ist das Problem, was wir im linken Bereich haben.
Überlegt sich einer, ob er links ist, und quatscht mit einem Linken.
"Ich denke Mal schon eher, dass ich links bin. Immerhin bin ich für Arbeiterrechte, Gleichberechtigung und höhere Steuern für Reiche."
"Na ja, was sagst du zur gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe?"
"Soll doch jeder heiraten können, wen er will..."
"Und wie siehst du das mit dem Mindestlohn?"
"Finde ich aktuell zu niedrig, da kann man nicht unbedingt davon leben."
"Und wie stehst du zur staatlichen Förderung von Menstruationsprodukten?"
"Ist durchaus sinnvoll, Frauen können ja nichts daf-..."
"WAS?? Dir ist schon klar, dass es TRANS-MÄNNER gibt ODER!?! Die können auch menstruieren!!! Deine Sprache ist TOTAL diskriminierend!!! Ich WUSSTE es, dass du ein Nazi bist!!!"
Später quatscht er mit einem rechten.
"Nein, ich bin nicht rechts. Ich sehe, wozu das rechte in der Geschichte geführt hat und das möchte ich nicht nochmal haben."
"Mensch, darum geht es ja doch nicht. Es geht doch um unser Land! Unser Volk! Unsere Kultur! Schau Mal, die Ausländer bauen quasi eigene Städte und wollen sich gar nicht integrieren!"
"Na ja, so grundsätzlich kann man das nicht sagen. Ja, es gibt ein paar Kandidaten die keine Glanzbeispiele für Integration sind, aber..."
"Na siehste! Es geht doch nur um die schlechten Ausländer, mach dir keine Sorgen. Aber du hast ein Problem damit, wenn Ausländer nicht das Deutsche übernehmen! Brudi, ich sag's doch, du gehörst zu uns! Keine Sorge wegen den anderen Sachen, gib dem noch ein halbes Jahr und wir bringen dir noch bei, wie man Juden hasst."
(Konzept geklaut von einem englischen Komiker dessen Namen ich vergessen habe)
Did she actually highjack the plane? Going from the video it sounds like a bit of a hyperbole.
EDIT: Jesus fuck, no one actually provided anything to the contrary, just downvoted. Almost proving what I said elsewhere about lemmy's toxicity...
I have immunity from waiting in line.
Depends on where you launch it from. If you launch it from the end, that would happen. But if you were to launch it from the beginning of the loop you could give it the proper inertia for it to be able to go through the loop.
The irony is: the original theory of capitalism (in contrast with the clusterfuck that we have now) was based on the idea that competition breeds innovation - because those who didn't innovate would go out of business due to being surpassed by the others.