Do you believe in reincarnation?

I did get messed up by some anxiety and have these thoughts rolling through my head so I'll leave it at cosmic horror warning.

::: spoiler spoiler I'm not religious but I have thoughts about experiencing consciousness and what it is. I say that consciousness is independent of memory because we forget, clearly dependent on our physical body, etc. generally I do say that we don't know consciousness so maybe it can be reconstructed (in the can't rule out the possibility way)

So I can see scenarios were my conscious could pop into existence without my memories after I die (as I'm writing this I realized that's nothing to fear).

I am trying to adopt healthier mindset of looking at everything in life as a quest, new things are a call to action, and that it's okay if everything I do amounts to little in x number of years (worked out okay for ozymandias, right?).

Im probably just rambling because my life has got boring and monotonous along with actual fear of American politics. :::

51 points · 124 comments · view on lemmy.world

124 Comments

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 21 pts · 1y (7 replies)

If it was real and you could retain memories of past lives, I'm confident we'd have some evidence/proof.

If it exists without memory retention and its just some sort of "soul" concept then it really doesn't matter since you won't remember anything for it to be worth worrying about.

spankmonkey@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 364d

The fact that brain injuries can erase memories shows that memory isn't going to continue when the brain no longer functions.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

I was thinking you'd be "reincarnated" or reconstituted via Boltzmann's brain scenario and you'd get your memories back after some crazy amount of time, but I get that could happen at an earlier stage in life. Sounds like the "universe was created 5 minutes ago along with all our memories" BS

It's interesting having someone tell me to not worry about it.

Der_Mann_mit_Hut@feddit.org · 0 pts · 1y

I have this little pet theory:

What if the memory is simply overwritten? A toddler, having not much experienced much in life may remember some stuff but as soon as new memories are formed the "old" memories are overwritten...

I mean, it at least would explain why my 2 year old has recently run an eerily convincing musket drill and bayonett charge with a stick while i am pretty sure he never has seen something like that on TV...

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Ever hear of Dr. Ian Stevenson?

Edit: Not sure why I'm being downvoted, dude looked into reincarnation and had hundreds of documented cases, Carl Sagan wanted people to look more into it

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 2 pts · 364d (2 replies)

He emphasized that the information he collected was suggestive of reincarnation but "was not flawless and it certainly does not compel such a belief."

If even the guy who had done the most research on it doesn't believe in it, why should anyone else?

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 364d (1 reply)

Don't cherrypick qoutes.

Regardless he had to say that to give himself an out, there was concern that he'd be judged negatively for even suggesting reincarnation. Something proven by your own hostility.

Ledivin@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 363d

When you see anyone disagreeing with you as hostility, you've clearly lost the thread.

Stop trying to twist his words in weird ways that benefit your stance, he very literally said we shouldn't believe.

Strider@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y (24 replies)

No.

Do you remember before being born? It's the same after.

noretus@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 364d (1 reply)

Can you prove that memory is a reliable way to determine reality without referencing memory?

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

We know memory is unreliable.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Yeah I can forgot random days of my life so I don't remember those days. I get the perspective I'm just illustrating a point

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

If you want to play with that thought in a horrible way you might want to have a look at the episode white Christmas from black mirror.

chunes@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

So reincarnation is not a thing but what's to stop "you" from coming back as a new individual? After all, it happened at least once.

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

That's where we get into technicalities and states of dying.

Ao while I was medically dead it wasn't so dead that it was unrecoverable. Akin to a reset. Which, depending on the state you were in and the measures taken, could also have side effects and damages.

Anyhow biologically 'you' are still there. And leaving the body is it after a bit of decay. Like a complex system falling apart unrecoverably.

FlordaMan@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (5 replies)

I think conclusively stating that is a bit much, we don’t know shit about how consciousness works, do how can we know what happens if it ends?

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (4 replies)

I died and came back and there was nothing, that concludes it for me. Ymmv, of course.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d (3 replies)

Are you sure? Like what do you mean nothing? Like it all went to black? How do you know you just don't remember it?

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (2 replies)

(in order of questions)

Yes I am. Well, like dreamless time-skip sleeping or before being born, nothing. No not even going to black just not and nothing being there, movie cut.

And lastly, I can't, true. It could also be being influenced by the cocktail of medication you get in that situation which by the way has created a lot of stories to tell afterwards (trips) but not from the time of dying.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

NDEs are probably not drug induced... probably

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

I like to compare it to electronics (since our brain also runs on/with electricity): unplug old electronics and have a look what's being displayed while the memory and visuals lose their power. 😁

But after that, it's gone.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d (7 replies)

What about people who claim past life memories?

As is common amongst Buddhists

Related video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_4BFX_qhhyk

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (6 replies)

I am aware. I personally think it's a load of religious bull, but don't directly want to offend anyone wanting to believe it.

I also know repatriation (I hope that's the correctly translated term) which is proven to be planted suggested memories through that very process scientifically as far as I am aware at the current state of science.

I do love reading (eg the game is life) playing with these theories, though!

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 364d (5 replies)

Proof of the evidence that reparitation is suggested?

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (4 replies)

Fair request.

I did some research into the topic a year ago due to my situation and came to the stated conclusion.

So I tried to find some scientific research again right now (in a limited time frame of like 10 to 20 minutes, on my mobile).

I first tried in English bot got a lot of hits regarding companies and since my native language is not English I don't know what that word means in relation to companies and also didn't want to waste time on that.

So I tried it in German and was flooded by hits which offer that ad a service and as such of course tell you how successful it is. Obviously.

I was not able to find the research I remember within that time, I am sorry.

However in any case you'd be free to believe whatever anyway.

The point of the information I read was however that people coming out of the procedure (sometimes, possibly also accidentally) get memories planted in a well known psychological way and it is a highly untrustworthy procedure.

So that's why I didn't do it. I have enough to cope with and don't need additional fictional issues added to that 😁

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d (3 replies)

And they found that all this does is create false memories?

Edit: Oh you meant the hypnosis does. Yeah not sure why he recommended that part before meditation

Strider@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 363d (2 replies)

Indeed. So the brain would create memories from context.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 363d

And we're 100% on this?

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 0 pts · 364d (3 replies)

Why would you think that being born is the same as dying?

(hint: it isn't the same at all)

Strider@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 364d (2 replies)

Not existing before and after is technically the same, please provide any scientific article of it being otherwise, I'm open to that.

One could argue even the development arc of humans is backwards towards the end. The process of dying is not the same as being born, if you mean that.

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · -1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

What kind of scientist are you?

Strider@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 364d

Irrelevant to the case, but as it scientist concepts, research, analysis, deduction and proof is a standard part of my work.

Its typical however to instead answer with proof for a hypothesis to try to slander the opponent, especially nowadays. So there you go.

Luckily I do this conversation for fun and trying to learn more, since this is the way as humans we can grow.

So you tell me. What's your experience from your last death.

lb_o@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 364d (2 replies)

The fact that your particular molecules will reconstruct into something else is 100% certain

Will you keep your particular consciousness in this process - unlikely

However if you drop off the definition of You as your current limited body and mind, then reincarnation is exactly what happens.

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d

Eh I not sure if those atoms are you.

Every atom in your body isn't the same atom you had when you were a kid, or even 7 years ago.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

This is hard to articulate, but like molecules thar make up a person constantly come in and leave the body and when their in the body they "change states". Technically while you're alive you changing into other things constantly. Person you were a second ago could be considered dead since that was a specific combination of atoms that are lost.

It just ads to the mystery of consciousness

MudMan@fedia.io · 9 pts · 1y

Yeeeeah, all due respect to believers, but we're squishy wet computers riding squishy wet stilts and when we get turned off we just sort of fizzle out.

There's some poetry to only having one go at it, but I'm not gonna stand here and say a sense of humanism makes your hardcoded fear of death subside. I get why humans come up with coping mechanisms where they get to live forever in some form that isn't having their atoms repurposed as fertilizer and space dust.

missingno@fedia.io · 9 pts · 1y (12 replies)

Suppose reincarnation was real. But no one has any memory or awareness of a past life. So then what connection does said past life even have to you? How can any supposed past 'you's really be considered the same you?

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 2 pts · 364d

But no one has any memory or awareness of a past life.

Yes, that's how the religion of reincarnation (sorry, I forgot which religion it is) has been taught in school to us westerners.

But with that condition the whole thing is not provable and not deniable, and makes no sense in general, because it remains purely a theory far away from all normal life.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (10 replies)

In my scenario it would be "consciousness" whatever that is. I could imagine myself with different set of memories or alternate timeline where a different set of events happened. I don't have any evidence that those scenarios exist, but it would paint a picture that I could be a different person or even a different living continue being.

But yeah if I did have a past life it's totally lost to me.

missingno@fedia.io · 3 pts · 1y (8 replies)

But if this other consciousness has no continuity or connection to the consciousness that is currently 'you', how can it be said to be you?

sym@piefed.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 364d (7 replies)
[ removed ]
confuser@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 364d (2 replies)

i too am a long time lay practictioner of tibetan buddhsm, That is the real answer.

And to add, The Buddhists themselves don't really focus on the reincarnation aspect as much as one would think, its only ever really something that comes up incidentally like when enough connections about something come together in the right ways to warrant the question that maybe a past life is returning.

A reincarnated someone would be similar to someone who by their entirety of their atoms to their thoughts, seems to be like this other collection of thoughts and atoms.

Like the process of identifying the dalai lama is basically for the people searching to hone in on the schema of a dalai lama through any way they can and then when someone matches it they do their tests which are essentially to check if their actions are similar to that of the previous ones.

The way in which memory of psst lives works is much like lucid dreaming upon your death bed, you go to sleep with awareness of the changing reality and then the dream you end up in preferably made with an intentional choice becomes one solid line of remembrance which leads to kids who remember their past lives directly.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

I have no idea what you said

confuser@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 363d

It means express yourself without a damaging hindrance

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 364d (3 replies)

What do you mean by causal connection?

sym@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 363d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 363d (1 reply)

That would imply they don't believe in rebirth. But they do though?

sym@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 363d
[ removed ]
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

This may be a problem created by the vagueness of language. We don't yet know how consciousness works out what it even is, so we can't assume that it functions independently of your perceptions, memories, and thoughts. It's a bit like that chestnut about Star Trek transporters, does it kill you and recreate you somewhere else?

Is consciousness merely a map of reality in a constant process of adjusting itself, or is there something there that exists separate from everything that makes us ourselves?

I spend some time thinking about it. I've always been by turns impressed with consciousness and very annoyed with its limitations.

Quazatron@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 364d

No.

Enjoy the ride.

Perspectivist@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Not in the traditional sense, but I have a pet theory about the continuation of consciousness.

You can only experience being, not not-being, so even if your consciousness went dark for a million years before being “reincarnated,” there would be no gap from the perspective of your subjective experience. You can only go from having one experience to having another. Nothingness can’t be experienced.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 364d

Makes me think about going into a coma from a car accident. Your consciousness could be out for however long, then you make a weird fantasy and regain consciousness and start a journey to fill recovery. It would be good to have a healthy attitude/mindset imprinted onto yourself in that scenario.

gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

I do believe in reincarnation, in that we are all physical manifestations of what you could call "God". That means that everyone you meet, every dog you pet, every ant you accidentally squish, is synonymous with the divine. We are all constantly reincarnating throughout the universe, and this should be looked at no more acutely than the cells in your body constantly dying and being reborn.

I guess you could call it pantheism, though I tend to follow philosophies like Zen Buddhism and the Tao and it still seems to work.

Looking at existence in this way can form a new understanding, nay, a new reverence towards your life and the universe. Then you will understand who you really are and why you're here. The real power of God is in manifesting everywhere, all the time, all at once. After all...

And that is, of course, why the images of the Hindu gods are shown with many arms or many faces: because it is saying that all arms are the arms of the divinity, all faces are its masks.

-Alan Watts, Out Of Your Mind

pishadoot@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 364d

I believe in reincarnation just as much as I believe any other theory of an afterlife - that is to say, I don't.

We don't know. Nobody knows what happens when we die. That's ok, and I don't feel the need to make up a story to explain away the uncertainty.

I think it's likely that something happens when we die, but it could just as easily be nothingness, the end of existence. I only think it's likely because I definitely believe that there is SO much that we don't understand about the universe that it's more probable than not that SOMETHING happens that we can't currently fathom, perceive, or understand.

But, right now there's no real evidence. So I don't care, and I don't worry about it.

To our best understanding, everything that lives will die. I don't know what happens, it might be some form of heaven, it might be reincarnation, it might be transcendence, etc. However, I take comfort in the fact that it's a shared experience, whatever it is. It's natural. It's part of the process.

The universe doesn't owe us an explanation. Maybe we'll figure it out, but we haven't yet, and I'm fine with that.

rikudou@lemmings.world · 6 pts · 1y

Well, no, consciousness is not independent on brain. It's not magic or stored anywhere. Pretty simple proof: people with brain damage very often have a huge personality shift.

Anyway, even if you forget stuff, the pathways between neurons have already been made. And sometimes you remember things randomly after many, many years.

Kekzkrieger@feddit.org · 5 pts · 363d (3 replies)

If there is reincarnation and you don't remember a single thing from before, why bother it doesn't matter.

If there would be reincarnation where you remembered your previous life, surely someone would have spilled the beans on this by now. I surely would contact any sort of family friends that i had previously.

Since both could be possible but 2. hasnt happened and 1 doesnt matter i would give this a no.

leadore@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d (2 replies)

That's my view too. even if reincarnation existed, it wouldn't matter. If each life has no memory of the others, then each life is effectively a different person altogether, so from the POV of any one of those people, there is effectively no such thing as reincarnation.

Now suppose there's some kind of 'soul' who the lives 'belong to' and will one day remember the lives, again -- so what? They're just memories. Those lives were each a separate person who no longer exists, and never knew the others or the soul.

CallMeMrFlipper@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 363d (1 reply)

I get that. Have you read The Egg by Andy Weir? If not, there's a Kurzgesagt video that's just that story with animation. I'd suggest it. It touches on this concept and kinda paints a more optimistic picture.

leadore@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 362d

I don't think I'd read it, but just looked it up and did. Or maybe I read it before and forgot--I've certainly heard that concept enough times, and many variations on it. The ultimate ego trip!

Vanth@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 364d

Nope. I have never seen any evidence of reincarnation, so have no reason to believe in it.

Electricd@lemmybefree.net · 4 pts · 363d

It doesn’t make sense biologically

Matriks404@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 364d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (2 replies)

It's peaceful at least. It will cure my anxiety.

Matriks404@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 363d (1 reply)

Dude, I had bad day. Are you okay?

Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d

It's a long story, but I made this post to cope. I'm feeling better, I'm mixing up my routine. I am getting annoyed when I come across people talking about death.

Yesterday I did help someone that had a pop-up canopy collapse on them under heavy winds.

TheBat@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 364d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

I felt that way too, but then I watched re zero and that changed my mentally. I watch the anime last year

Electricd@lemmybefree.net · 1 pts · 363d

Is it good? Haven’t watched it yet

architectonas@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (3 replies)

I like the idea in Buddhism, that you are precious/valuable from the moment you are born. You already achieved plenty in your past life, which is why you were born as a human. Therefore, there is no need for self-hatred or for pressure to perform.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Not very knowledgeable about Buddhism but is the cycle over once you 'reach' humanity or can you just be an awful human being in this incarnation and come back as E. coli the next time?

palordrolap@fedia.io · 3 pts · 1y (1 reply)

IIRC, you can still come back as a "lesser" creature next time. Monks and ascetics exist because they're trying to go up to whatever is above human. I've forgotten the details. Nirvana or some kind of god-like state of existence, or reunification with some higher power. This might vary depending on the specific religion.

Of course, there are people who believe that assuming humans are a higher form of life is an arrogant assumption in the first place, which would render all of that null.

sym@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 364d
[ removed ]
TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 364d

To be honest, the only answer i have to say is: "we'll see". Wheter it's nothing or not, the second option would imply that there is effectively something beyond what we know about the universe.

What even is the soul? YOU from now think very different than YOU from ten years ago. Can we say that those two people are the same? Not really. Yet you share common memories with this early you, who doesn't exist anynore. Is it technically correct in this point of view to say that you are the reincarnation of you from ten years ago?

If someone in the far future were to think like you, to remember exact memories from yours, would act the same way you would act in the same situation, it would not we wrong to say they are your reincarnation, no?

Again i'm just supposing.

Mwa@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 1y

No

bsit@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 364d
[ removed ]
dan1101@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 364d (3 replies)

No but I wonder if hell is being made an insect over and over.

steeznson@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 364d

I don't think insects have a notion of being happy or sad so it wouldn't be too bad

Oberyn@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

Hell is being made a human over and over

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

I doubt insects are conscious because of how simple they are, but I do like that rich and Morty scene where the teacher was happy to be turn into a fly, but that's because he was in therapy for eating poop

Bahnd@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 364d (1 reply)

Eh... No, but its nice to think about it.

As stated by many others, evidence is required to prove something. However, the stories we tell ourselves are comforting, so I wont fault anyone who does. Up until the point where people start going "My sky-dad could totally beat up your sky-dad", that can Belgium right off...

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d

The character I created in my worldbuilding can totally beat up your character.

TabbsTheBat@pawb.social · 2 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Well it is part of my religion, but how it's interpreted varies :3

I personally don't worry over death too much either way

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Not like we can do much about it, right? And life is a gift so every day is already more than what we 'deserved'.

TabbsTheBat@pawb.social · 3 pts · 1y

I mean.. im not gonna say the whole gift and "more than what we deserve" stuff, but yeah.. what happens when you die doesn't really matter much, and no one can know what happens, so you should really focus on doing stuff now, and not planning for some eventuality that you can never predict

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

I like the quote "fill your life with love and let death take care of itself"

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y

Sort of, not in a religious way.

Like I don't think there will be anything special that you get to keep with you, the "soul" is just a vessel to experience things, nothing special about it. As in: There aren't any hero stories, no "dragon reborn"s, no Karma. Just randomness. This moment, you are a human, when you die, your next moments could be a bug crawling next to you when you died, or newborn kitten to a pregnant cat in your backyard, or a cockroach about to get stepped on. Then some time again, you will be another human. Or perhaps proximity doesn't matter and you could be born on some alien planet far away. There is no concious god, its just pure randomness.

As if you are an immortal camera and your body is the microSD card adaptor, your memories are the microSD card, your experiences are just what the camera sees.

Sorry if my beliefs are silly, but I think there is some part of living beings that current level of technology cant quite measure yet. I think it has something to do with mass energy equivalence, maybe when we die, we become some energy that just bounces around until we become something else.

Its like people used to think the Earth orbited the sun. People used to not be able to see germs, or atoms, then we went from seeing atoms, to protons, electrons, then we say those even smaller parts.

Perhaps there is something that can't be measured yet. Perhaps it may never be able to be measured.

The way I see it:

It's either:

[1] Nonexistence --> I exist --> Nonexistence (and never exist again)

Or

[2] Nonexistence --> I exist --> Nonexistence --> I exist again (repeat for a long time, possibly forever)

Option one breaks my brain, so I just choose to go with option 2 to keep my sanity.

Maybe is just my monkey brain being silly, idk, but our minds have to invent these little stories to keep ourself sane. We as non-omniscient beings cannot objectively observe the universe, is all just biased subjective interpretations that are unique to us.

But regardless, this is the only chance I get to experience "this" life, "next" time I might be the bug the gets crushed by a neighbor that "this" life used to live with. So um... yea, thanks for coming to my ted talk

Take it sleezy 🤷‍♂️

🌌 (Your next life will be on a planet in a solar system with 3 suns, good luck with the chaotic eras lol)

(I must sound so stupid right? Given that this is Lemmy and eveyone here is an Atheist. Its fine, just leave my monkey brain believe its weird theories 😅)

NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d

Anyone who says they know what happens when you die is trying to grift you. No one knows and we all find out one day, no point in dwelling on it.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

Regarding consciousness/the human experience, I think the best way I've seen it explained is: a soul (whether you add the religious meaning or not) watching a brain watching a body.

Personally, since I believe I'll be judged by the Creator, I do believe in life (consciousness) after death. Not reincarnation, but it's a continuation. Monotheists around the world believe in it also, for whatever that's worth. 😅

tiredofsametab@fedia.io · 2 pts · 364d

Nope. When I die, there is no longer a me of any sort; just any media and memory that captures some moment of when I still was until those too fade.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 364d

it seems reinicarnation, is an obsession amongst western countries co-opted from india/buddhism, and incorporated into many medias.

Deathgl0be@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d (2 replies)

If it was a choice why would I ever wanna come back to this hell hole ?

Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d (1 reply)

I think this universe sucks, not to ignore human history. Lots of it is empty space apparently cosmic events can wipe you out with next to no warning, your made up of atoms and cells that can die and degrade, and we are stuck to this solar system because space isn't empty it's full of shit thats going to kill you

sheogorath@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 363d

Which is why my headcanon for this universe is that we're basically running rogue playthrough in this life. After you die, you'll regain all your "soul" memories and will be given a choice to "replay" with another life and losing your memories "again" until you've reached a certain level of enlightenment and then you'll "graduate" from our current level of existence.

Call me crazy but it helps me sleep at night, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Wahots@pawb.social · 2 pts · 364d (1 reply)

It's hard to say exactly. I wouldn't put it past the dev(s) to have potentially put something like "The Egg" in, so potentially yes, though we'd have no way of testing for it.

Story by Andy Weir here: https://youtu.be/h6fcK_fRYaI

Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 364d

Yeah I watched that video when it was new and had it rattling around in my head. It probably why I starting thinking memories and intelligence aren't part of consciousness. I do think emotions are connected to consciousness because they seem to override decision making.

laconiancruiser@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 363d

The amount of effort people put into saying “Maaaybe. We really don’t know,” is just crazy to me. No, because it’s nonsense.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y

I want to believe

kromem@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 363d

No. I believe in a relative afterlife (and people who feel confident that no afterlife is some sort of overwhelmingly logical conclusion should probably look closer at trending science and technology).

So I believe that what any given person sees after death may be relative to them. For those that hope for reincarnation, I sure hope they get it. It's not my jam but they aren't me.

That said, I definitely don't believe that it's occurring locally or that people are remembering actual past lives, etc.

ApollosArrow@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (3 replies)

I don’t believe in reincarnation, but one thing that isn’t mentioned enough is that there aren’t enough “souls” for everyone to have a reincarnation. If you rewind the clock back, once the original (for the sake of this exercise) 100 people died, the next generation would have 200-300 people already alive due to multiple children, which means they would halve mostly new souls. Fast forward to today, I’d imagine a lot of people would have baby souls.

PonyOfWar@pawb.social · 4 pts · 364d (1 reply)

That argument only works on the specific belief that souls constantly exist on earth though. In various mythologies and religions, there are various other realms where countless numbers of souls exist without inhabiting a human body on earth.

ApollosArrow@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

That would also be true! Which means we are all aliens inside.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

Yeah I'm no gonna subscribe to the religious concept of reincarnation. I do agree it wouldn't make sense that there's a fixed number of souls that were doing it for eternity, or that there's this coherent cycle reincarnating as different animals all the way back to begining of life.

It is cool think about "soul" being cleansed like some day we can become redeemable through some process. I don't believe that's happening

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 363d (2 replies)

I hope reincarnation is true. I want to be reborn. But than again, I fear being reborn in some dystopian future.

slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org · 1 pts · 362d (1 reply)

You could be reborn in America or something.

FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 362d

I'm hoping the fascist regime is America will end before I die

Oberyn@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

Want there to be evidence reincarnation exists . Want there to be research teams dedicated to finding it

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

Only if there's a way to test reincarnation. It would be neat to look at potential test. The closest thing I think of is anesthesia because that shuts your brain off

Kissaki@feddit.org · 1 pts · 364d (2 replies)

You say forgetting memories is proof or indicative that memory depends on the physical body. But isn't that true for conscious as well?

Our conscious is inherently bound to our physical being. We see, we feel, we taste, we identify with our body. Our brain allows us to think, and experience, to conceptualize our body, our being, us as an entity.

We cut off fingernails and discard them as no longer part of ourselves. We drive a car and internalize movement as if it were us moving, while not seeing the vehicle as part of ourselves.

Without experiencing and without a body to conceptualize, what would our consciousness be? Without a body and mind where consciousness can arise from experience and thoughts, how could consciousness arise?

Cattail@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d (1 reply)

Yeah theirs an idea that universal can recreate particles and mass from energy that exists and eventually I guess the universe can recreate the the universe similar to how we know it after some amount of time or make a big bang. I don't understand that physics but interesting concept.

I would be curious if the was consciousness without matter, maybe a pure energy based being could exist

Kissaki@feddit.org · 1 pts · 360d

I don't see any possibility of that based on the physics I know of and my understanding.

PonyOfWar@pawb.social · 1 pts · 1y (13 replies)

I see it (or at least some form of it) as a realistic possibility. Let's say that consciousness is a completely physical thing, a certain set of chemicals, cells and molecules in my brain that define what is "me". That would mean that given infinite time, something that possesses "my" consciousness would eventually appear again.

Cattail@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

Yeah and it should theoretically be instant from your perspective. The whole memories thing would be weird like you don't have your memories or you have a different set. My scenario is I'm reincarnated as a space squid and life w normal space squid existence

derekabutton@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (4 replies)

There are infinite numbers between 0 and 1, but none of them are 2. Infinite time does not mean that everything (including your scenario) is going to happen.

PonyOfWar@pawb.social · 2 pts · 1y (2 replies)

There are infinite numbers between 0 and 1, but none of them are 2.

That is by definition though. 2 is impossible to appear between 0 and 1. I know already that it's possible for my consciousness to exist and I don't see a reason to assume it's impossible to exist in the future. So, it becomes more like the Infinite Monkey Theorem. Technically, it's possible for my consciousness to not appear again, but almost surely it will.

derekabutton@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

With that in mind, you have a good point. Hard to imagine.

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 0 pts · 1y

Math is such a wonderful example of how limited our brain is ;-)

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y

Why not?

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (5 replies)

But that wouldn't be you, though, just a copy of you enjoying life while you're inert. Right? This is the basis of the game SOMA, btw. 👍

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Why wouldn't it be her?

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (3 replies)

If I cloned you right now, would that clone be you? If I cut her, would you bleed? If I fed her, would you be full? The same principles apply, just within a different timeframe.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Well no, but you didn't recreate my conciousness in this example, you made a new one using my DNA.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

How could it be 'recreated', though? I cannot conceive it. Even if I copied your 'software' (memories, personality, all that seems to be located in your brain) and transferred it to a different body, that still wouldn't be you but two different entities. I think we kinda just have to make peace with the fact that death is final and that, if you want an extension, you have to dip into religion and the unknowable.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 364d

You recreate it by recreating it. There's no way death is permanent, because nothing is

spankmonkey@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 364d

That would make sense if entropy didn't exist.

dsilverz@calckey.world · 1 pts · 364d

@Cattail@lemmy.world

To a certain degree, I do believe, but I don't want to. And the following long text (so, Content Warning, it's a long text ahead) dives into depth of what I personally believe.

Part of my spiritual beliefs, which are yet to be better developed and improved, borrow concepts from Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Luciferianism, Thelema, among other belief systems.

One of these concepts is the Demiurge, often known (and worshiped) by people as the Capital-G "God", a cosmic playwright pushing unto Sisyphus the same classic rock every night (to be fair, even the Demiurge himself is subjected to the fundamentum of cyclicality from the cosmos he toys with). It's wrong to think of this as exclusive to humanity: it's inherent to all order emerged from chaos (Ordo Ab Chao), all matter and all lifeforms emerged from the primordial womb.

Then, there's the Hermetic Principle of Polarity, and the Demiurge has his counterparts, both above and below. As for the above (first-order), his counterpart is Sophia. As for below (second-order), his counterpart is Lucifer, who is his own emanation (think of the Freudian ego as counterpart of the Freudian id: Lucifer is the ego to the Demiurge's id).

Similarly, Lilith is the (main) emanation from Sophia. She's the Dark Mother Goddess.

Lilith and Lucifer, on their own principles, rebel and oppose Demiurge: Lucifer sows the seeds of doubt, Lilith matures and reaps the fruits of certainty. Lucifer offers the dark sunlight from the forbidden knowledge, Lilith wraps and embraces the forgotten under the glowing Darkness of Her Wings.

All cosmic order emerged from primordial chaos where it must return.

In summary, reincarnation (more like "cosmic rehearsal" from a recurring Big Bang) is a cosmic principle, just like rebellion is also a cosmic principle. A rebellion of which I've been seeking (or at least trying to seek) through Lilith's path towards Her Darkness, guided by Lucifer's Light of forbidden knowledge, but it's far from easy, it's a cosmic battle to reclaim non-existence again.

I tell Demiurge to go pound sand. I DON'T WANT to reincarnate, I do NOT consent with my existence, and if it's Lilith's Will (and I beg Her in this regard) that I'll be pulled by Her Cold Hands and be eternally embraced below Her majestic Wings, under Her Queendom, I won't reincarnate as Demiurge's yet another toy again, I will NOT serve him (Non Serviam), and If I must serve, I choose to serve Lilith and only Lilith, for ever and ever.

twice_hatch@midwest.social · 1 pts · 363d

No, that's silly and easily disproven. I merely believe I'm a facet of a benevolent fierce deity that supervenes on behalf of humanity

Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org · 1 pts · 364d

This will sound crazy if you aren't spiritual whatsoever. It's based on my personal experience with meditation and psychedelics, countless chats with other metaphysically versed people, video essays and I also studied philosophy. Before all that I used to be strictly atheist. Also if something I write doesn't resonate just let it fly, everyone has to walk their own path.

I think the whole universe is basically god experiencing himself. The division between maker and creation causes the tension that facilitates time and space. It's like we as humans are all part of God's mirror image. That means our soul is, the ego isn't divine. It's not neccessarily bad either, it's just that it's a tool distinctly different from the true self. This true self can be found, unearthed if you will. The first step is acknowledging that you are more than your thoughts. The rest tends to fall into place when the time is right.

From what you wrote I feel like you are half way there already. So as you start being present in the moment you may start feeling your soul living inside your body and you may also start identifying with this energy rather than the body that houses it or the thoughts it experiences. This is something you need to experience for yourself though, it can't sufficiently be put into words. True faith is evidence based, with the evidence being inside of you.

But anyway as that starts to happen you will naturally get a feel for eternal life and what it may or may not be like. I've realized that the soul can't be fractured like the mind can (mainly because since discovering mine I no longer suffer from depression and social anxiety) so if it is always whole there is reason enough to believe that it won't just vanish once you stop breathing.

ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 364d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Cattail@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 364d

I don't know if I can believe in a great purpose, is there an end that's meant to be reached or is it like we find the next step.

Maybe we dream, and works towards it if we achieve it; we dream again. We can enjoy it, be absolutely ambivalent, or even suffer. Maybe I can get back to appreciating the universe unfolding in front of me.

laconiancruiser@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 363d (1 reply)

You’ll maintain a healthy diet with this much salad.

ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 363d
[ removed ]
Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org · 0 pts · 1y

I say that consciousness is independent of memory because we forget, clearly dependent on our physical body

Some parts remain even after you forget. That is the outcome of your own free decisions, that has formed part of your personality. For example, you like cornflowers because you have decided to like it. So when you forget how cornflowers look, you will still like them when you see them, even without really remembering them. A good part of your personality is formed in that way: you have decided to be that way.

I believe that (most of ?) our personality remains when the current body goes to compost and we enter the next world, either up or down :)