Carighan Maconar

u/Carighan@piefed.world
15 posts · 211 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

It's funny, that pizza shop on the corner doesn't benefit from liability protections. It is their ass on the line, which is why people running personally-owned places tend to actually worry about accountability.

And why, yes, you can easily lose your home and shit if your all-in restaurant place goes tits up. Maybe we need more liability protections for those without enough money, in turn we need less or none who'd have the money to pay for the damages they cause to others livelihood?

This is why we need personal accountability by C-suites in regards to company misgivings. Yes companies are legally entities but we need like, 50% of the accountability is shared by the C-suites either as a group, or if they have it in writing for a specific thing, by a specific one, the CEO or CTO or whatever.

A person. So there's a very real example of the personal risk to freedom or wealth (the second will hit investors more I presume) if you do this.

Plus I have a feeling that the moment it's their ass on the line, these C-fuckers will, surprisingly, agree to do this shit less often.

Aaaah, I see where your consternation comes from. Yeah I'm not a primary english speaker, I did not mean to imply "automated" with "mass banning". I meant they clean up shop and get rid of vibe-coded shit, but "mass banning" for me would be anything from a hundred projects up, and that's something human reviewers would easily clean up shop each day.

Obviously a rule that should not and cannot be defined "hard" should not be used for automated banning. At most for automated-selection-for-review.

Why? That'd not he what a company banning the projects would do, so why should it be done beforehand?

It's exactly about having a hard cut-off, but for a softly defined offense.

Yeah but I also get it as a thing to put down, just in case you need to mass-ban thousands of clearly-AI-generated projects. You can then just point to this ToS.

on sit down! · c/lemmyshitpost · 1 pts · 12d

Random weird symbols, you're from a non-US country -> Clearly must be something related to you. On-point for DDG's always-shitty results, at least from my experience. :<

There will be laws for this in your country, but they're country specific.

For your cases:

  • The key is a technical protective measure. It's not the IP, but circumventing it except to legally access my legally accessibly content is not allowed.
  • Private showings are fine, even with a certain amount of non-personal-aquaintances in the mix.
  • Re-streaming is tricky and depends on how you handle it on a technical level. Re-streaming without circumventing protective measures for your personal use is usually fine.
  • You can temporarily leave during a private showing, it's still legally a private showing.

The big difference with a streaming site is that it is automatically a public showing because they do not know who accesses the site (and in fact would not want to know, lest they open those viewers up to legality issues again).

Again, those are for my country. It differs everywhere.

Yeah the only reason a company is not interested in fascism is because they're jelly they're not included in the money grift. And then they only desperately want to be included.