Volodymyr Zelensky, in the next phase of talks to end the war in Ukraine, intends to draw a red line at the most contentious issue on the table: the Russian demand for Ukraine’s sovereign territory. As long as he remains the nation’s president, Zelensky will not agree to give up land in exchange for peace, Ukraine’s chief negotiator, Andriy Yermak, told me today in an exclusive interview.
“Not a single sane person today would sign a document to give up territory,” said Yermak, who has served as Zelensky’s chief of staff, lead negotiator, and closest aide throughout the full-scale war with Russia.
“As long as Zelensky is president, no one should count on us giving up territory. He will not sign away territory,” he told me by telephone from Kyiv. “The constitution prohibits this. Nobody can do that unless they want to go against the Ukrainian constitution and the Ukrainian people.”
195 Comments
carbs@lemmy.world · 155 pts · 249d
And nor should they, never give in to bullies.
aarch0x40@piefed.social · 63 pts · 249d
Russia's showing signs of desperation anyhow which is why they're trying to push through an agreement. They can't debase the currency much further, they don't have the reserves or the GDP. Ukraine is in more the position strength here as they've spend their time building alliances which has been aided by Russian actions strengthening the resolve of Europeans.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 249d
US here, and I wish we were one of those allies. You know, as we promised.
redlemace@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 248d
Yeah, would have been nice if the word (signature in fact!) of us government had meant anything (we knew russia never lives up to it)
jumjummy@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 248d
Unfortunately, this is just a stark lesson for any other country out there. Do not give up your nuclear weapons no matter what “guarantees” you get.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 248d
Isnt the lesson "develop nukes now"?
plyth@feddit.org · 3 pts · 247d
The US pressured Ukraine to accept assurances and not guarantees. It matters which kind of guarantees are given.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d
We knew Russia wouldn't. I'm just sad that we aren't holding up our end of the bargain. I suspect we'd have support from other nations.
MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
Sounds like the EU needs a nuclear weapon program. At least one warhead in every EU nation, and at least 10 in every bordering Russia.
And also an autonomous weapon program. Like Project Manhatthan, but for Skynet.
Maggoty@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 248d
Ah yes, but with Trump bending over backwards to accommodate Putin the Russians needn't worry.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 248d
plus putin is also shoring up far-right european govt in the EU too.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 248d
so many of thier fuel stations are hit, its going to start affecting his 2 base of influence, moscow and st.pete, the last thing he wants is those people in the cities complaining,.
joostjakob@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
If they really felt desperate, wouldn't they show just a bit more flexibility in their demands?
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 248d
If Putin shows weakness, Russian's might start thinking he'll give in to their demands.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
The will if they need to. Putin is much better at playing the game than the US under the orange moron.
Buffalox@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 249d
Thanks for the archived link. 👍
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 49 pts · 248d
Don't give up a single meter of land
Require reparations from Russia
Demand all children back
Demand a formal apology for the pain and suffering caused
Demand Putin in jail through the ICC
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -35 pts · 248d
By doing what?
A little tired of hearing this endless "well, if I were Ukraine, I would simply win the war and claim a trillion dollars in reparations and make Russia disappear off the map" Internet wish casting.
What do you do to extract any of these concessions that hasn't already been tried? And how many more people are you willing to throw into the meat grinder trying?
mean_bean279@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 248d
It’s not our decision to make how many people Ukraine is willing to sacrifice for their land. That’s THEIR decision.
The better question here is how many people is Russia willing to sacrifice for a war of conquest that shouldn’t have happened in the first place.
queermunist@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 247d
It's our decision whether we give them billions of dollars of weapons.
gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 247d
Absolutely it is. We choose whether we live in a world where we defend freedom or where we appease bullies.
I guess for some people it's an easier choice than for others.
queermunist@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 247d
Is that why Ukraine is over $100 billion in debt to its Western "allies"?
Putting people into debt slavery is a weird way to defend freedom...
gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 247d
Debt is a normal part of war, and Ukraine's war debt is about a quarter of their peacetime GDP. Most of that has already been covered by the EU aid package last year.
Characterizing that as debt slavery is a pretty huge stretch.
queermunist@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 247d
At this scale those debts are a chain around their necks that can be used to control them.
As for the aid package, it merely covers half of the debt. On top of that? It's conditional! Ukraine has to meet certain requirements to receive that aid: energy, border management, agricultural demining, and the development of a list of "strategic and essential" raw materials. Aside from demining that doesn't sound like defending freedom, that sounds like they are trapping a client state into dependency so they can be exploited for primary production.
This has never been about freedom, I don't know how anyone could ever believe it was.
mean_bean279@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 233d
We don't give them shit, we sell it to them on loan with interest. It's all old hardware that we don't use anymore. It's a win win, our military budget goes down, they kill Russians. how do you not understand that 4 years into the war?
queermunist@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 233d
So, we're trapping them in debt slavery so that we can steal their natural resources. They die, we profit. Win/Win
Also, it's not like those profits go to us. They go to the manufacturers and their investors, with only some coming back in the form of wages. It's mostly a way to take public dollars and then hand it out to political donors. Win/Win/Win
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -22 pts · 248d
It clearly is, or you wouldn't be telling them the terms for peace.
They're not the ones negotiating loss of territory. You gotta quit this "Well I'm rubber and your glue" line of reasoning.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 248d
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
Being a Tankie is when you don't want to fight a war? But being a conservative is when you do want to fight a war? And they're both on the same side?
I feel bad for anyone trapped in a warzone and treated like fodder for the war machines.
But I've got no pity for the cheerleaders on the sidelines eager to trade human bodies for rhetorical points.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
That's not some kind of virtue. Make the other fucker die for theirs, etc.
But once you're dead, it's not your land anymore. Telling tens of thousands of additional Ukrainians to die so the state can auction off a dead guy's property to Jared Kushner's holding company is fucked.
🚢
null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 248d
Capitulating to an aggressor isn't going to save lives.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 247d
Nobody in this thread seems interested in saving lives. It is entirely an argument over territorial control
AnyOldName3@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 247d
Giving a country with a track record of violating treaties as long as Russia's anything that lets them feel like they gained from the war in return for a treaty saying they'll stop the war is going to cost more Ukrainian lives than continuing to fight, even to the last man. All a peace treaty like that achieves is vindicating Russia's decision to violate the last treaty. It doesn't stop the war, just pauses it while Russia rearms, so it can be even bloodier when it resumes than it would have been if it hadn't paused. If Ukraine can't make Russia lose, more Ukrainians (and more citizens of Russia's other neighbours who are at risk of being next in line) survive if they make Russia's victory pyrrhic so they learn that it isn't profitable to invade their neighbours again.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 247d
Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post–Cold War Stalemate
A good book and worth a read, if you're genuinely curious at the history leading to the current crisis.
But it's a hard read for anyone who believes history started in 2014
null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 247d
What? I'm here telling you that if you want to save lives, don't capitulate to the country killing everyone.
As any child knows, if you let a bully take your lunch money they're just going to come back tomorrow.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 247d
That hasn't proven out over the last 3 years. The death toll in Ukraine has significantly outrun every other Russian conflict since WW2.
When you think like a child, you get the results to match
derg@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
It's Zelensky that says it, rumor has it Ukraine won't give up land in exchange for peace
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 247d
“How many people are you willing to throw into the meat grinder”
Yes us lemmy posters are all high ranking Ukrainian officials. Our moral inputs into this site dictate outcomes on the battle field and our opinions hold us accomplice to the slaughter. Putin is not responsible at all; it’s the people posting on the internet!
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 247d
101st chairborne, to be sure. Tons of folks seem to think this war is a team sport that you just cheer at from the sidelines.
Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
Kinda seems like Ukraine are winning the war of attrition to me.
echodot@feddit.uk · 47 pts · 248d
It's not simply a bad political decision to give up territory it's illogical as well.
The fact that Russia is even engaging in a war with Ukraine indicates that they are duplicitous since they agreed not to attack Ukraine in order to get Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons.
Any deal with Russia will be violated as soon as it suits Russia to violate it. Giving up a territory for peace simply gives Russia the opportunity to rebuild their forces, as soon as those forces are rebuilt they will violate the peace treaty. Again.
plyth@feddit.org · -3 pts · 247d
Russia argues that there was a regime change in 2014 which released them from that agreement.
Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 247d
Russia says a lot of things
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 247d
Shocking new informartion shows that russia had their fingers crossed behind their backs at the time the deal was made.
plyth@feddit.org · 1 pts · 246d
Their argument is that they didn't break the agreement.
echodot@feddit.uk · 11 pts · 247d
That's not how agreements work. If it was, they would be pointless.
plyth@feddit.org · 1 pts · 246d
Minsk II, they are pointless. People even question US and French Nato commitment.
But hypothetically speaking, why should Russia be bound to the agreement if the West actually did a regime change?
smol_beans@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
What about the majority of Ukranians that voted for the gov that got overthrown in 2014? Their voices and opinions don't count?
RidderSport@feddit.org · 3 pts · 247d
Opinions change, afterall those same people voted at least partly for Zelenskyi
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 247d
Yeah, in 2014 Ukrainians just got rid of pro-Russian government in Ukraine what, of course, violated the agreement of peace since Russia cannot claim Ukraine peacefully anymore. This is actually "totally" logical.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
You dropped a /s
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 247d
Just for you to know: not every person knows/uses slang/abbreviations, so that if you want other people to understand you, use standard English, please.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d
Either use /s or make your sarcasm clearer.
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 246d
Ahh, okay. Thanks. Will know from now the meaning of /s.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 246d
Just with these kind of topics you have to be careful. Your edit makes things even clearer.
plyth@feddit.org · 1 pts · 246d
We call the Russian influence on the West hybrid war, wouldn't the Western influence in Ukraine be the same?
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 246d
Same, same, but different. I agree that both these cases can be classified as influence, but, at least as I know, the influence of the West has no intention to occupy Ukraine or turn it into puppet state. The West mostly needs resources, democratic alignment and overall stability, while it has no interest in wiping out the national identity of Ukrainians and abuse them, unlike Russia. So, between 2 evils it would be better to choose the lesser one.
plyth@feddit.org · 1 pts · 246d
Britain got out of the EU for this reason.
What about the posts about Amazon working conditions and US healthcare? At least Germany is approaching US conditions.
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 246d
How policies of this company are related here? I agree that Amazon abuses their workers, but the workers have a freedom to leave this job. Government doesn't force them to work there, it only participates in the creating of conditions that may force people to work there. While, as I understand, Russia is going to oppress Ukraininas on a level of government in case of successful conquering of territories. And I haven't even mentioned the overall hate of ordinary Russians to Ukrainians.
So, as for Ukrainians, having the West model of economy versus government and social oppression from the East is not a hard choice to pick up.
plyth@feddit.org · 0 pts · 246d
What do you expect?
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 46 pts · 248d
chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 248d
I don't know how much it would encourage Putin to invade again.
It's not like he invaded part of Ukraine and was allowed to keep the annexed territory in the name of peace, then 8 years later invaded again, right?
gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 248d
That's exactly how they ended up in a situation. Putin took Crimea with basically no resistance. He just didn't count on Zelensky. Most other leaders would have given in to the pressure and let Putin overrun Ukraine (for a nice golden parachute).
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 12 pts · 248d
Yeah, historically Ukrainian corruption while not as bad as in Russia was just as pervasive and Putin didn't really think Zelensky or any Ukrainian leadership would act on principles. Of course, it's an easy mistake to make when you have no principles and surround yourself with people who have no principles.
PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 248d
That same orange shit stain is days away from de facto declaring war on Venezuela. Disgusting.
Rose@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 248d
Even if they were to not invade Ukraine again, Putin has been using war to distract the population from domestic problems, so he'd just pick another target after Chechnya, Georgia, Syria, Africa, and Ukraine.
Empricorn@feddit.nl · 41 pts · 248d
Because if they did, EVERY SINGLE country that wants to invade another, including Russia, will know that if they just wait a year everyone will forget about the sovereign land they stole...
Sunflier@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 248d
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 248d
There is no scenario in which Russia gives up control of Crimea. It is simply too strategically important.
Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 247d
What about the scenario that they collapse within due to no economy? That'd lose crimea for them quickly.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 247d
Is there any serious analysis that anticipates that? I mean, a flurry of meteor strikes could also do it, I suppose.
echodot@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 247d
Yes. Their oil production is way down due to the destruction of a lot of their refineries so fuel supplies are running low. They are also unable to produce enough amination for their tanks. So their tanks won't go and can't fire, hard to call that winning.
frisbird@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 247d
They lost a few percentage points of total refining capacity.
The strikes Ukraine made did disrupt a large percentage of the refineries, that's true. But the strikes didn't do a lot of damage and the refineries were brought back onine shortly.
The total annual production of those refineries was affected. But only something like 3% - 6%.
Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 246d
This week there are reports, plus lots of corroborating videos showing orcs running into battle without helmets or armor. They don't seem to be doing great.
frisbird@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 246d
And yet Ukraine can't seem to defend against them? Russian territory gains have been accelerating over the last 4 weeks. Pretty bad situation if Ukraine can't defend against unarmored and unarmed soldiers
Randomgal@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 247d
People have been saying this since week 2 of the war lmao
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
too much gas/oil that russia desperately needs.
GaryGhost@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 249d
Russia will come back and take it all, don't give them an edge. Trump will be on TV whining how Ukraine rejected his really good peace offering.
cecilkorik@piefed.ca · 28 pts · 249d
When ever Trump is upset I'm a happy person.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
they waited til the right time to take crimea, its almost always a dem president in office before he struck, he miscalculated with ukraine. its the same reason gop ruins the economy, they get blaming points, in this case crimea, ukraine so the reps get re-elected once again, and give russia pass when they are back in power.
vga@sopuli.xyz · 34 pts · 248d
I know this is mostly a fantasy by now, but in actual reality, Russia obviously needs to give Crimea back to Ukraine and then continue minding its own fucking business.
PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk · 22 pts · 248d
ContinueStart
echodot@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 248d
Has Russia in its various incarnations, ever minded its own business? They've been a pain basically since their inception. Mostly because they seem to have predilection for some variation of oppressing their own people and then using those oppressed people to oppress more people.
There was about a 15-year window when they had a democracy and that's been it.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 248d
Are you talking about the 90s and early 2000s, when Russia experienced a drop in life expectancy on par with WWII? When foreign capital pillaged the country with the explicit purpose of making an example of them?
Here's a link to The Shock Doctrine: Rise of Disaster Capitalism. It helps explain how things got bad enough that Vladimir fucking Putin seems like the lesser evil to the people who lived through it.
frisbird@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 247d
Really? So the invasions by Napoleon, by the WW1 victors, and by the Third Reich were all just Russia being a pain?
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 248d
whos going to make them? until europe invades, im sorry but you kinda have to hope the us does something
vga@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 248d
Yeah, that's the fantasy part.
dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 247d
doh, my b missed that word
WanderWisley@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 248d
Good! Fuck Russia! Fuck Putin! Fuck Trump!
FinishingDutch@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 248d
You don’t reward a thief and murderer, you shoot them between the eyes. As a Dutchman, I wholeheartedly support shooting every uniformed Russian or allied you can find. Twice.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 248d
In all fairness, I think kost Russian soldiers aren't there by much choice, Putin loves his meat grinder and has pulled well over a million Russians through it.
Yes, that is a problem that Russians should fix themselves, but still. Any soldiers surrendering should be treated well. Show them they've really been figuring on the wrong side
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 248d
Most of the soldiers getting sent into the meat grinder are ethnic minorities from poor regions of Russia. They're people that European Russians don't care about.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 248d
putin is less likely to send muscovites or st.petersberg russians(aka white russians) thats where his influence is, if he starts to send those people, the people are going to riot.
Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 247d
They do have a choice. When Russian frontline collapses in WWI, they started to make revolution in the Russia. Soldiers have all the guns, they have a choice, but they don’t use it or care to use it.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 247d
It is hard to revolt against a fascist state..
Alone, you have no change
There are horrible examples made with individuals who try
Organisation is made very hard and punishment is inhumane
People just want to live their lives, and if risks for revolution is so damn high, they can not afford to do it
It worked with the Nazis, it works with Russia and it will work with MAGA
If we don’t have strong protections against fascist takeover, they will do it and will block all counter movements while they are small
That is why they try to make antifa illegal, because active fighting against fascism is always needed, because the danger of a fascist group taking over is always ther
And fascism does not mean against jews, it means usage of power to suppress those with less power. It means slavering with extra steps.
Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 247d
That’s not what I was saying. Russian people have been made revolution before, which started from the soldiers tired of the war. I didn’t speak of the US military or people.
Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 247d
This sort of thinking is what the elites want..
If you apply your hate about the Russian invasion to all people of Russia, you make the job easier for Russian government to spread hate against others even more.
If people of countries would not hate each other, but only people responsible for war, there would simply be no war.
War only works by propaganda, without hate and fear mongering, there would be no wars.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -23 pts · 248d
We literally do and we do it regularly.
At this point, telling Russia to give the land back might as well be a land acknowledgement you read in between demanding Florida to back to the Cherokee and telling the Normans to leave England.
Well, quit wasting your time. Get down to Ukraine and win the war, then.
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 28 pts · 248d
Well good for them. Bending knee to Putin won’t secure peace, it’ll only secure them an intermission until Putin can finish the job.
SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 248d
If anything, Russia should give up land to Ukraine!
Dicska@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 248d
Give back*!
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 249d
Why should they?
myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 248d
Because he didn’t say thank you.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net · -58 pts · 248d
Because the zone is a wasteland anyways, and the few that live there were pro Russian as far as I remember
If a part of your country doesn’t want to belong to you anymore, then it shouldn’t (like Taiwan or Hong Kong)
tawaken@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 248d
The vast majority regions that Russia currently occupied/demanding were overwhelmingly pro-Ukrainian (opposing to Russian aggression) before the invasion. Or are you referring the annexation referendum or some vote results made under occupation by foreign military force? If you brutally invade a neighboring country and force its people to make an annexation referendum at gunpoint, surely the result will favor you, and you can invade other countries wherever you want like that.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · -5 pts · 248d
Source?
tawaken@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d
The views and opinions of South-Eastern regions residents of Ukraine: April 2014 https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=302&page=1&y=2014&m=4
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 248d
Thank you. I think there is some slight nuance here but these numbers certainly refute the narrative that the locals wanted to join Russia. Assuming the poll was conducted fairly. I'm not familiar with the agency behind it.
tawaken@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 248d
I had bookmarked more different polls, but I lost all after I renewed my PC :/ You can look into it and find more.
drhodl@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 248d
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · -2 pts · 248d
drhodl@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 248d
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 248d
Id like to hear your opinion on Crimea
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 248d
Only because of Russia. Imagine the implications of that mindset. Just bomb a place to shit them take it.
False. Are you going off what Russia said?! Lol Russia killed, displaced, threatened, and lied about those votes.
We already established that's built on a lie but even if that's true that's not a green light for Russia to invade.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -5 pts · 248d
Do you have any data suggesting otherwise? Before the invasion, those people weren't happy with the anti-russian language laws passed by the central government or the fascist militias they wouldn't stop.
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
Once again, you're using a gaslighting argument called changing the argument. Russia should be allowed to invade Ukraine because a boarder region wants to leave? Even if that was true, the way Russia is going about claiming the region isn't justified. If Russia cared so much they wouldn't have turned the region into a wasteland. They wouldn't have tried to take the capital. They wouldn't be launching attacks well past the disputed area. Hell is you want to get specific, Russia wouldn't have any right Crimea. But I guess you have the dame lies on hand for that region too.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -9 pts · 248d
Neither side has any interest in the well-being and prosperity of the people living in those regions, I just want the war to stop. Same position I've held since 2022 when the lines were mostly where they are, and the peace deal was mostly where it is, but millions were still in their homes and hundreds of thousands still alive.
NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
The war ends when Russia respects Ukraine's original post USSR fracturing boarders agreement because Ukraine had something like 80% of the USSR's nukes. You want the war to end. STFU.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -8 pts · 248d
Russia will never agree to that, so you're just advocating every last Ukrainian be sent to die in a meat grinder? Maybe if you send the Poles, Germans, and French to die too, Russia will run out of manpower and then you can have your borders.
Electricd@lemmybefree.net · -8 pts · 248d
Source?
calcopiritus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 247d
You believe that an invading army that commits war crimes and comes from a country with no democracy is going to hold free and fair elections? Are you insane?
Electricd@lemmybefree.net · -4 pts · 247d
I’m getting USA vibes
Obviously it is something that means they can’t be fully trusted. Disregarding the results without searching for counter proof is dumb. This region was known for not being very pro Ukraine in the first place
Maggoty@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 248d
The 2014 elections were actually pretty close in those areas. A month later the Russians invaded the Donbas though so there wasn't any chance to be pro-Ukrainian after that. And then there's the fact that people tend to not like like invading armies. I'm pretty sure anyone still in the area isn't a fan of the people shelling them every day.
Also, it's not a wasteland, it's actually a pretty strategic area.
Billy_fuccboi@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
They were "honest" Russian elections
drhodl@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 248d
There is no such thing !
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 248d
in 2014, the ukrainian govt was a pro-russian pm, he fled after the people revolted against him. oh one of trumps former cabinet was working with russia/ukraine at the time too.
Maggoty@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 246d
Yup and then they held snap elections right after. Russia was sore that Ukraine actually supported the pro-EU party and invaded Donbas under the fiction that it was a locally led and staffed rebellion against Kyiv. But there wasn't enough local support for a rebellion.
TRock@feddit.dk · 7 pts · 248d
You're wrong
Electricd@lemmybefree.net · 1 pts · 248d
Nice argument
TRock@feddit.dk · 3 pts · 248d
Thx
PKscope@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
So the U.S should give up Texas every time they get a hair up their ass and holler to secede?
C'mon dude. Be real.
unphazed@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Honestly? I say if Texas voted, let 'em go. Let Abbot even be the Confederate President, then wait until Mexico shows their displeasure.
frongt@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 248d
The US would never allow it. Too many military resources in Texas.
iopq@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
Wrong, everyone pro Russian stayed or moved to the occupied Donbass area in 2014
drhodl@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 248d
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
what putin was the resources in ukraine, and of course to replenish thier population with ukrainians.
not_me@piefed.social · 22 pts · 248d
watson387@sopuli.xyz · 20 pts · 249d
Nor should they.
switcheroo@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 248d
Never bow to bullies.
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 247d
Bully the bullies back.
PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 248d
Nor should they. And they own their oil discoveries.
dudesss@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 249d
And we should donate, as we should. And fight where we can.
FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 248d
Demand reparations, send all the Russians back to actual Russia and Putin to The Hague
UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 248d
Good
Gammelfisch@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 247d
With the Russians and MAGA, one should sleep with one eye open. The Russians are in a wartime economy and can produce more weapons than they lose on the battlefield. The only way to stop them and throw back the Russians is to create another 1917 revolt.
Allero@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 247d
As a Russian communist with relatives in Ukraine, count me in!
(Historical context for others: 1917 has seen two revolutions, February one, which ended monarchy, and October one, which brought bolsheviks, the communists and socialists siding with Lenin, to power. Lenin has then taken Russia out of the World War I)
SabinStargem@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 247d
Russia has been drained to the dregs, far as vehicles go. People go over sat footage and count the amount of machines in the vehicle parks. Covert Cabal made a video on that several days ago.
Russia Has Began a MASSIVE withdraw of ancient T-72 Ural and A variant tanks
clot27@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 247d
russia needs another lenin (well whole world does)
betanumerus@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 247d
Randomgal@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 247d
The article literally says no lmao
teohhanhui@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
And he has resigned...
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-anti-corruption-officers-search-office-zelenskiys-chief-staff-officials-2025-11-28/
Rose@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 248d
Credibly_Human@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 248d
Given that Europe has had 4 years to start cranking up its military power and has failed to do so meaningfully, and the US looks like a vassal state of Russia at the moment, I feel this may become an inevitability if Europeans don't stop bickering about where exactly gets to make what, and starts actually making things, like with the 2 modern fighter projects (as Europe cannot make its own 5th yet alone 6th gen fighters), or the joint European (France and Germany mainly) tank project.
echodot@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 248d
You might want to look into that because Europe absolutely is ramping up its military response.
Credibly_Human@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
What part about mentioning 3 specific projects as examples of where Europe is not doing enough makes you think that I am not aware of their efforts?
I am specifically saying those efforts are not enough nor are they soon enough.
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
You're statement would have had more truth to it in 2023 then it does today. Europe is still behind Russia in that regard but Russia committed to fully switching to a wartime economy.
Credibly_Human@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
Just to be clear, your point and argument, are that I am correct, but I am wrong because exactly as I mentioned, Europe could have done better if they bolstered their defences and prepared?
It feels like you've just taken my comment as an attack on Europe, but have no real criticisms of my points.
My statement would be less true, not more true in 2023, because the point is, the longer they go without having done so, the more dire the situation becomes.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · -11 pts · 248d
What i don't get is: has anybody bothered asking the people who have lived in the affected territories (Donbass) what they want?
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 248d
Maybe that'd have been a valid point back in say 2005 or something but the Russians have pretty thoroughly muddies the waters for such a vote to be possible at this point. While I don't know about the Donbass in particular nearly as wellas I probably should if it's anything like Crimea there's a solid chance that quite a solid chunk of the original locals want to turn Moscow into a smoking crater.
Russia likes to move colonists in as fast as possible and frankly speaking they can drown on their own blood.
echodot@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 248d
And how would they go about doing that? It's not like Russia wouldn't allow there to be a free vote.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -3 pts · 248d
What if they invited UN observers?
bold_atlas@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d
Like they did in Crimea?
And it doesn't matter. With the mass killings and population transfers it CAN'T be a fair vote now. It's a moot point. The only time a vote could have been fair or representative was BEFORE the Russian invasion and ethnic cleansing.
TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 248d
Some people wanted to join Russia, the majority didn't, and it varies year per year per whatever issue is making the rounds. Funny thing about independent movements though, they don't really care about the percentage of people and sub-regions who didn't want to leave or what they thought.
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -10 pts · 248d
Why does it matter what they want? What next, are you gonna ask the people being sent to die? The only people who really matter are billionaires like Putin and Zelenskyy and what chickenhawks on
redditlemmy want.Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · -26 pts · 248d
69% of Ukrainians want out of the war. They are tired of dieing for land: https://news.gallup.com/poll/693203/ukrainian-support-war-effort-collapses.aspx
I dont trust Russia at all, but no one is winning the war except for corporation war machine.
But if you disagree strongly, ukraine is ready for you here's how you can sign up your life for the war: http://joinuarmy.org/en/
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 248d
The divide among people who would be new Russians and the people safely in the cities was stark previously. People going to be annexed really don’t want that it seems.
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · -1 pts · 248d
Of course not, but its the rest of the country that would have to fight and die to try to get it back.
You're just saying lives are less important than land. How many acres is your life worth?
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 247d
Super weird correlation bro. As if the people didn’t come with the land. As if a captured population wouldn’t be mistreated. I believe I spelled that out clearly so no idea where you conjured up your bs. Absolutely terrible argument.
I sold about 350 acres in 2022 and I’m down to just 3 now because that’s all I need for my farm ❤️. I’d rather be dead than hand them over to some Russians against my will.
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 247d
Saying the people come with the land is not a strong point, its a weird correlation bro. Populations can be evacuated or protected, and the fighting itself is what puts them in the most danger. More war means more civilians abused or displaced, not fewer.
You can reclaim and trade for land. You cannot reclaim the dead. This is why calling any negotiation stupid ignores the actual moral math of large scale conflict.
And you didn't say how much land your life was worth. After you answer say how much land is worth your neighbors life too. Because we've done this before in war. Thousands dieing for inches....ww1.
sommerset@thelemmy.club · -17 pts · 248d
Was completely avoidable too. Just do what you yourself signed in Minsk agreement.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 248d
Yeah all russia had to do was not invade
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
How were they supposed to quell widespread anti-corruption protests and restore Putin's slumping popularly without a successful 3 day military operation? Do you realize how much the successful war against Georgia boosted Putin's popularity right when he needed it? /s
sommerset@thelemmy.club · -6 pts · 247d
Piglets were supposed to follow Minsk agreement.
That's all they needed to do.
Ya know - not to harass 70% of ukranian population that's Russian speaking. Not to say that "we are developing nuclear weapons" - things like that
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 247d
Rationalize russias warcrimes however you want
sommerset@thelemmy.club · -4 pts · 247d
War crimes? Ukranians are getting white glove treatments, full citizenship, benefits and are allowed to leave the country if they don't like it.
It does not get any better.
U gotta to be a total idiot to fight for a ukranian army to protect slightly differently colored oligarchs.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
From the bottom of my heart, and, on behalf of all the lives lost and ruined by putlers fascist government and war, fuck you.
drhodl@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 248d
sommerset@thelemmy.club · -57 pts · 248d
Zelensky is a completely incompetent moron. He could have easily done a deal and avoided whole war. Now he's gonna be exactly the same thing but with ruined economy and wasted lives.
drhodl@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 248d
sommerset@thelemmy.club · -36 pts · 248d
Lmao. Its going to be a smaller Ukraine . Much more manageable one.
That population that fled to Europe is not coming back.
They will be taught a lesson and denazified.
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 9 pts · 248d
Somehow I doubt Russian fascists intend to denazify anything. More likely they will add Ukrainian people and economic output to their war machine and pick a new former Russian Imperial possession to invade.
Rose@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 248d
Yep, they're already doing this in the occupied regions. The men there are sent to the same war.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 248d
or they plant russian citizens in the region, so they can "vote to join russia"
drhodl@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 248d
nlgranger@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 248d
This is what-if thinking. Right now the Russian are clearly showing disinterest in negotiating the end of the war, they are fully prepared to sacrifice more lives in order to gain territories, there is no reason to think they weren't already at the start.
IronBird@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 248d
it's delusional thinking, they took crimea...and they tried to to take more when they thought they could get away with, russians have been using the same playbook for centuries now. there are so many examples to pick from here showing this...give them anything and it just paints you as an easy target for more.
the real question (imo) is why hasnt someone just assassinated putin by now
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 248d
Because everyone close enough to assassinate Putin benefits from the regime. None of them are in their positions for altruistic reasons and all them them would face the gallows if Russia had real accountability. It's why Coup attempts are frequently not launched by Generals.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
there was barely resistance during obama when he took crimea, he was hoping biden was the same. his micalculated, covid helped indirectly, because everyone was basically home and paying attention to the news.
nlgranger@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
More specifically he underestimated the preparation of Ukrainian soldiers, notably the fact that NATO instructors came to share their training and tactics and help to prepare for the next war. He was well aware of it though, he used that as an argument that Ukraine was about to join NATO.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 248d
they still have over 135-144milion people in russia, he would probably send half of his orcs if he could.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 248d
My word, this is the stupidest thing I've read today
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -20 pts · 248d
Nobody wants to accept that the celebrity comedian placeholder candidate who won on a generic protest vote years before the war started isn't this generation's Nelson Mandela.
I'm beginning to understand how the Ukrainians have lost to an army as incompetent and corrupt as the Russians.
drhodl@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Zelenskyy is a hero, the Churchill of our time. Your boss Pootang is a greedy, theiving, cowardly midget with a tiny penis, Boris.
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · -5 pts · 248d
Churchill? The guy who killed 4.2 million of Indians via famine? Who proclaimed fascism the antidote to the poison of communism?
I like Zelenskyy less than most billionaires, but I wouldn't compare him to a genocidal ghoul like Churchill.
drhodl@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 247d
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 248d
Ohh you just took the crown for stupidest comment I've read today
Aljernon@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 248d
The slow walking of Military Aid under Biden and the disruption of aid under Trump are the main reasons the Ukrainians haven't done better. Most people are amazed they did as well against the Russian's as they have.