You heard Mike Johnson campaigning for the DSA in front of the whole country, right? Using scary Boogeyman language to describe perfectly reasonable and honorable things?
Isn't it fun that the media offers a presumption of innocence when we're talking about our evil billionaire oligarchs despite hard facts to the contrary, but we get a presumption of guilt even when there is zero evidence to back it up?
For me it's cat fur - if I so much as THINK about my cats, my black t-shirts are absolutely blanketed. No amount of brushing or lint rolling is sufficient to eliminate the problem, so I just don't wear black.
This just looks like they want to see how much ram prices soar so they can see how much they can ask for the thing
Charging more to cover their costs is NOT the same thing as maliciously price gouging (which is what was alluded to here).
If the cost of materials goes up, the cost of the device goes up. They're a business not a charity. I think we both fully agree that they are waiting to see where prices land closer to launch to determine the final pricing of the device. But I don't agree that they're optimizing for profit. They already know what margin they expect from this device and might even be planning on eating some margin to keep the price competitive.
The Steamdeck, pre-RAMpocalypse, was maybe one of the best values in gaming hardware, in part because they were subsidizing the price like Sony and Microsoft do for home consoles. Any other handheld PC on the market was 2-3x the price. They can't be expecting that same kind of sales volume from the Steam Machine, so the amount they can afford to subsidize will be lower for sure.
It's only suspicious if you haven't been watching the wildly swinging RAM pricing. It would be a far worse experience for Steam and for the consumer if they set a price and had to keep jacking it up before the product had even been released.
When I went to Montreal, I'm not exaggerating when I say that every single service worker I interacted with opened with "Bonjour, hello!" You would only have to fuck that up once if you didn't realize what was happening there.
Yeah, thanks - that must have been it. I read their post with the inference I took from the title in my head and didn't re-examine it after reading their message. And they didn't say anything like "it's been a great 8 years" like a lot of similar posts might to dispel it.
I mystified what it was that I read in that post that made me think that they only lasted a month to begin with, before announcing they were shutting down in a month. And even more confusing that I've literally never heard of them, that seemed reasonable when I thought they were a month old.
Some people are going to get screwed pretty hard here then, if they've been buying games there for years. Pretty horrific management of the situation if they can't work out a deal with steam to save people's games.
How could their costs be high enough that they can't survive more than ONE month after launch? But we all dodged the bullet I guess, can you imagine this happening a year in when people actually had a chance to buy multiple games from them? What a pitiful response. It'll be harder for anybody to enter the market when things like this happen.
Better than your heart exploding. And I imagine the quantity is dialed in by their doctor to limit risk while still helping to treat the POTS.
It's a treatment vector for POTS.
Not for long, when they hear cheering in the streets.
$1750 x 10/wk = $17,500
$17,500 x 4 weeks/mo = $70,000
No, he literally spelled out their platform, eXcEpT HE juSt pREtenDeD iT sOUnDEd sPpPpooOoOooOOky!
https://youtube.com/shorts/6D8qZaOwH3k
You heard Mike Johnson campaigning for the DSA in front of the whole country, right? Using scary Boogeyman language to describe perfectly reasonable and honorable things?
Isn't it fun that the media offers a presumption of innocence when we're talking about our evil billionaire oligarchs despite hard facts to the contrary, but we get a presumption of guilt even when there is zero evidence to back it up?
If ever there were gas being sold that was absolutely OVERLOADED with Ethynol, it's this gas. You very well may be getting what you pay for.
Well the fun bonus effect with those is that if you lose your phone, you've lost literally everything.
For me it's cat fur - if I so much as THINK about my cats, my black t-shirts are absolutely blanketed. No amount of brushing or lint rolling is sufficient to eliminate the problem, so I just don't wear black.
Charging more to cover their costs is NOT the same thing as maliciously price gouging (which is what was alluded to here).
If the cost of materials goes up, the cost of the device goes up. They're a business not a charity. I think we both fully agree that they are waiting to see where prices land closer to launch to determine the final pricing of the device. But I don't agree that they're optimizing for profit. They already know what margin they expect from this device and might even be planning on eating some margin to keep the price competitive.
The Steamdeck, pre-RAMpocalypse, was maybe one of the best values in gaming hardware, in part because they were subsidizing the price like Sony and Microsoft do for home consoles. Any other handheld PC on the market was 2-3x the price. They can't be expecting that same kind of sales volume from the Steam Machine, so the amount they can afford to subsidize will be lower for sure.
Of all companies, I think Valve deserves the benefit of the doubt. You're ascribing business practices to Valve that I have no memory of them using.
Sure, even if it has never turned downwards - then constantly rising prices still makes the point.
It's only suspicious if you haven't been watching the wildly swinging RAM pricing. It would be a far worse experience for Steam and for the consumer if they set a price and had to keep jacking it up before the product had even been released.
I'll bet you that Walmart is selfinsured, and this absolutely hits them directly.
When I went to Montreal, I'm not exaggerating when I say that every single service worker I interacted with opened with "Bonjour, hello!" You would only have to fuck that up once if you didn't realize what was happening there.
No? He turned 18 years old and enlisted 5.5 years ago, has now served over 5 years.
Yeah, thanks - that must have been it. I read their post with the inference I took from the title in my head and didn't re-examine it after reading their message. And they didn't say anything like "it's been a great 8 years" like a lot of similar posts might to dispel it.
I mystified what it was that I read in that post that made me think that they only lasted a month to begin with, before announcing they were shutting down in a month. And even more confusing that I've literally never heard of them, that seemed reasonable when I thought they were a month old.
Some people are going to get screwed pretty hard here then, if they've been buying games there for years. Pretty horrific management of the situation if they can't work out a deal with steam to save people's games.
How could their costs be high enough that they can't survive more than ONE month after launch? But we all dodged the bullet I guess, can you imagine this happening a year in when people actually had a chance to buy multiple games from them? What a pitiful response. It'll be harder for anybody to enter the market when things like this happen.