I'm sad that someone I thought was good committed heinous crimes, but if he indeed committed those crimes I want him prosecuted. I will be mad if Clinton is prosecuted and Trump isn't because that would be a double standard, they should both be in prison
You have no idea what Clinton did or didn't do. And if you think the Department of Obstruction of Justice is above fabricating evidence, destroying exculpatory evidence, manipulating grand juries, perjury and endless other forms of fuckery, you haven't been paying attention.
See, MAGA don't base morality on actions, they don't see good abd bad actions, they see good and bad people. They're loyal to Trump no matter what he does, even if he does something completely against their values. They assume democrats think the same way and they expect democrats to be hypocrites and say it's fine if Bill Clinton does it.
It's not just that, an email leaked where Epstein told his brother that trump gave "Bubba" a bj...
"Bubba" is one of Clinton's nicknames. But trump literally and consentingly sucking a dick will hurt him more with his base than raping kids, even if it's not attached to a Clinton.
Yeah. I've been doomscrolling bsky far more than I should these days but had missed this. Apparently at least a few of the more reputable news/politics folk have actively been struggling with how to even approach this in a way that is sufficiently disrespectful to the rapist(s) while not being homophobic or misogynistic which... respect.
The Epsteins buiseness model was basically "create blackmailable situations to sell to world leaders" and this is part of what Putin has on Trump. I saw another comment that basically said "a ring of pedophiles conspired with Russia to take over our country". Which is basically what happened and the people who voted for them got played, hard.
For extra fun, try posing the statement to Google's AI mode and watch it try to pretend this isn't in the news right now, and then make up lies to protect Trump, until it realizes it can't a suddenly kills the conversation.
"Trump blew Clinton" led to it talking about how he "blew Clinton away at the polls in 2016." Every additional layer of specifity leads to another slight diversion. Adding "Bill Clinton" caused it to recognize that this is in the news right now, but it's definitely not true because Bubba isn't Bill Clinton. Telling it that Bubba is Bill's known nickname caused it to agree that this is true, but Epstein said that "Bubba doesn't refer to Bill Clinton." (Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.) Telling it that Epstein is a known pedophile sex trafficker with ties to these men and reason to lie caused it to admit that Epstein isn't a reliable source for this, and it tried to dismiss the validity of the emails altogether as "contextually untrustworthy." I then told it that a known pedophile discussing his practices in a believed to be private email thread is a reasonable context to consider the validity of his statements, but it was tired of me, and went "here are some more links on the subject. Any additional messages with start a new conversation." This could normal after being 5-6 messages deep with this AI; I had literally never used it before to know, but it felt weird to me.
It is weirdly defensive about the possibility that this had taken place, actively omitting details to bias weird takes.
There is no factual basis or credible reporting from authoritative news sources or public records to support the claim that Donald Trump performed a sex act on Bill Clinton.
The search results discuss various political rumors, social media speculation, and unrelated news stories concerning both individuals, including the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein email releases. However, none of these sources contain evidence for the specific act mentioned in the user's question. The suggestions found in online forums and social media are entirely speculative and lack any factual verification.
It did mention "Jeffery Epstein email releases" in passing, but it should have given that specific email as to where the rumor came from. Definitely more vague than was reasonable to be.
It doesn't matter, the rumor has even less legs than the couch fucking. No one on the left would believe it because he's never done anything for anyone else in his life, and no one on the right would believe it because "god president daddy ain't no queer!"
That is just republicans. Every accusation is a confession with them.
In large part because they completely lack morality/empathy but insist on their own self righteousness. So if they are doing something, the Other must be doing it too.
So Trump is our first closeted gay president?!!!!!
11/14/2025, the USA announces its first closeted gay president! The world rejoices! Its not that bad! C'mon, tell us more! Thr truth will set you free...and hopefully us too!
We can now ask for all our rights back and then some. If the president does it, then why shouldn't we also be able to enjoy those same freedoms?
If Trump tries to have Clinton prosecuted, that will mean former presidents can be prosecuted for this, which means Trump has no intention of ever leaving office
66 Comments
Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world · 130 pts · 273d
AbidanYre@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 273d
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 273d
Some democrats might care, although I feel like Clinton's power has really fallen off so who knows.
FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 272d
I'm sad that someone I thought was good committed heinous crimes, but if he indeed committed those crimes I want him prosecuted. I will be mad if Clinton is prosecuted and Trump isn't because that would be a double standard, they should both be in prison
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 269d
You have no idea what Clinton did or didn't do. And if you think the Department of Obstruction of Justice is above fabricating evidence, destroying exculpatory evidence, manipulating grand juries, perjury and endless other forms of fuckery, you haven't been paying attention.
FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 272d
See, MAGA don't base morality on actions, they don't see good abd bad actions, they see good and bad people. They're loyal to Trump no matter what he does, even if he does something completely against their values. They assume democrats think the same way and they expect democrats to be hypocrites and say it's fine if Bill Clinton does it.
pennomi@lemmy.world · 118 pts · 273d
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works · 70 pts · 273d
He's not planning on being a former president.
blave@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 273d
I’ll take “ex” president
cmbabul@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 273d
Well not a living one
FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 272d
It shows he has no intention of leaving office
RandAlThor@lemmy.ca · 73 pts · 273d
Desperate old pedophile tries to deflect and distract attention away from his own criminal activity.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 273d
It's not just that, an email leaked where Epstein told his brother that trump gave "Bubba" a bj...
"Bubba" is one of Clinton's nicknames. But trump literally and consentingly sucking a dick will hurt him more with his base than raping kids, even if it's not attached to a Clinton.
snooggums@piefed.world · 19 pts · 273d
But even more if it is a Clinton.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 272d
Maybe he was just chomping on Hillary's strap-on.
evenglow@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 273d
He thinks we won't go after someone on the same team. It's not meant to distract. It's meant to block.
We know this is much bigger than Trump. We know lots of rich people are involved. He has no idea that is the whole point.
shittydwarf@piefed.social · 57 pts · 273d
Apparently trump gave ole bill a blowjob
synae@lemmy.sdf.org · 26 pts · 273d
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 273d
classic@fedia.io · 24 pts · 273d
I thought this was just some random silly comment. But apparently this is a thing
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 273d
Yeah. I've been doomscrolling bsky far more than I should these days but had missed this. Apparently at least a few of the more reputable news/politics folk have actively been struggling with how to even approach this in a way that is sufficiently disrespectful to the rapist(s) while not being homophobic or misogynistic which... respect.
Siethron@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 273d
We need to spread this more.
The Epsteins buiseness model was basically "create blackmailable situations to sell to world leaders" and this is part of what Putin has on Trump. I saw another comment that basically said "a ring of pedophiles conspired with Russia to take over our country". Which is basically what happened and the people who voted for them got played, hard.
Kyrgizion@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 273d
At this point it doesn't even matter if it's true or not. The internet will MAKE it true.
ceenote@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 273d
Maybe he's just angry that Bubba hit it and quit it.
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 273d
Because he’d rather stay and play?
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 273d
Lol, I can't believe this us actually plausable with the evidence that came out. See, everyone? It's not all bad in this batshit crazy timeline.
TheMinister@sh.itjust.works · 56 pts · 273d
He’s trying to change the algorithms away from “trump blew Clinton”
Do your part and search Google for “trump clinton blowjob” and “Donald trump blew bill Clinton proof” etc
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 273d
Glide@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 273d
For extra fun, try posing the statement to Google's AI mode and watch it try to pretend this isn't in the news right now, and then make up lies to protect Trump, until it realizes it can't a suddenly kills the conversation.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 273d
It just said to me that there wasn't any conclusive proof that it happened, which is true.
Glide@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 273d
"Trump blew Clinton" led to it talking about how he "blew Clinton away at the polls in 2016." Every additional layer of specifity leads to another slight diversion. Adding "Bill Clinton" caused it to recognize that this is in the news right now, but it's definitely not true because Bubba isn't Bill Clinton. Telling it that Bubba is Bill's known nickname caused it to agree that this is true, but Epstein said that "Bubba doesn't refer to Bill Clinton." (Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.) Telling it that Epstein is a known pedophile sex trafficker with ties to these men and reason to lie caused it to admit that Epstein isn't a reliable source for this, and it tried to dismiss the validity of the emails altogether as "contextually untrustworthy." I then told it that a known pedophile discussing his practices in a believed to be private email thread is a reasonable context to consider the validity of his statements, but it was tired of me, and went "here are some more links on the subject. Any additional messages with start a new conversation." This could normal after being 5-6 messages deep with this AI; I had literally never used it before to know, but it felt weird to me.
It is weirdly defensive about the possibility that this had taken place, actively omitting details to bias weird takes.
grue@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 273d
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, apparently.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 273d
It did mention "Jeffery Epstein email releases" in passing, but it should have given that specific email as to where the rumor came from. Definitely more vague than was reasonable to be.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 272d
To be fair, there's no way Trump could know who was on the other side of the wall in that glory hole.
Well, except for asking, and that'd just sound like "Mmpfgharbl."
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 273d
It doesn't matter, the rumor has even less legs than the couch fucking. No one on the left would believe it because he's never done anything for anyone else in his life, and no one on the right would believe it because "god president daddy ain't no queer!"
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 51 pts · 273d
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 273d
That's why he goes with the hoax is the parts that implicate me
jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works · 28 pts · 273d
markz@suppo.fi · 23 pts · 273d
As long as there's proof, go for it! If he's on that list, he must go, and it sets a precedent as well!
Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 273d
Wow, that is desperate.
Something, something projection.
snooggums@piefed.world · 8 pts · 273d
It's like a five year old who accuses everyone else of doing what they are doing.
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 273d
That is just republicans. Every accusation is a confession with them.
In large part because they completely lack morality/empathy but insist on their own self righteousness. So if they are doing something, the Other must be doing it too.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 20 pts · 273d
Yeah, let's see that discovery
Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com · 16 pts · 273d
He really didn’t think this through.
tankplanker@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 273d
I hope Bill makes a plea deal incriminating everyone else
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 273d
Clinton cares far more about his own reputation and legacy than his party or country. So not gonna happen.
That said, the funniest timeline ever would be
2piradians@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 273d
Buddy, nooooooobody thinks of Hilary to finish
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 272d
Speak for yourself.
etherphon@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 273d
Surely one of these old fucks must be feeling some remorse? What the f..
Kirp123@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 273d
People that rape children aren't big on remorse.
etherphon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 273d
I suppose that's probably true.
apftwb@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 273d
"Did you have sexual relations with President Trump?"
"I learned my lesson last time. No comment"
altphoto@lemmy.today · 12 pts · 273d
So Trump is our first closeted gay president?!!!!!
11/14/2025, the USA announces its first closeted gay president! The world rejoices! Its not that bad! C'mon, tell us more! Thr truth will set you free...and hopefully us too!
We can now ask for all our rights back and then some. If the president does it, then why shouldn't we also be able to enjoy those same freedoms?
deluxe@lemmynsfw.com · 2 pts · 272d
Unmarried bachelor president James Buchanan and his very very very good friend Senator William Rufus King would like a word.
Spes@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 273d
Full swing: The “Me Too” movement has now shifted to “Him, too!”
gressen@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 273d
Investigate them all.
Inucune@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 273d
Of all the people to go after... The Clinton's? Someone doesn't know their crime families very well...
Lucky_777@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 273d
Someone trade Putin some oil for these pics please
sturmblast@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 273d
Trump is such a moron
fartographer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 273d
Have they not seen how we treat our own party's politicians? What makes them think we're gonna suddenly rally an ex-politician?
"You think you can take me down?! I'm gonna burn your socks!"
"Eww, did you dig through my trash to find those?! Look, if you want them, you can have them, but stop threatening me with my garbage."
FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 272d
If Trump tries to have Clinton prosecuted, that will mean former presidents can be prosecuted for this, which means Trump has no intention of ever leaving office
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 273d
Clinton: dude, I already had to deal with one blow job scandal, if you go through with this, I may as well go through another.
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 272d
Well, we already knows he likes 'em on the hefty side. On the other hand:
"I did not have sexual relations with that creep. I'd never want to stir Putin's porridge."
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 272d
Did he really say that? LOL.
Also, kinda suspicious using his go to phrase if so lol
Empricorn@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 272d
It's like threatening (most) Independents/Democrats with investigating Nancy Pelosi. 🤷♂️ Like, go for it.
shittydwarf@piefed.social · 2 pts · 273d
Binturong@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 273d
But don't look too close or you might notice the dick in his mouth...