"Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. It is an informal fallacy that the accused party uses to avoid accountability—whether attempting to distract by shifting the conversation's focus away from their behaviour or attempting to justify themselves by pointing to the similar behaviour (which may be true or false, but irrelevant) of their opponent or another party who is not the current subject of discussion.[1]
Drag has a long subscription to Proton VPN and doesn't like them. Their client sucks on Linux, the connection is super buggy and slow. And they're MAGA, too.
You do not have an effective opposition, the Democrats are bought and paid for by corporations.
Yeah, obviously. Everyone knows the billionaires give them bad consultants on purpose to make them gaff and lose votes. That's how the Democrats stop progress to the left.
And everyone knows the counter strat is to vote for them anyway.
Drag doesn't like !dragons@pawb.social because drag was banned from it for using drag/dragself pronouns. And drag never even posted there! It was for using the pronouns on a different community! Then the mod used an alt account to harass himself and blame it on drag, to make an excuse for the ban. He's been caught harassing himself with alts lots of times since then, whenever he gets into an argument with someone who doesn't like him
Sorry bud, but arguing over the policy of whether Rust is allowed in the kernel is arguing about politics. We're sorry we got politics in your policy debate.
Haha foggy
Xitter :(
Well, wild wolf packs do have leaders - mum and dad! So these Real Men are cosplaying as mothers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
"Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. It is an informal fallacy that the accused party uses to avoid accountability—whether attempting to distract by shifting the conversation's focus away from their behaviour or attempting to justify themselves by pointing to the similar behaviour (which may be true or false, but irrelevant) of their opponent or another party who is not the current subject of discussion.[1]
Animals feel bad when you hurt them.
This is staged, they just built a sideways room and put a normal cat in it
That's not true for everyone. Some people lose weight as they age. It's mostly cultural factors.
Sorry chief, this doesn't look like Samuel L Jackson at all
A pawn can still take a king if it works with its comrades
Drag has a long subscription to Proton VPN and doesn't like them. Their client sucks on Linux, the connection is super buggy and slow. And they're MAGA, too.
This is like reading the messages in a game of Diplomacy
Yeah, obviously. Everyone knows the billionaires give them bad consultants on purpose to make them gaff and lose votes. That's how the Democrats stop progress to the left.
And everyone knows the counter strat is to vote for them anyway.
What about the Germans who were Jewish and had to hide in attics?
Do they like it better than dry dog food?
Thank you for creating epistemology content
Drag doesn't like !dragons@pawb.social because drag was banned from it for using drag/dragself pronouns. And drag never even posted there! It was for using the pronouns on a different community! Then the mod used an alt account to harass himself and blame it on drag, to make an excuse for the ban. He's been caught harassing himself with alts lots of times since then, whenever he gets into an argument with someone who doesn't like him
Yes.
So the authoritarian crying mccarthyism is a racist? You really think tankies would do that, just go on the internet and be hypocrites?
Sorry bud, but arguing over the policy of whether Rust is allowed in the kernel is arguing about politics. We're sorry we got politics in your policy debate.