screenshot of KDE version 1 running on Debian 13(sid)
taken from: https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1buqeeo/kde_112_kde_1_compiled_on_debian_13_trixie/
screenshot of KDE version 1 running on Debian 13(sid)
taken from: https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/1buqeeo/kde_112_kde_1_compiled_on_debian_13_trixie/
38 Comments
chevy9294@monero.town · 79 pts · 2y
Liar! You are not runnning KDE! On one app it says "KDE Control Center" instead of "KDE Kontrol Kenter".
squid_slime@lemm.ee · 39 pts · 2y
Kalm down.
Classy@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 2y
Whatever you do, DO NOT acronymize that utility!!
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y
OR ELSE you WILL be LAUGHING IN PORTUGUESE!!!!!!!!
knorke3@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 2y
i suppose that would make it (K|C)DE
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 54 pts · 2y
Because you gave us a screenshot of KDE1 with a neofetch output that shows Debian 13, and because your title says so.
roguetrick@kbin.social · 28 pts · 2y
It's the note that really did it for me.
ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y
Yeah that really confirmed it. Who trusts neofetch, come on
UprisingVoltage@feddit.it · 5 pts · 2y
Facts
grue@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 2y
Damn, I know Debian is famous for having outdated packages, but this is ridiculous!
lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 2y
it(kde v1) was compiled along with qt v1.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz · 32 pts · 2y
QEMU… coward!
superfes@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 2y
Caught somewhere between Windows 95, OS/2, and BeOS...
CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
There’s a little Workbench in there too, to my nostalgic eyes.
Titou@feddit.de · 12 pts · 2y
Can we talk about how much ram it consume ?
JoMomma@lemm.ee · 11 pts · 2y
Masochism
lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 2y
it's nothing for a GNU/Linux user
AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y
Is that a new Linux distribution?
bort@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 2y
it's all of them
CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
As someone who has distro hopped three times in two weeks after finally giving up on Microsoft for a daily driver, I feel this.
Tumbleweed is being good to me so far though so I might be done!
Wait why are you all laughing?
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
Shut up. It's stable.
squid_slime@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y
This is one step further than the peeps with win xp theming!
9point6@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y
Ah, I thought this was aVoid Linux
NGC2346@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 2y
That's pretty crazy though 👀
lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 2y
ikr! ancient desktop environment on unstable release
guy_threepwood@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
I suppose it’s better than those people running CDE on modern desktop Linux!
https://github.com/cdesktopenv/cde/tree/master/cde
turbowafflz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
Those people are just wrong because they're not using NsCDE instead. NsCDE is wonderful and no one will ever convince me otherwise
rollingflower@lemmy.kde.social · 8 pts · 2y
Crazy, already got virtual workspaces and a desktop containment with widgets
lemmyvore@feddit.nl · 11 pts · 2y
Workspaces are super old, basically as old as X itself. Pretty much any Linux DE has always supported them one way or another.
I think widgets may have been done before KDE too. Depends how you define them I guess, if it's just dynamic output slapped on a graphical bar they'd definitely been done.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
xeyes was technically a desktop widget I suppose. Desktop widgets started pretty much with X11.
fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev · 6 pts · 2y
my void + kde 5 is using less ram.
Decipher0771@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 2y
Reminds me of OS/2
Marzanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 2y
KDE 1 was great!
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 2y
Beautiful.
lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 2y
just like god intended. not as beautiful as templeos though
titey@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 2y
True true.
psycho_driver@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Would
porl@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
That brings back memories!
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 2y