I'll be honest, the real pictures would fool me. The era where you could tell by the number of fingers or toes is gone, apparently. She does seem to change military branches a bit too often to be realistic. And, her colleagues seem a bit too unbothered by someone taking a picture of her with her shoes and socks off and feet up on a desk in an apparent military setting. But there aren't any pictures I glance at and think "oh, that's obviously AI".
My only immediate reaction would be "The fuck is that badge thing" followed by "why is the car British and why are there plate carriers strapped to the seats". But otherwise I would initially think it's just low quality slop, especially after the IDF thirst trap propaganda trend.
I don't know what modern military wear is. The badge thing seems strange, but I don't know if it's wrong. I can imagine putting plate carriers on the seats to dry them out if it has been hot and sweaty, but I don't know if that's actually common. As for the car, I would guess there are places where they might use what's available locally, and who knows what that would be.
You have to admit that it's at least high-quality slop. No extra hands, no extra toes or fingers. No text that is obviously slop.
High quality? Yes. Good under scrutiny? Absolutely fucking not.
Just to further my the points I made. The badge is stupid and indistinct also why the fuck would they be wearing it in fatigues. The plate carriers are strapped to the seats in a way I'm not even sure would be possible for their size. And the car is a fucking mess of random design elements and even eras, this one is hard to put into words but the interior has bits taken from GM cars, Land Rovers, and even some Toyota elements, also the vents are all fucked.
Point is that you can easily rip this image apart if you just look for things that just don't make sense. Hell the plate carriers alone being strapped that tightly to the seats are fucking weird.
if you just look for things that just don't make sense.
Do we have to do that with every image we see now? I would bet that a real image also has a lot of things that don't make sense. I feel sorry for people who genuinely have 6 fingers. It's rare, but it happens.
No not really, most of the AI slop out there is still obviously flawed in some ways that are obvious. Liquids, consistent backgrounds, and general weirdness can all be solid signs but none of these things are individually signs of AI. Honestly the best way to pick it out isn't any individual but of weirdness but compounding weirdness, this image for example has the plate carriers, no door handle on the car, the interior having multiple manufacturers design elements, the stupid badge, and that I can't define what's going on in the background. Any one of these could just be weird but together is a general tell tale of AI.
Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at.
I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me.
For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot.
For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications... I'm literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself.
Whilst I've not used those tools, I've used their competitors and they constantly hallucinate methods, parameters, and write pointless unit tests (as in mock a return value and then test for that return value).
Her shirt is partially wet. Maybe she was carrying a jug of oil for the lesbian oil fights and it leaked partially over her right boob. No big deal for a sexy soldier!
Given how frequently GOP conventions crash grindr, maybe the hetrosexuality is performative and they paid less attention to the boobs than you or I did.
Seeing as how they got scammed into voting into :: waves hands at everything :: this, yeah. 100%, without a doubt, we have a huge voting block that are also marks for grift after nationalism-flavored grift.
Joking aside, if we want long-term solutions, we absolutely must get to the bottom of how that keeps happening.
Yep militaristic propaganda using "sexy" women is widespread and disgusting from the US to Israel though they usually manage not to use such obvious ai.
What the hell is that on her chest? That should have been a dead giveaway but Magats be Magats. Sex is baaaaaad and siiiinnn, but we happily pay money to AI OnlyFans accounts!
I would have given it the benefit of the doubt as it could have been a locally procured civilian vehicle that is being used on an overseas base as a runner vehicle.
There’s another picture of her where she’s wearing a skirt and stockings with her feet up on the desk while everyone else (including another female service member) in the room is wearing fatigues. Just consistently out of place.
No idea if they have a policy against it officially, but I doubt it. It would have to be a policy about AI generation specifically since successful OF "users" are definitely going to be registered companies for tax and organization reasons, either with the model directly controlling it or as a business group like traditional porn licensing content. So the content wouldn't match the "user" in those cases. Fake names are pretty standard for anything remotely close to adult for safety reasons as well.
OF wasn't originally created for adult content, it was originally intended to be very general. Tons of bands and similar had OF accounts before it ended up focusing on adult content, many still do because it is a good service setup for exclusive content like that. They were just the platform that didn't cave and crackdown on adult content like other similar services when threatened by payment processors, so all the users went there as it was banned elsewhere.
I am not even fucking kidding you. In times of desperation, I do think "Man... I ain't pretty, I ain't smart, I got no quick ways to make money except... scamming a bunch of morons"
During the pandemic I frequently wished I could lose my conscience and make all kinds of money from the rabid anti-mask and anti-vax crowd. I could be so rich now.
I ran into a Discord where the whole purpose was running AI woman Instagrams and OnlyFans. And it was huge; they ran competitions, frameworks guides and everything, and apparently made a lot of cash doing it.
And it got me thinking… Does it even matter?
If you’re paying to stare at some internet person behind glass, whom you’d never deeply interact with, it mind as well be fake, since the relationship is so vapid anyway.
Nah, I left that place immediately; can't remember what it's called. TBH I don't lurk in any Discord unless I basically have no choice.
But if you want to dig it up, it's linked to related Discords of the local diffusion/imagegen community (as the whole business is just generating sexy pictures en masse).
Mirrored images aren't particularly unusual. And most streamers don't unmirror their cam feed, so it would almost certainly be ignored subconsciously because it's not out of place in context.
116 Comments
Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 250 pts · 169d
It has 3 tiddies lol
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · 115 pts · 169d
FACT CHECK:
Un-shocking tldr: X account is spreading misinfo
Source article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein
Original picture (note the human number of mammaries):
merc@sh.itjust.works · 45 pts · 169d
I'll be honest, the real pictures would fool me. The era where you could tell by the number of fingers or toes is gone, apparently. She does seem to change military branches a bit too often to be realistic. And, her colleagues seem a bit too unbothered by someone taking a picture of her with her shoes and socks off and feet up on a desk in an apparent military setting. But there aren't any pictures I glance at and think "oh, that's obviously AI".
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 168d
My only immediate reaction would be "The fuck is that badge thing" followed by "why is the car British and why are there plate carriers strapped to the seats". But otherwise I would initially think it's just low quality slop, especially after the IDF thirst trap propaganda trend.
merc@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 168d
I don't know what modern military wear is. The badge thing seems strange, but I don't know if it's wrong. I can imagine putting plate carriers on the seats to dry them out if it has been hot and sweaty, but I don't know if that's actually common. As for the car, I would guess there are places where they might use what's available locally, and who knows what that would be.
You have to admit that it's at least high-quality slop. No extra hands, no extra toes or fingers. No text that is obviously slop.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 168d
High quality? Yes. Good under scrutiny? Absolutely fucking not.
Just to further my the points I made. The badge is stupid and indistinct also why the fuck would they be wearing it in fatigues. The plate carriers are strapped to the seats in a way I'm not even sure would be possible for their size. And the car is a fucking mess of random design elements and even eras, this one is hard to put into words but the interior has bits taken from GM cars, Land Rovers, and even some Toyota elements, also the vents are all fucked.
Point is that you can easily rip this image apart if you just look for things that just don't make sense. Hell the plate carriers alone being strapped that tightly to the seats are fucking weird.
merc@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 168d
Do we have to do that with every image we see now? I would bet that a real image also has a lot of things that don't make sense. I feel sorry for people who genuinely have 6 fingers. It's rare, but it happens.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 168d
No not really, most of the AI slop out there is still obviously flawed in some ways that are obvious. Liquids, consistent backgrounds, and general weirdness can all be solid signs but none of these things are individually signs of AI. Honestly the best way to pick it out isn't any individual but of weirdness but compounding weirdness, this image for example has the plate carriers, no door handle on the car, the interior having multiple manufacturers design elements, the stupid badge, and that I can't define what's going on in the background. Any one of these could just be weird but together is a general tell tale of AI.
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · -20 pts · 169d
Reminds me of people who proclaim AI can't code for shit.
I wonder if they've used Claude or Codex in the last ~3 months.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 169d
Amazon Holds Mandatory Meeting After Vibe-Code Triggered Major Outages
~ Mar 11, 2026
syreus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
Knockout
d15d@feddit.org · 12 pts · 169d
I have and while it seems to be doing a decent job at things I'm bad at it is far from usable for the things i'm actually good at
flying_sheep@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 169d
Which is often a sign for something not being good at anything, only you not being good at assessing something you don't have expertise in.
See also: journalism about events you've actually participated in.
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · -13 pts · 169d
Yes exactly. At least for now, use the AI for things you are not expert at.
I suck at graphic design so I get nanobanana to do that for me.
For simple bugs or creating testcases or easy to describe new features, Codex does it because it does a good job 85%+ of the time saving me a lot.
For really complex race conditions or vast complex enterprise applications... I'm literally an expert at debugging, a minority of human practitioners are better than me. Ofc I do that myself.
Flamekebab@piefed.social · 6 pts · 169d
Whilst I've not used those tools, I've used their competitors and they constantly hallucinate methods, parameters, and write pointless unit tests (as in mock a return value and then test for that return value).
BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca · -2 pts · 169d
4.5 kind of changed everything.
djdarren@piefed.social · 6 pts · 168d
Nothing says "serious journalism" like that article censoring the term "foot fetish".
Lawnman23@piefed.social · 58 pts · 169d
Klear@quokk.au · 55 pts · 169d
Zos_Kia@jlai.lu · 4 pts · 169d
tacosanonymous@mander.xyz · 27 pts · 169d
You mean the perfect amount?
RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip · 29 pts · 169d
how am i supposed to put my face between her tits if there's another tit taking up that space i ain't got two heads bro
Duranie@leminal.space · 4 pts · 169d
You don't? Commit to intense yoga and stretching and one day you might get there. I have faith in you.
SethTaylor@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d
He should try tai-chi walking lol
atropa@piefed.social · 1 pts · 169d
tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social · 17 pts · 169d
They put the feet in the shot to distract from the three boobs.
Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 169d
I came here to say the same thing. Not tiddies, triddies.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 169d
Wouldn't that make the former "duoddies", then?
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
Should have been a giveaway, but those people aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 169d
First thing I noticed. Like, come ON.
raman_klogius@ani.social · 1 pts · 169d
threeddies
ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world · 99 pts · 169d
She looks like the chick with three tits in the bar from the first Total Recall
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 169d
They made a sequel to total recall? 😕
Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 169d
2012 remake, haven't watched it the reviews weren't good enough
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 169d
The reasons not to watch it are legion.
hayvan@piefed.world · 1 pts · 169d
It's bad, not worth your time.
ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 168d
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1386703
issei6969@futurology.today · 1 pts · 169d
BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network · 71 pts · 169d
The third boob didn't give it away?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 169d
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 168d
I swear I've met way too many people who developed an early fetish from this because it was the first boobs they'd seen.
melfie@lemy.lol · 8 pts · 168d
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 169d
Yep that's the one
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 169d
The lighting does look a little weird
Other elements make it look overcast but the lighting on the chest implies direct sunlight partially obscured by the car
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 168d
Her shirt is partially wet. Maybe she was carrying a jug of oil for the lesbian oil fights and it leaked partially over her right boob. No big deal for a sexy soldier!
davidagain@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 168d
Given how frequently GOP conventions crash grindr, maybe the hetrosexuality is performative and they paid less attention to the boobs than you or I did.
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 7 pts · 169d
"Yes, I know it's paper mâché, I don't care!"
how_we_burned@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 169d
That and the 6 toes
blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 169d
I don't see 6 toes but I see feet that are based on a mishmash of men's and women's feet
Wilco@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 168d
I do kind of see the possibility of 6 toes. It is a bit blurry.
Switorik@lemmy.zip · 48 pts · 169d
I'm having a flashback to Total Recall
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 169d
Going to have to try and find the copy I have on VHS with all this Recall talk...
toynbee@piefed.social · 3 pts · 169d
You don't recall where you left it?
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 164d
No, I don't recall the exact contents of every box of DVDs & VHS tapes. It'll take a bit of looking as time permits.
toynbee@piefed.social · 1 pts · 164d
Sorry - I wasn't trying to demand anything from you. I was just trying to use the word "recall" in a relevant sentence.
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 164d
NP my dude, no demands received. I was going to look for it anyway.
MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 42 pts · 169d
I'm confused, how is this stealing? They paid for pictures, they got pictures.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
Strictly speaking, AI images violate OnlyFans terms of service.
But otherwise, sure. Who was actually harmed here? If she'd been real, would this have been better somehow?
sheetzoos@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 168d
Zephorah@discuss.online · 32 pts · 169d
So, now you can make money on onlyfans without ever appearing yourself.
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de · 22 pts · 169d
Is this how openai will make money?
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 169d
Seems fitting. Grok did it with child porn.
Zephorah@discuss.online · 4 pts · 168d
Probably. Let’s be real. If new tech can be monetized for sex, it will be.
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · 15 pts · 169d
legit DDG search I just did "best ai generator for " 4th autocomplete was "onlyfans'
We are all chumps. Dumbfucks who work for paychecks all day. The sharks are already crowding each other out in a feeding frenzy for the free money.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
Always could. We used to just call it "pimping"
Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 169d
Yea it's been a thing for a while.
Kirp123@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d
Wouldn't even be surprised if there are some doing money that way.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 169d
Seeing as how they got scammed into voting into :: waves hands at everything :: this, yeah. 100%, without a doubt, we have a huge voting block that are also marks for grift after nationalism-flavored grift.
Joking aside, if we want long-term solutions, we absolutely must get to the bottom of how that keeps happening.
AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 169d
Well there is that thing where for the entirety of my 50 plus years on this Earth, the conservatives have been striving to destroy public education
AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 168d
If we can scam them out of all their money wouldn't that be a win-win?
spirinolas@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 168d
On their defense, I'd be pretty curious myself to see 3 titties.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works · 28 pts · 168d
What mortal could resist the call of the 3 tiddied siren?
mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de · 26 pts · 169d
Incredibly surprising that the AI did the feet better than the titsNevermind the photo in the OP is altered to look more fake. Most reliable X post
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 25 pts · 169d
Yep militaristic propaganda using "sexy" women is widespread and disgusting from the US to Israel though they usually manage not to use such obvious ai.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 169d
What the hell is that on her chest? That should have been a dead giveaway but Magats be Magats. Sex is baaaaaad and siiiinnn, but we happily pay money to AI OnlyFans accounts!
Pringles@sopuli.xyz · 13 pts · 169d
Cort@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 169d
Even when there's 3
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 169d
That's what I immediately thought of!
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 169d
Everyone understandably points out the 3 boobs, but the patches and insignas on the t-shirt is laughable too.
Asafum@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 169d
And the right side steering wheel on a supposedly US military vehicle...
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 169d
I would have given it the benefit of the doubt as it could have been a locally procured civilian vehicle that is being used on an overseas base as a runner vehicle.
starik@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 169d
Or a mirrored image
vaionko@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 169d
The flags aren't mirrored though.
starik@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 169d
Good point
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social · 2 pts · 169d
Yeah, very few streamers unmirror their face cam feed, so it's pretty normal now to just ignore mirroring like that subconsciously.
nymnympseudonym@piefed.social · 3 pts · 169d
maybe believable back when the USA was a NATO ally
Mucki@feddit.org · 3 pts · 169d
It is a right hand drive 70 series from Toyota Japan. That model is not street legal in the US.
jontree255@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 169d
There’s another picture of her where she’s wearing a skirt and stockings with her feet up on the desk while everyone else (including another female service member) in the room is wearing fatigues. Just consistently out of place.
NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 168d
This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 169d
MAGA families dealing with the consequences of having an unstable imbecile for a patriarch/matriarch
senior citizen financial stability disintegration SFX
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
Oh, no! My nonexistent support system exists even less!
TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 169d
slaps another sticker of Calvin pissing on Democrat Party™ logo onto truck cab back window
"Take that, Libs!"
jtrek@startrek.website · 19 pts · 169d
If they were smart they wouldn't be maga. Because they are maga, you can infer they are stupid. Poor reasoning skills. Poor emotional regulation.
NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 168d
This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.
I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.
okcomputer@piefed.world · 16 pts · 169d
Does the site actually allow you to do this and receive payments in your name? That’s wild
captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
If you are taking about OnlyFans:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein
From: https://lemmy.world/post/44246810/22660472
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social · 2 pts · 169d
No idea if they have a policy against it officially, but I doubt it. It would have to be a policy about AI generation specifically since successful OF "users" are definitely going to be registered companies for tax and organization reasons, either with the model directly controlling it or as a business group like traditional porn licensing content. So the content wouldn't match the "user" in those cases. Fake names are pretty standard for anything remotely close to adult for safety reasons as well.
OF wasn't originally created for adult content, it was originally intended to be very general. Tons of bands and similar had OF accounts before it ended up focusing on adult content, many still do because it is a good service setup for exclusive content like that. They were just the platform that didn't cave and crackdown on adult content like other similar services when threatened by payment processors, so all the users went there as it was banned elsewhere.
SethTaylor@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 169d
I am not even fucking kidding you. In times of desperation, I do think "Man... I ain't pretty, I ain't smart, I got no quick ways to make money except... scamming a bunch of morons"
njm1314@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 169d
It's very funny to me how blatant it's a foot fetish picture too.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 168d
Look at that chest. Three boobs for Tue price of two.
SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 168d
TWO WEEKS!
Eternal192@anarchist.nexus · 12 pts · 169d
Three tits works every time.
Ioughttamow@fedia.io · 12 pts · 169d
I totally recall that this is true
NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 168d
This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.
I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.
Amuletta@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 168d
During the pandemic I frequently wished I could lose my conscience and make all kinds of money from the rabid anti-mask and anti-vax crowd. I could be so rich now.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 169d
I ran into a Discord where the whole purpose was running AI woman Instagrams and OnlyFans. And it was huge; they ran competitions, frameworks guides and everything, and apparently made a lot of cash doing it.
And it got me thinking… Does it even matter?
If you’re paying to stare at some internet person behind glass, whom you’d never deeply interact with, it mind as well be fake, since the relationship is so vapid anyway.
Crackhappy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
This is why hentai is a thing.
everett@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 169d
Not sure if !boneappletea@lemmy.world or clever pun.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 169d
Invite? Asking for a friend.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 168d
Nah, I left that place immediately; can't remember what it's called. TBH I don't lurk in any Discord unless I basically have no choice.
But if you want to dig it up, it's linked to related Discords of the local diffusion/imagegen community (as the whole business is just generating sexy pictures en masse).
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 169d
They just thought the triple boobed lady soldier was legit?
NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 168d
This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.
I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.
plyth@feddit.org · 6 pts · 169d
Is the assumption correct that they say that they can tell the difference? The whole conflict would make much more sense if they know that they can't.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 169d
Could swear I've seen her in an old Schwarzenegger movie
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 168d
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online · 3 pts · 169d
The vehicle is also not American. It has the driver's seat on the right side...
And yes I did notice the disfigured boobs... Or maybe she is that alien hooker from Total Recall.
NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 168d
This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.
I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.
duckman@startrek.website · 3 pts · 169d
Would any of the us vehicles be right hand driven?
blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 169d
The left hand is too busy after seeing this image
halcyoncmdr@piefed.social · 2 pts · 169d
Mirrored images aren't particularly unusual. And most streamers don't unmirror their cam feed, so it would almost certainly be ignored subconsciously because it's not out of place in context.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol · 3 pts · 169d
I mean fake or not they probably got the "experience" they paid for. No one harmed here, unlike most AI bull.