fratermus

u/fratermus@piefed.social
1 posts · 152 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

When I was stationed in [the former West] Germany in the 80s one of the guys in my platoon was an avid & considerate traveler. He never claimed to be Canadian but

  • he had a Canadian flag patch on his traveling pack
  • listened to the Dayglo Abortions and knew all the words to Proud to be a Canadian

He didn't want to lumped in with "Ugly American" a-holes. And he wasn't. Probably more due his considerate behavior than flag patch but who knows.

Other proof of his excellence: he took me to my first Fields of the Nephilim, Sisters of Mercy, and Nitzer Ebb shows.

on Amazon · c/thepoliceproblem · 2 pts · 23h

I apologize in advance for the long reply. In my defense A) I am retired; and B) I had two cups of coffee this morning.

TL;DR: I don't know for sure what's happening in the picture. I do know that police forces are agents of the State. I will suggest below that police forces are not structured for (and have no significant interest in) protecting or serving the public.


Yes, but we’re sat here commenting on a picture of police protecting corporate property during a protest, so we are dealing exclusively with “what we might want”

Seems to me that the picture is of "what actually happens". Or happened at that moment.

Everyone piling on complaining that police shouldn’t be doing that,

I didn't say anything about what the police in the pic were doing.

no one has any idea what a competent and well trained police force would be doing instead.

what a competent and well trained NYPD would be doing instead:

  • the NYPD's official mottto is Faithful Unto Death. Doesn't shed much light on what they should be doing.
  • the NYPD Street Crime unit's motto was We Own The Night . That seems a little sketchy to me. Like a statement of power rather than an indication of what they should be doing.
  • the NYPD's old cruiser slogan was Courtesy, Professionalism, Respect . Indicates how they aspired to behave but not what they should have been doing.
  • the NYPD's new slogan cruiser slogan is Fighting Crime, Protecting The Public . Now we have something to work with, a clear statement of what they think they should be doing.

So. Are the officers in the pic fighting crime and/or protecting the public? It's not clear to me that they are but I'm willing to listen to other interpretations.

what a competent and well trained police force would be doing instead:

Normatively, I might say

  • intervening in criminal behavior they observe
  • responding to reports of active criminal behavior
  • investigating reports of past criminal behavior they did not witness
  • first response (along with firefighters and EMTs) to emergency situations

Descriptively,

  • catching slaves and returning them to their owners, historically speaking. Radley Balko does a good job laying this out.
  • providing an income stream to the State
  • NOT providing any particular police service to anyone - Warren v. District of Columbia
  • NOT being too intelligent - Jordan v. City of New London
  • uttering the magic words like "I suspect this was involved in a crime" and seizing [cars, houses, cash, whatever]. Bonus points for using seized assets to buy frozen margarita machines.
  • manipulating suspects (Reid technique) and lying to them (Frazier v. Cupp). It's illegal for suspects to lie, though. Laws for thee but not for me.

Basically citizens are forced to pay for a police force under penalty of fine or imprisonment, but the police don't have to do anything for the citizen. And the police can steal the citizen's stuff with effective impunity. Don't get me started on Q.A. or the incestuous relationships PDs have with DAs (the latter having absolute rather than just qualified immunity).

Do most Americans vote... without any thinking...

Yes. It's rare for a US citizen to be in a different political party or religious denomination than their parents. <- not happening by accident

Also, most people I try to have good faith discussions with speak solely in soundbites they heard in their favorite news ecosystem. No critical thought occurring at all.

on Amazon · c/thepoliceproblem · 5 pts · 1d

So you don’t want the police to protect homeless people, for example?

What we might want and what actually happens are different things. In philosophical terms it's the difference between the normative and the descriptive.

Example: for the several years I was unhoused police harassed me regularly (despite being careful of to break no laws or inconvenience any Normals) and offered help exactly zero times. Admitted it's anecdotal but I don't think it's an outlier case.

"To Serve and Protect [the status quo]"

Questions with my BOFH answers when I'm annoyed. And I'm often annoyed.

  • Q. I downloaded [whatever]. Where is it?
  • A. Wherever you told that dialog box to put it. I wasn't there.

  • Q. What's "any key"?
  • A. It's any key on the keyboard. Pick at random, or pick your favorite letter if you have one. [note: this isn't exactly true but I've never seen anyone pick CapsLock or some other key that might not result in continuance.]

  • Q. Why isn't my computer working?
  • A. It's not turned on.

  • Q. Why can't I run a microwave, air conditioner, and blowdryer off a walmart marine battery in my campervan?
  • A. Because math.

  • Q. how big is a millimeter?
  • A. It's a unit of measurement, so a millimeter is exactly 1mm. You can see them as small hashmarks on most rulers. One inch is roughly 25mm, if that helps. (narrator voice: "It didn't help.")

  • Q. What time is it?
  • A. [/me, the 8-12 substitute teacher, turns to look at the classroom's wall clock. I point to it.] The clock is right.
  • Q. What does it say?
  • A. Well, you might remember that [/me visualizing the sweet nothingness of death or at least a tequila & NyQuil blackout] the short hand shows the hour and the long hand shows minutes.
  • Q. [dead teen eyes staring at clock, jaw slackening, brain melting] So.... what does it say?
  • A. [existential crisis]

{edited for formatting}

What’s the best way to break up a dog fight at the dog park?

I don't know the best way but I'll say what I did earlier this year when a ~150lb cane corso attacked another person's a younger dog of the same breed (~120lbs, neither of them were mine). By the time I got over to them they were locked onto each other's faces and jerking their heads back and forth. The owners were useless in preventing damage -- blood was already smeared over the dogs. I applied a short blast of POM pepper spray at the combined dog face area and the combatants suddenly remembered they had better things to do like breathing and being able to see .

They recovered from the spray in a few minutes and the owners left the dog park, one would guess to the respective vets to fix the damage. And hopefully to schedule neutering for their intact males.

I assume I'll collect downvotes about this approach but it worked and didn't risk further damaging the animals. No regrets.

if it was a cheap solution everyone would just install batteries but guess what?

I'd say it can be a cheap solution (see below) but folks don't want to decrease their power use to do it. Tiny Home dwellers and vanfolk can live offgrid indefinitely because they plan their use and electrical systems mindfully.

I lived off-grid for over 6 years with a power setup that cost about $1,350. And even then I was using a premium solar charge controller and semi-premium battery bank. If I were building out the same capacity today it'd cost about $850.

I personally haven’t ever heard of someone being “forced” to connect to the grid but if so that’s a sad thing.

I used to live in a tiny rural town, pop. ~700. Town council passed an ordinance that everyone had to be connected to the grid. This happened about a month after the mayor (and town plumber) stood on my porch and talked about how gummint should stay out of people's business.