Now that this is settled, startups (or any company for that matter) require significant up-front capital. The gate is creating a company and not the point where a company fails. Most of the time lots of funds or not companies going to the dogs will just be liquidated instead of resuscitated.
Yes that is the legal justification. I am not interested in the legal justification. Laws are not inherently good. They were clearly paid less than their worth if there's six figure payouts to be had here.
This is the fundamental injustice of capitalism. The owner pays you a small amount and keeps all the profits. A child would recognize that as unfair.
23 Comments
EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world · 142 pts · 131d
So AI will help you to fail your own company
kambusha@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 131d
Now I can disappoint my parents in less than 10 seconds. Just like my girlfriends.
Tja@programming.dev · 5 pts · 130d
Why do your girlfriends disappoint your parents in less than 10 seconds?
Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz · 115 pts · 131d
I can't imagine an AI trained primarily on the communications of failed startups will be particularly effective.
AnthropomorphicCat@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 131d
Just do the complete opposite of what they did and you should be fine.
13igTyme@piefed.social · 26 pts · 131d
My start up didn't have a rich CEO with rich parents to save them when they fail.
Step 1: already be rich.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 131d
I mean... It's definitely a solid first step
silverneedle@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 130d
I want to found literally anything.
Step 1: already be rich.
Now that this is settled, startups (or any company for that matter) require significant up-front capital. The gate is creating a company and not the point where a company fails. Most of the time lots of funds or not companies going to the dogs will just be liquidated instead of resuscitated.
Nalivai@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 130d
As opposed to what it is now, right?
sparky@lemmy.federate.cc · 2 pts · 130d
“synergize”
MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip · 43 pts · 131d
Now AI will participate in workplace theater for you!
jtrek@startrek.website · 29 pts · 131d
This feels like theft. Maybe not technically legally but the people who did the chatting aren't getting the money. Capitalist hellscape
PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 131d
The employer owns everything you produce at work. Documents, code, emails, everything.
Tja@programming.dev · -1 pts · 130d
The people doing the chatting already got a paycheck for the chatting (among others).
jtrek@startrek.website · 5 pts · 130d
Yes that is the legal justification. I am not interested in the legal justification. Laws are not inherently good. They were clearly paid less than their worth if there's six figure payouts to be had here.
This is the fundamental injustice of capitalism. The owner pays you a small amount and keeps all the profits. A child would recognize that as unfair.
Tja@programming.dev · -3 pts · 129d
That's right, a child. Adults behave differently, fortunately.
Zoot@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 129d
Tja@programming.dev · 0 pts · 129d
Respecting contracts has nothing to do with billionaires.
Etterra@discuss.online · 23 pts · 130d
Some of them are selling to equity firms do be cannibalized and advanced/destroyed, or weirder, radically rebranded. For example:
Wispy2891@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 130d
I want to point out to other Lemmy users that this example it is not generic but it's a real life example (allbirds)
Etterra@discuss.online · 5 pts · 130d
Yeah I forgot to mention that part, thanks.
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 131d
Lol are they trying to train an LLM to sound like a disgruntled worker at a failing company?
solrize@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 131d
My great startup idea is workable at last! Monetize your spam!!
eletes@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 129d
Krazam is calling the future
https://youtu.be/IU4ByUbDKNc