Data you are supposed to be observing the behavior of 21st century humans, not interacting with them. You are in danger of violating the temporary prime directive. We don't want another Sarjenka incident.
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
32 Comments
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works · 69 pts · 247d
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 28 pts · 247d
pedz@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 246d
...is your taxonomic nomenclature.
EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 245d
Data you are supposed to be observing the behavior of 21st century humans, not interacting with them. You are in danger of violating the temporary prime directive. We don't want another Sarjenka incident.
altasshet@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 244d
That's my cat's name...
SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works · 48 pts · 247d
Do you know if they actually check? My leopard has let himself go a bit and may not be typical.
BootLoop@sh.itjust.works · 47 pts · 247d
Perhaps it's cumulative. 200lbs worth of cats total.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 19 pts · 247d
That’s a lot of cats.
wischi@programming.dev · 15 pts · 247d
The last line says 2 pets max. So two small Snow Leopards maybe?
Maiq@piefed.social · 31 pts · 247d
Sad Khajiit noises...
stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 247d
Happy 185LB Khajiit noises!
Maiq@piefed.social · 4 pts · 247d
This one weighs 83.914 kilos though.
stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 247d
kibiz0r@midwest.social · 10 pts · 247d
It costs 400,000 treats to feed this cat… for 12 seconds.
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 247d
If I let my Leopard eat the landlord's face I won't pay any rent. Sounds good.
$35 a month pet rent...
Fuck the capitalistic system, may the landlord's all die.
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 247d
Do you have the address been looking for somewhere to rent that i can keep my Leopard?
Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 247d
So a small female leopard would be allowed?
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 247d
Two leopards, there’s a two pet limit!
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 247d
If you pay the $250 deposit and $35/month pet rent. 👍
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social · 9 pts · 247d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_(cat)
fibojoly@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 247d
Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 247d
they would charge per occupant if it wasn't for those regressive pro child birthing laws
FatVegan@leminal.space · 7 pts · 247d
I would assume it's rent and that's why there is a 2 pet limit. Kind of insane.
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 246d
I don't think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.
Like, over time it's more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.
But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.
So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.
pupbiru@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 246d
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 pts · 245d
So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit
Slippery fuckin slope.
jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 244d
landlord can't legally charge more for children
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 243d
Hmm I wonder why, maybe because they tried and people were sensible enough to push back.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 7 pts · 247d
What if my tiger is still a baby? 🤔
edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 247d
That's fine, but once it's past the limit, do NOT attempt to flush it away. It will be very mad at you for turning it into a wet claw tornado.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 247d
Seems reasonable
PK2@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 246d
The extra fees may sound unfair, but as long as my baby can scout her own food it all balances out.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 244d
If you can get a tiger through the door, I don't think anyone is going to argue with it.
arrakeen_urbanite@feddit.online · 2 pts · 247d
marcos@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 246d
Well, it said "Cat Cat".
People should turn the autotranslator down. And stop messing with word capitalization!
drascus@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 245d