Strikes on Bemani damaged key water reservoir for 20,000 people living in area amid a historic drought in the country
Military strikes that damaged two water storage facilities in southern Iran may constitute a war crime, military and legal experts say, after reviewing media reports and visual evidence of a 10 June strike on Bemani, a small district about 2 miles from the strait of Hormuz.
It’s unclear if the strikes deliberately targeted the district’s water tanks, or if they unintentionally destroyed a key reservoir for about 20,000 people living nearby. But if the tanks were the target, then the legal question becomes critical, Brian Finucane, a former state department lawyer, said. “It’s either a military objective or it’s a civilian object: attacking one is lawful, attacking the other is a war crime,” Finucane said.
79 Comments
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 115 pts · 68d
Bruh the administration has been like.. "We're going to do war crimes".. then proceed to do what they said.. and the lawyers are like "Welll maaybeee its a bit war-crimey..." while the administration is like yeah no dog we doing war crimes.
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 68d
Dunno why the voters who didnt do anything when they couldve are upset that the shitty govt they got isnt doing anything. Well duh.
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 68d
That's the part that pisses me off most. If kamala would've won, she'd be better than trump, for sure. But beyond that, this fucker would be rotting in prison right now.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 14 pts · 68d
Correct.
Now think on: If Bernie had won 2016, we could have been spared all of this madness.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 67d
I'll do you one better: if the natives were able to kill the colonists that "discovered" the new world, we could have avoided the whole genocide and slavery thing.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · -1 pts · 67d
yeah because genocide and slavery started in 1492?
pfftt hahaha... you ML guys either have tapioca for brains or actively ignore history...
wait, could it be both?
that said, " if the natives were able to kill the colonists that “discovered” the new world" coulda been cool af. But the Aztecs kinda already had a good grasp on genocide and slavery as their empire was built on outward expansion, acquisition of their neighbors and their property, and they were really into human sacrifice.
but yeah would be awesome to see the cortez and columbus types torn to pieces on the shores....
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 66d
Obviously I was talking about the genocide and slavery that America is well known for. I love tapioca!
Yeah unfortunately they didn't get the Cook treatment, lol.
frisbird@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 65d
Genocide and slavery are abstract concepts. In history there are isolated phenomena of genocide and slavery we can pull out and discuss. But there is a single historical process of genocide and slavery that we are literally still participating in and we can generally call that historical process the Western European Empire. The Western European empire as we know it extends back in an unbroken line for at least 600 years and it integrated genocide and slavery into its core process of propagation. At it's height, the Western European Empire dominated over 80% of the world population. The USA is the helm of the Western European Empire, and we could potentially call it the North Atlantic Empire, because some people get confused by the fact they think the USA is not Western European. Regardless, yes, if the indigenous people literally everywhere were able to send every Western European expedition packing, the world would be in a much better place. If the inhabitants of what we call the Western Hemisphere had done it, the world would be in a better place. But since they didn't, it is up to all of us to do the work of decolonizing our homes and bringing about an end to this historical process.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · 8 pts · 68d
Biden's AG didn't, and she campaigned exclusively to republicans, no shot she'd appoint an AG who would, for fear of alienating the imaginary moderate republicans.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 67d
You do realize Jack Smith put together two bullerproof cases against him and they were both ready to go to court, and the only reason they didn't was because the Scotus punted until after the election...?
P00ptart@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 67d
You're talking federal crimes though. If he didn't become president again, it wouldn't be up to the federal government. He had more than enough crimes against states to put him away for life.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 67d
Lmao. You think Kamala "fundamentally the same as Biden" Harris would prosecute trump, after Biden declined to pursue justice?
P00ptart@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 67d
State crimes at least would have gotten him there.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 67d
Sure buddy, he'd be the first and only president to face any justice, lol.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 67d
Dunno why the voters would be so apathetic when both candidates were pro genocide and pro war. Weird.
Kanda@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 67d
Well at least they followed through on what they said for once
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 68d
war-crimey
I like that word.
radiofreebc@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 68d
Gormadt@slrpnk.net · 13 pts · 68d
Hell it even started with a crime against humanity! (that school for those who have forgotten (there's been SO MUCH going on))
village604@adultswim.fan · 40 pts · 68d
May?
Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 68d
Exactly.. May?
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 68d
No 'may' about it.
partofthevoice@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 68d
It’s even June, bro. May was last month.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 67d
Dude, the day before yesterday was already the 10th
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 67d
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 67d
Fuck. I'm travelling through time again.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 67d
I’m so sick of all the conditional language that lets trump continue to be a piece of shit that should have been imprisoned decades ago for rapes and tax dodging among other crimes or shot for war crimes today.
monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 67d
The crazier thing is that all these news organizations have lawyers on retainers and still they don’t use them. Call it a war crime, put your lawyers to work. A bunch of fucking cowards the lot of them.
Then you have “entertainment news” out there calling Obama a muslim born in Kenya for a decade. The world is upside down.
godsammitdam@lemmy.zip · 25 pts · 67d
The fuck do they mean "may?" In what realistic context does it not?
Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 66d
I was thinking the exact same thing. This world has become a clownshow.
ChetManly@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 67d
"may". Lol
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 67d
Have a fucking spine.
"Targeting civil infrastructure is a war crime... we destroyed civilian infrastructure"
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 68d
That's why the US is so adversary to the International Criminal Court.
Leviathan@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 67d
US Presidents and war crimes go together like Republicanism and pedophilia, classic combo.
magnue@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 68d
Being a billionaire pedo is a crime too according to some experts but here we are.
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 68d
no shit?
em2@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 68d
and none of it matters because there will be zero consequences
Bwaz@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 67d
may constitute a war crime?!?
VitoRobles@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 67d
Bombing a school for young girls is a war crime. Still no punishments
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 67d
Tired of all this limply worded tripe that comes from people's mouths and headlines.
trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf · 15 pts · 67d
Getting really sick of these headlines feigning ignorance
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 68d
"War Crimes? What's that? We're no longer apart of NATO because it's too WOKE now, so war crimes don't exist!" -- Trump, Probably
Magnum@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 67d
When did the US leave NATO?
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 67d
Soon enough if they actually try to charge Trump with being a war criminal, lol
Magnum@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 67d
The NATO charges people with anything? Are you by any chance american?
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 67d
No. The UN does iirc, I mistaked the UN for NATO, but I thought it made the quote funnier since Trump wouldn't know the difference, would he? Yes though, I am an American
Magnum@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 66d
Funny how you thought its funny that Trump makes the mistake while making the mistake. He is so stupid amiright?
pirate2377@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 66d
I mean, he's said worse
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 67d
Pretty sure they're thinking of the UN (whose Geneva Convention first codified war crimes)..and still wrong about the US leaving 😄
Formfiller@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 67d
This entire administration is a war crime
NightTitan@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 67d
That hesgeth ain't no sissy. He's a war criminal. Him and the whole administration. Fuck. These. Animals.
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 8 pts · 67d
Put it on the pile.
Prior_Industry@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 66d
It's never going to be enforced, so I guess this is just a footnote in history.
bufalo1973@piefed.social · 7 pts · 67d
MAY???
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 67d
The very war is a war crime.
nullspace@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 67d
War crime? More like bore crime. It's time for some cagefighting at the White House! WOOOOO!!!
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 68d
Seems like every war I've been alive for has multiple war crimes and aside from a select few exceptions, nothing happens. We, the US, can't hold our people accountable for domestic crimes, so I'm not holding out much hope for any consequences here either.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 68d
almost all the recent wars all the way to nixon was merely a distraction something domestic, this time its distraction from the cabal of pedophiles .
Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 66d
Try withholding 1$ of your taxmoney then xd
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 67d
Fucking may? What clown wrote this headline?
howdy@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 68d
bro, whether or not if was the intended target should not affect if it was a war crime or not??
you can't just say oops teehee 😇 and absolve yourself??????
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 5 pts · 68d
Nothing is going to happen either way, so we may as well dispense with the niceties like "it may constitute" and just be honest with each other. It is a war crime, but we don't feel like there's any realistic opportunity to do anything about it so, there's no harm in saying it is, nothing will happen, and we'll all move on.
Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 68d
Just add it to the fucking pile, Jesus Christ
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 67d
underThunder@thelemmy.club · 4 pts · 67d
Professorozone@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 66d
Oh no! This WAR has risen to the level of war crimes! Well someone's gonna answer for this now!
/s
stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 67d
It pretty obviously is one. But who is really the governing authority to make it official?
BigMacHole@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 67d
WAR Crimes? FINALLY something to STOP the Law and Order Crowd! ANY Minute they'll DENOUNCE these WAR CRIMES because it's OPPOSITE Law AND Order! ANY Minute it will happen! SOON!
Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 68d
Good luck prosecuting when the US when it doesn't recognize the ICC
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 68d
It does create a war crime. It can't yet be declared until the case is heard. Will it be heard and considered in court? Will Israels war crimes be heard and considered in court?
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 2 pts · 68d
sure, right after they get to all of Russia's war crimes in Ukraine. Any day now. Yep.
fuck
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 67d
And Ukraine war crimes against Russia? They've been using unmanned "killbots" which don't have the ability to accept a surrendering soldier.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 2 pts · 67d
yes, to kill soldiers; russia uses drones to hunt and kill civilians.
sorry, if russia hadn't started the stupid war they wouldn't be in this shitty position to start with. I have ZERO FUCKING SYMPATHY for putin's shit show, slava ukraine!
wpb@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 66d
Using mustard gas to kill soldiers is a war crime. The key determining factors for a war crime are typically excessive cruelty, and indiscriminateness. Mustard gas cannot tell the difference between a soldier holding up a white flag and one that is about to charge at you. Hence a war crime.
Some stuff that typically doesn't factor into something being a war crime: is the other side really bad; is it used to kill soldiers; is it effective.
I'm not saying Ukraine is committing war crimes. I don't know. But what I am saying is that "they're using it on soldiers" is not a counterargument. And what I'm also saying is that just because they're in the right in this conflict does not mean they're incapable of committing war crimes.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 1 pts · 66d
if vatnicks didn't want to fertilize ukrainian soil they should stay the fuck out of ukraine
wpb@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 66d
Look, I'm not saying Ukrainians defending themselves is a bad thing. But, and I know this may be controversial, war crimes are a bad thing. And I'm going to get even more edgy and contrarian: I don't think anyone should commit war crimes.
Do you think war crimes would be justified in Ukraines defense? Do you think it would be ok for Ukrainians to torture PoWs to get information? Do you think they should be allowed to keep ethnic Russians in concentration camps the same way America did for the Japanese? Because if Ukraine were to start doing these things (or if it turned out they were doing these things), that would be cause for me to start doubting whether they were the good guys in this conflict.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 1 pts · 66d
the only evidence I have of war crimes are your aspersions.
I know the russians have been killing civilians indiscriminately.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 67d
Russia does not have the capability to use unmanned drones to hunt and kill civilians. Killing a surrendering soldier is a war crime, full stop. You are just as bloodthirsty as your demented pedophile president. Good luck with all that.
borkborkbork@piefed.social · 0 pts · 67d
Pretty sure you know the truth.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/02/1160016
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/28/world/europe/kherson-ukraine-drones-russia.html
https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/2025-deadliest-year-for-civilians-in-Ukraine-since-2022-UN-human-rights-monitors-find
https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/the-observers/20260221-ukraine-life-russian-drones-civilians
Meanwhile, Russian soldiers surrender to drones often:
https://factually.co/fact-checks/military/are-russians-surrendering-to-ukrainians-2026-613d1e
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/46155
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkirichenko/2026/03/11/russian-soldiers-are-now-surrendering-to-ukrainian-drones-and-robots/
If you're going to post bullshit, at least find something to back it up with.
Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 66d
Lol, I see you don't know the difference between an unmanned killbot and a piloted drone. Get back to me after you do some more reading.
Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 67d
Well, Trump is a convicted criminal so might as well add War criminal to that list.