Yeah season 21 is crazy, they took a hard sci fi turn about 10 seasons ago and now everyone is split up. They made a whole cinematic universe and its very confusing. Jim was a CIA agent for a while and now he's a post apocalyptic survivor. IMO they're making the character do too much, bir I guess that's what happens when you run out of ideas ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i was really there for dwight’s arc as unexpected the heir to the massive hairbo gummy bear empire. his big move for the recipe from high fructose corn syrup tp beet sugar was brilliant.
The literally is a movie about people suffering from cancer. And one about somebody who's lost a limb. I'm surprised someone as clearly educated in the film arts as you doesn't know that.
Yeah, god forbid you might gain a new perspective and develop *gag* empathy for people that live different lives or have different problems than you do
The worst is when you're watching something with subtitles (in your own language because it's hard to hear sometimes), then someone on screen speaks a different language with the subtitles hardcoded into the video.
Great, right?
Well no, because Amazon's (or Netflix etc, they all do it) subtitles have a big "[Speaks German]" up the entire time, blocking the hard coded subs entirely so you cannot see what they say without temporarily disabling subs. Like bitch, I KNOW THEY ARE SPEAKING GERMAN, MOVE THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY SO I KNOW WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
It's so fucking stupid and infuriating. How have they not addressed this shit?
I get a special kind of mad when I watch a foreign film in its original language. Turn on that language's subtitles and the subtitles don't match what's being verbally said because apparently the subs have been translated into English then back into the original language so nothing matches and everything sucks. Or worse when they've translated some idiom for American audiences and have translated that idiom back so what's being said makes zero sense.
Whenever I watch anything in Japanese with my boyfriend, we put on English subtitles for him. Meanwhile, I spend most of the time screaming internally "THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY SAID. THIS IS NOT WHAT ANYONE IS SAYING!?!" instead of actually enjoying the show.
Sometimes for fun I'll watch it foreign language movie I'll turn on English dubbing and run subtitles as well. It's really hilarious how different the two will be
Yeah I remember Man in the High Castle was really terrible with subtitles. It didn't have hard-coded subtitles at all and the programmatic ones didn't work reliably. So I'd be sitting there and and thinking "ok am I not supposed to know what they're saying?" After the scene goes on for a while it becomes "yeah I definitely supposed to know what they're saying well I guess I have to mess with subtitle settings." Sometimes it wouldn't work at all and I'd have to open a ticket with Amazon Prime and wait until they got it working.
So I guess they gave up on fixing subtitles and just baked them in. But still fucked it up anyway. Apparently a company as big as Amazon still can't do QA on the use case of someone who's an english speaker just watching on their platform. It's sad.
The only time a "[speaks German]" type of subs is acceptable is when the audience is not supposed to understand what's being said. Obscuring the hardcoded subs with that bullshit is absolutely infuriating.
My Dad is incredibly dyslexic, and it's a legit issue for him.
Growing up, if a movie or TV show had subs we had to take turns reading it out loud for him. I still have to catch myself trying to do automatically it when we're watching something with other people.
if a movie or TV show had subs we had to take turns reading it out loud
I do this for my wife, because she spends most of a film on her phone.
She's listening to the audio and can mostly follow what's going on by glancing at the screen and reading subtitles every now and then, but if there's a foreign language with subtitles, or a text description (Paris, 11 AM or 10 years later, etc.), she'll miss it and then be completely lost.
I can't tell you how many times I've had to pause a movie and give a quick recap to get her caught up with the plot.
I believe Netflix order movies to be understandable to people who are not paying attention. Maybe they have something that is good enough for you, it would save you from having to recap stuff.
Second Screen Viewing, yeah. Basically, Netflix is dumbing down their scripts so people can understand the plot even when it’s just playing on their second screen while they do other stuff. Apparently our attention spans have shrunk so much that people can’t even be expected to pay attention to the movies they put on.
I am conflicted here. On the one hand, I agree that subtitles would have been nice. On the other hand, I think folks with hearing disabilities get shut out of other content so much that I don't think this somewhat solitary case makes it good mildly infuriating material. It's most likely just an oversight. Much less likely a clever scheme to highlight ableism.
I mean, by US law (back when analog TV was standard) all TV broadcasts had to include closed captions on scanline 23(?) for people with hearing disabilities. it was part of the vertical blanking interval so it didn't interfere with the regularly visible broadcast. It is good to include subtitles for all dialogue, spoken in the local dialect, in a foreign dialect, and even the various sign languages. That's isn't to say that yes, I fully agree that differently abled people should be able to take part in the dialog and should have accommodations where needed.
Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?
That's either "sign language doesn't work with our speech-to-text algorithm and we'll be throat fucked if we hire an actual person to do a job" or some massively pretentious statement about accessibility in media.
Sometimes, and specifically on Amazon prime, if a show / movie has hard coded subs (for sign or other foreign languages) you will need to turn off the optional subtitle setting.
Of course then, when someone does speak out loud you won't get your normal subs until you turn the setting back on. I used to put in a new complaint for each show that it happened on until i canned prime altogether and went back to pirating all their content.
Germany adds the funky police that sometimes only German subtitles are allowed no matter the audio language you pick. So if there are no German-language subtitles because none were ever made, well you're shit out of luck now, fuck you and your subtitle needs! 😐
This film would never work for second screen viewers because the characters would have to nonstop be saying “I’m being really quiet” or “we can’t make any noise, even loud breathing, or the monster will get us”.
SDH subtitles (subtitles for the deaf & hard of hearing) describe all the relevant sounds in a scene including background song lyrics, there is likely to be another plain subtitle track if you don't want that
Oh if only. I've seen two tracks on occasion on streaming services but it's extremely rare. I think it was on Netflix or Prime and it's been years since I've seen it. As someone who is not hard of hearing but just has a little trouble understanding sometimes it's very useful to have the option that's exclusively dialogue.
If the song lyrics are relevant to the scene, sure I could see them being there. Like those songs that are custom written to do a sort of 4th wall breaking live commentary on the characters. But a lot of songs? Not needed at all.
I see this more and more with shit on streaming services where, for some fucking reason, they strip the subtitles out for the non-native language parts even tho they are supposed to be subtitled for the audience. Like for example I wanted to see the new Ghostbusters the other day since it was on HBO which I have, but half-way through I had to stop it and pirate it anyway, because all the scenes with just the bad guys talking was supposed to be subtitled but they took the god damn subs out. They didn't even translate the dialogue in closed captioning even tho the audience is supposed to know what they are saying!
I was watching rental family (an american guy moves to japan to be an actor and speaks a very little japanese) and somehow they decided to ignore all the parts in japanese and from the subtitles there was only the english parts. In the beginning i was like "ok, it's to let the audience know that the protagonist does not understand what they're shouting to him - then finally i had to pirate a sub from opensubtitles to understand was going on as the dialogues were 95% in japanese
My favorite is when services will put a caption like “[speaking spanish]” over top of the English subtitles that are in a film for a Spanish speaking character.
The film maker put the subtitles in there so if you can’t speak Spanish you can understand what the character is saying and then you can’t read it because Amazon decided to helpfully inform you they are speaking.
Then how ? You just discovered it. There are plenty movies with subtitles but at least you get the experience of our daily life in 2 minutes and there is a post about it on Lemmy.
That's not the best experience but it worked.
Most of time, we won't understand when you talk. Few people will do the effort to write on a paper. And there is a lack of subtitles, interpreters. We are forced to go through various stressful situations.
So, i love that it show you the other side. I love that you get this experience once in your life because most of time, people don't care. They aren't deaf and ignore it, since it don't concern them. They have no idea how many movies, podcasts, dramas, meetings, appointements, parties, course...are inaccessible to us. They just call, talk and live on.
Yeah it is a shame, but i hope you will be a little more aware and join us. :)
For a decade tech has fucked sub's accessibility. The landscape is a complete mess, simultaneously stuck with tech that is too old and also suffering from awful implementation of new tech (LLMs suck at closed captioning but everyone insist it is the only way to do it now). Yet context reading to know who needs subs when is still so archaic and depends completely on user input. But then, the content is always innadecuate, specially when it's for the hearing impaired.
Yeah I've noticed a lot of llm subs on streaming platforms and I'm like bro wtf the stuff you download is better than this. How can you be the one making the thing and not put accurate fucking subtitles on it. It's pathetic. I mean are have the llm do the heavy lifting but you've still gotta proof it ffs.
Because it only makes sense because employers can’t be trusted to hire equitably. It is a thumb on the scales, and so is an injust act, but is currently necessary due to bad hiring practices.
Hopefully we can grow out of this and employers will just hire the best people for the job, regardless of personal circumstance.
You seem to think DEI is when employers have to meet a diversity quota, when in reality, it upholds laws stating employers can't make any hiring decisions based on race or any other such demographic.
Diversity, Equality, Inclusion. The acts support diversity by barring exclusion on grounds of demographics and demanding equality by barring the use of demographic information as part of the hiring process. DEI does not define any minimum diversity metrics.
It's civil which was nice, but it's also an argument that is (charitably) extremely poorly thought through. It's just an appeal towards free-market regulation, which in an ideal world does work great but we have hundreds of years history (and the fact that I do not have a pet dragon) that establishes this is not an ideal world and it would not in fact work great.
It's a good, optimistic, hope-for-the-future thought yes - but they're using that to justify badmouthing DEI policies which is both incredibly counterproductive and pretty suspect.
They are not really though, they are still agreeing that it is necessary, just that they wish it wasn't. Which the people DEI is supposed to support would probably agree to
We aren't helping anyone by shoehorning random diversity stuff into cheap ass media. Sure we might have 20 out of place same sex relationships but god forbid if they were to touch on difficult topics. The people at the top make wild choices and are then rewarded because is supports the executives ideas about "diversity." In practice diversity is really just a marketing to make us forget about all the systemic problems in the world.
144 Comments
ruuster13@lemmy.zip · 134 pts · 53d
No info about film in thread: mildy infuriating.
FluidBeef@quokk.au · -13 pts · 53d
It’s from Lollywood, you’ve probably never heard of it.
sanitation@lemmy.today · -39 pts · 53d
U haven't seen that movie?
A quiet place
ruuster13@lemmy.zip · 21 pts · 53d
U have seen this one?
Zarobi@aussie.zone · 15 pts · 53d
I cri evere tim
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 53d
Failed to Load Media makes my favorite videos
sanitation@lemmy.today · -4 pts · 53d
No. What's that? It looks sad
Jimbabwe@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 53d
I believe it’s called The Rural Juror
EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 53d
The... Rurrershurr?
tempest@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 53d
No Rrrrrrewwrjerrr
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 53d
They Turk er Jurrr.
cybervseas@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 53d
The best days of my flerm…
HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world · 81 pts · 53d
Is that Jim from The Office!?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 69 pts · 53d
CIA Jim, yes
AmyAye@nord.pub · 10 pts · 53d
Didn't he also play CIA Agent Jack Ryan?
faintwhenfree@lemmus.org · 5 pts · 52d
He does a good job of it
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 53d
He couldn't stay in Athlead forever.
kieron115@startrek.website · 1 pts · 52d
I thought Jim was asian???????
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 51d
You might have him confused with White Josh.
DisasterTransport@startrek.website · 19 pts · 53d
Yeah season 21 is crazy, they took a hard sci fi turn about 10 seasons ago and now everyone is split up. They made a whole cinematic universe and its very confusing. Jim was a CIA agent for a while and now he's a post apocalyptic survivor. IMO they're making the character do too much, bir I guess that's what happens when you run out of ideas ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
turdburglar@piefed.social · 2 pts · 52d
i was really there for dwight’s arc as unexpected the heir to the massive hairbo gummy bear empire. his big move for the recipe from high fructose corn syrup tp beet sugar was brilliant.
i’ve just started the creed season - no spoilers!
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 5 pts · 53d
I want there to be a film with both Tim and Jim sitting at a desk pulling reaction faces to camera at everything going on.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 53d
Who’s Tim?
MycelialMass@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 53d
Original Jim from the UK version of The Office
ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 53d
I believe his name is Bilbo Watson
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 53d
Big reaction face guy.
k0e3@lemmy.ca · 77 pts · 53d
I mean if you have a better way to make viewers understand what people with hearing impairments go through every day, then I'm all ears.
PlaidBaron@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 53d
Phrasing.
hardcoreufo@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 52d
Are we not doing phrasing anymore?
11111one11111@lemmy.world · -73 pts · 53d
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 16 pts · 52d
MAGA film criticism.
Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 52d
Guy whos never watched movies or felt empathy:
Tiger666@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 52d
Wow.
qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 52d
🤣
echodot@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 52d
The literally is a movie about people suffering from cancer. And one about somebody who's lost a limb. I'm surprised someone as clearly educated in the film arts as you doesn't know that.
mriormro@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 52d
I’m always surprised by how stupid people can get.
Congrats!
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org · 5 pts · 52d
Yeah, god forbid you might gain a new perspective and develop *gag* empathy for people that live different lives or have different problems than you do
nomy@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 52d
Have you seen the trash currently being turned out? What could it hurt? Tell someone elses story, maybe it'll be entertaining.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 59 pts · 52d
The worst is when you're watching something with subtitles (in your own language because it's hard to hear sometimes), then someone on screen speaks a different language with the subtitles hardcoded into the video.
Great, right?
Well no, because Amazon's (or Netflix etc, they all do it) subtitles have a big "[Speaks German]" up the entire time, blocking the hard coded subs entirely so you cannot see what they say without temporarily disabling subs. Like bitch, I KNOW THEY ARE SPEAKING GERMAN, MOVE THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY SO I KNOW WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
It's so fucking stupid and infuriating. How have they not addressed this shit?
Doom@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 52d
I get a special kind of mad when I watch a foreign film in its original language. Turn on that language's subtitles and the subtitles don't match what's being verbally said because apparently the subs have been translated into English then back into the original language so nothing matches and everything sucks. Or worse when they've translated some idiom for American audiences and have translated that idiom back so what's being said makes zero sense.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 51d
Whenever I watch anything in Japanese with my boyfriend, we put on English subtitles for him. Meanwhile, I spend most of the time screaming internally "THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY SAID. THIS IS NOT WHAT ANYONE IS SAYING!?!" instead of actually enjoying the show.
alternategait@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 52d
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 51d
The FCC is American though. Anything in a "foreign language" is clearly not important information to them.
alternategait@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 51d
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 51d
I'm just playing lol. Believe it or not, there are at least some people left in the US government who care about such things. I'd like to think...
mkwt@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 47d
The FCC regulates closed captions on over the air broadcast television.
They're not going to regulate the Internet streaming services.
alternategait@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 47d
yuknowhokat@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 52d
Sometimes for fun I'll watch it foreign language movie I'll turn on English dubbing and run subtitles as well. It's really hilarious how different the two will be
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 6 pts · 52d
Oh I hate that. Netflix animes are super bad about it. I wish they'd have the subbed English dub as well instead of a translated sub.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 52d
Yeah I remember Man in the High Castle was really terrible with subtitles. It didn't have hard-coded subtitles at all and the programmatic ones didn't work reliably. So I'd be sitting there and and thinking "ok am I not supposed to know what they're saying?" After the scene goes on for a while it becomes "yeah I definitely supposed to know what they're saying well I guess I have to mess with subtitle settings." Sometimes it wouldn't work at all and I'd have to open a ticket with Amazon Prime and wait until they got it working.
So I guess they gave up on fixing subtitles and just baked them in. But still fucked it up anyway. Apparently a company as big as Amazon still can't do QA on the use case of someone who's an english speaker just watching on their platform. It's sad.
Aneb@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 52d
It happens on Jellyfin too but probably because the subs and videos are pulled from the same source
k0e3@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 51d
The only time a "[speaks German]" type of subs is acceptable is when the audience is not supposed to understand what's being said. Obscuring the hardcoded subs with that bullshit is absolutely infuriating.
JackTea@piefed.world · 49 pts · 53d
That's not going to work for me. I can't read. Can they do a dub?
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 46 pts · 53d
That’s called audio description, they do it for blind audiences.
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 53d
My Dad is incredibly dyslexic, and it's a legit issue for him.
Growing up, if a movie or TV show had subs we had to take turns reading it out loud for him. I still have to catch myself trying to do automatically it when we're watching something with other people.
anguo@piefed.ca · 14 pts · 53d
I grew up in a country where movies are rarely dubbed. I was reading the subtitles out loud for my siblings who couldn't read yet for entire movies.
Zarobi@aussie.zone · 10 pts · 53d
I read video game dialogue out loud for kids like a storybook. Also anime subs that have no official dub, it can get pretty silly
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 6 pts · 53d
Do you do make voices too for each character? XD
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 53d
why would you not?
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 3 pts · 53d
I would 100%
Zarobi@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 53d
Of course lol. I try and copy the Japanese voice actors
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 3 pts · 53d
That's so cute
cobysev@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 53d
I do this for my wife, because she spends most of a film on her phone.
She's listening to the audio and can mostly follow what's going on by glancing at the screen and reading subtitles every now and then, but if there's a foreign language with subtitles, or a text description (Paris, 11 AM or 10 years later, etc.), she'll miss it and then be completely lost.
I can't tell you how many times I've had to pause a movie and give a quick recap to get her caught up with the plot.
huppakee@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 53d
I believe Netflix order movies to be understandable to people who are not paying attention. Maybe they have something that is good enough for you, it would save you from having to recap stuff.
Carl@anarchist.nexus · 8 pts · 53d
Second Screen Viewing, yeah. Basically, Netflix is dumbing down their scripts so people can understand the plot even when it’s just playing on their second screen while they do other stuff. Apparently our attention spans have shrunk so much that people can’t even be expected to pay attention to the movies they put on.
Fluke@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 52d
Yeah. Fuck all that shit.
I'm living in the "how it happened" stages of Idiocracy. What the fuck is this timeline?!
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website · 46 pts · 53d
I am conflicted here. On the one hand, I agree that subtitles would have been nice. On the other hand, I think folks with hearing disabilities get shut out of other content so much that I don't think this somewhat solitary case makes it good mildly infuriating material. It's most likely just an oversight. Much less likely a clever scheme to highlight ableism.
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 53d
heh
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website · 3 pts · 53d
Eff me, that wasn't intended!
drcobaltjedi@programming.dev · 10 pts · 53d
I mean, by US law (back when analog TV was standard) all TV broadcasts had to include closed captions on scanline 23(?) for people with hearing disabilities. it was part of the vertical blanking interval so it didn't interfere with the regularly visible broadcast. It is good to include subtitles for all dialogue, spoken in the local dialect, in a foreign dialect, and even the various sign languages. That's isn't to say that yes, I fully agree that differently abled people should be able to take part in the dialog and should have accommodations where needed.
Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website · 3 pts · 53d
Yes, I did hear that before.
Snoopy@piefed.social · 2 pts · 52d
>Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?
Because of Laurent Clerc & Thomas Gallaudet :)
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 52d
That's either "sign language doesn't work with our speech-to-text algorithm and we'll be throat fucked if we hire an actual person to do a job" or some massively pretentious statement about accessibility in media.
Archimedes@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 52d
One masquerading as the other
arc99@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 52d
More likely it's a technical goof, somebody not folding the full English (and other language) subtitles into the streaming container.
Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip · 34 pts · 53d
Sometimes, and specifically on Amazon prime, if a show / movie has hard coded subs (for sign or other foreign languages) you will need to turn off the optional subtitle setting.
Of course then, when someone does speak out loud you won't get your normal subs until you turn the setting back on. I used to put in a new complaint for each show that it happened on until i canned prime altogether and went back to pirating all their content.
Carighan@piefed.world · 5 pts · 53d
Germany adds the funky police that sometimes only German subtitles are allowed no matter the audio language you pick. So if there are no German-language subtitles because none were ever made, well you're shit out of luck now, fuck you and your subtitle needs! 😐
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 53d
Its really weird that they do that. Like I would have assumed that the hardcoded subs were part of the video.
FluidBeef@quokk.au · 33 pts · 53d
This film would never work for second screen viewers because the characters would have to nonstop be saying “I’m being really quiet” or “we can’t make any noise, even loud breathing, or the monster will get us”.
tigermountain@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 52d
What pisses me off about subtitles is when they start displaying lyrics to songs playing in the background.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 52d
Although I love it when they subtitle the inaudible-but-foreshadowing news anchor in the background.
Rooster326@programming.dev · 9 pts · 52d
Snatch is a completely different movie if you can understand Mickey (Bradd Pitt) character.
Example
Monte_Crisco@thelemmy.club · 2 pts · 51d
It also helps if you like daggs
kip@piefed.zip · 17 pts · 52d
SDH subtitles (subtitles for the deaf & hard of hearing) describe all the relevant sounds in a scene including background song lyrics, there is likely to be another plain subtitle track if you don't want that
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 4 pts · 52d
Oh if only. I've seen two tracks on occasion on streaming services but it's extremely rare. I think it was on Netflix or Prime and it's been years since I've seen it. As someone who is not hard of hearing but just has a little trouble understanding sometimes it's very useful to have the option that's exclusively dialogue.
ReluctantZen@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 51d
English subs typically are never plain unfortunately
Ellvix@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 52d
If the song lyrics are relevant to the scene, sure I could see them being there. Like those songs that are custom written to do a sort of 4th wall breaking live commentary on the characters. But a lot of songs? Not needed at all.
Landless2029@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 52d
I don't mind stuff like that when it's at the top of the screen like a fansub
tigermountain@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 52d
That's a good idea.
glitchdx@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 52d
Or there's no lyrics but the subtitles keep repeating "heat" or "scary".
tigermountain@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 52d
That's hilarious.
swizzlestick@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 52d
I've not had scary yet, but heat does come up a lot for me in autogenerated subs when it can't figure out wtf is going on.
Gentle backing music:
Subtitles: Heat
Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 52d
I don't mind it as long as they do something like italics and little music notes or either end
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 29 pts · 53d
I see this more and more with shit on streaming services where, for some fucking reason, they strip the subtitles out for the non-native language parts even tho they are supposed to be subtitled for the audience. Like for example I wanted to see the new Ghostbusters the other day since it was on HBO which I have, but half-way through I had to stop it and pirate it anyway, because all the scenes with just the bad guys talking was supposed to be subtitled but they took the god damn subs out. They didn't even translate the dialogue in closed captioning even tho the audience is supposed to know what they are saying!
Wispy2891@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 52d
I was watching rental family (an american guy moves to japan to be an actor and speaks a very little japanese) and somehow they decided to ignore all the parts in japanese and from the subtitles there was only the english parts. In the beginning i was like "ok, it's to let the audience know that the protagonist does not understand what they're shouting to him - then finally i had to pirate a sub from opensubtitles to understand was going on as the dialogues were 95% in japanese
immutable@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 52d
My favorite is when services will put a caption like “[speaking spanish]” over top of the English subtitles that are in a film for a Spanish speaking character.
The film maker put the subtitles in there so if you can’t speak Spanish you can understand what the character is saying and then you can’t read it because Amazon decided to helpfully inform you they are speaking.
bhamlin@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 53d
🫵🤏🤞🤞🤘☝️👍🤌👍🤞🤌🫱🫲🫷👉👐🫶🙌🫶🤛
rovingnothing29@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 53d
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 53d
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 9 pts · 53d
This made me curious how many words in ASL (and other sign languages) can be made just using the hand emojis. 🤔
PlaidBaron@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 53d
Not many.
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 52d
afaik 🤟 is the only emoji based off an ASL sign so I don't think there's many
CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 52d
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 52d
⬆️⬆️⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️⬅️➡️🅱️🅰️ [START]
Redfox8@mander.xyz · 4 pts · 52d
Great band!
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 52d
The Konami Code?
Redfox8@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 52d
Indeed! A UK band from the early 2000s.
https://piped.video/watch?v=eEX4RETLPgE
(Incase the piped link doesn't work https://youtu.be/eEX4RETLPgE)
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 51d
I had no idea. Thanks for the link!
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 52d
Directions unclear, stealing third base
Snoopy@piefed.social · 21 pts · 52d
As a deaf person, why not ? :)
UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com · 15 pts · 52d
so you’re against accessibility?
PinkyPeaky@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 52d
I don't think they are against it. I think this is just a rather dark humour way to say this is my everyday normatively
Snoopy@piefed.social · 13 pts · 52d
Nope. That show you my daily life.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 52d
I get your point bit if anyone is trying to draw attention to the plights of deaf people, this is not the way how to do it
If I want to see this movie, I'll get very annoyed, turn it off within 5 minutes and I'll chrcl something else. Where is the attention now?
Snoopy@piefed.social · 14 pts · 52d
Then how ? You just discovered it. There are plenty movies with subtitles but at least you get the experience of our daily life in 2 minutes and there is a post about it on Lemmy.
That's not the best experience but it worked.
Most of time, we won't understand when you talk. Few people will do the effort to write on a paper. And there is a lack of subtitles, interpreters. We are forced to go through various stressful situations.
So, i love that it show you the other side. I love that you get this experience once in your life because most of time, people don't care. They aren't deaf and ignore it, since it don't concern them. They have no idea how many movies, podcasts, dramas, meetings, appointements, parties, course...are inaccessible to us. They just call, talk and live on.
Yeah it is a shame, but i hope you will be a little more aware and join us. :)
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 52d
Hey man let the deaf people have one. No need to make about yourself.
PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 51d
Screw them! Not like they can see what we type anyway!
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 51d
🤣🤣🤣🤣
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 53d
Maybe you missed the point.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 52d
Then there are the shows too cheap to make real subtitles and instead use auto generated ones that can't handle accents or names.
IWW4@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 53d
I am a bit lost here.
I just watched A Quiet Place on Amazon and it had subtitles…
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · -4 pts · 53d
Subtitles also describe sounds, they're not just about speech.
Cytobit@piefed.social · 17 pts · 52d
You're thinking of closed captioning. Subtitles is just dialogue.
CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 52d
That is called described audio.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 52d
Well, ackshually...
Nollij@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 52d
That is Subtitles for the Deaf and Hearing-impaired (SDH). It is not the standard for subtitles in the US and Canada.
dustyData@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 53d
For a decade tech has fucked sub's accessibility. The landscape is a complete mess, simultaneously stuck with tech that is too old and also suffering from awful implementation of new tech (LLMs suck at closed captioning but everyone insist it is the only way to do it now). Yet context reading to know who needs subs when is still so archaic and depends completely on user input. But then, the content is always innadecuate, specially when it's for the hearing impaired.
webhead@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 52d
Yeah I've noticed a lot of llm subs on streaming platforms and I'm like bro wtf the stuff you download is better than this. How can you be the one making the thing and not put accurate fucking subtitles on it. It's pathetic. I mean are have the llm do the heavy lifting but you've still gotta proof it ffs.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol · 2 pts · 51d
PhoenixDog@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 51d
A Quiet Place
Zephyr@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 52d
It takes a pretty hardcore film goer to learn a whole language just to watch a movie.
finley@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 53d
skisnow@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 53d
Bloomcole@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 52d
It's a shit film anyway
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · -39 pts · 53d
Yes but think about how diverse it is
call_me_xale@lemmy.zip · 32 pts · 53d
DEI is a good thing, actually.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · -6 pts · 53d
Its a bad thing, but it’s less bad than the thing it’s trying to solve. We should look forward to a scenario where DEI is obsolete.
paranoid@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 53d
Why do you think DEI is a bad thing?
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 53d
Because it only makes sense because employers can’t be trusted to hire equitably. It is a thumb on the scales, and so is an injust act, but is currently necessary due to bad hiring practices.
Hopefully we can grow out of this and employers will just hire the best people for the job, regardless of personal circumstance.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 53d
You seem to think DEI is when employers have to meet a diversity quota, when in reality, it upholds laws stating employers can't make any hiring decisions based on race or any other such demographic.
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org · 0 pts · 52d
The D in DEI literally stands for diversity though. But you're probably right and they are thinking of affirmative action
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 52d
Diversity, Equality, Inclusion. The acts support diversity by barring exclusion on grounds of demographics and demanding equality by barring the use of demographic information as part of the hiring process. DEI does not define any minimum diversity metrics.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 53d
Oh I sure do look forward to the well-reasoned and deeply nuanced explanation you're certain to get in response to that question.
01189998819991197253@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 53d
Lol i was expecting something, too, but the answer is actually quite reasonable
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 53d
It's civil which was nice, but it's also an argument that is (charitably) extremely poorly thought through. It's just an appeal towards free-market regulation, which in an ideal world does work great but we have hundreds of years history (and the fact that I do not have a pet dragon) that establishes this is not an ideal world and it would not in fact work great.
It's a good, optimistic, hope-for-the-future thought yes - but they're using that to justify badmouthing DEI policies which is both incredibly counterproductive and pretty suspect.
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org · 1 pts · 52d
They are not really though, they are still agreeing that it is necessary, just that they wish it wasn't. Which the people DEI is supposed to support would probably agree to
skisnow@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 53d
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · -17 pts · 53d
Compared to good writing?
We aren't helping anyone by shoehorning random diversity stuff into cheap ass media. Sure we might have 20 out of place same sex relationships but god forbid if they were to touch on difficult topics. The people at the top make wild choices and are then rewarded because is supports the executives ideas about "diversity." In practice diversity is really just a marketing to make us forget about all the systemic problems in the world.
call_me_xale@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 53d
I'm sorry, I missed the part where its a tradeoff.
Also, what makes a same-sex relationship "out-of-place"? Gay people exist everywhere, my dude.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 53d
In what world are same-sex relationships not a difficult topic, because I would very much like to move there.
waldfee@feddit.org · 2 pts · 53d
If anything they're reinforcing that it's a difficult topic
1egg4u@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 53d
1egg4u@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 53d