1min

695 points · 79 comments · view on lemmy.world

79 Comments

Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 56 pts · 109d (1 reply)

I only get 1 min either way

errer@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 109d

I don’t think you get 3 seconds with prime Tyson

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 109d (9 replies)

I mean......Logan Paul didn't seem to have much of an issue against Tyson.

How's Lana's blocking? I bet I could knock her out easier that I could knock out Tyson.

CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 109d (7 replies)

It’s Logan Paul, 99.999% sure he also pays his “Opponents” to let him win

youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 15 pts · 109d (5 replies)

Tyson is like 70 dude.

scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 109d (3 replies)

Yes, but he's also Mike Tyson. He can probably still hit someone hard enough to kill them on the spot.

UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 108d (1 reply)

Power is indeed the last thing to go but the peekaboo style requires a lot of explosiveness and athleticism. It's hard to keep that up with old age. I do think he could've done better but not as much as a lot of people think. There were definitely some secret clauses or something.

slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club · 2 pts · 108d

I think the combination of weighted gloves, exhibition match and not in Tyson's prime did this. The ambition is what makes people fight harder. Tyson got paid the moment he got in the ring. There was no incentive to knock Paul's head off (as much as we would've loved to have seen it.)

Tyson was an animal during his prime because he was also trying for heavyweight champion or defending it.

Weighted gloves make the hits slower and don't allow for hits as hard as there could have been.

Paul recently fought someone who is still in his prime, and what happened? The jaw break seen around the world.

captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d

Every loss makes a boxer worse. He may still be strong, but he made his name and fortune receiving head trauma.

CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Which still doesn’t mean Logan Paul’s boxing career isn’t total bullshit

backalleycoyote@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 109d

Jake forgot that one simple trick.

SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 108d

Tyson was holding back punches in the first few rounds. He could have knocked Jake Paul out in the first round. Paul won because Tyson was tired after like round 2.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 109d (11 replies)

Does Gen Z have any iconic porn stars or is it all just camgirls?

Impound4017@sh.itjust.works · 24 pts · 109d

The equivalent is probably somebody who went down the TikTok Star -> Onlyfans path.

zewm@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 109d

I reckon there is that British chick that fucks 1000 men a day or something. Is she Gen Z?

Beethedude@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 108d (1 reply)

I think it's like music; everything has been democratized and splintered by access. So now there are only a tiny few truly global music stars and countless microscenes; to some people Oli Sykes is the most famous man in their universe but tons of normies have never even heard of him or his band. I think same deal has happened to porn, especially with the rise of "farm to table" amateur porn/camgirling. More fish in smaller oceans.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Yeah, the decline of broadcasting and democratization of media production has splintered culture, even in porn.

HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 108d (2 replies)

What's the difference between porn stars and camgirls?

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 108d

Who is running the camera.

CombatWombat@feddit.online · 2 pts · 108d

Distribution rights

Beethedude@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 108d
[ removed ]
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d

Emily Willis or is she a millenial? Or Sky Bri.

Egde400@fedinsfw.app · 1 pts · 108d

Possibly goth egg or Elly Clutch

redsand@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 108d

Shrooms Q maybe? More of them would probably recognize purplebitch or babyfooji though

DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 109d (3 replies)

db2@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 109d

Now kith

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 109d (1 reply)

What is he doing with Norm McDonald in that photo???

fartographer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Playing matchmaker

WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 109d (3 replies)

Frankly, I'm not sure I could take Lana Rhodes in a fight. She seems like a badass.

Tiral@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 109d (1 reply)

Right? I'm stage 5 kidney failure on dialysis, they'd both fuck me up probably. I guess I might have a higher chance of survival with Lana?

altphoto@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 109d

Nice try buddy! You'll need a good scaple if you want her juicy kidney.

0x0@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 108d

Goodass but that's an opinion.

ekZepp@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 108d

panda_abyss@lemmy.ca · 26 pts · 109d

1 minute with either of them is the same length of time, so neither, and both.

rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 109d (1 reply)

I don't know anything about Lana Rhodes, is she also a convicted rapist?

pipe01@programming.dev · 3 pts · 108d

Depends on the video you're watching

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 17 pts · 108d (1 reply)

I don't think I could take either of them in a fight.

NannerBanner@literature.cafe · 5 pts · 108d

Considering I don't know how well she can throw a punch, or how rough he is in bed, I'm just going to propose a cross country run. It avoids all the possible unpleasant options.

OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 109d (3 replies)

This is a "what is heavier, 1 kg of bricks or 1 kg of feathers"-type of question.

0x0@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 108d

I'd rather be hit with a kg of feathers though.

D_C@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 108d

Easy, Mike Tyson is far heavier than both of those...

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 108d

... ~220 lbs of Mike Tyson vs ~120lbs of Lana Rhoades?

QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 109d

mike Tyson is 59 now, still don't think I'd last a minute though

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 12 pts · 109d

Lana Rhodes certainly. She isn't going to be able to affect me.

Mike Tyson would get me some 3-4 seconds in.

ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 109d

I'll just take the money.

sik0fewl@piefed.ca · 10 pts · 109d (1 reply)

Which weighs more, a pound of feathers or a pound of gold?

WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 109d

A pund of feathers.

The guilt you get from skinning those pigeons is infinitely more heavy.

hesh@quokk.au · 10 pts · 109d (1 reply)

Lana Rhodes has big blobby butt implants

Rekonok@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 108d

First the cat piloting a mecha wasn't real and now this

We're not in the stupid timeline but in the disappointment too

ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 109d

Would not last 1 minute with either

ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca · 9 pts · 109d

I'm pretty sure the for the vast majority of people Mike Tyson has a much better chance of finishing them off in a minute than Lana.

kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 109d (2 replies)

I don't really want to hit a woman. But I could kick Lana's ass.

TachyonTele@piefed.social · 14 pts · 109d

Lick*

village604@adultswim.fan · 8 pts · 109d

Are you sure about that? Porn stars are usually in really good shape.

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 108d (2 replies)

1min is the same as 1min actually, so by those rules i wouldn't last longer with either

samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 108d (1 reply)

What weighs more, a pound of Mike Tyson or a pound of Lana Rhodes?

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 104d

what lasts longer, a minute of Mike Tyson or a minute of Lana Rhodes?

tired_n_bored@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 108d (1 reply)

The post implied a boxing match with the girl

Kangy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 108d

Found Sherlock Holmes

captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 108d

I suspect I can run away from a septigenarian asthmatic for a minute, even in a boxing ring. Idk if I can flee from a young and healthy woman that long

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 108d (1 reply)

Terrible question.

What’s the reward here?

Getting a TBI or getting laid?

portuga@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Getting smacked on the face by those big cheeks? Or I don’t know, that woman on the right

some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 108d (1 reply)

Ken M comment

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d

Grandson still in central park?

stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 108d

Can I choose the bear?

in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 108d

As a bi.... Neither.

SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Ummm ...yeah. Nah.

faqtimaan@lemmy.wtf · 3 pts · 109d

Well atleast he is trying

Pirtatogna@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Neither of them are really my type tbh.

aesthelete@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

Lana

0x0@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 108d (3 replies)

I had to google Lana Rhodes.

Skullgrid@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d (2 replies)

try a porn vid site next

0x0@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 108d (1 reply)

Done.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d

BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d

The real challange starts when Tyson gets erected for you

Typotyper@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 108d

Oh thugar, you tho thweet...why don't you thlide on over here and we can kith

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d (1 reply)

I'll go for Mike. Lana is no longer the prime Lana.

Nalivai@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d

They're both far from their prime.

NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 108d

I know for a fact that I can survive a minute in the ring with Mike Tyson. In fact, I bet I could last 5 minutes. Or 10. However long I can pretend to have problems at the ring corner with my team before I concede.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 108d

So uh, bisexual with a black belt here:

I could last longer than one minute, in either the bedroom or the boxing ring, with either of them.

10 minutes in the ring with with Tyson?

I am almost certainly unconscious with multiple fractures.

10 minutes in the bedroom with Tyson?

... probably the same thing.

10 minutes in the ring with Rhoades?

I'm laughing and she's whimpering, breathing heavy.

10 minutes in the bedroom with Rhoades?

... probably the same thing.