Disney shareholders demand reasons for Kimmel suspension
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/24/2025/disney-shareholders-demand-reasons-for-kimmel-suspension
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/24/2025/disney-shareholders-demand-reasons-for-kimmel-suspension
73 Comments
don@lemmy.ca · 156 pts · 347d
Most relevant parts:
Definitely financially motivated, and not out of ur the goodness of their own hearts.
PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au · 120 pts · 347d
You're not wrong. On the other hand, the more that it can start to be seen that siding with Trump's bullshit is a catastrophe that will get you in trouble with your friends, instead of just some sort of abstracted sin against the country and constitution, I think the better.
yucandu@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 347d
What they'll end up doing is creating a government/private hybrid network where taxpayers give money to Disney to create "wholesome American content". Like the Nazis did.
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 347d
Unlike the Corporation for Public Broadcasting?
pdxfed@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 347d
Disney✝️
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 346d
Not just your friends. If it can cost you your job or ruin your month, suddenly capitulation hurts
lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works · 39 pts · 347d
I fear the best we can hope for is that people do the right things, not that they do then for the right reasons.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 347d
The simple fact is that when it comes to corporations, that's the only way to force changes. The Shareholders ultimately decide who runs the company and whether it is acting in their interests. Disney's comparatively small fuck up here with Kimmel (compared to the entire empire) has cost the company millions in lost profit from subscription cancellations alone and an untold amount of goodwill worldwide, which indirectly equates to lost profits for years. Losses way more impactful than the small piece of the pie that is the show on ABC.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 347d
dint they lose billions, not millions, just from the kimmel thing alone.
THe colbert situation pretty much primed the situation to be worst.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 347d
Probably, I was being conservative on the estimate, and Disney will never admit it. They'll find ways to hide the actual impact in other minutiae.
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com · 1 pts · 347d
Maybe they need to do the same with Nexstar & Sinclair. I understand Sinclair is in debt over 4 times its market cap.
creepystephenscreepiestdoll@lemmynsfw.com · 1 pts · 346d
And they bought back shares from the tax rebates the last time we did this dumbass dance...
ccunning@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 347d
“Shareholders” in the headline was the giveaway
Worth noting this bit from the footnotes of the article though:
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com · 9 pts · 347d
I dont agree here. Other relevant parts you skipped:
A group, not all.
And there it is. The questions they are asking forces the release of information that will make all shareholders (who are the people you are describing) unhappy. This makes things difficult for executives making these decisions, thus making it more likely they won't do it again.
Tagging repliers for discussion: @PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au @onslaught545@lemmy.zip
danc4498@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 347d
I wonder if they ended up making more money for the suspension. I haven’t ever watched a Jimmy Kimmel monologue, but I watched that one. And I would be open to watching more in the future. Just because of how relevant it is.
theneverfox@pawb.social · 1 pts · 347d
I watched, but I have zero interest in watching him again. It was basically just comedy slop, the only joke that landed for me was the "I agreed to read this statement, to renew your subscription..."
But based on the fact I never would have watched him, and some people would probably find him funny, it's got to be a net positive - 6 days for global exposure? That's the holy Grail of marketing
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 347d
This is not a net positive. It's some damage control but people are going to remember that they rolled over for facism and not renew their subscriptions.
The extra views Jimmy Kimmel will have this week will not recover the lost revenue from the people who cancelled their subscriptions and won't return.
theneverfox@pawb.social · 3 pts · 347d
Oh I'm just talking about his show... Yeah, Disney is definitely going to suffer for this one
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 347d
they lost billions.
onslaught545@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 347d
Well, yeah. Why else would shareholders sue a company?
dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 134 pts · 347d
My favorite was AFTER unsubscribing from Hulu and Disney+, I got an email about an upcoming price hike:
Talk about tone deaf.
Edit: the email was dated the 23rd.
kobra@lemmy.zip · 23 pts · 347d
lol this happened to me too
LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 347d
After they just made billions in profit the year before. Always chasing the $$$.
doctortofu@piefed.social · 79 pts · 347d
Looking forward to how Disney rephrases "because at the time we thought gargling a shriveled orange ballsack would be the most profitable option for us" into a nice lengthy shareholder notice...
MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al · 71 pts · 347d
THE MOUSE DEMANDS TRIBUTE!
FenrirIII@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 347d
The tree of Mickey must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of late-night TV show hosts and news anchors
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 347d
You Don’t! Fucking! Talk To Me! (Haha) Like That! (haha) You Little! Piece! Of Shit!
LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world · 64 pts · 347d
What a cluster this all is. So many government officials are saying "we had nothing to do with this situation", then little donny comes in and destroys that by proving he was responsible for it. Then Disney is like, "yeah we will put it back on." but GOP owned Sinclair and Nexstar said "Screw Jimmy, we wont show him cause we need our merger to go through and we need to bribe the king."
All of this could be avoided if people voted for a real president, and not a grifting pedophile who only knows "win or lose" and has never made a compromise in his sheltered life.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 347d
It’d be solved if they actually legislated corporate behavior to prevent monopolistic behavior and enforced those laws. We wouldn’t have to deal with these giants like Sinclair or Disney owning what we see and hear and fighting to consume everything for profit and control.
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 347d
It'd be solved if Congress was controlled by adults who fulfill their responsibility to reign in the executive branch instead of sycophants who gleefully hand over their authority to a demagogue.
It'd be solved if the federal courts up to and especially SCOTUS actually ruled on law instead of partisan team sports mentality.
It'd be solved if the US actual did a proper reconstruction after the Civil War.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 347d
Let's be real here, Sinclair and Nextstar's merger was secondary to liberal tears. They've been turning local stations into MAGA propaganda machines at a breaknecl speeds.
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · -1 pts · 346d
1 trump succ, 2 trump got in because too mamy voters were sick enough of wokeness that they voted the nuclear idiot option. 3 theyd make that vote again 4 we should learn from this so no more orange face occurs
F_State@midwest.social · 59 pts · 347d
"Our government is increasingly a fascist dictatorship and bending knee seemed more profitable at the time but the people were at least briefly awakened from their torpor"
People are pissed about whats going on in this country but they either don't see what they can do about it, live in denial about it, or are unwilling to make the sacrifices required. So when an easy way to fight back it presented itself, people took it.
Jarix@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 347d
"People" don't know what actions to take. They don't believe that they are able to do anything meaningful.
They are already struggling and just trying to take care of themselves.
This has always been the case. It always will be the case.
Until a movement is formed that people can help with in their own way, they won't be out fighting for their rights, that will be going to work. Trying to stay safe. Trying bit to bring undue attention to themselves because the forces that should come to help them if they need it, are the ones making life hell for the average person.
There is no plan
There are no opposition leaders to rally behind
But I'm a cynic, maybe I'm wrong.
MagicShel@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 347d
I think you've nailed it spot on. But I don't know that it's more cynical than the proposition that the entire population is waiting for the opportunity to fight one another over social principles (that sounds cynical AF, honestly).
We change behaviors by percentages and generally not in massive waves. Kimmel looks like an exception but I bet it was really an internal schism and we moved the needle just far enough to be exploited by the right people.
HasturInYellow@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 347d
My vote is Luigi Mangione. guys a real hero. Sitting in jail on trumped up charges, which if they are even true, would only make me like him more.
Ersatz86@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 347d
+1 for “torpor”
drmoose@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 347d
I worked with many high level American corporate workers and they legitimately think they can outsmart and take advantage of any situation and they often actually do. Nexstar and Sinclair just thought they can play trump to cash in a quick quid pro quo and nobody will notice and severely miscalculated - suits them right and hopefully they get punished hard now.
HasturInYellow@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 347d
Hopefully they get so punished that their entire bloodline is destitute.
elbiter@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 347d
Because his orangity the emperor said so.
plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 347d
Actually, he didn't even have to ask. They just did it, pre-empting the administration
More than complicit, outwardly fascist
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 347d
Fascism.
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 21 pts · 347d
I wonder if the conversation will be honest or will be a politicians response with words intended to appease the questions without saying anything meaningful
hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 347d
The difference is that the board/CEOs can actually be held accountable by shareholders, and aren't nearly as easily distracted by the jangling keys of "immigrants and trans people".
They're evil and greedy fucking monsters, but it also means they're very easy to understand. Line go up = good, line down = bad, and this decision made line go down.
StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 347d
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 347d
they are going to price hike even more now, since it costed them a ton of money.
HeyJoe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 347d
Honestly, the more I think about that ending, the more I feel it was done on purpose to easily secure a second season renewal. At this time, it's still not renewed.
I loved the show otherwise.
StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 346d
llama@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 346d
It's wild in 2025 when most people watch their content via streaming apps, or cable/satellite at the very least, that we're still subject to the priorities of network affiliates broadcasting over rabbit ears when it comes to content. Broadcast TV and your local channel 4 affiliate has zero future. Who cares if Nexstar and Sinclair merge or not? They're both doomed to ultimately fail.
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 346d
Oh jah, i mean youtube gets a billuon views a month (google it)....public/cable tv is inconsequential and no one watches late night tv.
This was just an excercise of us finally checking disney in my opinion.
Disney has been playing w a new name i hear. Wayland-yetani.
skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 346d
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 346d
Like putting a carwash on some land to sit in it.
yarr@feddit.nl · 9 pts · 346d
Here's a record related to the decision:
IMPORTANT MEMO
To: Disney Leadership
From: Donald J. Trump
Subject: JIMMY KIMMEL IS AGAINST CHARLIE KIRK — VERY BAD!
Dear Disney,
You know me — I love the great people. But Jimmy Kimmel? He’s not a fan of Charlie Kirk. He said some very unfair things. Like, he called the Maga gang “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.” That’s NOT nice! That’s NOT TRUE!
I told him, “Jimmy, stop talking about Charlie Kirk!” But he didn’t listen. He’s a disgrace. A DISGRACE! And when I say “disgrace,” I mean anti-American. So I want you to SUSPEND him. S-U-S-P-E-N-D. No more jokes about Charlie Kirk. No more laughs. Just a big, beautiful silence.
If you don’t do it, I’ll have to say you’re NOT doing your job either. And that would be terrible.
Best regards, Donald J. Trump
P.S. Jimmy’s a loser. A total loser.
WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org · -2 pts · 347d
These are America ...what questions do they have?
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -148 pts · 347d
Lol. Are people still talking about this nothing? WTF
Triumph@fedia.io · 110 pts · 347d
Yes, people are still talking about the FCC chair and the president violating the First Amendment with exactly zero consequences.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -57 pts · 347d
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 347d
When did fascists come to this platform? Suddenly they seem to have slithered forth
Zentron@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 347d
Its like a parasite , if you dont fight them from the start they spread and rot the place from within.. old story i heard from a bar , if you let one nazi drink in peace , they will bring their friends and crowd out the people who feel unwelcome , and in the end you'll just have a nazi bar
FerretyFever0@fedia.io · 63 pts · 347d
Yes, we care about the 1st Amendment, thanks for asking :)
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -67 pts · 347d
Does the first amendment protect novelty television?
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca · 66 pts · 347d
... yes? Very much indeed so?
phoenixarise@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 347d
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -28 pts · 347d
I didn't know. Thanks.
zarathustrad@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 347d
Yes, the existence of Fox "news" and most right wing radio proves it.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 347d
It does when it’s the government who is making calls to cancel shows.
Alaik@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 347d
The first amendment protects all private entities from the government limiting what they can say barring a few exceptions. Making fun of someone is not an exception. Threatening to fine the hell out of someone for making a joke, ESPECIALLY if you think they have low ratings and no one watches them anyway? Thats definitely violating the first amendment.
Tl;dr Either astroturfing or dumb.
chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world · 41 pts · 347d
Troll account. ez block.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -30 pts · 347d
ProIsh@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 347d
And people are still talking about your hero getting blasted. The world continues to spin.
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -27 pts · 347d
People are still talking about Zappa, too? What a world.
deacon@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 347d
Hey all apropos of nothing, I enjoy using the bloc function liberally on Lemmy. It’s really wonderful.
don@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 347d
Lol. Are people still asking this nothing question? WTF
CannedYeet@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 347d
Yeah, move on to important topics, like the Epstein files.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -36 pts · 347d
Protesting Jimmy Kimmel getting an extended paid vacation is the only thing that's left for liberals to do.
They can't protest to end genocide, that's illegal.
They can't protest in defense of LGBTQ rights, that's divisive and unelectable.
They can't protest over the environment, it's bad for
big businessthe jobs economy.They can't even protest over inflation, because the BLS isn't allowed to release bad numbers anymore.
All liberals have left is Kimmel.
protist@mander.xyz · 14 pts · 347d
What I see here is straw man after straw man. Do you even talk to anyone in real life?
PeacefulForest@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 347d
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 347d
Impressive collection of whining
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · -37 pts · 347d
The internet downvote is their strongest rebuttal.
PeacefulForest@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 347d