Trump refuses to meet ‘Radical Left Democrats’ Schumer and Jeffries to avert shutdown
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-democrats-government-shutdown-schumer-b2832047.html
542 points · 148 comments · view on lemmy.world
148 Comments
Hayduke@lemmy.world · 217 pts · 334d
Funny to think of the right viewing the, globally speaking, center-right as “radical left”. The level of hyperbole and hypocrisy from the right is stupefying.
It’s one thing I am trying to impart on my kids. If someone speaks fluently in hyperbole and absolutes, or getting louder the more they are challenged (or both), 100% they are full of shit and trying to sell you something.
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · -33 pts · 334d
This is a major part of the problem we're in. And I'm sorry but I'm going to "both sides" a bit because there is plenty of blame to toss around.
Democrats and Republicans have both been upping the rhetoric for decades, describing their political opponents in harsher and scarier terms. Most politicians did so understanding that it was all basically just "campaign talk" and not really true. But it gets votes so you do it. You can see this when you see retired politicians giving interviews where their language is much softer and reasonable than when they were in office.
Republicans turned it up to 11 quicker than Democrats though - and Donald Trump and his followers actually believed the rhetoric rather than understanding that it was just campaign BS.
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 334d
When did Democrats treat Republicans harshly? The problem is that they don't, they're spineless bastards who would rather take one step towards fascism than two steps towards progress
Xaphanos@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 334d
1864?
PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au · 19 pts · 334d
This is a deep cut, this is an underrated comment lol
Xaphanos@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 333d
Thank you.
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 334d
A few Democrats have properly called out Republicans for what they are: fascists and Nazis. This very much hurts the feelings of the fascists. Can't you see how mean it all is?
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · -45 pts · 334d
I get so 'fing sick of this "we play too nice it's why we lose" BS. And yes - BOTH SIDES do that.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 27 pts · 334d
You mean by stopping Walz from calling Republicans "weird?"
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · -24 pts · 334d
Bush II was called a fascist FFS. Back when we still had a court that didn't believe the president was a king actually and congress would at least occasionally push back on the executive.
PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au · 40 pts · 334d
Bush 2 was a fascist. Stealing the 2000 election, and constructing this whole extrajudicial framework with ICE and Guantanamo and whatnot, very directly laid the groundwork for what's happening right now. Trump is only able to direct a law enforcement agency to wander the land executing his will without having to convince anyone whose allegiance is to the law instead of their orders, because George Bush set it up for him in the first place. Right-wing media at the time getting in on defining a fantastical narrative under which they could direct the anger of their followers at "enemies," Bush saying that atheists shouldn't be considered citizens... it was all there. It was just new, so it was just getting started, it couldn't have much impact and the country resisted a lot of it.
Trump is more fascist than Bush was. But the people who were seeing the first little seeds of something that could grow into something horrifying, all the way back then, were 100% right.
OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 333d
People were saying to anyone who would listen that Guantanamo was going to lead exactly where we are today. The sane washing as we call it now goes back so far.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 333d
Let’s not forget who came after W. Those who could have undone the damage but only cemented it further and built it up.
Schmoo@slrpnk.net · 15 pts · 333d
You hear harsh words and assume they must be hyperbole without trying to determine the truth. The truth is there have been fascist elements in US government for its entire history which have waxed and waned over time; it was waxing under Bush II and now it's a full moon. When people warned about fascism you say they were being unreasonable, even though you seem to acknowledge that Trump really is fascist, vindicating their warnings.
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 334d
Just because Dubya wasn't given the freedom to exact fascism, doesn't mean The Decider didn't want it.
Tippy@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 333d
Ah yes, Bush, the paragon of antifascism
This comment was satire, right?
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 8 pts · 334d
I'm not gonna go into detail because PhilipTheBucket already did that, but: Yeah, the court only stole the election for him.
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · -25 pts · 333d
You notice how things went from "Oh we just call them weird" to full-on "THEY'RE FASCISTS" in like 0 seconds?
teawrecks@sopuli.xyz · 22 pts · 333d
For the record, the "weird" meme was years after their rhetoric was deemed objectively fascist by every historical expert on the subject. It wasn't hyperbole, only people saying, "it can't happen here, that's a slippery slope argument".
And now here we are: SCOTUS-approved racial profiling, concentration camps, disappearing, FCC openly stifling free speech, open attack on sec 230, a budget to benefit oligarchs, pay2win tariffs, rule-by-executive-order. Trump now considers it an act of terrorism to say you are anti-fascism.
To still bend over backwards to say "both sides" at this point is absolutely wild to me.
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 333d
It was probably because Trump was talking and is now acting, like a fascist.
Hell, he's got a card carrying, open neonazi in his cabinet, that he picked. Twice.
Ie, Gorka.
scutiger@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 333d
What would you call the current state of the GOP right now if not fascism?
Soulg@ani.social · 4 pts · 333d
They are literally definitionally fascist though? What the fuck do you expect?
JawnZ@lemmy.today · 24 pts · 334d
... if one side moves farther to the right, and the other side stays where they are, the side calling out the mover isn't "both sides".
(Not that Democrats haven't also moved farther right)
kurwa@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
They literally did a 180 on immigrants when Joe Biden was president what are you talking about lol
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · -22 pts · 334d
I mean... I say right in the post that Republicans are worse. But partisans are simply incapable of any introspection.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 333d
The reason you are being downvoted is because you are doing a “both sides” over two right wing political parties in a left wing space that overwhelmingly recognizes that neither party represents us or our interests. Whether you mean to or not you are lumping everyone left of center in with the right-wing Democrats simply because they are the least-right party that currently exists, and that is not only reductive, but harmfully inaccurate.
Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world · 183 pts · 334d
I wish they were radical left.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 169 pts · 334d
Or even regular left.
massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 69 pts · 334d
Or left light, or left light classic.
It's just left zero.It's just one of those generic brands you'll find on some low shelf in a semi-abandoned dollar store.
Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 334d
Are the crystal left?
TwoDogsFighting@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 334d
They are, I'm afraid, new left.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 334d
Ah yes, right.
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 334d
Man that shit got cancelled so fast and hard Tipper Gore put a warning label on it. This shit is like Kroger-brand diet Pibleft.
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 333d
Shit, or even actual centrists...
nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 34 pts · 333d
Id settle if they just left all together.
Empricorn@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 333d
Or just radical!
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 333d
Yep. They might actually do something.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 333d
According to the very special imperial political spectrum created by the USA, they are leftists! Of course this has no bearing on reality, a perfect fit for our country the United Scammers and Assholes.
nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 117 pts · 334d
Democrats need to let the shutdown happen but im almost positive they'll just give the fascist everything he wants instead.
Blackfeathr@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 334d
Schumer et al: "best we can do is write some sternly worded letters"
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 333d
"Send us money to keep first past the post voting safe the two party system intact!"
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 333d
This is offensive. They also had signs.
Blackfeathr@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
Ah yes I almost forgot about those ping pong paddles.....
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 333d
They need to shut it down AND call for a nationwide general strike. And then we don’t stop until every Republican has been removed from government, gerrymandering has been outlawed and fixed, and RCV is the law of the land.
Zaktor@sopuli.xyz · 8 pts · 333d
Seriously. That's what's lacking from nearly all Democratic politicians. They don't want to lead, they just want resistance to materialize externally, do some tone policing, and then take credit for any successes. When you're systematically powerless, you should be building your power to impact the system from external sources.
Vorticity@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 333d
They're going to let the shutdown happen but they're not going to point the blame where it needs to go. They're going to be spineless and let the Republicans blame them for the shutdown.
They absolutely have to shut it down. That said, if they lose the messaging game (they will) they will absolutely lose this fight.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 334d
That's exactly what Republicans want. They've already proven previously that the people don't actually care about a shutdown occurring. And that just lets t hem further reduce government expenses. The things that get shutdown are things they can't grift from anyway so they don't care about them.
grue@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 333d
It's a lose/lose, but at this point the fascist-controlled agencies are actively working against their intended purposes, so losing in the way that shuts down the government is the lesser evil.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 333d
Standards are low. We can easily do better if we break these legacy political parties duoopoly on the electoral system.
grue@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
Okay, but that's not going to happen by October or whenever the funding deadline is.
You gotta have a plan that's actually actionable in the short term, or else you're just indulging in pointless wankery.
tomenzgg@midwest.social · -4 pts · 333d
Shutting it down would be giving him what he wants: expanded powers and no one to answer to (because the government is shut down).
tidderuuf@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 334d
Shut it down.
Shut it all down.
IndridCold@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 333d
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 334d
Do you know the way to Shell Beach?
mako@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 334d
tomenzgg@midwest.social · -1 pts · 333d
Except a government shutdown doesn't shut down the entire government. It shuts down Congress and many executive agencies while expanding the powers of the president; and one of the heads of the executive branch, nominated by Trump, is one of the authors of Project 2025.
tomenzgg@midwest.social · 2 pts · 333d
Guess we like using Project 2025 as a rhetorical gotcha but not any in terms of keeping its implementation out of reach; noted.
tomenzgg@midwest.social · 2 pts · 333d
Guess what isn't shutdown during a shutdow: DHS, ICE, and immigration.
crystalmerchant@lemmy.world · 70 pts · 334d
Lmaoooo Chuck is radical left, sure buddy sure
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 33 pts · 333d
Everything left of themselves are radical to Facists. Alex Jones got a lot of leeway back in Bush days because people thought him being against Bush meant he was closer to center, but it was the opposite. Bush wasn't terrible enough for Jones.
Same with Fuentes and Kirk really; groypers attacked TPUSA mostly for not being racist enough to Jews.
Treczoks@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 333d
The Chuck that comes crawling to "find a compromise". With Nazis.
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 333d
Anyone left of "Shooting the homeless for sport" is a radical leftist.
Paddzr@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
It's the new woke.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 54 pts · 333d
Shut it the fuck down.
pivot_root@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 333d
Don't worry, I'm sure they will find some moral-grandstanding excuse to avoid doing it.
Tronn4@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 333d
Aka aipac money
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 333d
You think it'll reopen?
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
After renovations are complete.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Hopefully not
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 333d
The alternative would probably be an all out dictatorship, no?
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 333d
Hard to keep a dictatorship when your gestapo isnt being paid.
Inucune@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 333d
Trump will just pay them out of his own pocket.
Nope, couldn't say it with a straight face.
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 333d
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 333d
I'm being flippant here, but the federal government is doing much more harm than good right now.
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 333d
We don't even have the NOAA or CDC anymore
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 333d
Never open back up
sturmblast@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 333d
I'm still waiting to see who these 'radical left democrats' are... cuz I'm more left and radical than ANYONE that's elected currently. I don't understand how that doesn't just get old..
Joeffect@lemmy.world · -14 pts · 333d
You're not radical or left enough to have gone all the way around to being extremely right... it's like a circle...
Edit: people obviously didn't get the joke 🤷♂️
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 333d
Horseshoe theory is bullshit.
The original spectrum is based on seating arrangements of the French ruling body after the revolution. Maybe that's not a good model to begin with.
echodot@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 333d
No it's not. The political spectrum is two-dimensional not one dimensional. You've got radical left and radical right on one axis and then you've got authorian and libertarian on the other axis. Their can be, and has been, authoritarian left wing leaders. Trump is right and up. They've gone left and up, they haven't gone in a circle.
Joeffect@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
It was a joke
drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 41 pts · 334d
Government is starting to break down. Officials are being arrested by ICE. This really feels like the pot is so ready to boil, which just sucks for the average Joe trying to get by.
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 333d
Pots been boiling for years, the right just put a lock on the lid like a pressure cooker.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 333d
And took the knob, and sold it to Russia. They'll sell us a new knob, but it just spins on the axle, occasionally turns red hot, and yells banal insults at you.
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com · 40 pts · 334d
Likely will try and pull some 'because congress is absent' emergency rule bullshit to grab for full dictator powers.
Triumph@fedia.io · 29 pts · 334d
The other subtext is coloring Schumer and Jeffries as terrorists.
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 334d
More evidence for the next Nuremberg trials.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 36 pts · 334d
Nuremberg trials happened because an alliance of antifascist countries fought hard at great cost to take the fascists down with the help of organized resistance inside. Today we don't seem to have any of the prerequisites.
PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au · 13 pts · 334d
There are precedents from a few different countries that fought to overthrow a tyrannical government and then had to sort out how to deal with recovering and rebuilding their politics and society in whatever form. Chile, Argentina, South Africa, or Ukraine might be better models than postwar Germany.
There is also this: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/126900/8008_FDTD.pdf which is based on absolutely exhaustive real world research about what does and doesn't work, and is highly regarded in a ton of activist communities outside the US (and for some reason almost unknown inside it.)
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 333d
Imagine invading the Americas. Hope you got allies in canada, central and or south America to establish a beachhead (assuming they havent been occupied).
D day only had to cross the channel and it was a immense effort.
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 334d
They're going to do all that that anyway. Trying to argue that we should give them what they want because they might do bad things otherwise is a quite absurd position considering all the terrible and illegal things they've done already and helping them in their pursuits is exactly what the Democrats have been doing this entire time.
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com · 1 pts · 333d
Hadn't said anyone should give them what they want, but I see them using as a pretext to try a power grab.
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 333d
Giving them what they want is implicit to preemptively backing down from a fight. If these legislators aren't actively opposing them, then they're giving them what they want.
As I said, they'll invent pretexts wherever they feel like. Some white Morman kid shot Charlie Kirk and theyre blaming trans people, Jimmy Kimmel, and antifa for it for example.
BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 334d
If he will call you radical left anyway, then why not try to be the radical left he calls you for just a day?
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 333d
What would the donors think?
abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 pts · 333d
They believe anyone who isn't them is a radical leftist.
frog_brawler@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 333d
abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 333d
Basically.
echodot@feddit.uk · -1 pts · 333d
They could never really be a terrorist organisation, they spend most of their time arguing with each other.
alekwithak@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 333d
First of all infiltrating these groups and causing infighting is the oldest trick in the book. So if this isn't your full-time job, then familiarize yourself and stop giving free labor to fascists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur
Second of all, who? Who are you talking about? Antifa is not an organization, not a group, there are no members. It's like labeling Swifties as a terrorist organization, do you understand? It is not an organization, it is a blanket term for a subset of people who like Taylor Swift. Antifa is just a blanket term for anyone who opposes fascism. So yeah, they could never really be a terrorist organization, because first they'd have to become an organization.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 333d
No matter how far to the right democrats shift, republicans will always call them radicals.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 333d
It's called Propaganda.
Eh_I@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 333d
Schumer is going to give him such a tweeting 😡
StewNasty@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 333d
I bet he'll even follow it up with a strongly worded letter with at least 3 very strong points addressed to whomever will pay attention to him.
CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 333d
Only if the Baileys think that’s the right thing to do.
DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 333d
Shutdown might help Trump to push his project 2025 agenda with no judges working and the justice halted.
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 333d
I know that was Schumer's excuse last time, but I'm not sure that really adds up. The federal courts can still fund themselves for a few weeks after a shutdown. Also, the lower courts are slowing Trump down, but the Supreme Court is consistently ruling in his favor. If anything, he should want the courts to be running as quickly as possible so he can keep appealing and getting the Supreme Court to overturn all the restrictions the lower courts are placing on him.
Plus, while ICE is being designated an essential agency and ICE agents are expected to fulfill their full duties during a shutdown, they do it without pay (and get back-pay when the shutdown ends). That's not a big deal for a week, but if you stretch a shutdown out for a month, that starts to hurt. I'd like to see how loyal Trump's dogs are when they're not getting fed.
BanMe@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 333d
Schumer said after the fact, or his underlings leaked, that he knew public perception last time would have favored the Republicans even more as a result, as they successfully blamed the shutdown on Dems. But now he no longer sees this equation that way.
I'm not a big fan of his right now but I like to at least hope that level of strategy is actually happening
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 333d
I'm not buying this narrative. After a solid year of democrats insisting that biden was pressuring netanyahu behind the scenes when absolutely nothing of the sort was actually happening, I place no faith at all in any assertion of what's going on behind the scenes. This is a post facto justification of actions schumer took because he wanted to. If I were to give him the benefit of the doubt here and accept the "public perception wouldn't be with us" narrative, the best I can say is that he's a spineless amoral windsock who is utterly incapable of leadership.
He'll find some new excuse to cave. It may take time. He might actually go through with it this time, but it won't last more than a week and there will be zero concessions for ending the shutdown.
pjwestin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Strong leadership can shape public perception, so if that's true, it's just a further indictment of his inability to lead. I have to assume that Schumer thought Trump wouldn't be able to get enough House Republicans behind his bill, and had no plan for how the Senate would respond if he did. It's the only possible explanation for why he would let every House Democrat take the position that the shutdown would be preferable to the bill, then make them all look like idiots a few days later. I don't think there's any strategy happening here.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 333d
Because all those precious checks and balances work right?
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 333d
No pay for ICE et. Al.
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 333d
The judges are helping him push P2025...
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 333d
Anyone who doesn't kiss his ring is "radical left"
peoplebeproblems@midwest.social · 18 pts · 334d
Calling it. Something about "but muh federal works don't deserve this" wiping away tears with $100 bills.
Shut down the government. Fascism is based on one part greed, and if the lowest arent getting paid maybe they'll stop being able to do as much damaging stuff.
ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 16 pts · 333d
That's hilarious. They weren't even demanding anything substantial, like the abolition of ICE or the removal of National Guard troops for cities. They staked their claim on budgetary issues related to healthcare... and Trump couldn't even stomach that.
echodot@feddit.uk · 13 pts · 333d
Because he's a brainless goblin that thinks that in any situation there has to be a winner and a loser, and he has to be the winner or he would be the loser. So if he doesn't think he can win a situation he will refuse to engage in it, because he has the emotional maturity of a 4-year-old
titanicx@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 333d
Dude, be real.
A 4 year old acts better then this.
kokesh@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 333d
Isn't he aiming for government shutdown since the beginning? After all he wants to be Orange Shitler.
lemmylump@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 334d
The Bailey's are so fucked, and rightly furious with this chucklefuck.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 333d
Inb4 anti-trump Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger gets called a "Radical Leftist"
ubergeek@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 333d
Ok.
gonf@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 333d
Oh, the idiots who wouldn't even endorse Mamdani? Yeah, good job shitheads, go against the will of your own voters to try to stay on better terms with the worst people, who won't even work with you.
crusa187@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 334d
lol
lmao even.
shutting down the anti-anti-fascist government is precisely what’s needed for Americans, so you can rest assured Chucklefuck and Jeffries absolutely will not do this.
Just last night Schumer was on tv crying “we hope and pray Trump will sit down and negotiate with us.” LOL. These two have huffed so much of their own farts it has melted their brains. That, and all the donor money.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 12 pts · 334d
oh good. its on him then.
WanderWisley@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 333d
SimpleMachine@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 333d
They'll just roll over like they always do, what's new?
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 334d
Americans about to be sitting on a worlds supply of soybeans:
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 334d
LOL, Taco's brain has been thoroughly infected by not only the "liberal media" narrative for decade upon decade (the "liberal media" has been punching itself in the nuts over just how "liberal" they truly are, joining in with the wingnut chorus about how "liberal" these corporate outlets all are. Sigh.), but the narratives from even-further-right outlets like Faux.
YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 334d
He doesn’t care. It’s an easy way to appease his base. “Lefty lefty left”
DarkCloud@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 333d
...and what if the Democrats try to shut it down, but Trump and Scotus figure out a way to not have a shut down without democrat involvement.
...there, that would be Trump in power permanently.
bampop@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 333d
When all rules are optional, that part isn't really an "if"
frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · 8 pts · 334d
Like he voluntarily meets black people or Jewish people who don't suck his dick.
kingofras@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 334d
PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 334d
If this keeps up Chuck Schumer is gonna have to capitulate without even grandstanding about "reaching across the aisle" and meeting with Trump. Rough time to be Chuck.
danc4498@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 334d
Make Fascism Great Again
Sunshine@piefed.social · 6 pts · 334d
mkwt@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 334d
Why would Trump need to meet with democrats to avoid a government shutdown? Democrats are not in control of any chamber of Congress. Is Trump admitting that he does not command the loyalty of the Congressional Republicans that do control Congress?
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 334d
A normal funding bill would require 60 Senate votes. They don't have that.
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 334d
Out of reconciliation bills for the year already?
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 334d
I dunno. I think they can do a continuing without any Dems but - maybe not
monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 333d
The art of the deal, Ladies and Gentlemen!!!!
stylusmobilus@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 333d
Why would he? They’ll fold. Both of the are custard spined.
foggy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 334d
Ah, the folks extending a hand to meet in the middle are radical and fringe.
Got it.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 334d
How do you shut something down that isn't working?
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 334d
Things can always get worse.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 333d
Old pussy couldn't handle it
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 334d
Can he use some emergency power to fund ICE and other law enforcement during a gov't shutdown?
Envy@fedia.io · 4 pts · 334d
mrbeano@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 333d
This is my fear. The only things that will be shut down are the systems & courts that are currently slowing the march of fascism (somewhat). Of course they'll find the funds to continue domestic terrorism.
MNByChoice@midwest.social · 3 pts · 333d
I don't think Trump is bothering with legality at this point. I don't expect he would stop spending in a shutdown, even if legally required.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 333d
MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 333d
Chump doesn't care. He is going to disrupt anything he can and continue blaming the 'left' for it.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 333d
they are more closer to the gop politically and probably are the ones spearheading backdoor deals with the moderate republicans, than to the left.