A lack of sex held back life's diversity for millions of years, fossil study finds

https://phys.org/news/2026-06-lack-sex-held-life-diversity.html

229 points · 22 comments · view on lemmy.world

22 Comments

PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus · 75 pts · 53d (8 replies)

Glad to know I'm in good company 😆

5715@feddit.org · 26 pts · 53d (7 replies)

They were not not having sex because had trouble finding a mate, they didn't have sex because they didn't need to... :)

TachyonTele@piefed.social · 42 pts · 53d (1 reply)

Well you know WHAT SUSAN I Dont need to have sex either! And further more, I enjoy sleeping on this couch!!

Maroon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 52d
[ removed ]
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 18 pts · 53d (1 reply)

I'm sure that's what they told themselves.

5715@feddit.org · 5 pts · 53d

I mean, they kinda had to, because... you know... they were all by themselves

Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 53d (2 replies)

Sex just hadn't been invented yet

searabbit@piefed.social · 8 pts · 53d (1 reply)

Now I'm wondering what kinda freaky organism invented sex for the first time

ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 53d

Whatever it was, it was probably Fr*nch.

dxdydz@slrpnk.net · 42 pts · 53d

“It took getting freaky for life to get freaky” was right there…

AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 30 pts · 53d (2 replies)

Well the diversity of the Cambrian explosion makes more sense now. Life on earth discovered sex and just had a few million year long planet-wide orgy lol

On a serious note, what if that’s actually kind of what happened? Like what if species specific sexual reproduction wasn’t the norm when life was starting out? If animals were basically just accepting whatever DNA was given them—regardless of whether it was from their species or not—sure lots of the offspring wouldn’t be viable, but ample food and lacking predators means you can try again. This kind of breeding would facilitate some incredible genetic diversity which is exactly what we see in the Cambrian diversification.

We have no idea why so many of them looked the way they do, but what if thats because they inherited lots of traits they didn’t need?

GentriFriedRice@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 53d (1 reply)

I think that's a little backwards. Evolution is all about filling niches. The article seems to state Ediacaran diversity was driven by phenotypic (environment-induced) variation caused by ecological stressors. They claim sexual reproduction seems to be a product of environmental factors which drove the diversification.

It's thought that the Ediacaran had fewer viable niches than the Cambrian, it's just really not understood why that is. We don't really see anything near that explosion in diversity again until the land-colonization of the Devonian which is kind of the same explosion driven by unoccupied niche phenomena

Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 52d

Was that Worms and the churning up of the sea floor, or was that earlier than the Ediacaran?

Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 pts · 53d (1 reply)

Same

darthsundhaft@piefed.social · 4 pts · 53d

Same

Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 52d

Yeah, me too.

danekrae@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 53d (1 reply)

"Cool, what is this I grew?! Maybe I can stick it in whatever that thing over there is."

janus2@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 53d

probably what the first bacterium to spontaneously mutate the gene for an F pilus "thought"

FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 53d

SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 53d

sorry about that

bfg9k@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 53d

...so fish don't always fuck in it?

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 53d

That’s what she said!

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 4 pts · 53d

Epic handshake meme material