Me, who has learned where the ladyparts lay, enjoys taking time to get to know them and typically doesn't need mechanical assistance due to sufficient preamble.
I just absolutely hate the way lube feels on my skin, idk if its an autistic adjacent trait or what. Similar with lotion just kinda like nails on a chalkboard
As a gay man, and a slut, i think I have an opinion that matters here. I don't believe that they can be compared directly. Some cut ones are cut way far back and seem to cause pain, while others are crazy long and look like a weird sea creature. I have never noticed a large difference in cleanliness or sensitivity. They do taste different.
Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you can't go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and there's nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.
However, what about everyone who doesn't have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people who've experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now don't have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?
This whole thought experiment begs many questions.
I think we would see an additional category. People that were circumcised against their will, wanting to go back to the side they may have loyalty for.
Someone who was passionate that the uncircumcised side was the only side to be on, the righteousďżź side, but was forced into circumcision.
I think they try to sew back on the foreskin. The thought may begin with some being ashamed that they lost their foreskin and had to âreplace itâ, but it may quickly become a thing of âwho is going to know?â.
Problem is.. someone would come up with a way to tell. And the âtrue foreskinersâ do not accept the âsewed on foreskinersâ. There is bigotry and divided among their side.
Causing an inner struggle and broken down factions of the same side.
Some âsewed on foreskinersâ may feel that the âtrue foreskinersâ arenât the side they used to be and wonât accept them anyways, so they removed the replaced foreskin to either join the circumcised or possibly start their own, new side.
âThe circumcised rebornersâ
They did heavily in lots of countries including mine. For decades and decades and decades. It was framed in two ways. You could go to hell if you didn't or you could get really sick and it could fall off. Wonderful direction from the church. In my specific case Catholic Church.
I will go with my original thought then, the Crusades - I think European Christendom had not yet incorporated circumcision at the time, but the Muslim world was practicing circumcision, so that would be a war between the circumcised and the uncircumcised?
My foreskin doesn't go all the way up when I have a full erection, and I don't think that's rare.
Edit: Curious amount of downvotes. Are you grossed out by anatomical descriptions of healthy male genitals? If so, WTH are you doing in this thread? Do you not think that it's rare? Then comment instead of downvoting, or at least in addition to it.
Not sure I understand, but you grab below glans and force foreskin on and off the penis head repeatedly. Don't have to pull it all the way to the tip, going halfway is enough. The foreskin skin is much smoother than hands, so barely any lube is required, just the natural skin oil is enough. I wouldn't call it smegma as it usually refers to white substance full of dead skins and bacteria, but the underside of healthy clean penis foreskin is naturally a little wet.
It's crazy how you poor mutilated people have no idea how it was designed to work.
For one, I haven't had smegma since my parents taught me to clean behind the foreskin (arguably later than they should have) when I was 7. You think we're all just walking around with dirty penises?
For two, the foreskin pulls back below the head, you can pull it down far enough that you look circumcised then you can pull it back over. Pull is a strong word it doesn't take effort, but doing this is pleasurable to the point of ejaculating (i.e. that's one way to masturbate as a person with a foreskin). No need for lube.
I'm uncircumcised. The foreskin is automatically pulled down/back when you're fully erect (or at least mine is...), what mystifies me is how you'd pull it back up far enough that you can use it in place of lubrication for the glans. Is your foreskin just that long? Mine certainly isn't.
So I think there's 2 parts to this, one is different people are different but the other is that when masterbating one might not be quite as erect as with a partner
Mine only goes half to 2/3s down the glans when erect, and there is enough slack to where if I hold the foreskin lower down it can slide up to mostly cover it. Sometimes a lil bit of spit or some such is still needed to lubricate the glans though.
Broadly it's probably just difference in genetics of size/slackness of foreskin, idk
Probably some combination of not necessarily producing enough (not all people make the same amount) and lack of foreplay/edging
::: spoiler personal anatomical anecdote
For example I really only have precum after a decent amount of foreplay/edging, and not all that much. And a lil lubrication is sometimes useful for getting to that point.
:::
i'm cut and have no idea what this meme is about. growing up, i thought all dicks just looked like mine, i only found out about what a dick is supposed to look like the first time i watched porn...
With a strong enough erection (such as when having sex, aka what you'd see in porn) cut and uncut look the same. The difference only shows itself with a semi or when soft
If the foreskin pulls back like it should, they are similar enough most people wouldn't notice the difference at a glance. If the foreskin is getting caught or not pulling back it's potentially a sign of various conditions that can be harmful if ignored
Potentially. But you can have a perfectly healthy dick even if it doesn't pull back fully when erect. As long as it can happen when flaccid so you can clean it properly it usually shouldn't be an issue.
81 Comments
tenchiken@anarchist.nexus · 73 pts · 327d
Me, who has learned where the ladyparts lay, enjoys taking time to get to know them and typically doesn't need mechanical assistance due to sufficient preamble.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 105 pts · 327d
(this is about jorkin' it)
tenchiken@anarchist.nexus · 47 pts · 327d
The true art is in knowing who's "it" is getting jorked
molten@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 327d
Hahaha and by "it" lest just say.. my peanits
friend_of_satan@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 326d
ethaver@kbin.earth · 8 pts · 327d
a man of culture
mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 326d
It can be wet down there but still bad friction though. Lube is a game changer.
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 326d
I just absolutely hate the way lube feels on my skin, idk if its an autistic adjacent trait or what. Similar with lotion just kinda like nails on a chalkboard
mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 326d
Could try different kinds of lube. oils and silicone are very different feeling to water-based.
shawn1122@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 326d
I can see it working until about age 55.
PacMan@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 325d
That butthole is not gonna wet itself
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 31 pts · 327d
Personally I would rather get bottom surgery
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 9 pts · 326d
Same
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 327d
Also uncut looks better IMHO.
Floodedwomb@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 326d
As a gay man, and a slut, i think I have an opinion that matters here. I don't believe that they can be compared directly. Some cut ones are cut way far back and seem to cause pain, while others are crazy long and look like a weird sea creature. I have never noticed a large difference in cleanliness or sensitivity. They do taste different.
user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 20 pts · 326d
I was not ready for that đ
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 326d
How so? Which ones smell and taste more pissy?
Floodedwomb@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 326d
In my experience, pissy has more to do with cleanliness and hair.
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe · 1 pts · 325d
As a straight man, you get more piss power when cut. Sometimes the river splits into two or three
beejboytyson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 327d
Idk I'm uncut and I think elephant trunk or dune sand worm. đ¤ think I shared to much...
TerranFenrir@lemmy.ca · 31 pts · 327d
I'd honestly love to see a world war between circumcised and uncircumcised folks. I wonder who would win.
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 65 pts · 327d
Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you can't go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and there's nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.
However, what about everyone who doesn't have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people who've experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now don't have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?
This whole thought experiment begs many questions.
SpoonyBard@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 327d
I think we would see an additional category. People that were circumcised against their will, wanting to go back to the side they may have loyalty for. Someone who was passionate that the uncircumcised side was the only side to be on, the righteousďżź side, but was forced into circumcision.
I think they try to sew back on the foreskin. The thought may begin with some being ashamed that they lost their foreskin and had to âreplace itâ, but it may quickly become a thing of âwho is going to know?â.
Problem is.. someone would come up with a way to tell. And the âtrue foreskinersâ do not accept the âsewed on foreskinersâ. There is bigotry and divided among their side. Causing an inner struggle and broken down factions of the same side. Some âsewed on foreskinersâ may feel that the âtrue foreskinersâ arenât the side they used to be and wonât accept them anyways, so they removed the replaced foreskin to either join the circumcised or possibly start their own, new side. âThe circumcised rebornersâ
half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 327d
Cursed writing prompt or next ya post apocalypse
tryagain@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 327d
Circumplasty set to be the next big craze. Make it bigger than before so it looks like a JNCO leg. "Oh baby I love the way your shit is so baggy"
half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 326d
Bahahahah jnco leg
mx_smith@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 326d
Or the men that had a messed up circumcision so it looks uncircumcised when soft and circumcised when erect.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 327d
The circumcised can learn all the issues with it, then not circumcise their kids.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 327d
Asking the real questions
Meron35@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 326d
This overlooks female circumcision (it is as terrifying and horrifying as it sounds)
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe · 2 pts · 325d
This overlooks intersex circumcision (does this actually exist?)
Meron35@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 325d
Intersex operations are usually marketed as "interventions" rather than circumcisions. Also as terrifying as it sounds.
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 326d
msage@programming.dev · 3 pts · 327d
Oh my, TnJessica, I was not expecting you here :D
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 326d
I'm a mod here
msage@programming.dev · 3 pts · 326d
I meant more the theory than you specifically.
Nonetheless, happy with everything ^ ^
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 326d
Unexpected mod is unexpected still.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 327d
really weird thing to say about genital mutilation
Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 326d
Old enough to have no choice in the matter. We should be pissed at the church, backward medicine and our parents, not each other.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 1 pts · 326d
Is the church even part of this? In most countries, christians don't practice circumcision.
Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 326d
They did heavily in lots of countries including mine. For decades and decades and decades. It was framed in two ways. You could go to hell if you didn't or you could get really sick and it could fall off. Wonderful direction from the church. In my specific case Catholic Church.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 2 pts · 326d
That's wild, I didn't expect that even the catholic church gets in on this. Where I live, this would sound completely absurd to most christians.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 4 pts · 327d
Obviously the circumcised. They would easily convert the captures enemy soldiers to their side but the uncircumcised would not be able to do it.
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 326d
jokes on you, i wear chainmail
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 327d
what do you think the Iraq war was, sweaty?ignorant white colonist shows their racismrumschlumpel@feddit.org · 7 pts · 327d
Wasn't the Iraq war mostly between muslim Iraqis, who are almost always circumcised, and US-americans, who are also usually circumcised?
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 326d
TIL Iraqis circumcise their boys!!
I will go with my original thought then, the Crusades - I think European Christendom had not yet incorporated circumcision at the time, but the Muslim world was practicing circumcision, so that would be a war between the circumcised and the uncircumcised?
undeffeined@lemmy.ml · 28 pts · 326d
*Skin issue
TootSweet@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 327d
Just when I thought Lemmy was over the trend of talking about stroganoff.
Pencilnoob@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 327d
How do I delete someone else's comment
đ¤˘
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 327d
Good thing I can, I dont think I will tho
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 26 pts · 327d
TBH no idea how the foreskin helps with jerking a fully erect penis. Do you pull it all the way up, somehow? Or do you just have that much smegma?
Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 64 pts · 327d
you can move the skin up and down, so ur hand doesnt have to slide
kartoffelsaft@programming.dev · 17 pts · 327d
I am circumcized so I know foreskin is not a prerequisite for that.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 7 pts · 327d
Yeah, but it goes up further and with the head of the penis being the most sensitive area, having that foreskin is quite useful.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 326d
It must depend on the person because so am I and I certainly don't have enough slack to use it like that.
MediumGray@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 326d
It's not a prerequisite, it's just that it works better.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 11 pts · 327d
My foreskin doesn't go all the way up when I have a full erection, and I don't think that's rare.
Edit: Curious amount of downvotes. Are you grossed out by anatomical descriptions of healthy male genitals? If so, WTH are you doing in this thread? Do you not think that it's rare? Then comment instead of downvoting, or at least in addition to it.
morphballganon@mtgzone.com · 6 pts · 327d
... who's out here sliding their hand? The skin slides relative to the deeper layers, foreskin or not
Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 326d
people that use lube
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 28 pts · 326d
every now and then i'm reminded to be thankful i got to keep mine, jesus christ lmao
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 5 pts · 326d
I'm uncircumcised, actually.
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 326d
i like how two people disagree with that
drath@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 327d
Not sure I understand, but you grab below glans and force foreskin on and off the penis head repeatedly. Don't have to pull it all the way to the tip, going halfway is enough. The foreskin skin is much smoother than hands, so barely any lube is required, just the natural skin oil is enough. I wouldn't call it smegma as it usually refers to white substance full of dead skins and bacteria, but the underside of healthy clean penis foreskin is naturally a little wet.
Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works · 24 pts · 327d
What a day to have eyes.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca · 22 pts · 326d
It rolls over the glans.
So you just kind of. Like. Roll it.
PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 326d
It's crazy how you poor mutilated people have no idea how it was designed to work.
For one, I haven't had smegma since my parents taught me to clean behind the foreskin (arguably later than they should have) when I was 7. You think we're all just walking around with dirty penises?
For two, the foreskin pulls back below the head, you can pull it down far enough that you look circumcised then you can pull it back over. Pull is a strong word it doesn't take effort, but doing this is pleasurable to the point of ejaculating (i.e. that's one way to masturbate as a person with a foreskin). No need for lube.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 7 pts · 326d
I'm uncircumcised. The foreskin is automatically pulled down/back when you're fully erect (or at least mine is...), what mystifies me is how you'd pull it back up far enough that you can use it in place of lubrication for the glans. Is your foreskin just that long? Mine certainly isn't.
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com · 6 pts · 326d
So I think there's 2 parts to this, one is different people are different but the other is that when masterbating one might not be quite as erect as with a partner
skisnow@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 326d
Sounds like TYL... ;)
astropenguin5@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
Mine only goes half to 2/3s down the glans when erect, and there is enough slack to where if I hold the foreskin lower down it can slide up to mostly cover it. Sometimes a lil bit of spit or some such is still needed to lubricate the glans though.
Broadly it's probably just difference in genetics of size/slackness of foreskin, idk
bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 327d
Why don't people just use precum? It's plenty slippery.
astropenguin5@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 325d
Probably some combination of not necessarily producing enough (not all people make the same amount) and lack of foreplay/edging
::: spoiler personal anatomical anecdote For example I really only have precum after a decent amount of foreplay/edging, and not all that much. And a lil lubrication is sometimes useful for getting to that point. :::
SingularEye@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -1 pts · 326d
thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 326d
i'm cut and have no idea what this meme is about. growing up, i thought all dicks just looked like mine, i only found out about what a dick is supposed to look like the first time i watched porn...
winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 326d
Most porn dicks are cut though?
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com · 16 pts · 326d
With a strong enough erection (such as when having sex, aka what you'd see in porn) cut and uncut look the same. The difference only shows itself with a semi or when soft
EddoWagt@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 325d
That's just not true
Rakonat@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 325d
If the foreskin pulls back like it should, they are similar enough most people wouldn't notice the difference at a glance. If the foreskin is getting caught or not pulling back it's potentially a sign of various conditions that can be harmful if ignored
SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 325d
Potentially. But you can have a perfectly healthy dick even if it doesn't pull back fully when erect. As long as it can happen when flaccid so you can clean it properly it usually shouldn't be an issue.
thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 326d
Okay, maybe not the first time I watched porn, but it was one of the times I watched porn
omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 327d
đ¤˘đ¤Žđ
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 326d
Then there are those of us fans of the dry rub