Congrats on copy and pasting from Wikipedia. Now let's focus on this bit: According to international law, including the 1948 Genocide Convention, such acts constitute genocide if done with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a nation or ethnic group.
As I've already mentioned. It's a good thing not to let children be lost in a war zone. They should be looked after as if they were any other child, leaving them alone would be descrimination. Amd for those that are orphans there's nothing wrong with giving them a chance at an ordinary life. Now can you give evidence that what they're doing isn't them looking after Ukrainian children lost in a war as I'd hope Ukraine would also do if they found Russian children lost in the war, and that these acts are actually a deliberate way to destroy in whole or in part an ethnic group?
I'm not denying kids are winding up in Russia's custody. That's what should happen. They shouldn't just get lost in the streets or worse part of an active warzone, and if they are orphans then they should be given a house.
Do you have evidence that they specifically took children from their families to raise in Russian households?
Should kids that are stuck in a warzone be left to die? Should orphaned children not be given a chance at a normal life if you can't find their parents?
They arrested someone for clapping at a town meeting they don't give a fuck.
Goal posts.
Shelling your parliament with a tank isn't violent?
Orisa
Read that as gravy at first
There's morning tea which is a light meal between breakfast and lunch.
Why did you hentai censor the swear word?
I could enjoy the stick a lot for a day but the rock I could put on my desk and enjoy it a little every time I see it.
Sure but you can't treat them as serious problems if you don't understand why they exist.
Maybe it's a chekovs gun scenario where you can't put a goat in a scene without it screaming because we all expect it to.
Congrats on copy and pasting from Wikipedia. Now let's focus on this bit: According to international law, including the 1948 Genocide Convention, such acts constitute genocide if done with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a nation or ethnic group.
As I've already mentioned. It's a good thing not to let children be lost in a war zone. They should be looked after as if they were any other child, leaving them alone would be descrimination. Amd for those that are orphans there's nothing wrong with giving them a chance at an ordinary life. Now can you give evidence that what they're doing isn't them looking after Ukrainian children lost in a war as I'd hope Ukraine would also do if they found Russian children lost in the war, and that these acts are actually a deliberate way to destroy in whole or in part an ethnic group?
Also this isn't even sealioning lmao. You just can't provide evidence for your claims.
No it does not.
I'm not denying kids are winding up in Russia's custody. That's what should happen. They shouldn't just get lost in the streets or worse part of an active warzone, and if they are orphans then they should be given a house.
Do you have evidence that they specifically took children from their families to raise in Russian households?
Can you provide a source for children being deliberately kidnapped from their homes?
Should kids that are stuck in a warzone be left to die? Should orphaned children not be given a chance at a normal life if you can't find their parents?
Because they won the war. The American government isn't going to give 300 billion to its citizens unless they too fight for it.
Wtf.
Evidence they're being stripped of their Ukrainian identity?
You can't say spaz in the UK.