We're happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola. We're collaborating on future devices meeting our privacy and security standards with official GrapheneOS support.
https://motorolanews.com/motorola-three-new-b2b-solutions-at-mwc-2026/
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116159602850585685
We're happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola. We're collaborating on future devices meeting our privacy and security standards with official GrapheneOS support.
https://motorolanews.com/motorola-three-new-b2b-solutions-at-mwc-2026/
27 Comments
vikingtons@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 162d
vendor collaboration is difficult to get right. hope it all goes well.
KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 162d
Same here!
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 162d
I loved my Moto devices. The first Droid was awesome with the slider. Feels like another world back then.
KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 152d
I miss slifers!
KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 162d
This is so awesome!!
poopsmith@lemmy.ml · -5 pts · 161d
gegil@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 162d
I wanted to finally buy a pixel 10 this year. I guess that now i will be waiting to buy the real phone.
idriss@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 161d
bruh, take my money
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 162d
LETS GOOOOOO
just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 161d
The same motorolla that supports IDF?
Metr0pl3X@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 159d
Motorola Solutions and Motorola Mobility are not the same. Motorola as a singular brand does not mean what it once did. The former spun off the latter and sold it. Mobile Phones are NOT a product of the firm with said ties.
mathemachristian@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 161d
Noooooo Motorola
kalapala@sopuli.xyz · -5 pts · 162d
Isn't Motorola a chinese company?
It's hard - to me at least - to believe that Motorola is allowed to provide a device without backdoor(s). What's the catch here?
gid@piefed.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 162d
Motorola Mobility is American, and a subsidiary of Lenovo who are Chinese.
eatCasserole@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 162d
American is not better. Anybody remember Edward Snowden? I'm sure it's only gotten worse since then.
nfreak@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 162d
The US is far, far more of a threat than China even remotely is. That being said, I highly doubt the GOS devs would even consider any collaboration if a backdoor was ever a possibility.
Ajen@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 161d
The possibility of backdoors is unavoidable, and it's part of their threat model. It's why the mobile baseband is isolated, for example.
artyom@piefed.social · 1 pts · 162d
If you're American*
carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 161d
or any global north country, honestly, especially in the five eyes
there’s not much one could do to anger the chinese government enough for them to risk sending agents to kidnap or kill a westerner
all the US needs is a request to law enforcement
artyom@piefed.social · -2 pts · 161d
I dunno what that means. US doesn't have jurisdiction outside the US, just like China doesn't have jurisdiction outside of China, so not a whole lot they can do to you. I have heard of Chinese kidnapping their own people who fled to the US, but I'm not sure how true that is.
In the US, yes. Not even that, really.
kalapala@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 161d
China having police stations in the europe for example is a bit much to me.
gid@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 162d
Oh yeah, to be clear I was just clarifying the structure. I don't consider American companies to be any more trustworthy than companies based elsewhere.
kalapala@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 161d
So does that mean that collaboration is done with American company and not Chinese company?
gid@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 161d
Simple answer is yes.
However, Lenovo have full legal and financial control over Motorola. But because Motorola is a subsidiary, it's legally distinct from its parent company. And because it's incorporated in the USA it has to be compliant with US law. So, for example, Lenovo is not permitted to compel Motorola to violate US law.
KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 162d
A subsidiary of Lenovo
JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 161d
Not preinstalled software.
kalapala@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 161d
Hardware backdoors still exist.
skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 161d
For as long as major powers control the production of the majority of computing devices this will be true. But as far as I know there are no short term alternatives for completely open mobile device hardware... so if hardware backdoors are in your threat model then unfortunately mobile devices are not for you...better stick to the very small community of open hardware for laptop/desktop computers for your communication needs.