If what OP said was actually true, then it would make investigating child porn cases nearly impossible. Someone does have to watch the footage to determine if a crime was committed, and often the people who have to do that end up having major mental health issues as a result.
Wouldn't a detective or whatever do that though and not the jury? Or would they actually show a Jury that?
I'm gonna tell them I think they should hang drunk drivers or some other outlandish stuff if they ever put me in a potential jury pool just to make sure I get immediately sent home and never get contacted for it again.
The cops can watch it, copy it, sell it on the dark web, pass it up to their bosses, use the panopticon to find the kid in question, hunt them for sport, black bag them, rape them, force a confession through torture, and then throw the kid into the serial sexual assault wing of the state prison for 30 years.
Funny you mention this. I attended an all guys boarding school in the 90s.
If there existed WebCams and the Internet, I would be a gay porn billionaire.
Instead, I just have a lot of very fond of memories, and then knowledge that there is no such thing as a straight man. A little bit of weed, and any guy loves having his asshole licked.
...dunno how this works in other parts of the world, but here in Europe they'd try you as a minor and seal the evidence - which they'd do whether you'd be naked in security footage or not. It just doesn't matter, they'd examine the evidence as a part of the proceedings nonetheless!
I don't think this is explicitly illegal anywhere, but related laws can be interpreted to make it so. Judges have a LOT of leeway in this area, so much so, the "kid" could be a legal adult, and also fully dressed.
52 Comments
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip · 92 pts · 75d
Where I live, nudity is not by itself considered indecent, so this would not be true.
So, be sure to rub one out during the crime.
pulsey@feddit.org · 18 pts · 75d
they called him the rubbing robber
Bratosch@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 75d
Nananananananana BEATMAN
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 75d
In the U.S. at least a naked child isn't obscene. Also if they masturbate on camera the police and courts absolutely can still view it.
merc@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 75d
If what OP said was actually true, then it would make investigating child porn cases nearly impossible. Someone does have to watch the footage to determine if a crime was committed, and often the people who have to do that end up having major mental health issues as a result.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 75d
Heroes - hope they’re nightmare-proof people
DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 75d
Wouldn't a detective or whatever do that though and not the jury? Or would they actually show a Jury that?
I'm gonna tell them I think they should hang drunk drivers or some other outlandish stuff if they ever put me in a potential jury pool just to make sure I get immediately sent home and never get contacted for it again.
Fedizen@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 75d
Or it attracts people to these positions that are looking to view these things.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 75d
If a minor is provocatively nude in front of a surveillance camera, could they be prosecuted for production of child pornography?
Lemminary@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 75d
I wouldn't be surprised, tbh.
Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 75d
Hence why the nudist colony of all ages can be naked together. Its completely legal
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 87 pts · 75d
The cops can watch it, copy it, sell it on the dark web, pass it up to their bosses, use the panopticon to find the kid in question, hunt them for sport, black bag them, rape them, force a confession through torture, and then throw the kid into the serial sexual assault wing of the state prison for 30 years.
binux@sh.itjust.works · 62 pts · 75d
I'm just imagining someone saying this in response to OP's joke at a party and this is the (natural) response
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 75d
She's into it
binux@sh.itjust.works · 38 pts · 75d
There's always a 10th dentist
JordanZ@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 75d
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 75d
Something just awoke in her
joelfromaus@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 75d
Her inner voice donned a police cap.
lobut@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 75d
whenever I see the reaction on the girls face I feel embarrassed but when I look at the guy's face ... I don't know why I can't help but laugh.
jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 75d
...which would be a crime so yes not a counterexample but still yes you can of course say those things if you like.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 75d
flandish@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 75d
history has shown that there exists a cohort of folks the concept of “crime” does not apply to.
halfapage@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 75d
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 75d
Don't get in the way of Lemmites trying to be edge lords.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 75d
But I'm still technically innocent lol
abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone · 50 pts · 75d
That's where your wrong, they hire people to do that.
lime@feddit.nu · 30 pts · 75d
commit crimes?
abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone · 35 pts · 75d
Ironically, yes!
Oisteink@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 75d
Not legally, but yeah, you can hire minors to do your crime.
https://bra.se/english/publications/archive/2025-01-21-children-and-youth-in-criminal-networks
lime@feddit.nu · 5 pts · 75d
oh i'd rather it not be minors. children have no sense of quality.
Oisteink@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 75d
In crime quantity can take you pretty far pretty fast
But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 75d
If you kill a guy right at daylight savings and go home. You’re not lying when you say you were at home at 2am
MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 75d
In the vein of threads about genies that fuck with your wishes:
Picked the wrong direction of daylight savings time, so instead of rolling back to 1am it went to 3am.
OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 75d
What if you’re an adult but you just strap naked minors to your body?
Wait, no that would raise other issues I suppose.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 75d
They legally can’t stop you if you declare that it’s an official action.
homes@piefed.world · 18 pts · 75d
Funny you mention this. I attended an all guys boarding school in the 90s.
If there existed WebCams and the Internet, I would be a gay porn billionaire.
Instead, I just have a lot of very fond of memories, and then knowledge that there is no such thing as a straight man. A little bit of weed, and any guy loves having his asshole licked.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 75d
https://catalogofbias.org/biases/selection-bias/
homes@piefed.world · 13 pts · 75d
Meh. Had a gay ol’ time, that’s all I know.
RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip · 8 pts · 75d
The truth is sometimes men are just too horny to care about whose hole or tongue it is.
homes@piefed.world · 4 pts · 75d
Or just too lonely
I grew up in the 80s and we were promised a future that was gonna be awesome.
We got a future that fucking sucks
Just keep taking turns with your work buddy. It’s easy and it feels good.
Fedizen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 75d
Look its not gay if you say "good game" afterwards. Then its just lads winding down.
Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 75d
Nudity is not pornography.... But, say, you were rubbing one out while robbing a store...
napkin2020@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 75d
Rubber rubbing robber
tias@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 75d
Says who? Certainly not the law.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 75d
Incorrect. Only poor people cannot watch the footage.
qwertyasdf@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 75d
db2@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 75d
Also known as an Epstein island audition.
umbraroze@piefed.social · 5 pts · 75d
...dunno how this works in other parts of the world, but here in Europe they'd try you as a minor and seal the evidence - which they'd do whether you'd be naked in security footage or not. It just doesn't matter, they'd examine the evidence as a part of the proceedings nonetheless!
GhostFace@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 75d
You can do a lot of things as a minor as long as you keep receipts. And I guess as long as they're someone who isn't wealthy.
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 75d
Just claim that it's actually generated by Grok! /j
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 75d
I don't think this is explicitly illegal anywhere, but related laws can be interpreted to make it so. Judges have a LOT of leeway in this area, so much so, the "kid" could be a legal adult, and also fully dressed.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · -5 pts · 75d
In civilised countries minors can't commit crimes anyways.
cattywampas@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 75d
What does this mean
ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com · 32 pts · 75d
In civilizated countries, it's illegal for children to commit crimes, so they can't.
lime@feddit.nu · 10 pts · 75d
in civilised countries children can't commit crimes. anything and everything they do is automatically legal.
Mubelotix@jlai.lu · 2 pts · 75d