8 films have now made over $1B since Netflix's CEO said going to the theaters for many people is an 'outdated concept'

https://popculturenews.com/films-to-gross-1b-since-netflix-said-theaters-are-outdated/

200 points · 45 comments · view on lemmy.world

45 Comments

procrastitron@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 23d (7 replies)

Both can be true.

Saying “for many people it’s an outdated concept” is absolutely true.

I don’t go to theaters anymore and quite possibly never will again.

That doesn’t mean no one goes anymore.

For that matter, making over 1 billion dollars doesn’t even require most people to go.

With tickets (in the US) costing around $20, if only 10% of people went to see a movie then it would make 700 million in just the U.S.

inmate_p01135809@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 23d (6 replies)

Yep. My wife was interested in watching the Odyssey. It would take ~5 hours, including travel, and about $75 for tickets, gas, and ONE snack and ONE drink. For that amount of money, we can buy pizza on the way home, buy/rent the movie, and watch it on our couch, AND do it again for a second movie, and still have money left over.

We are entering an age where impatience is a luxury. I can wait for the movie to be available for streaming.

kinkles@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 23d (2 replies)

Why are you including the movie itself in your time estimate?

Linktank@lemmy.today · 28 pts · 23d (1 reply)

That's time away from home. Nobody likes that.

altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 23d

Based.

JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 23d

I rarely go to theaters but made it a point to see Oppenheimer and The Odyssey in theatres because there is no other way to watch 70mm IMAX. That way of watching a movie is a memorable and unique cinema experience in itself. So, I have to side with your wife on this one, simply because you just cannot get that experience in any other way.

EDIT: Another movie that should have been seen in a top notch movie theatre was Joker, but for a completely different reason. Hildur Guðnadóttir's soundtrack was like a breathing, living being and a definite main character of the story. It was something that needed to be felt in a decked out theater sound system. Her Academy Award for it was a "no brainer".

mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 22d (1 reply)

not living within 20 minutes of a theater is definitely working against you there

going to the movies is like going out to dinner, for me. I can make dinner at home. I can have a different experience at the theater. both experiences can be good but they're different. sometimes different is good. but experiences outside the home always cost more.

inmate_p01135809@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 22d

You can afford to go out for dinner?

rozodru@piefed.world · 40 pts · 23d (3 replies)

imho streaming is an outdated concept because streaming services have or are going back to the cable tv model thus negating the benefit of streaming. they've just becaome cable tv with a tivo box.

watson387@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 23d

Exactly. It was relevant when it was cheaper and every station didn't have their own service. In hindsight, having it all in one bill was the best part of cable.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 4 pts · 22d

Modern non-pirated streaming services are indeed lile cable TV

But if you buy the movie and put it on your Jellyfin server or stream from a pirate site...

MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 23d

I love my TiVo.. works great with antenna. Unfortunately, they stopped making new boxes that work with antenna. Gee, I wonder why?

TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca · 18 pts · 23d

Someone let netflix know that cable subscriptions are an outdated concept too.

Tikiporch@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 23d (2 replies)

Netflix revenue for last 12 months is $48b.

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 23d (1 reply)

And there were a lot more than 8 movies in the past year.

Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 23d

Well, all those statistics don't matter to disprove the statement that cinema is an outdated concept. You only need a single profitable movie to say otherwise.

bowsertattoo@piefed.social · 14 pts · 23d

I love going to the theater, i hope this means more movies in theaters

TwinTitans@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 23d

Streamings the one that’s outgrown it’s usefulness.

bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 23d (4 replies)

I still love theaters. But I want wayyyyyyy less shiny fake CGI (and now mostly ai generated) movies.

cRazi_man@europe.pub · 3 pts · 23d (3 replies)

I want shiny, exploding, space, special effects shit in the cinema. If it isn't a visual spectacle then I'm happier watching at home.

bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 23d (2 replies)

Thats fine and all but not for me. Its boring and shallow for me.

lastweakness@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 23d (1 reply)

I assume that's why we have different movies

bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 23d

Totally! I was being snarky in my original comment, I do like some shiny boom boom movies but I want a little more diversity. Movies are all blending together a little too much like ai slop because they all use the same CGI and have the same plot..

Teal@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 23d

Overspending on creating movies and shows only to cancel them and raise monthly fees is an outdated concept.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 22d (2 replies)

Netflix will never replace theaters for every single person out there and I say this as someone who used to have a Netflix subscription that was replaced with increased amounts of piracy (and an Apple TV+ subscription, that's literally the one thing I haven't cancelled, great originals and only originals, no watching The Office or Friends for the umpteenth time, I'm starting to feel like a shill for saying it, but they have some great shows and many average or above average shows).

Netflix works best as "background noise". Occasionally you'll find a great show to binge that they'll cancel soon, occasionally they'll even have a decent original movie (which is sadly made specially for streaming where people are expected to be scrolling on theirp hone so the plot has to be repeated 3 times as they apparently told Matt Damon).

The theater is an experience. You go there to watch a movie you've been anticipating. You spend that ludicrous amount on snacks (or don't) because you know you don't go every week anyway. You go there because you want to be immersed, your phone on silent in the pocket, maybe you go with your friends or family and then it's great to discuss it on the walk out after the end. If this is not something you enjoy then true, going to the theaters is an outdated concept for you and that's fine.

atx_aquarian@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 22d (1 reply)

If you mainly want it for background noise, there are cheaper services with just as much filler/ambiance shows.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 19d

Well my cheaper service is Jellyfin + torrents. Discovery is harder, but you can just click on shit in seerr and download it if you don't have anything special in mind

dan69@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 23d

To Netflix, shutup and allow multiple users from different devices to use the service.

ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 23d

If Netflix and other streaming platforms didn't try to rapidly enshittify over the past 2 years, they might have been right. The main reasons I have gone to more movies is that I was kicked off my family streaming plans, and I'm not sure when/if I'll be able to find it on streaming.

M137@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 22d (2 replies)

From what I've read online it seems like people in the US generally never go to the cinema anymore, a big part of that being that the cinemas there fucking suck. Old low quality and broken everything, loud obnoxious people, overpriced snacks that aren't good etc. (I guess that's just the US in a nutshell though).
Overpriced snacks at cinemas are surely a mostly global thing but the rest of the things aren't.
I've been to cinemas in 4 countries in Europe and they were all well kept and updated, no one said anything louder than a whisper (other than reactions like laughs and screams which are fine) and no one used their phones during the movies.
I got to the cinema about 4 times a year here in Sweden and have done so since I was a kid, never once had a bad experience.

OhShitSon@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 22d (1 reply)

Wow, my SO and I go to the cinema between 4-8 times a year, but there's always someone on their phone. The cinema itself is always excellent though.

kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 22d

would you say it's:

gedfromgont@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 23d

Ok, how many films have been made in total that went to the cinema versus the ones that were so successful? And is that rate higher than the ones that went to streaming?

Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 23d

The theaters are fun, but it's gatta be a really good movie.

Spiderman was worth it. Highly recommended.

JamesTBagg@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 23d

The worst part about going to theaters is the facilities are cared for less and less. Saw Odyssey at a Cinépolis, what's supposed to be a "luxury cinema" chain. Seats were sticky, girlfriend's seats broke halfway reclined, first dish to come out was cold, smelled like they still allowed smoking in there, after movie girls were in the bathroom and I was not sitting on the disgusting chairs and couches in the common area. Luxury?

MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 23d

I've been looking to tix to the 70mm IMAX. Constantly sold out. I know it's been extended. I'll keep looking.

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 22d

I finally went back after more than 25 years of boycotting theaters, just to see The Odyssey. I was boycotting for 2 reasons: 1) Grossly Expensive snacks and 2) Having to pay to watch a company's advertisements. I got over it for the snacks but the advertising still left me with a bad taste in my mouth (and there seemed to be even more advertisements this time around). I was spoiled I guess as I grew up watching nothing but movie trailers of coming attractions and a pre-movie cartoon. You can argue that movie trailers are advertising but I don't count them.

the_q@piefed.social · -4 pts · 23d

Nice job, everyone. You really showed that capitalist how to give different capitalists your money for the privilege of remaining placated.

Widdershins@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 23d (6 replies)

Can't smoke in theaters anymore. I can go to the store and buy a prerolled joint coated in resin and rolled in moon rocks and crystalline THC but I can't smoke it in any theater. If they want to fill seats for Hotel for Dogs 2 they need to look at their audience and open more drive-in theaters.

JamesTBagg@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 23d (3 replies)

Nah, your stank ass can stay home away from the rest of us.

Widdershins@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 23d (2 replies)

Pardon me for suggesting drive-in theaters come back and having a solid reason for them to. Enjoy your boring ass movies in filthy theaters with broken, sticky, public seating and cold food at a luxury price. I'll be eating a hot, cheap, rotisserie chicken and hot boxing my own car with heated seats until I can barely see the dogs or the hotel they are staying at in the sequel.

fireweed@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 23d (1 reply)

Hopefully you've got a designated driver that's going to come and drive you home...

Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 23d

One of the dogs will drive.

Or the hotel.

They haven't decided yet.

TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca · 4 pts · 23d (1 reply)

The fuck lol? I mean I love theaters and drugs and even I would just say to you my guy, time progresses linearly. Try this next time.

Smoke > attend movie

If it's a long movie you can try this

Smoke > attend movie > step outside for a moment to smoke more > go back inside

Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 22d