No, I'm not going to apologize for supporting emancipation

Again, wrong. Maybe do so reading.

Unless you mean state as in nationalism, wasn't a thing until the 19th century. Where Palestine was self-governing under the ottoman empire until British occupation began.

::: spoiler From the Introduction

Conventional wisdoms are often articulated by powerful elites; they are not always based on facts. The conventional wisdom is that Palestine never in its history experienced self-government, political or cultural autonomy, not to mention practical sovereignty and actual statehood. Nothing is further from the truth. As we shall amply demonstrate in this work, over three millennia from the late Bronze Age and until the establishment of the Israeli state in 1948, Palestine enjoyed a great deal of social, political and economic autonomy and also experienced statehood through six distinct, though not mutually exclusive, ways – ways which had a profound impact on the evolution of the ideas of Palestine across the millennia:

• Autonomous economic and monetary systems and the issuing of Palestinian currency: the institution of independent monetary policies and the minting of distinct Palestinian currency were evident in the cases of the coinage of Philistia or Philisto-Arabian in the 6th‒4th centuries BC (discussed in chapter one) and the minting of Arab currency ‘in Filastin’ throughout early Islam (discussed in chapter six).

• Imperial patron‒protégé systems: the construction of patron‒client systems and the rise of local and autonomous regional and urban elites in Palestine, as was in the case of the ‘urban notables’ of Ottoman Palestine. But ultimately, as we shall see in chapter eight, these Ottoman urban elites in Palestine were rule-takers not rule-makers and rule-breakers.

• Administrative, provincial and military autonomy: this is evident throughout the Roman and Byzantine periods in what became widely known as Provincia Palaestina or the Dux Palaestinae, the ‘military commander of Palestine’ (discussed in chapter four), Mutawalli Harb Filastin (“ ”, Military Governor of Palestine) (discussed in chapter six) and in late Ottoman period Palestine with the creation of the autonomous administrative Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem as the key province of Palestine (discussed in chapter nine).

• Palestinian client states: the emergence and creation of several Palestinian client states, partly based on the same patron‒client relationships. Although the types of client states in Palestine and the degree of their subordination to imperial or powerful states varied significantly, the kings of Philistia throughout much of the Iron Age, the client King Herod the Great under the Romans in the 1st century AD (discussed in chapter four), the Ghassanid tribal Arab federate kings (supreme phylarchs) of Palaestina Secunda, Palaestina Prima and Palaestina Tertia in the 6th and early 7th centuries (discussed in chapter five) and to a lesser extent the autonomous regime of Ahmad Pasha al-Jazzar in the 18th century were cases in point.

• Palestinian practical sovereignty and statehood: this was achieved by Daher al-‘Umar following his successful rebellion against Ottoman rule in the middle of the 18th century (discussed in chapter eight).

• Ecclesiastical independence and autocephaly: this was achieved by the Church of Aelia Capitolina and Provincia Palaestina from the mid-5th century following the Council of Chalcedon (discussed in chapter four).

:::

In the 1960s and 70s it became the signature phrase of the Palestine Liberation Organization to indicate the replacement of the State of Israel with a State of Palestine extending “from the river to the sea,” including the expulsion of Jews.

Hamas have since called for the expulsion of all Jews.

Hamas proclaims it in its 1988 founding, charter document, The Hamas Covenant. The second paragraph declares to all the world that, “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.” The introduction section promises “[o]ur struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious” and will only end when “the enemy is vanquished and Allah’s victory is realized,”

https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/From-the-River-to-the-Sea

It refers to genociding the Jews to get back the area. Technically it doesn't, like saying 'all lives matter' isn't technically anti-black, but it is. Wearing a swastika might mean you support the Hindu notion of well-being, but it doesn't.
Symbols have meaning and hiding behind technicalities allows dog whistling and regressive behavior.
Yes, Israel is abhorrent in its actions in Gaza, and a form of shared peaceful cohabitation in the area would be ideal. But allowing slogans that are known to represent genocide, doesn't help.

No it doesn't. It means the land won't be owned by Israel.

The history of harassment, Palestine, and israel is largely irrelevant.

If a law prescribes (proscribes?) specific phrases regadless of intent and context, they should be chosen very, very carefully.

Im not an expert, but i think other states require a context like "intended to incite hatred".

By prescribing this particular phrase, even if you are correct, it allows harassment to portray Palestine as ignored and persecuted - the very intention of terrorism.

See here

Yeah, it's not a surprise that ethnosupremacist fascists dedicated to ethnic cleansing use their twisted version as a call for even more ethnic cleansing.

https://www.palquest.org/en/historictext/16211/palestine-national-council-5th-session-political-statement

The objective of the Palestinian people behind the bitter struggle in which it is engaged for the liberation of and the return to its land is to set up a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians, including Muslims, Christians and Jews, and to liberate Palestine

You didn't answer my question, and you are a dumbass. The "proof" you linked is just more baseless assertions, and none of them support the idea that any slogan calling for a free Palestine is actually coded language that actually refers to expelling all the Jews.

Really, it's just projection. The Israeli project is the expulsion of all Arabs from Gaza and the West Bank, and they've said it openly. To quote Yoav Gallant, "We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly... There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed." That quote encapsulates both statement of intent to commit genocide, as well as genocidal dehumanization. Yet it's always pro-Palestinian speech that's suppressed and criminalized - pro-Israel speech is not subjected to the same "actually, this means this" standard, despite how the Israeli state is both genocidal in intent and actively undertaking genocide.

So what are Israeli Arab citizens not allowed to do that Jewish ones are? Given that its a "well known fact" they're second class citizens?

I'll give you that Smotrich and Ben Gvir are fascists if that's who you're referring to but it's hardly accurate to claim they "run the country", nor are their views representative of the average Israeli given they get a pretty small percentage of the vote.

Also- nothing I said was a lie or misinformation as far as I'm aware but feel free to point out where you disagree.

So you're in favor of a one-state solution?

Who do you think will govern that state?

Israel does did not have fair elections. The ultra-orthodox political elite were extremely privileged in Israel's elections. Something like 15% of the population was responsible for an 80% share-by-weight of the electoral outcome.

This has recently changed, so it's expected that Israel's next election (this year) will be more fair, and it's likely that the ultra-orthodox faction will lose power. However, they know this quite well and are likely to try to use the war in some way to maintain their hold on power. Time will tell.