Should the next President of the US pardon Trump for all his crap like Ford did Nixon?

29 points · 59 comments · view on lemmy.world

59 Comments

Triumph@fedia.io · 69 pts · 2d (1 reply)

We got Trump in no small part because Nixon was pardoned.

Natanael@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 1d

14A3 disqualification and legally nullify the entire second term (erases all pardons and eliminates all immunity), impeachment, prosecution for crimes against humanity, put him against the wall

Treczoks@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 2d (5 replies)

Nope. Pardoning Nixon was a mistake that should not be repeated.

Rhaedas@fedia.io · 3 pts · 2d

Giving him a general pardon and not for specifics was the mistake. Alternate history for Nixon going to trial or any other course other than the one he took is a wild ride. As is most points in history, but it would have been an ugly America, so Ford's spoken motive had some merit. Whether Reagan makes it in seems to be a debated point, depending on how long the Nixon trial(s) go.

YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 13h (3 replies)

But he was not a crook, someone said?

Treczoks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4h (2 replies)

Then that someone has slept in school, or had an American education.

YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3h (1 reply)
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 53m

Instead of just throwing in a random YT link, how about some information?

silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk · 37 pts · 2d (5 replies)

I think the country needs nuremburg trials

Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 1d (3 replies)

#GuillotineParty

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1d (2 replies)

Guillotines are tired and boring.

#WoodchipperParty

Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Guillotines are a metaphor, implying the French Revolution.

Wood chippers are a metaphor for Fargo, North Dakota.

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1d

Who said anything about metaphors?

jackal@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 1d

Hear, hear! We need to have an absolute fuckton of trials for people involved in this blatantly corrupt administration.

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2d

Even if Trump copied Nixon by resigning early so Vance could pardon him, he’d still be facing various state charges. (And he could always be extradited outside the US for war crimes.)

Aeao@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 20h (1 reply)

Ford shouldn’t have pardoned Nixon.

SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 4h

Nixon looks like an angel compared to Presidents after him.

Space_Cowboy92@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1d

Fuck no.

HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com · 12 pts · 1d

Fuck no

TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 2d (4 replies)

The next president should arrest every other president and conscribe them to slave labor until the nation's school lunch debts are repaid.

dan1101@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d (1 reply)

And private prisons all closed.

TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 2d

Replaced with The People's Prison where I can throw things at all the incarcerated presidents like a horribly mismanaged zoo

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Does this include digging most of them up and propping them up on trial in the manner of Pope Formosus?

TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 2d

I think that's up to the president, sounds stinky

_haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 2d

Absofuckinglutely not! Nixon shouldn't have been pardoned either!

Malica@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 19h

Bro what next president

fratermus@piefed.social · 8 pts · 1d

No.

pbhj@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1d (1 reply)

You should drop him into Iran to face punishment from the Iranian families whose children he bombed at school.

Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4h

There ain't enough of him to go around. Willing to negotiate sending a musk, hegseth, or thiel though.

o0evillusion0o@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 2d

Nice try, Don. You're not getting off that easy. With the TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES (TM) alone you're looking at way more time than you have left on the earth you're working hard to destroy.

Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d

Fuck no.

Bwaz@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2d

Of course not. He should send Trump and his sons to Guantanimo.

DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 1d

NO. Pardons shouldn't cover unrepentant criminals who know what they're doing.

LodeMike@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 19h

No

Siegfried@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1d

I'm sure of only one thing, the rest of the world won't pardon you so easily you fucktards

SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 4h (1 reply)

Should they or would they? Should they? Of course not. Will they ? Of course because no POTUS wants to set precedent of accountability.

whoneedsgravy@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 1h

It’s like that thing in the drive thru, where the person in the car ahead paid for your coffee. The President pardons the president behind him so the next president can pardon him.

stoly@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1d

Ford was a loyalist who put party over country. We needed a reckoning and that never happened. If it had happened, you'd have found a much different Reagan and Trump presidency.

anon_8675309@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1d

He doesn’t need one. SCOTUS said it’s all legal.

AA5B@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1d

He won’t live long enough to face consequences. Let him pass in infamy as the most corrupt ever. Let him be featured only in history about how fragile democracy can be.

And dish out justice for his minions and sycophants, everyone who violated the constitution, broke laws or enriched themselves. Especially including his family

Toasticus@piefed.social · 5 pts · 21h (4 replies)

Hard to pardon someone who hasn't like...been sentenced or impeached yet. For some reason.

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 21h (3 replies)

except that is literally what Ford did to Nixon, and pardons aren't a thing for impeachment anyway (for US federal offenses)

Aeao@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 20h (2 replies)

I do think you have to admit to the crime tho. I could be wrong but accepting a pardon means you agree you were guilty I believe.

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 20h (1 reply)

You don't have to actively admit to it, though you are right that something like this was held here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States

Aeao@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 19h

Interesting. So you don’t have to admit it but if you accept the pardon you are essentially guilty.

“implicit admission of guilt” it says.

I would assume that means that media could say you are guilty and you couldn’t sue them for slander. Like you don’t have to say you are guilty but you cant claim you are innocent… well you can claim anything I guess but yeah people could safely call you guilty at that point.

Major_Tsiom@fedia.io · 4 pts · 2d

Well no, but the next president will likely be Republican and will surely do it. We can't vote them out anymore. Our last chance was 2024. We have to overthrow them. If we do that, then we should hang Trump.

FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d

No, but they will.

It's a big club, we ain't in it, and their class solidarity is absolute.

chilicheeselies@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 5h

No. We need to make examples.

SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d (1 reply)

The next "president" will quite likely be named trump.

Rivalarrival@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 1d

If they run Hillary or Harris again, you're probably right.

Jon Stewart should be president. And Mark Kelly should be his VP. Media presidents have done exceptionally well at achieving their objectives. The problem is their shitty objectives, not their celebrity.

Thorry@feddit.org · 2 pts · 1d (1 reply)

The whole pardon thing should be abolished ASAP!

stoly@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

The pardon isn't the problem, it's who gets elected. The power of the pardon has existed for a thousand years or so in English Common Law.

ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org · 2 pts · 2d

...?

Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 6h

If he is pardoned, we will get Nixon 3.0 but somehow dumber and more corrupt.

Formfiller@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 13h

No

4grams@awful.systems · 1 pts · 1h

No, not a chance. They need to make these criminals accountable, and if they can’t, they need to invent new laws to lock them away forever (no joke, I don’t care how unconstitutional ot is, never stopped the current administration). Things need to change, this has to be a lesson.

I doubt it will happen though. 4 seconds after winning, if the dems get power, they will once again discover decorum and will claim it to be their most precious asset.

But even then I won’t despair, because at least a slightly less criminal enterprise will be in control and we can vote for better ones next time.

This of course will never happen though, because instead of incremental changes for good in the right direction, moron Americans will fall for the next “one weird trick” when a single election doesn’t solve every problem in the world.

Eh, maybe some despair after all.

peacepath@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 6h

Is there a chance the next president of the US be neither republican nor democrat (for the parties labels)?

Widdershins@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d

I bet the worst thing Nixon stuck his weiner into was a lukewarm Hot Pocket. In his words, "I am not a cook."

x00z@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4h

No. The correct course of action is a public hanging.