I know people who work at inpatient acute facilities and they are constantly having to cockblock people to prevent truly horrible things from happening (think anorexia dating borderline or NPD + NPD)
So while this particular story may not have happened, this general story happens daily.
Your personal choice is yours, and nobody can comment it. But making it a legal interdiction? That's something else entirely. People with disabilities or illnesses can live long, happy and meaningful lives. Even more so if the society weren't ableist.
I mean it sounds harsh, but some people really shouldn‘t have kids. Some because of genetics (adoption is fine) and some because they are clinically insane and would destroy their children‘s psyche (these kids would be better off given up for adoption)
In reality that‘s hard to achieve, but it is true.
If childcare resources were abundant and free that would offset the problem a great deal, but capitalism and rugged individualism and all that. Like, given all the stupid out there I definitely see the appeal of it, and even things like eliminating genetic disorders would qualify so the line gets kinda fuzzy insofar as the ethics are concerned. The issue is that once systems are in place for wide scale eugenics of any flavor, some asshole will absolutely use it to genocide an ethnic group or other minority.
Oops that's eugenics! I get the sentiment but instead we should have a ridiculous amount of resources freely available to children and new parents, healthcare childcare food assistance socialization education. It takes a village and all that.
Eh, eugenics work. If not dog breeds wouldn't exist.
We're just really, really bad at agreeing on what genes are good ones and attempts at filtering for good genes in humans tend to more or less immediately become about skin color because of course they do. And also it being basically impossible to do without massive human rights violations.
But being difficult, massively immoral and unethical and usually in practice just an excuse for simple racism doesn't mean it doesn't work.
Eh I mostly don't disagree, hell eliminating conditions like Huntington's disease could qualify as eugenics so I don't really have an issue with it in concept. Problem is if there's a system in place for widespread eugenics some asshole is gonna use it for a genocide.
Wiping out Huntington's would be a genocide in the most literal possible sense.
To be fair, if not for the whole massively immoral and unethical part, we could wipe out Huntington's in a generation or two with mandatory testing and sterilizations. But again that whole massively immoral and unethical thing.
I say we invert it. To prevent aristicracy and nepotism, the wealthy will be prohibited from reproducting. No one in the top 10% of income or wealth gets a baby license.
What if we just make them adopt a kid for every multiple over the 3x over the national average income. So Musk would have to have like 4 million kids. Then you heavily follow them with CPS and fine them for any infraction. Basically making CPS the biggest taxing authority.
There's some evidence for and some against. If these two have mental conditions caused by environmental factors that they overcome they may actually provide a really good environment to a child.
People with borderline have a much higher success rate at maintaining their abusive relationship style with people who are already mentally struggling or otherwise neurodivergent.
That tracks. I struggle to maintain boundaries and have a history of BPD folks being into me. It never goes well, and I can't imagine a psych ward would go any differently
Pretty sure given Bacchus is over both alcohol and madness, he's going to preside over their entire relationship. Fertility too, so they may want to be extra careful with protection.
Fortunately for them I'm pretty sure he's just fertility as in fucking, not fertility as in reproducing. They just have to keep an eye out to stop Hera, Aphrodite, or Demeter from catching on to fhdm
Also dating during the first stages of recovery is widely discouraged. The point is to focus on yourself and feel good about yourself, not dump all your energy and focus into a new relationship.
By comparison, I know of a couple (met their kid), who had divorced and remarried each other so many times (often but not always with another marriage in between) that the last time they had to go to a different state because my state refused to do it yet again. Apparently the state will let you get married and divorced as many times as you'd like, but only so many times with the same partner.
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
No where in that does it say to write your own greentexts, screenshot them, and then post them here.
can confirm. the government doesn't want you to know this but you can just write your own greentexts. they're free, you can just take them. i have so many greentexts at home.
Can confirm. Got more actual dates with people that are legitimately interested in me from psychiatric hospitals and group therapy than online dating apps.
A lot of people come across way better in person than via text.
Also, everybody takes their best photos and puts them up so when you meet them, they always look a little different than you expected, and that's always a moment of awkwardness.
If you meet someone in person they have no priors and it can just be you.
Apps can work too, but the ghosting is a constant emotional drain.
Are y'all coin flip relationships quality? I want enough time I do not think about that person in any type of addictive or reminiscent context. I want my relationships to be clean slate with a clear head. I do not care if that takes months or years.
Have you heard of the saying "beggars can't be choosers"? Anon writes that they had zero romantic success elsewhere. Theoretically there are more options than Tinder and a psych ward, but this is a 4chan user.
Because to many people, being alone for their entire lives is already terrible. And it's not like it's a foregone conclusion that a relationship with a person you met in psych ward is terrible, it's also possible that it's good (or at least better than with a non-psych ward person) because they understand each other's issues. Conversely, many people who never went to a psych ward also have mental health issues, which often go entirely untreated.
They've both said it's better to be alone than with a terrible person and that they don't have a choice to be with anyone, so I don't think they're really thinking this stuff through.
Regrettably, for some of us, our own thoughts are the most terrible thing we can be with. Besides all the most terrible people I know have never been committed.
it's less sane people and more sexually repressed people ime.
least for the US...those goddamn protestants really fucked up this country from the getgo, and one of the biggest tenants of chucklefuck protestants is be ashamed of all things sexy
Yeah I know, but I'm completely talentless as an artist and wanted to make the meme anyway. I'm hardly going to commission an actual artist to draw it for me, am I?
The bubble where he can't just download some freely available tools and a model file around 10GB and make something like that on basically any gaming computer from the last 5 years by typing in a description? Because that's not going away - only the massive investment circle-jerks throwing money at things with no real product, no solid idea of what a product would look like and no plan of ever turning a profit are going away, and possibly causing a recession in the process.
Look I don't want to tell you your business, but to me this is less of an AI vs human thing and more about embracing yourself. I've had so much more joy from people's dogshit drawings than I have from the AI stuff. There's a heart and soul behind dogshit.
I prefer to see dogshit human art than whatever soulless sinful shit generated by an AI.
Hell, most good memes are badly drawn dogshit, that's part of the culture.
I'm with you. It's better to get the point across and the message out than to nitpick about how the message must be formatted. It's like people nitpicking grammar/vocabulary, instead of recognizing that language is a tool for communication, and as long as it's understandable, it's fine.
126 Comments
IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip · 174 pts · 241d
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 121 pts · 241d
Okay so yes it's green text but...
I know people who work at inpatient acute facilities and they are constantly having to cockblock people to prevent truly horrible things from happening (think anorexia dating borderline or NPD + NPD)
So while this particular story may not have happened, this general story happens daily.
starchylemming@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 241d
yeah you really really want to prevent them to have kids on accident. hell on purpose too.
those poor kids
one fucked up parent already fucks up a kid. imagine two
its a place where people calm down for the first time in forever, bored and together with others in the same situation. ofc romance ensures
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 55 pts · 241d
Worse yet a lot of mental health conditions have genetic components so the kids are basically getting the worst hand you can possibly deal them.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 10 pts · 241d
We should get the government to put a licence on breeding so only the genetically strong can have children
zloubida@sh.itjust.works · 85 pts · 241d
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 241d
That may be the best use of that meme I've seen. I appreciated the chuckle.
87Six@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 241d
I mean, genetics are genetics.
I may have epilepsy and am strongly considering getting a vasectomy so I don't accidentaly create a fucked up kid that can't live normally.
Adoption is always an option an all'at. And plenty of romance can happen without kids... Hell, ESPECIALLY without kids lol.
zloubida@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 241d
Your personal choice is yours, and nobody can comment it. But making it a legal interdiction? That's something else entirely. People with disabilities or illnesses can live long, happy and meaningful lives. Even more so if the society weren't ableist.
87Six@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 241d
Yea maybe not that far
Flax_vert@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 241d
Did not expect eugenics to make a comeback in 2026 😭
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 241d
Really? I've seen it creeping into the collective conscience for at least a few years now.
tetris11@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 241d
I mean, if you could screen your kid for known debillatating chronic diseases, you probably will, no?
invictvs@lemmy.world · 54 pts · 241d
This thread went into eugenics stuff waaay too fast
eldoom@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 241d
I thought it had a pretty even pace
EldenLord@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 241d
I mean it sounds harsh, but some people really shouldn‘t have kids. Some because of genetics (adoption is fine) and some because they are clinically insane and would destroy their children‘s psyche (these kids would be better off given up for adoption)
In reality that‘s hard to achieve, but it is true.
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 241d
it's one thing to believe in that at a high level, and another to enshrine it into law & enforce it.
EldenLord@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 241d
The potential of abuse is wayyy to high to actually make laws about that.
It would be like saying that eating unhealthy is bad and then passing laws that may lead to someone being executed for eating a Twix.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 241d
If childcare resources were abundant and free that would offset the problem a great deal, but capitalism and rugged individualism and all that. Like, given all the stupid out there I definitely see the appeal of it, and even things like eliminating genetic disorders would qualify so the line gets kinda fuzzy insofar as the ethics are concerned. The issue is that once systems are in place for wide scale eugenics of any flavor, some asshole will absolutely use it to genocide an ethnic group or other minority.
presoak@lazysoci.al · 1 pts · 241d
B0rax@feddit.org · 1 pts · 241d
Very predictable plot 4/10 would read again. 7/10 with rice.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · -2 pts · 241d
Sir this is
Wendy'sgreentextedible_funk@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 241d
Oops that's eugenics! I get the sentiment but instead we should have a ridiculous amount of resources freely available to children and new parents, healthcare childcare food assistance socialization education. It takes a village and all that.
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 241d
Eh, eugenics work. If not dog breeds wouldn't exist.
We're just really, really bad at agreeing on what genes are good ones and attempts at filtering for good genes in humans tend to more or less immediately become about skin color because of course they do. And also it being basically impossible to do without massive human rights violations.
But being difficult, massively immoral and unethical and usually in practice just an excuse for simple racism doesn't mean it doesn't work.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 241d
Eh I mostly don't disagree, hell eliminating conditions like Huntington's disease could qualify as eugenics so I don't really have an issue with it in concept. Problem is if there's a system in place for widespread eugenics some asshole is gonna use it for a genocide.
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 241d
Wiping out Huntington's would be a genocide in the most literal possible sense.
To be fair, if not for the whole massively immoral and unethical part, we could wipe out Huntington's in a generation or two with mandatory testing and sterilizations. But again that whole massively immoral and unethical thing.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 241d
I say we invert it. To prevent aristicracy and nepotism, the wealthy will be prohibited from reproducting. No one in the top 10% of income or wealth gets a baby license.
IronBird@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 241d
if the 2 richest people were forced to fight to death every year, imagine the rush of wealth donations there'd be every year to not be at the top
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 241d
What if we just make them adopt a kid for every multiple over the 3x over the national average income. So Musk would have to have like 4 million kids. Then you heavily follow them with CPS and fine them for any infraction. Basically making CPS the biggest taxing authority.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 241d
Oops that's how you get rich people stealing babies from poor people
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 241d
I'm a mentally unstable trans woman and have 4 kids. The government can suck my giant girl dick.
potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 241d
I get your argument but the broaderidea here is that people in the psych ward aren't generally making good decisions
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 241d
Some countries are just big psych wards
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 241d
you really should put an /s to that
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 241d
Sir this is a 4chan greentext community
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 241d
You really want Trump telling you who you can fuck.
IronBird@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 241d
also, stress is large trigger of latent mental conditions your at risk for and guess what is incredibly stressful...living at the bottom in amerikkka
arrow74@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 241d
That's really not well proven.
There's some evidence for and some against. If these two have mental conditions caused by environmental factors that they overcome they may actually provide a really good environment to a child.
Olhonestjim@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 241d
At least 3 generations on my dad's side show distinct signs of high functioning autism.
Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 241d
It's not some eugenics thing.
People with borderline have a much higher success rate at maintaining their abusive relationship style with people who are already mentally struggling or otherwise neurodivergent.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 241d
That tracks. I struggle to maintain boundaries and have a history of BPD folks being into me. It never goes well, and I can't imagine a psych ward would go any differently
lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org · 64 pts · 241d
> True story
> Written in Greentext
🤔🤔🤔🤔
RalfWausE@feddit.org · 61 pts · 241d
CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org · 14 pts · 241d
especially considering that the dating service is interested in you looking for a partner, not actually finding one
fibojoly@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 237d
Also it helps if you have stuff in common and are not there to meet people as your first goal.
slazer2au@lemmy.world · 54 pts · 241d
30 day alcohol program is to encourage not drinking for 30 days right?
And not to be plastered for 30 days like the name implies.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 241d
The court has sentenced you to a month long bender. May Bacchus have mercy on your liver.
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 9 pts · 241d
Pretty sure given Bacchus is over both alcohol and madness, he's going to preside over their entire relationship. Fertility too, so they may want to be extra careful with protection.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 241d
Fortunately for them I'm pretty sure he's just fertility as in fucking, not fertility as in reproducing. They just have to keep an eye out to stop Hera, Aphrodite, or Demeter from catching on to fhdm
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 241d
One often leads to the other, unless prevented from doing so.
kali_fornication@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 241d
yeah we're both trying to stay sober
BigDiction@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 241d
Also dating during the first stages of recovery is widely discouraged. The point is to focus on yourself and feel good about yourself, not dump all your energy and focus into a new relationship.
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 5 pts · 241d
And if it doesn't exist, we should invent it!
slazer2au@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 241d
I think that is called a booze cruise.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 241d
Or in some places, a "month"
kat_angstrom@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 241d
He can fix her! She can fix him! I believe in Love!
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 241d
At the very least they're taking each other off the market for the rest of us
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 241d
unfortunately :(
Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 14 pts · 241d
Maybe this is a Sodium (explosive) + Chlorine (corrosive) = salt (delicious) type of situation?
tetris11@feddit.uk · 11 pts · 241d
~ just listen to therimmerlimmerhar! ~
dmention7@midwest.social · 2 pts · 240d
^Guitar!^
mycodesucks@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 240d
You don't NEED to be fixed if you complement each other's crazy.
blady_blah@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 241d
If this story doesn't convince you that birth control should be free to anyone who wants it, then you're an idiot.
elkalbil@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 239d
I'm sorry I can't upvote you multiple times!
fibojoly@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 237d
I never thought some people shouldn't be allowed to breed until I heard the stories from my obgyn wife. Holy shit is it heartbreaking, sometimes.
Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 241d
I knew a guy who met one of his wives while locked up in county jail.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 241d
Lmao at “one of”
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 16 pts · 241d
By comparison, I know of a couple (met their kid), who had divorced and remarried each other so many times (often but not always with another marriage in between) that the last time they had to go to a different state because my state refused to do it yet again. Apparently the state will let you get married and divorced as many times as you'd like, but only so many times with the same partner.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 241d
That sounds like a supreme waste of money
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 241d
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 241d
okwhateverdude@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 241d
No where in that does it say to write your own greentexts, screenshot them, and then post them here.
lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org · 46 pts · 241d
But it also doesn't say you CAN'T do that either, so it is free game!
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 241d
can confirm. the government doesn't want you to know this but you can just write your own greentexts. they're free, you can just take them. i have so many greentexts at home.
Senseless@feddit.org · 29 pts · 241d
Can confirm. Got more actual dates with people that are legitimately interested in me from psychiatric hospitals and group therapy than online dating apps.
eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 241d
A lot of people come across way better in person than via text. Also, everybody takes their best photos and puts them up so when you meet them, they always look a little different than you expected, and that's always a moment of awkwardness. If you meet someone in person they have no priors and it can just be you. Apps can work too, but the ghosting is a constant emotional drain.
Etterra@discuss.online · 28 pts · 241d
When she's literally your kind of crazy.
Apytele@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 241d
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 240d
Anon goes off the grid on the crazy hot matrix.
SethTaylor@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 241d
Involuntary committment to psych ward, you say?
My odds have just increased significantly
5715@feddit.org · 8 pts · 241d
Gotische Weibchen?
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 241d
mit großen Brüsten
5715@feddit.org · 3 pts · 241d
So geht das nicht, bonk!
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 241d
bist du es, Eunie?
ICastFist@programming.dev · 7 pts · 241d
tinder limits the amount of matches you get per week (like 5 per week last i used it, 3y ago), so there's that
Buffy@libretechni.ca · 5 pts · 240d
I fear that when I was young I would have read this post and immediately committed myself in the pursuit of love.
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 241d
I really hope they get married
stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 241d
what
j4k3@piefed.world · 1 pts · 241d
When source 4chan implied vets the story.
Are y'all coin flip relationships quality? I want enough time I do not think about that person in any type of addictive or reminiscent context. I want my relationships to be clean slate with a clear head. I do not care if that takes months or years.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 11 pts · 241d
Have you heard of the saying "beggars can't be choosers"? Anon writes that they had zero romantic success elsewhere. Theoretically there are more options than Tinder and a psych ward, but this is a 4chan user.
j4k3@piefed.world · -7 pts · 241d
Why does anyone need to have such a desperate mentality? Being alone is far better than being with a terrible person.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 23 pts · 241d
Because to many people, being alone for their entire lives is already terrible. And it's not like it's a foregone conclusion that a relationship with a person you met in psych ward is terrible, it's also possible that it's good (or at least better than with a non-psych ward person) because they understand each other's issues. Conversely, many people who never went to a psych ward also have mental health issues, which often go entirely untreated.
j4k3@piefed.world · -2 pts · 241d
Some of us do not have a choice at all.
Tonava@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 241d
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 3 pts · 241d
They've both said it's better to be alone than with a terrible person and that they don't have a choice to be with anyone, so I don't think they're really thinking this stuff through.
j4k3@piefed.world · 1 pts · 241d
Y'all are stupid halfwits. I'm in social isolation from physical disability.
edible_funk@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 241d
They met in the psych ward. Your question kinda answers itself.
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 241d
Regrettably, for some of us, our own thoughts are the most terrible thing we can be with. Besides all the most terrible people I know have never been committed.
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 241d
Sane chicks fuck boringly imo
IronBird@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 241d
it's less sane people and more sexually repressed people ime.
least for the US...those goddamn protestants really fucked up this country from the getgo, and one of the biggest tenants of chucklefuck protestants is be ashamed of all things sexy
fibojoly@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 237d
Love is a
battlefieldpsych ward.BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip · -5 pts · 241d
whats with the racist pepe
BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 241d
being mexican is racist now?
ikidd@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 241d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe
QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · -4 pts · 241d
Why did you say racist twice?
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 12 pts · 241d
Nah we won't let the rascists have pepe
CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 241d
agreed
fuck the racists and those who let them have exclusive access to my boy Pepe.
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 241d
I have a serious weakness when it comes to insane women.
TheBat@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 241d
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 241d
Yeah I know, but I'm completely talentless as an artist and wanted to make the meme anyway. I'm hardly going to commission an actual artist to draw it for me, am I?
TheBat@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 241d
IronBird@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 241d
bubble popping won't stop memes like this, localized models are the only ones that really make sense.
bubble really only concerns the datacenters
Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 241d
The bubble where he can't just download some freely available tools and a model file around 10GB and make something like that on basically any gaming computer from the last 5 years by typing in a description? Because that's not going away - only the massive investment circle-jerks throwing money at things with no real product, no solid idea of what a product would look like and no plan of ever turning a profit are going away, and possibly causing a recession in the process.
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 241d
I don't have paint on my mobile, believe it or not. And also as previously mentioned any visual art I produce looks like dog shit.
Baggie@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 241d
Look I don't want to tell you your business, but to me this is less of an AI vs human thing and more about embracing yourself. I've had so much more joy from people's dogshit drawings than I have from the AI stuff. There's a heart and soul behind dogshit.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 241d
and a lot of free time
Orygin@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 241d
I prefer to see dogshit human art than whatever soulless sinful shit generated by an AI.
Hell, most good memes are badly drawn dogshit, that's part of the culture.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 241d
I'm with you. It's better to get the point across and the message out than to nitpick about how the message must be formatted. It's like people nitpicking grammar/vocabulary, instead of recognizing that language is a tool for communication, and as long as it's understandable, it's fine.
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 241d
you think people look at memes because they're visually appealing?
Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 241d
Nope
hayvan@piefed.world · 1 pts · 237d
Just draw some extremely shitty drawings with your mouse. They are better, people will enjoy shitty art over AI slop.
eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 241d
Yup, me too. They're so fucking intense compared to normies.