Over 80 Chrome Extensions Found Selling Their Users Data - And It’s All Completely Legal

Nobody should still be using Chrome after they killed proper ad blocking. The browser is a legitimate security threat.

The largest extensions in the network: 

• Custom Profile Picture for Netflix (200K users)

• Hulu Ad Skipper (100K)

• Netflix Picture in Picture (100K)

• Ad Skipper for Prime Video (60K)

• Netflix Extended (60K)

• Stands AdBlocker (3M users) sells browsing data to third parties for “market analytics purposes.”

•	Poper Blocker (2M users) discloses selling identifiers, browsing activity, behavioral profiles, and inferred sensitive data – including health conditions, religious beliefs, and sexual orientation, all inferred from the URLs you visit.

•	All Block, an ad blocker for YouTube (500K users), sells anonymized data “for analytical and commercial purposes.” Published by an entity called Curly Doggo Limited, based in London.

•	TwiBlocker (80K users) discloses transferring browsing data to third parties who “process or sell it for analytical purposes.”

•	Urban AdBlocker (10K users) routes browsing data and AI conversations through the BiScience data broker.

•	Career.io Job Auto Apply (10K users) states in its policy that it may use personal data collected from your resume to sell to third parties, including data brokers, for targeted advertising and profiling. A job application tool that sells your resume.

•	Dog Cuties (6K users) is a cute dog wallpaper new-tab extension. Confirmed data seller through the Apex Media network.

•	EmailOnDeck (10K users) is a temporary email service – a tool people use specifically when they don’t want to share their real information. Its policy states it may sell, rent, or share its mailing list.

•	Survey Junkie discloses selling URLs visited, clickstream data, and “modeled information” about consumer preferences to market research agencies, ad agencies, and data analytics providers.

• Dashy New Tab (10K users) has its Chrome Web Store listing marked “does not sell your data.” Its actual privacy policy marks data as “Sold or Shared: Yes.” We believe this is CCPA compliance language for standard analytics, not commercial data sales – which is why we left it out. But the contradiction between the store listing and the privacy policy is real. If a publisher’s own policy says “Sold or Shared: Yes” and the store listing says the opposite, which one should users trust?

Props to the article for listing some of the extensions.

Sure do wish they'd list all that they investigated and publish as a "sells data / doesn't sell data"

If you're still using Chrome in 2026, you get what you get.

As if chrome users would give a fuck. I mean, they use chrome and probably all else that is google.

thought the thumbnail was MF DOOM for a sec

In the US maybe, I doubt this is legal in the EU. It is most definitely illegal with sensitive data like health data.

Who even installs these?

It's the evolution of shareware.

Is it really news that tech and associated companies say the security of their users is important to them while grossly violating that principle.

Just use the eff ones if they're ever in this position we're done

ohhhhh nooooooo this is soooooo horrible /s