Hell there's even a market for market based smut where craft markets are having anal sex with farmers markets while simultaneously having illicit affairs with stock markets. Everyone needs a little lovin'.
There's a market hungry for smut about literary agents who reject manuscripts for Amazon prime printing being pounded up the butt by their own rejected manuscripts. If you can think it, Doctor Chuck Tingle has written it being pounded up the butt. I think that's rule 34L
An overwhelming amount of booktok/bookstagram (and their mentally challenged brother, bookbook, close relative of Moon Moon) is very much in love with e.g. Morning Glory Milking Farm.
WARNING: Look that book up at your own peril. You've been warned.
Compared to some dark romance? Sure. I mean, very, very few things will top the femur scene in I Will Break You (the trigger warnings specifying "inappropriate use of thigh bone" were NOT joking), so compared, indeed tame.
But for your average non-smut reader, there's a lot of emphasis on... milking.
Though still not as full of smut as e.g. Kiss Of The Basilisk. Which is like, 98% pure porn.
Look up "ice planet barbarians". Forgot the author but there are a lot of different kind of barbarians, orcs, demons, etc. That are rough but with a soft spot, protecting the female lead heroically while taking her for themselves.
This is fantastic. Thanks for posting the reddit link, which has now been edited further:
EDIT 2: Apparently I also owe an apology to the small (but vocal) contingent who really wanted this to be minotaur smut. I'm doing my part. Now get typing.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
And the linked thread is basically a writing competition that the author is hosting with a $100 prize. The title is "Announcing the 2026 Beefhammer Prize For Excellence in Minotaur Erotica". Lovely!
My motto is if a thing has a hole or a pole someone wrote about fucking it. I say "it", because whatever it is can be an anthropomorphic toaster. Probably called "Hot Toasted Love" or "Butter my Bread".
Edit:, now I started down a dark rabbit hole... Which is also fucked in a book most likely.
The sequel to Corruption of Champions is on Steam. Corruption of Champions 2. You can technically find it without googling if you search the Steam store.
"The Staff: A Different Kind of RPG", and the picture is a naked minotaur looking down at a topless buff dude.
You might as well have called it "The Really Big Dick: This Aint For Kids" and had the minotaur's cock on the dude's head. That's the only way it could possibly have been any more suggestive.
The drawing is super suggestive, that Minotaur is ripped, face looking down while his chest pump up showing physical dominance while his "enemy" with his height only achieving the bare minimum to cover his massive huge humongous...personality
Ouch. Seriously, what was he thinking with that cover. Or the artist for that matter. Should have shopped it out to at least one friend and asked “based on the cover, what do you think this is about?”
He's upset because everyone made the wrong assumption, it's actually a story about a sentient staff that gets revenge for being used as a sounding rod for 30 years.
"Jason knew that this was beyond him. And some deep inside him rose. A deep knowing that he could take this the minataur. Sterlingly strong, the minataur stood with a knowing going in his eyes. This wasn't his first rodeo. "Don't fail me now" Jason thought as he gripped his staff ever tighter."
"The minataur thrust himself at Jason. A tangled mess of limbs and horns, they jostled for position. Jason held the minataur's head down by the horns. "I've got you now" as he moved to thrust his staff deep inside the ... The world a twirl, Jason found himself on his back, lurching. Something gored him and the man-beast had struck the first blow. He had never felt anything like this before. The power. The grace. The yearning for release. He was no longer in control. When was the last time he wasn't in control?"
This company has existed since the 1940s; reading erotica is not even remotely a new phenomenon and you're fighting a losing battle if you think you're going to change that. Maybe you should instead get comfortable with the fact that a healthy sexual appetite is normal and people have been engaging in various forms of mental masturbation since literally the dawn of humanity.
There's a difference between writing things to satisfy a "healthy sexual appetite" and some of the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published. I guess I'm more against literary depravity (like shit involving falling in love with your rapist or family stuff, many Wattpad stories are like that) than I am against just erotica.
The question is where do you draw the line? I'm sure that in Victorian times, something like sex with the lights on or anything not heterosexual is
the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published
and
literary depravity
I think a better question is how do we prevent people from getting hurt in real life, not what do you personally find disgusting. I personally cannot watch horror, pimple-popping, even had to look away during some action movies because I think the injury shown in these is disgusting, I actually have a pretty visceral reaction to it, but I don't argue for these things that will live rent-free in my head in a negative way to stop existing for everyone. I just don't consume it, and ask people to tag content appropriately if I see it untagged. But of course, if you injure a person in real life and not just on film or a book, then by all means throw the book at them.
I do get your discomfort with seeing things in public. I wouldn't want the shot of the slasher in the middle of violently killing someone on the public ad. I think if it's got a visual component do not show it in public, but if it's text you are probably too close to the other person's book/phone—I don't try to snoop on strangers in public and still sometimes see what is on their phones, but I don't look long enough to read.
It's brain poison, and you can waste your time with things that are not nearly as depraved. Stop your perspectivism, at some point these things are just morally wrong and shouldn't be published (any literature that praises/paints in a good light things like rape, assault, abuse, etc just because it makes people wet). Do I think it's a big thing overall? No, because this is porn for women and women aren't outside murdering and raping, that's almost entirely the domain of men. I do think that, especially for those that come from an amoral, postmodern culture and that never knew what it's like to have a proper male role model, or what male love should be like because their fathers either weren't at home or were confused and amoral, it can be somewhat dangerous.
What you find disgusting some will find normal, and what you find normal some will find disgusting. You do not get to be the arbiter of morality for me any more than I get to be the arbiter of morality for you.
No, that's nonsense, things are or aren't more on the side of virtue than vice and vice versa. If you wanna stand for rape, abuse, coercion, weird age gaps, bestiality, etc. in your literature because it turns you on, that's you, but it's depraved. And we all get to speak about it, and you don't have to agree with what I'm saying.
Literature seems a safe space to explore taboo and challenging ideas to me. Do you carry this same standard for violence* in media? Plenty of books feature grotesque depictions of violence and gore which similarly seeks to titillate, just perhaps not sexually; do you think we should be sounding the alarm on violence in media as well?
edit: non-sexual violence, to be clear, as you seem to be focusing on rape fantasy in fiction which is, of course, itself violence.
No ideas are being challenged by these low-brow smut books, come on, it's just literary porn. Sometimes considering heretical thoughts is the path to enlightenment, but this isn't relevant when discussing porn, lol. The difference between these books is whether it allows for people to fantasize about unhealthy, morally questionable kinks and maybe even normalize the things I talked about in the previous post, or not, that's it. And yes, there's a limit to everything, I also oppose positively framing pointless non-sexual violence, or just having it in for pleasure/titillation, ofc, who wouldn't?
74 Comments
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works · 87 pts · 171d
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works · 72 pts · 171d
There's a market out there for literally any kind of smut you can think of. It might be a small market, but there will be a market.
MacaqueAndCheese@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 171d
Hell there's even a market for market based smut where craft markets are having anal sex with farmers markets while simultaneously having illicit affairs with stock markets. Everyone needs a little lovin'.
ThePantser@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 171d
While the flea market watches from the corner.
village604@adultswim.fan · 8 pts · 171d
Rule 34, basically
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 170d
There's a market hungry for smut about literary agents who reject manuscripts for Amazon prime printing being pounded up the butt by their own rejected manuscripts. If you can think it, Doctor Chuck Tingle has written it being pounded up the butt. I think that's rule 34L
aeronmelon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d
And small as it may be, you will get paid better for your minotaur smut than you will for all your non-smut writing combined.
fonix232@fedia.io · 19 pts · 171d
An overwhelming amount of booktok/bookstagram (and their mentally challenged brother, bookbook, close relative of Moon Moon) is very much in love with e.g. Morning Glory Milking Farm.
WARNING: Look that book up at your own peril. You've been warned.
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works · 25 pts · 171d
TIN@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 171d
That was... diverting, thank you
MBM@lemmings.world · 0 pts · 170d
From what I heard that book is actually surprisingly tame and wholesome
fonix232@fedia.io · 6 pts · 170d
Compared to some dark romance? Sure. I mean, very, very few things will top the femur scene in
I Will Break You(the trigger warnings specifying "inappropriate use of thigh bone" were NOT joking), so compared, indeed tame.But for your average non-smut reader, there's a lot of emphasis on... milking.
Though still not as full of smut as e.g. Kiss Of The Basilisk. Which is like, 98% pure porn.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 171d
You: 'apparently'
Me, a furry for the last two decades: haha, yes, apparently, ha ha ha... haaaa...
truthfultemporarily@feddit.org · 5 pts · 171d
Look up "ice planet barbarians". Forgot the author but there are a lot of different kind of barbarians, orcs, demons, etc. That are rough but with a soft spot, protecting the female lead heroically while taking her for themselves.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 171d
For every single thing that exists or can be imagined, there is someone who wants to fuck it.
minorkeys@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Morning Glory Milking Farm
TheBat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de · 53 pts · 171d
This is fantastic. Thanks for posting the reddit link, which has now been edited further:
And the linked thread is basically a writing competition that the author is hosting with a $100 prize. The title is "Announcing the 2026 Beefhammer Prize For Excellence in Minotaur Erotica". Lovely!
neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works · 42 pts · 171d
It's cute that he thought "Gay Minotaur Sex" would be a brand new sentence somehow.
My sweet, sweet summer child...
Barrymore@sh.itjust.works · 33 pts · 171d
No, no, no. The new sentence is that it does NOT have Minotaur sex
MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 171d
I didn't even have to search much...
Minotaur Smut
My motto is if a thing has a hole or a pole someone wrote about fucking it. I say "it", because whatever it is can be an anthropomorphic toaster. Probably called "Hot Toasted Love" or "Butter my Bread".
Edit:, now I started down a dark rabbit hole... Which is also fucked in a book most likely.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 171d
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 171d
Chuck "Pounded in the butt by my book "Pounded in the butt by my own butt"" Tingle is cheating.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
You have to admit the ability to get pounded in the butt by your own butt is pretty remarkably convenient.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 170d
That's Doctor Chuck Tingle, three time Hugo nominee!
bhamlin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Is that Chuck Testa's pen name?
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 6 pts · 171d
I like the looks of that Ghost Raptor Seduction.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d
Any pole is a goal
SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 35 pts · 171d
Fantasy smut sells! This dude could make fucking millions off this. I would rewrite the whole thing if I were him.
TractorDuffy@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 171d
roll a D8, the result determines the outcome of your conversation:
I'd play the shit out of that game
Apytele@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 171d
That's literally just the text adventure video game Corruption of Champions (CoCs). The sci-fi version is Trials in Tainted Space (TiTS).
AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 170d
....is that real or a clever pun you just made up? I really want to know without using Google.
DeanTheCat@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 170d
The sequel to Corruption of Champions is on Steam. Corruption of Champions 2. You can technically find it without googling if you search the Steam store.
AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 160d
That means I'd need a steam account, which I don't actually have.
trslim@pawb.social · 2 pts · 170d
I actually beat Corruption of Champions 1, it was a really fun text based rpg! i would play it when i was bored in the military.
Apytele@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 170d
Yes.
AA5B@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 170d
Keep the title, keep the cover art, completely replace the content!
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 34 pts · 170d
I don't understand what they were thinking
"The Staff: A Different Kind of RPG", and the picture is a naked minotaur looking down at a topless buff dude.
You might as well have called it "The Really Big Dick: This Aint For Kids" and had the minotaur's cock on the dude's head. That's the only way it could possibly have been any more suggestive.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 170d
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 170d
It implies a furry wrote it. Which only increases the chances our hero will be swallowing an all beef hot dog.
I wonder if this is some viral marketing campaign. Where it was intentionally made sexual to get people talking about "what it looks like"
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 6 pts · 170d
It says LITRPG, not RPG. LITRPG is a story genre.
(Edit: this is meant to be informative, not condescending. I hadn't heard of that genre until semi recently.)
yuriRO@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 31 pts · 171d
The drawing is super suggestive, that Minotaur is ripped, face looking down while his chest pump up showing physical dominance while his "enemy" with his height only achieving the bare minimum to cover his massive huge humongous...personality
hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 32 pts · 171d
Also the title is literally called "The Staff"
yuriRO@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 171d
And come on, why the hero is shirtless with jeans!! That's hot
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 170d
Right? As soon as I saw it was called "The Staff" I was like "Come the fuck on."
Might as well have called it, "The Massive Throbbing Minotaur Meatstick"
EvilBit@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 171d
Oh god, I’m launching! I’m launching!
ramble81@lemmy.zip · 20 pts · 171d
Ouch. Seriously, what was he thinking with that cover. Or the artist for that matter. Should have shopped it out to at least one friend and asked “based on the cover, what do you think this is about?”
I mean the name literally has “The Staff” in it!
jqubed@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 171d
This seems to be garnering a lot of attention. Maybe he knew exactly what he was doing.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 171d
'oh no, I swear I was always totally innocent, stepbro...'
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 170d
The Subtitle "A Different Kind of Litrpg" isn't helping clarify The Staff isn't an innuendo
MacaqueAndCheese@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 171d
He's upset because everyone made the wrong assumption, it's actually a story about a sentient staff that gets revenge for being used as a sounding rod for 30 years.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Revenge? One should be so lucky!
Slovene@feddit.nl · 12 pts · 171d
Well then judging by the title it's about a group of coworkers?
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 171d
Banging a minotaur, right?
Right? Right?
Slovene@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 168d
Yeah, they're having a "white elephant" in the breakroom.
AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 171d
"Jason knew that this was beyond him. And some deep inside him rose. A deep knowing that he could take this the minataur. Sterlingly strong, the minataur stood with a knowing going in his eyes. This wasn't his first rodeo. "Don't fail me now" Jason thought as he gripped his staff ever tighter."
"The minataur thrust himself at Jason. A tangled mess of limbs and horns, they jostled for position. Jason held the minataur's head down by the horns. "I've got you now" as he moved to thrust his staff deep inside the ... The world a twirl, Jason found himself on his back, lurching. Something gored him and the man-beast had struck the first blow. He had never felt anything like this before. The power. The grace. The yearning for release. He was no longer in control. When was the last time he wasn't in control?"
psycho_driver@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Complete with the little spelling and grammar mistakes that such a novel would contain. Ahem, allegedly contain.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
don't think its gonna sell as good with a different cover. also "A NOVEL NOT ABOUT GAY MINOTAUR SEX?" should be its byline
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 170d
I feel like I want to start minutar smut now
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social · 3 pts · 171d
I'm not convinced that there isn't a whole lot of gay minotaur sex in this book.
psycho_driver@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
Why is the minotaur's left "leg" purple and engorged?
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 171d
There are three legs 😏
Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 171d
Why is one nipple bigger than the other? Modern mysteries.
Slovene@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 171d
The Štaff
SuperEars@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
I kinda see a bat's face in the thumbnail
Etterra@discuss.online · 1 pts · 171d
You need to include tags. I don't read fanfic but they probably have a tag for sex-free writing. Assuming there is any.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 171d
Reading gooner "literature" needs to be shamed, at least when it's read in public. It shouldn't be as popular as it is, I'll tell you that.
TractorDuffy@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
do you mean popular in public or popular in general
Vespair@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 170d
This company has existed since the 1940s; reading erotica is not even remotely a new phenomenon and you're fighting a losing battle if you think you're going to change that. Maybe you should instead get comfortable with the fact that a healthy sexual appetite is normal and people have been engaging in various forms of mental masturbation since literally the dawn of humanity.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 170d
There's a difference between writing things to satisfy a "healthy sexual appetite" and some of the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published. I guess I'm more against literary depravity (like shit involving falling in love with your rapist or family stuff, many Wattpad stories are like that) than I am against just erotica.
Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 170d
The question is where do you draw the line? I'm sure that in Victorian times, something like sex with the lights on or anything not heterosexual is
and
I think a better question is how do we prevent people from getting hurt in real life, not what do you personally find disgusting. I personally cannot watch horror, pimple-popping, even had to look away during some action movies because I think the injury shown in these is disgusting, I actually have a pretty visceral reaction to it, but I don't argue for these things that will live rent-free in my head in a negative way to stop existing for everyone. I just don't consume it, and ask people to tag content appropriately if I see it untagged. But of course, if you injure a person in real life and not just on film or a book, then by all means throw the book at them.
I do get your discomfort with seeing things in public. I wouldn't want the shot of the slasher in the middle of violently killing someone on the public ad. I think if it's got a visual component do not show it in public, but if it's text you are probably too close to the other person's book/phone—I don't try to snoop on strangers in public and still sometimes see what is on their phones, but I don't look long enough to read.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 170d
It's brain poison, and you can waste your time with things that are not nearly as depraved. Stop your perspectivism, at some point these things are just morally wrong and shouldn't be published (any literature that praises/paints in a good light things like rape, assault, abuse, etc just because it makes people wet). Do I think it's a big thing overall? No, because this is porn for women and women aren't outside murdering and raping, that's almost entirely the domain of men. I do think that, especially for those that come from an amoral, postmodern culture and that never knew what it's like to have a proper male role model, or what male love should be like because their fathers either weren't at home or were confused and amoral, it can be somewhat dangerous.
Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zip · 3 pts · 170d
I am just going to agree to disagree with you here.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 170d
That's cordial of you, I appreciate it.
Vespair@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 170d
What you find disgusting some will find normal, and what you find normal some will find disgusting. You do not get to be the arbiter of morality for me any more than I get to be the arbiter of morality for you.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 170d
No, that's nonsense, things are or aren't more on the side of virtue than vice and vice versa. If you wanna stand for rape, abuse, coercion, weird age gaps, bestiality, etc. in your literature because it turns you on, that's you, but it's depraved. And we all get to speak about it, and you don't have to agree with what I'm saying.
Vespair@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 170d
Literature seems a safe space to explore taboo and challenging ideas to me. Do you carry this same standard for violence* in media? Plenty of books feature grotesque depictions of violence and gore which similarly seeks to titillate, just perhaps not sexually; do you think we should be sounding the alarm on violence in media as well?
edit: non-sexual violence, to be clear, as you seem to be focusing on rape fantasy in fiction which is, of course, itself violence.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 170d
No ideas are being challenged by these low-brow smut books, come on, it's just literary porn. Sometimes considering heretical thoughts is the path to enlightenment, but this isn't relevant when discussing porn, lol. The difference between these books is whether it allows for people to fantasize about unhealthy, morally questionable kinks and maybe even normalize the things I talked about in the previous post, or not, that's it. And yes, there's a limit to everything, I also oppose positively framing pointless non-sexual violence, or just having it in for pleasure/titillation, ofc, who wouldn't?
CXORA@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 171d