King Charles portrait turned into Wallace and Gromit character by animal activists
https://inews.co.uk/news/king-charles-portrait-wallace-and-gromit-animal-activists-3104018
https://inews.co.uk/news/king-charles-portrait-wallace-and-gromit-animal-activists-3104018
33 Comments
NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world · 148 pts · 2y
The painting is protected by glass, so no damage was done to the painting.
I read through way too many articles that failed to mention this important detail.
http://bbc.com/news/articles/cydd9ye77rmo
argh_another_username@lemmy.ca · 52 pts · 2y
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 76 pts · 2y
I think it's a terrific representation of the horrifically bloody history of the British Monarchy
Leg@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 2y
Yeah, I don't think it was meant to be pretty lol
jonne@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 2y
Yeah, I know the artist said some other bullshit to justify this choice, but to me it just looks like the blood their wealth was built on.
theacharnian@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 2y
I like it
Pilferjinx@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
I like it because it's hella odd as shit. King, embrace the fuck-my-shit-up results of this glorious piece.
Aviandelight@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
I can't stop thinking about how someone got paid to make this painting.
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y
He's pretty famous for making portraits. Here's his portrait of Idris Elba.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
See, that isn’t ugly.
Which makes me think it was on purpose. Which makes me hate it a little less.
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
He has a lot of upper class clients who he paints just as ... starkly as the king's portrait.
It is very much on purpose.
Aviandelight@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 2y
Now that is a gorgeous balance of color and brush strokes. So why did the artist choose that awful color theme for Charles?
chuckleslord@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Right? Spit right in the royal families face and they pay you for the privilege. Priceless and hilarious
kandoh@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 2y
Philistine
Moneo@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
Same shit that happens with every climate protest. "Climate protestors deface painting" etc.
fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 2y
It's much less engaging this way.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 2y
I wouldn't anger Count Vigo of Carpathia like that. Remember what happened the last time?
Donkter@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 2y
He got turned into Wallace. The titular character.
khannie@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 2y
You really have to hand it to the British. They're great at stuff like this.
Nice bit of Wensleydale with a protest, eh?
angelsomething@lemmy.one · 21 pts · 2y
Improved it tbh.
cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 16 pts · 2y
so where's the change?
Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2y
He's smarter and less evil now.
aeronmelon@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y
"Fancy some cheese?"
Mango@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 2y
Oh no! Some rich person's pretty garbage was ridiculed!?
Heck off. I have real problems.
thorbot@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Now THIS is pod racing!!!!
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 2y
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2y
It still looks like him, except happier.
afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
I remember when you could go to an art museum and see pictures and sculptures of stuff. That was kinda nice.
andrewta@lemmy.world · -12 pts · 2y
~~If it were something that could easily be removed I'd laugh
Since it appears to be a lot more permanent. Hopeful they do jail time for vandalism.don't destroy artwork.~~
Edit : I've been told it its over glass. So in that case. Then it's good for a laugh.
Wilshire@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y
Jail time for nonviolent activism is excessive, and will probably motivate, not deter, more people to do the same.
afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
Hmm nah. I am less likely to do something if I know it will result in me going to jail.
riodoro1@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y
It’s over glass and ummm… I think it’s more important to first stop torturing animals and worry about the well being of inanimate objects later.
andrewta@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
Is it? Ah in that case I'll amend my comment.
gmtom@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y
Does "don't destroy artwork" apply to people whi tear down statues of like Saddam or Mussolini? Or what about confederates or slave owner statues?
usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 2y
They used stickers. I doubt it's super permanent by intention