Kid Rock is the people version of an above ground pool

• opinion
• missing basic functionality available on the website

choose one

It seems absurd to defend the incapacity & redundancy of a deficient technology. Did you miss the part where OP can't set the URL of their post & doesn't seem able to perform an easy edit? The URL in the body is still wrong. ::: spoiler Your comment needs text alternative. Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:

• usability
  • we can't quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
  • text search is unavailable
  • the system can't
    • reflow text to varied screen sizes
    • vary presentation (size, contrast)
    • vary modality (audio, braille)
• accessibility
  • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
  • some users can't read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
  • users can't adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
  • systems can't read the text to them or send it to braille devices
• searchability: the "text" isn't indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
• fault tolerance: no text fallback if
  • image breaks
  • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images. :::

OP just stated it's less capable by lacking basic features from the website, so if "works great" means "works like shit", then I'll concede your point.

It actually saves on resources because it’s not loading in CSS and JS.

I see no evidence of that: I'm pretty sure all clients load a web engine and related resources including CSS, which means you're installing a redundant, special-purpose web client when you already have a general web client installed. Plus, lacking basic functionality as OP states makes it the opposite of useful.