The Trump administration on Monday announced the creation a $1.7 billion fund to compensate allies of the Republican president who believe they were mistreated by the Biden administration Justice Department.
The “Anti-Weaponization Fund” was announced by the Justice Department as part of a deal to resolve President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in announcing the fund in a statement that it was “a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.”
Democrats and government watchdogs immediately pledged to fight what they called a “corrupt” and unprecedented resolution, warning that the arrangement would unjustly enrich people close to the president with taxpayer dollars and open the door to meritless claims of political persecution.
Trump’s lawyers disclosed the dismissal of the case in a filing Monday in federal court in Florida, where the president sued earlier this year.
The fund would represent not only a highly unorthodox resolution but also a further demonstration of the administration’s eagerness to reward allies who before Trump came to power were investigated and in some cases charged and convicted. Most notably, the president on his first day back in office pardoned or commuted the sentences of supporters who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His Justice Department since then has approved payouts to supporters entangled in the Trump-Russia investigation and investigated and prosecuted some of his perceived adversaries.
“This case is nothing but a racket designed to take $1.7 billion of taxpayer dollars out of the Treasury and pour it into a huge slush fund for Trump at DOJ to hand out to his private militia of insurrectionists, rioters, and white supremacists, including those who brutally beat police officers on January 6, 2021, and sycophant accomplices to his election stealing schemes,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.
Trump’s attorneys suggested in their court filing seeking to dismiss the case that the resolution would not be reviewable by a judge. But a group of 93 members of Congress filed a brief teeing up a challenge.
Justice Department announces a $1.7B fund to compensate Trump allies in a deal to drop IRS suit
https://apnews.com/article/trump-lawsuit-irs-leak-3729de38770b558be01712a143437bf8
19 Comments
ExtremeDullard@piefed.social · 80 pts · 79d
As LegalEagle says, we're living through multiple Watergates per week. The grift is the norm now, and you're the one paying for it.
Sanctus@anarchist.nexus · 34 pts · 79d
Theres a way we can make this 1 Watergate a week drop down to zero. But it involves a whole shit load of us deciding we have had enough before this fucker's four years are up.
TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 79d
I think the silent and war generations who grew up struggling during the Great Depression and experienced WWII, who held their Cold War era presidents accountable because of their experience, are vanishing. Their descendants, us, became complacent and pampered by material wealth. We barely struggled compared to the older generations, so we don't know how to fight for our rights.
tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 79d
I agree with the general point, but I don't think people don't know how to fight: there's just apathetic. Mass entertainment media and many social media platforms do a great job at distracting people from politics. Add this to the decline in education in the US, and you have an explanation for whatever's happening in the US right now.
Skyrmir@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 79d
Where does a president get the authority to create a fund?
homes@piefed.world · 45 pts · 79d
He doesn’t. In fact, it’s expressly illegal and a lot of different ways, but he stacked the court, filled the DOJ with cronies, and Congress is doing absolutely nothing to stop him.
MisterD@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 79d
The People should just sue him for the money back.
Kirp123@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 79d
If no one is stopping him from doing so then he has the authority.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe · 1 pts · 79d
"Where does it say he can't? GOTCHA!" - MAGA
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 79d
Streisand the shit out of his IRS payments. I pay more taxes than the billionaire trump.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump#Contents_of_returns
Bwaz@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 79d
Gotta wonder how having his tax retuns exposed was supposed to hurt him to the tune of $1B+. Or even $1k+. Particularly since he PROMISED to make them public back around 2016 (and didn't). Having them exposed could only hurt him if he was trying to hide something. A complete and total scam. And fools still support him and his GOP at the ballot box.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 75d
It was to the tune of $10B, but the judge was going to go against him. So he did this at the last minute so he wouldn't lose out on the opportunity to scam the money.
NekoKoneko@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 79d
The articles are doing a disservice by treating DOJ and Trump's actions to "settle" the "case" (quotations since neither is legitimate) as if it was already done. No, Trump is still trying to do it. It's a common tactic of Trump's team to act lawlessly and make people feel powerless and resigned that it's already done. This particular criminal looting is not beyond intervention yet.
It least it seems, this needs to be approved by a judge who has not yet ruled on the requests to dismiss the case (and thereby allow the settlement to proceed):
The headlines basically are saying, this is a deal, it's done. The last quote above suggests there is a "dismissal" but elsewhere clearly implies the dismissal request is pending. A reader may feel like this already happened and therefore there's nothing they can do about it. And indeed, it may happen. But the judge already said she is looking at the conflict of interest issue:
Ozzy@piefeed.com · 10 pts · 79d
Biggest grift in history continues.
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 79d
bribing for support
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 79d
More like The (Perversion of) Justice Department.
Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 79d
“Allies who believe they were mistreated by the Biden administration”.
So that’s all going directly to Trump, right?
reddig33@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 79d
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 79d
When has it?
Brkdncr@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 79d
This fund will be empty come the next presidential election.