Honestly, that's a steal. It was the last good year of the tesseract on that frame. After that they had nothing but problems with them leaking into fifth dimension space and good luck finding a mechanic that's glimpsed that and is still sane.
Typical example of a car manufacturer losing touch with what the public wants. Four dimensional cars were a hard sell, most people didn't really get it. And nobody gives a rat's ass about the fifth dimension except using it as a place to dump their trash.
He needed a 4d mechanic, but his car was already repaired, he just wasn't aware of it until it had broken again, but by that time, the 4d mechanic had unionized.
I will admit I didn’t think that maybe the site itself was using AI, and even sources I’ve found saying so aren’t entirely reliable (although I wouldn’t be surprised), so dare I say this wasn’t me denying “common sense.”
Ah, my bad for being a dick about it. Seeing people asking AI if shit is true/real has gotten so bad I instantly start slamming my head into the desk without pausing to make sure they knew that's what they were doing first.
No worries, I appreciate it. The whole situation around AI is just unfortunate, including the arguments about things being AI-generated (or how to tell they are without throwing it back at AI.)
If something doesn't have a synthid or similar thing built in to generated images by a very few AI companies then there is no way to tell if image, video, or text was created by AI unless it has an obvious tell, which is getting more and more rare.
Possibly. Could be other image editing. Since the picture didn't seem to exist on the internet until a few days ago I imagine it's AI, the entire point is that unfortunately there's no way to be sure unless you know something's provenance.
A tesseract is a spatial solid and not a temporal one. We don't map cubes in a temporal temporal way, and also when abstracting dimensions the spatial is separate from the temporal so assigning time an ordered number is fairly useless. Why we call the fabric "space-time".
38 Comments
chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 22d
Honestly, that's a steal. It was the last good year of the tesseract on that frame. After that they had nothing but problems with them leaking into fifth dimension space and good luck finding a mechanic that's glimpsed that and is still sane.
bampop@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 22d
Typical example of a car manufacturer losing touch with what the public wants. Four dimensional cars were a hard sell, most people didn't really get it. And nobody gives a rat's ass about the fifth dimension except using it as a place to dump their trash.
comador@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 22d
How do we know its not totalled from inside its own 4th dimensional space?:
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 22d
You'd need a 4d mechanic, wouldn't you?
db2@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 22d
Sorry I retired from that, I only play 5D chess in the park now. Literally inside the park.
Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 22d
He needed a 4d mechanic, but his car was already repaired, he just wasn't aware of it until it had broken again, but by that time, the 4d mechanic had unionized.
Venator@lemmy.nz · 5 pts · 22d
I wouldn't recommend that model anyway: the crumple zone is your forehead on your 3rd birthday.
Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf · 34 pts · 22d
This looks ai generated
Jestzer@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 22d
Other parts of the internet would agree with you
Abyssian@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 22d
Please don't waste your time with AI 'AI detectors'. Unless there's a synthid or something similar, they're entirely bullshit.
The last thing anyone should ever be using AI for is telling them what is and isn't real/true.
Jestzer@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 22d
I will admit I didn’t think that maybe the site itself was using AI, and even sources I’ve found saying so aren’t entirely reliable (although I wouldn’t be surprised), so dare I say this wasn’t me denying “common sense.”
Abyssian@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 22d
Ah, my bad for being a dick about it. Seeing people asking AI if shit is true/real has gotten so bad I instantly start slamming my head into the desk without pausing to make sure they knew that's what they were doing first.
Jestzer@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 22d
No worries, I appreciate it. The whole situation around AI is just unfortunate, including the arguments about things being AI-generated (or how to tell they are without throwing it back at AI.)
Abyssian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 22d
If something doesn't have a synthid or similar thing built in to generated images by a very few AI companies then there is no way to tell if image, video, or text was created by AI unless it has an obvious tell, which is getting more and more rare.
PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 22d
That’s obviously a Missouri plate too and looks credible as someone with one…
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 21d
That image is obviously AI though, the bumper on that tesseract is way too small compared to the grass blades
Abyssian@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 21d
Possibly. Could be other image editing. Since the picture didn't seem to exist on the internet until a few days ago I imagine it's AI, the entire point is that unfortunately there's no way to be sure unless you know something's provenance.
Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 22d
Good to know my ai sense is still somewhat accurate
FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org · 20 pts · 22d
My brain:
hehe ford dimension...
testaccount789@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 22d
"Lemmy has just hit a second tesseract"
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 22d
does it come with its own list or will @ptz@dubvee.org force one on me after purchase?
pentastarm@piefed.ca · 7 pts · 22d
Yes, but it's hidden in the Ford Service Contract.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 22d
In a zipped json file hidden as a BASE64 blob.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 22d
it might as well be in the glove compartment of a 1993 ford ranger.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social · 7 pts · 22d
https://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/CrookedHouse.pdf
Educate yourselves.
A crazy architect talks a dim bulb into building a house based on a tesseract.
High jinx ensue.
jjj@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 22d
Super funny except for the casual misogyny which deserves a trigger warning. 60s for you I guess.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 22d
hey! trigger warnings trigger me.
maybe give a trigger warning the next time you're giving a trigger warning.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social · 4 pts · 22d
I can't remember the name of the novel.
It's a horror / thriller set in the Edwardian Era. There is torture, mutilation, cannibalism, human sacrifice, and plain old murder.
The writer felt compelled to give a trigger warning because of some bad words.
expatriado@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 22d
i knew that name sounded familiar, but my mind hasn't think in 4 dimensions in a while
LSNLDN@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 22d
I’m actually on the list in that dimension not pictured there
Etterra@discuss.online · 2 pts · 22d
So the black list then?
bigbangdangler@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 21d
I believe this outsold the Toyota Terceleract back in the day.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 21d
Great car. You get in one door, you're already there. Get out the other door, you're on the moon. Great gas mileage.
Zannsolo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 22d
Isn't the 4th dimension time so a tesseract should be a 5th dimension object.
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 22d
A tesseract is a spatial solid and not a temporal one. We don't map cubes in a temporal temporal way, and also when abstracting dimensions the spatial is separate from the temporal so assigning time an ordered number is fairly useless. Why we call the fabric "space-time".
Willy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 22d
Remember that time I farted in Seattle?
SourDragon@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 22d
So YOU'RE the shooter!
bitteroldcoot@piefed.social · 2 pts · 22d
Damnit Bob, i told you not to park there. It's a freaking dimensional vortex you idiot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_He_Built_a_Crooked_House
PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 22d