Well, as usual, vagueness is a great shield and a good platform to radicalise people.
Obviously, a collective of people will place the marker for "exaggerated leftist views" on different places. So you will see all kind of markers.
But as usual, the propaganda material is selected, so the misogynist will look for misandrists (or a supercut that create the impression of misandry) with the "social justice warrior" optics (obviously, we are talking about the distorted perception of sjw present in misogynistic circles)
Obviously the views of people (or the distorted version created by a supercut) tend to be quite outrageous, as it should be for "good" propaganda. Then calling these views leftist, makes the propaganda work. As now, unaware people will confirm that the views are leftist, as they assume that is what it is about. when in reality, the seemingly misandrist view is obviously not leftist, as misandry is sexism.
I have been there. You do. If you are actually interested in learning about it, look up how there deposal system works and maybe visit e.g. Tokyo once. Tokyo can be nasty.
The worst part... it works. E.g. on me, and i know. It is difficult to see these kind of posts, which are clearly misandry, and then hear people deny the trend for misandry, especially online.
OBVIOUSLY there is a shit tonne of misogyny, especially online and that is a big problem. But we shouldn't ignore the trend to misandry. It is not a competition and we fight against misogyny better if we fight sexism in general, I believe.
But the posts make me feel like a shocking amount of people are not against sexism but just misogyny. How am I supposed to feel like those are not my enemy when I am opposed to sexism?
Then I spend time with the people that I love and I am good again but... it is fucking poison.
Ah yes, the very unbiased and fair comparison between murder and podcast incels. There are no real issues that men are facing...
I don't understand why people can't support women while supporting men too. I can. You can do too. It is not women vs men. It is tradition/sexism vs individual freedom/respect.
Thanks for your comment. I think you stated it well and i think you are right about him.
But I think his comments heavily imply that her beauty is the most important value to her (maybe he means it from a business perspective and then he might not be wrong... sadly).
So i think it is lack of knowledge AND poor phrasing and reflection.
she still got beauty [...] it isn't game over for her
"I am not reducing her to her appearance, but if she wasn't pretty in my opinion, it would be game over for her" that is how this reads. Look at the votes and realise that is what you sound like. If you feel and think differently to that, reflect on how you communicate your thoughts. I doubt you would want to tell e.g. a close female friend something that she would understand like that.
Your whole statement circles around the idea that while you agree that she is less healthy, she is still pretty and consequently, you think she will be fine. And that might be a understandable (while sad) perspective from a business perspective but you joined a conversation about her health. By moving the conversation away from her health towards her beauty (a very subjective matter, which is especially important in situation), you are communicating that you believe that a focus on her beauty is relevant.
Now i understand that you might be reacting to other people's comments and you feel like they called her ugly and you don't think she is. But instead of stating that, e.g. by saying "while it seems like she is less healthy right now, let's not call her ugly, that is just mean. And personally, i still think she is pretty" but by saying things that imply that her value is in her matching your aesthetic sense.
I want to assume that your heart is in the right but your words are not.
What a strange thing to say as a reaction to someone expressing worries about someone else's health. "She might be unhealthy but she is still cute in my eyes, which is all that matters." That is how it sounds.
Bad code that puts out wrong information to a doctor or endangers my data, threatens my safety without me having any control over. No amount of my own expertise will protect me. Simply because I don't control the situation. No amount of awareness campaigns will fix my issue.
But awareness campaigns have successfully communicated to most of us that googling your health issues will result in nothing of value, and usually a cancer diagnosis. I can choose to protect myself by not asking a llm. Like I protected myself by not asking google.
What i don't like about this, is the ignorance towards every other field.
The ai is not allowed to tell you that you might have some illness but the LLM is allowed to vibe code the system that holds your medical data, or the software of the medical device that analyses your e.g. blood and provide the data to the doctor.
Systems and professions are interconnected. Chatgtp telling me that I have cancer is not as bad as chatgtp making mistakes causing my medical data to be stolen and sold.
Well, as usual, vagueness is a great shield and a good platform to radicalise people.
Obviously, a collective of people will place the marker for "exaggerated leftist views" on different places. So you will see all kind of markers.
But as usual, the propaganda material is selected, so the misogynist will look for misandrists (or a supercut that create the impression of misandry) with the "social justice warrior" optics (obviously, we are talking about the distorted perception of sjw present in misogynistic circles)
Obviously the views of people (or the distorted version created by a supercut) tend to be quite outrageous, as it should be for "good" propaganda. Then calling these views leftist, makes the propaganda work. As now, unaware people will confirm that the views are leftist, as they assume that is what it is about. when in reality, the seemingly misandrist view is obviously not leftist, as misandry is sexism.
Remember that legal ai csam means that the government needs to prove that real csam is real csam, to convict a pedophile.
He literally broke laws for his factories. I know of a few cases
Something tells me that aunt calls for help when they have tech issues.
Maybe just personal experience...
For help, you know what you talk about. But if it is about privacy or safety, I am hyperbolic... apparently
Well Tokyo is huge. But e.g. shibuya isn't that niche and I walked on a sticky ground through broken glass there.
Tokyo is mostly clean. I am not saying that it is dirty.
I am saying, in Japan, seeing trash bag on the street is not usual (for collection usually) and e.g. Tokyo CAN be nasty.
I have been there. You do. If you are actually interested in learning about it, look up how there deposal system works and maybe visit e.g. Tokyo once. Tokyo can be nasty.
The worst part... it works. E.g. on me, and i know. It is difficult to see these kind of posts, which are clearly misandry, and then hear people deny the trend for misandry, especially online.
OBVIOUSLY there is a shit tonne of misogyny, especially online and that is a big problem. But we shouldn't ignore the trend to misandry. It is not a competition and we fight against misogyny better if we fight sexism in general, I believe.
But the posts make me feel like a shocking amount of people are not against sexism but just misogyny. How am I supposed to feel like those are not my enemy when I am opposed to sexism?
Then I spend time with the people that I love and I am good again but... it is fucking poison.
Ah yes, the very unbiased and fair comparison between murder and podcast incels. There are no real issues that men are facing...
I don't understand why people can't support women while supporting men too. I can. You can do too. It is not women vs men. It is tradition/sexism vs individual freedom/respect.
That is probably disappointing to hear for the bitches.
I don't care for "celebrities" but I like my music human.
What is Conflict of interest?
Thanks for your comment. I think you stated it well and i think you are right about him.
But I think his comments heavily imply that her beauty is the most important value to her (maybe he means it from a business perspective and then he might not be wrong... sadly).
So i think it is lack of knowledge AND poor phrasing and reflection.
"I am not reducing her to her appearance, but if she wasn't pretty in my opinion, it would be game over for her" that is how this reads. Look at the votes and realise that is what you sound like. If you feel and think differently to that, reflect on how you communicate your thoughts. I doubt you would want to tell e.g. a close female friend something that she would understand like that.
Your whole statement circles around the idea that while you agree that she is less healthy, she is still pretty and consequently, you think she will be fine. And that might be a understandable (while sad) perspective from a business perspective but you joined a conversation about her health. By moving the conversation away from her health towards her beauty (a very subjective matter, which is especially important in situation), you are communicating that you believe that a focus on her beauty is relevant.
Now i understand that you might be reacting to other people's comments and you feel like they called her ugly and you don't think she is. But instead of stating that, e.g. by saying "while it seems like she is less healthy right now, let's not call her ugly, that is just mean. And personally, i still think she is pretty" but by saying things that imply that her value is in her matching your aesthetic sense.
I want to assume that your heart is in the right but your words are not.
What a strange thing to say as a reaction to someone expressing worries about someone else's health. "She might be unhealthy but she is still cute in my eyes, which is all that matters." That is how it sounds.
Fuccbois and pua aren't honest about their intentions.
She is honest.
It is. The memories...
Kinda bad comparison.
Beijing was always* beijing. Peking was just a european fever dream.
On the other hand
Constantinople was the offical name and got later renamed Istanbul.
I am with you but...
Bad code that puts out wrong information to a doctor or endangers my data, threatens my safety without me having any control over. No amount of my own expertise will protect me. Simply because I don't control the situation. No amount of awareness campaigns will fix my issue.
But awareness campaigns have successfully communicated to most of us that googling your health issues will result in nothing of value, and usually a cancer diagnosis. I can choose to protect myself by not asking a llm. Like I protected myself by not asking google.
What i don't like about this, is the ignorance towards every other field.
The ai is not allowed to tell you that you might have some illness but the LLM is allowed to vibe code the system that holds your medical data, or the software of the medical device that analyses your e.g. blood and provide the data to the doctor.
Systems and professions are interconnected. Chatgtp telling me that I have cancer is not as bad as chatgtp making mistakes causing my medical data to be stolen and sold.
I am afraid... most