So did I to be honest

663 points · 52 comments · view on lemmy.world

52 Comments

hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works · 180 pts · 199d (12 replies)

Same. It actually took me a second to get the joke, then I realized I was the joke

essell@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 199d (8 replies)

Me too. I was looking around for the funny. It was me.

erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 199d (6 replies)

Me II

Mesophar@pawb.social · 1 pts · 199d

Me 100

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 199d (4 replies)

π™Όβˆ‘ 𝙸𝙸
𝙼𝙴 𝚰𝚰

glibg10b@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 199d (3 replies)

Isn't that Greek?

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 199d (2 replies)

Guilty. I used the sum symbol for a fancy "E" riffling through my phone keyboards. I know there is a better ascii character.

edited later: corrected my intended font\unicode.

edit2: I highly recommend a f-droid app called UnicodePad for anyone in need of a proper character map application.

rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 198d (1 reply)

It's not an E; it's a Sigma standing in for summation.

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 194d

I fixed it. Thanks!

P1k1e@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 199d

I was initially like, "really, under 2? Cheapass county can't even cover kids under 10?"

My foolishness knows no bounds

Tournesol@feddit.fr · 14 pts · 199d

it's just an error in font, I took a minute to find the real meaning of this ad 😬

CryptoKitten@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 199d

Same here!

kambusha@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 199d

Kids under aye-aye

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 84 pts · 199d (11 replies)

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 31 pts · 199d (6 replies)
  5    10
 111    1

Huh?

theolodis@feddit.org · 9 pts · 199d (1 reply)
  5    10
 101  1010

I think I solved it

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 198d

I think it’s

 8   11

Which is in Roman numerals

VIII   XI

But also works in arabic numerals

 5    10
 3    1
β€”β€”β€”β€”
 8    11

Checkmate god and baby Jesus.

SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 199d (3 replies)

loss

NickwithaC@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d (2 replies)

How?

Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d (1 reply)

When?

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 198d

Chicka Chicka Slim Shadey

reev@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 199d (2 replies)

In print, yes, in hand written maths I don't mind the line

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 199d (1 reply)

Until there's a lowercase L, or you're taking the absolute value of something ...

toynbee@piefed.social · 2 pts · 198d

I don't really handwrite anything these days, but my brother always taught me to put a little upturned curve at the bottom of letters to differentiate them from similar-looking numbers.

moistclump@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 199d

Is this loss?

driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br · 30 pts · 199d

At first I tough that that was a big ass kid for being under 2yo.

AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip · 28 pts · 199d

Took me a good while to read it as 11 so it is pretty confusing tbf

starik@lemmy.zip · 27 pts · 199d (2 replies)

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 199d (1 reply)

I think in order to see a major unified system font update, we are going to need two huge corporations battle each other in court.

A𝙸 vs. A1 steak sauce
πŸ€–πŸ₯©

hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 198d

Plus a class action lawsuit by guys named AL

πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈ

huquad@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 199d

Clearly they mean under 3

qwestjest78@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 199d (2 replies)

That kid is clearly not under 2 though. Should be that all kids ride free

X@piefed.world · 10 pts · 199d (1 reply)

The fine print:

*Picture is for illustrative purposes only, and is not an accurate depiction of children under II years of age. Please ensure that your child(ren) meet(s) the eligibility requirements as shown. This transit system shall not be liable for the outcome of any child 11 years of age who use it.

RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 199d

It is too, accurate for kids under eleven.

echodot@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 199d (4 replies)

Yep I couldn't understand why they chose to use Roman notation. To be honest though 11 is a weird age cut off to have picked.

Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 199d (3 replies)

They probably decided on 10 or below, but it didn't sound as catchy in the marketing

tetris11@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 198d (2 replies)

people kept thinking it was binary for 2 during audience testing

echodot@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 198d (1 reply)

Binary for three. Two would be 1 0 which would then get confused with 10 which would actually take us full circle.

tetris11@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 198d

That's why the changed it from 10 to 11 during testing, because people kept thinking it meant 2

redbeardgecko@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 199d

So did one to be honest

sircac@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 199d (2 replies)

Font matters

Hupf@feddit.org · 2 pts · 199d (1 reply)

β…‘

captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 198d

β…‘ <> I i L l

Had to copy the character and paste i elsewhere to see that it was not two letters.

derry@midwest.social · 6 pts · 199d

Kids under or travel free

RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 199d

No, but seriously. What the fuck?

espentan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 199d

Let's Do London.. hmm..

Klear@quokk.au · 2 pts · 199d (1 reply)

Kids under the tracks travel free.

jaybone@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 199d

But not far.

nonentity@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 199d

It’s an homophonic alliteration in binary.

Kids under three ride free.

swiftywizard@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 198d

I really do not understand, now is that supposed to mean II or XI?

sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 199d

Kids under 2' is a whole different type of measurement

Chick0nPlayz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 199d

I'd prefer London do me