Who said free markets can't deliver for the consumer

229 points · 31 comments · view on lemmy.world

31 Comments

20cello@lemmy.world · 70 pts · 33d (2 replies)

You know something is wrong when the drug dealers are more honest than the ruling class

Elting@piefed.social · 48 pts · 33d (1 reply)

Well, when you can't use the law to rig the competition, you have to remain competitive.

argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org · 4 pts · 33d

@Elting

Yeah, whenever a so-called capitalist talks about building a moat, it's like, that is the opposite of capitalism.

@20cello

nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf · 34 pts · 33d (2 replies)

No source — discarding data.

cRazi_man@europe.pub · 24 pts · 33d (1 reply)

But the Y axis says that they're almost at 150% purity. And down to almost $80/kilo

tdawg@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 33d

150% of the baseline

huppakee@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 33d

This graph is great at showing a selective part of reality. Free market thinking and capitalism tend to do well on those.

BeUnique@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 33d

Finally some uplifting news 😁

probable_possum@leminal.space · 7 pts · 33d (1 reply)

So. Supply is bigger than in 2014? I don't think demand is in decline.

So drug trafficking gangs found better ways to move their product into the target countries.

Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 33d

Much bigger supply, higher quality, lower prices.

Basically they just produce way more than before.

wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 33d (15 replies)

How can purity go above 100? Is this concentrated cocaine? Supposed to water it down first or something?

Bademantel@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 33d (2 replies)

100 is the relative purity and price in 2014.

Would like to see absolute numbers.

mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 12 pts · 33d (9 replies)

This is a relative scale. 100 being the baseline.

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 33d (8 replies)

So a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.

slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 33d (1 reply)

Not one random sample but the average of all samples.

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 33d

The random sample collectively.

frank@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 33d (2 replies)

Presumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it'd be 94/6

Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 33d

Specifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%.

It's impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that's the purity they export.

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 33d

That makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 33d (2 replies)

My coke has more coke!

argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org · 4 pts · 33d (1 reply)

@SCmSTR

That's 40% more coke per coke!

@Tar_alcaran

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 33d

What... Is your instance name

dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 33d

It clearly says 2014=100. Ergo a value of 160 is 3222.4 on the purity scale. You're going to need a lot of water.

yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 33d

For our purposes, 140 will do fine.

Abrinoxus@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 33d

Imagine if the market was that free for consumer goods

DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 33d

And Americans just get theirs cut with Fentanyl!

Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 33d
[ removed ]
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 32d

I've paid 50 euros per gram (currently 86% pure) for at least the past 10 years.

BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d

We need to introduce some socialism to that market. Like, we need to seize the means of production

kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d

Economies of scale? 🤔