I think it's funny, because bukkake is just a noun, kind of meaning to splash or pour something over something else. There are even dishes called bukkake, e.g. bukkake soba. But since in the anglosphere it pretty much exclusively refers to the sexual act, that just has a very different connotation.
I mean that‘s always the issue with this dumb auto swear / dirty word detection. It is simply not context aware.
Recently in a game of Hell Let Loose, someone wrote in chat that he needs hearing aids while playing and the game automatically censored „aids“ because of „get aids!“ and whatever shit someone might say in a shooter.
This auto-censoring is particularly outrageous in a shooter where you can literally see people being torn to shreds by explosions.
No, they're explaining it to primarily Americans, who typically don't get a splash of cream in their coffee, so much as they get a splash of coffee in their milkshake.
since you're going to pedant, pedant correctly. they don't get coffee in their milkshake, they get espresso. when they get coffee, they get a splash of milk.
No, I am talking about Starbucks drinks, Frappucinos, which are basically milkshakes, that have vague hints of actual coffee in them, where the majority of the 'coffee' flavor somes from flavored syrups or chips or powders of some kind.
Those are far, far more commonly imbibed in the US, compared to the rest of the world, than the more traditional coffee with a splash of something, or a dirty 'whatever' via adding an espresso shot, a traditional latte, etc.
In this case, "Bukkake" is a noun in both English and Japanese. "Bukkakeru" with the "ru" on the end is the verb form that the noun comes from. English didn't change it, the picking of nits above just wasn't quite correct.
The self censorship is really disheartening. I read a defense of it that I considered thoughtful, but I truly hate it. I don’t know what we should do about it. Mass resistance?
I've watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I read 1984, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I watched Idiocracy, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I switched to Arch, and then started seeing references to it everywhere, btw.
etc...
And it doesn't stop. This has to mean I still keep missing many. I'd probably scroll past this comment if I didn't see that label on some Adata drive, since they don't seem to be that common in EU.
Only with cold water. Semen has a lot of protein in it, which means it will curdle and harden like scrambled eggs when it gets hot. Lots of women make the mistake of trying to use hot water, (because hot water cleans better, right?) but that has it immediately gumming up and getting sticky before they can even get the shampoo lathered.
Yeah, I'm entirely capable of standing around and jerking off on my own, without driving across town, without having to interact with the kind of people that would show up to an impromptu bukkake party.
I mean, I would consider going to (or organizing) a planned sex party or something like that, but the problem for me here is mostly that it's just bukkake.
If the uh, the set of activities were a bit more diverse, or interesting, maybe me sitting around and not doing any work, like a lipstick party... or any number of things that actually require, or are considerably more enjoyable with another person or multiple people...
That'd be more appealing.
That, and, frankly, I kind of just find the idea of a bukkake scene inherently demeaning to women... or I gueas just any uh, subject, regardless of sex/gender.
Sure, probably some ladies are into that, some guys are into that, etc.
Just gives me bad vibes, don't like the idea of treating someone's face as a collective group cum dumpster, even if its consensual, just feels gross to me.
Further, you'd need to vet the participants, screen/background check them generally, also screen for STIs/STDs, etc.
From a misspent youth, I can tell you that many people, even straight men, ghost sex parties/moresomes, even with attractive cis women, even after paying a deposit in advance.
I think tattoos have become extremely commonplace, that’s all. I haven’t watched porn in many years, but I would guess it’s just a reflection of a general societal trend.
It shows up in the rantings and ravings of right wing nutjobs who lament these types of things. They once developed an AI to remove tattoos and make women dress more modestly, I have no doubt the porn is annoying them too.
If you don’t watch porn, then you’re speculating. Porn aesthetics aren’t a simple mirror of “societal trends” they’re shaped by platform algorithms, niche markets, and performer branding.
Dragging in right-wing moral panic and some AI anecdote is just noise. Without firsthand exposure or actual data, this is guesswork, not insight.
105 Comments
maniel@sopuli.xyz · 216 pts · 233d
nobody came;-)
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 58 pts · 233d
A painful missed opportunity.
Vespair@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 233d
Ngl I thought dodging the obvious punchline was the punchline
maniel@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 233d
yeah, it had to be, cause I've heard "nobody came" joke since a decade
vane@lemmy.world · 49 pts · 233d
_stranger_@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 233d
we don't know that. They may have blasted rope at some other bukakke party.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 173 pts · 233d
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 233d
Now fix it so POV is used correctly
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 24 pts · 232d
It is correct. They are looking at their sister.
slappyfuck@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 232d
I still don’t understand its usage that way. I’m not a prescriptivist, I just don’t get it.
lightnsfw@reddthat.com · 0 pts · 232d
What don't you understand? Do you not know what point of view means?
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 6 pts · 233d
Just change it to "my POV" because it's what the photographer is currently seeing.
Eheran@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 232d
Which then again makes it totally redundant... Just do not use it for something like this.
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 2 pts · 232d
Do you want me to fix it or not?
bitjunkie@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 232d
Nothing to fix
JackbyDev@programming.dev · 1 pts · 232d
Tell them, not me
BootyEnthusiast@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 233d
Thank you
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 233d
🤌
criss_cross@lemmy.world · 161 pts · 233d
You can’t say “bukkake” on the internet now?
Dojan@pawb.social · 78 pts · 233d
I think it's funny, because bukkake is just a noun, kind of meaning to splash or pour something over something else. There are even dishes called bukkake, e.g. bukkake soba. But since in the anglosphere it pretty much exclusively refers to the sexual act, that just has a very different connotation.
Pechente@feddit.org · 61 pts · 233d
I mean that‘s always the issue with this dumb auto swear / dirty word detection. It is simply not context aware.
Recently in a game of Hell Let Loose, someone wrote in chat that he needs hearing aids while playing and the game automatically censored „aids“ because of „get aids!“ and whatever shit someone might say in a shooter.
This auto-censoring is particularly outrageous in a shooter where you can literally see people being torn to shreds by explosions.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca · 138 pts · 233d
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 233d
Ah yes, the Scunthorpe Problem in action.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 233d
No swears allowed on the Deus Vult Youth Group Christian server!
I still can't believe those kinds of servers exist, but they do.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 12 pts · 233d
You mean that soba wasn’t supposed to have cum on it?
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 232d
... Yakisoba?
:/
Bukkakesoba.
https://www.foodandwine.com/recipes/soba-bukkake-chashu-pork-and-sesame-vinaigrette
=D
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 232d
Why beat around the bush? Just go directly to the source and eat fish jizz
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 232d
Well I mean, if you beat around the right bush, good things can happen =P
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 233d
Sorry to pick nits, but if the definition is "to pour something over something else," that's a verb.
Dojan@pawb.social · 12 pts · 233d
ぶっ掛け (bukkake) is a noun, like "a splash of coffee."
ぶっ掛ける (bukkakeru) is a verb, like "I like to splash around."
Granted, bukkake isn't that kind of splash, it's rather "they splashed water on the flames."
couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 233d
I never thought I'd become such an expert by scrolling lemmy but here we are
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 233d
i would change your first example to "a splash of cream in your coffee". in english that implies the sense of scale.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 233d
No, they're explaining it to primarily Americans, who typically don't get a splash of cream in their coffee, so much as they get a splash of coffee in their milkshake.
Thus, it works correctly.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 233d
since you're going to pedant, pedant correctly. they don't get coffee in their milkshake, they get espresso. when they get coffee, they get a splash of milk.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 233d
No, I am talking about Starbucks drinks, Frappucinos, which are basically milkshakes, that have vague hints of actual coffee in them, where the majority of the 'coffee' flavor somes from flavored syrups or chips or powders of some kind.
Those are far, far more commonly imbibed in the US, compared to the rest of the world, than the more traditional coffee with a splash of something, or a dirty 'whatever' via adding an espresso shot, a traditional latte, etc.
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 233d
Then your previous definition is incorrect, fyi
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 233d
It's the noun form of the verb bukkakeru. Japanese is weird.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 233d
"fondant" is an equivalent, from the French "to melt" its now a noun.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 233d
Not quite the same, although interesting!
In this case, "Bukkake" is a noun in both English and Japanese. "Bukkakeru" with the "ru" on the end is the verb form that the noun comes from. English didn't change it, the picking of nits above just wasn't quite correct.
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 233d
Technically the other poster's definition of bukkake was what was not quite correct, the nits I picked were based on that.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 233d
Haha fair enough. It's kind of hard to define a nominalized verb in English, I feel, so I'd give it to him, but you're free to pick all the nits 😂
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 232d
So basically, bukkake/bukkakeru is nearly a direct translation to 'splooge'.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/splooge
Where you can splooge your splooge all over someone, and then you'll have splooged your splooge on them.
And maybe you can be splooging untill the sun comes up, and people will say 'nobody else splooges like that guy'.
So, silly examples, but you can see 'splooge' is both the noun for the... resulting liquid, and also the verb for ... 'creating' it, expelling it.
Not exactly the same, grammatically, but pretty close.
scapegarced@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 233d
Maybe he meant to say that its the result of such action
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 233d
Kinda like when I asked my daughter what she was watching and she said mukbang videos... (Unsure of the spelling). I was like WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING??
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 27 pts · 233d
I'm too lazy to remake this meme because of censorship. Unfortunately, this is how memes are trending thanks to AI and algorithms
criss_cross@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 233d
Yeah it was less a judgement on you and more on the AI and algorithms :).
I miss the ole internet
Zidane@lemmy.ca · 23 pts · 233d
Be the change you want to see. On my phone so it's shit ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
tomiant@piefed.social · 1 pts · 233d
Pretty damn sure you can say bukkake on here in an image.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 233d
Bukkake.
Still seems to work on my end.
Hey-oh.
Magnum@infosec.pub · 7 pts · 233d
Worked on his end too.
slappyfuck@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 232d
The self censorship is really disheartening. I read a defense of it that I considered thoughtful, but I truly hate it. I don’t know what we should do about it. Mass resistance?
criss_cross@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 232d
Only thing I can think is stop using platforms that demand it.
But we’re in such a minority sadly :(
rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 233d
It's why you never see any content about drowning by Japanese users
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 57 pts · 233d
The fuck's the point of getting bukkaked if you're gonna wear a hairnet and goggles?
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works · 102 pts · 233d
It's required PPE in the state of California for all orgies. Safety first.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 232d
The irony is that the shower cap & goggles cause cancer in the state of California, so we just can't win over here.
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 231d
It's really weird how its only on California. Someone should look into that
user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 232d
I wonder how many references I am missing daily.
I've watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I read 1984, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I watched Idiocracy, and then started seeing references to it everywhere.
I switched to Arch, and then started seeing references to it everywhere, btw.
etc...
And it doesn't stop. This has to mean I still keep missing many. I'd probably scroll past this comment if I didn't see that label on some Adata drive, since they don't seem to be that common in EU.
Diddlydee@feddit.uk · 21 pts · 233d
I'm no fancy bukkake expert, but I'd wager cleaning is easier and less risk of eye infection.
jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev · 18 pts · 233d
Yeah, sure, @Diddlydee@feddit.uk
usernamefactory@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 233d
Goggles seem valid, but hair? Should rinse right out.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 233d
Only with cold water. Semen has a lot of protein in it, which means it will curdle and harden like scrambled eggs when it gets hot. Lots of women make the mistake of trying to use hot water, (because hot water cleans better, right?) but that has it immediately gumming up and getting sticky before they can even get the shampoo lathered.
OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com · 5 pts · 233d
Also, try Conditioner, not shampoo to get “proteins” out of hair.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 233d
it works on horse semen, don't see why it wouldn't work on people.
Bgugi@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 232d
Why do you need to get your semen out of horse semen?
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 43 pts · 233d
I can tell this is fake because "man passes up opportunity for free, consensual sexual act" is so far beyond fiction it's not even funny.
Although that does sound like an Onion article title.
UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip · 54 pts · 233d
I can think of several men I know, including myself, who would not want to attend a bukkake
TheBat@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 233d
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 28 pts · 233d
Yeah, I'm entirely capable of standing around and jerking off on my own, without driving across town, without having to interact with the kind of people that would show up to an impromptu bukkake party.
OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com · 2 pts · 233d
Sounds like you want to plan yours out then. If you do so at your own home, we’ve solved most of your hurdles here!
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 233d
I mean, I would consider going to (or organizing) a planned sex party or something like that, but the problem for me here is mostly that it's just bukkake.
If the uh, the set of activities were a bit more diverse, or interesting, maybe me sitting around and not doing any work, like a lipstick party... or any number of things that actually require, or are considerably more enjoyable with another person or multiple people...
That'd be more appealing.
That, and, frankly, I kind of just find the idea of a bukkake scene inherently demeaning to women... or I gueas just any uh, subject, regardless of sex/gender.
Sure, probably some ladies are into that, some guys are into that, etc.
Just gives me bad vibes, don't like the idea of treating someone's face as a collective group cum dumpster, even if its consensual, just feels gross to me.
Further, you'd need to vet the participants, screen/background check them generally, also screen for STIs/STDs, etc.
harmbugler@piefed.social · 7 pts · 233d
Oh come on
UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip · 2 pts · 232d
No I will not be coming on, that's the point
Honytawk@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 232d
Afraid seeing other dicks might awaken something in you?
UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip · 1 pts · 232d
No
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 233d
From a misspent youth, I can tell you that many people, even straight men, ghost sex parties/moresomes, even with attractive cis women, even after paying a deposit in advance.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 233d
By "misspent", are you referring to those deposits?
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 233d
oh ho! hee hee! ha ha!
But seriously folks...
I would pay on the door to avoid exactly this. Im one to dip if the scene isn't my bag, but I would at least make the effort to turn up.
Soulg@ani.social · -1 pts · 233d
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 233d
Well you're wrong on both counts, so at least you're consistent.
You may also be taking it far too seriously. I certainly wasn't. It's a ahitpost, not a documentary.
Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 233d
Does it count if there are goggles involved?
Not kink shaming but definitions matter damn it.
horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 233d
Always use protection.
dumbass@piefed.social · 3 pts · 233d
Damn occupational health and safety fucking ruins everything!
tomiant@piefed.social · 24 pts · 233d
Goggles? Shower cap? TISSUES???
What kind of podunk bukkake is this?! No wonder no one showed up.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 232d
tbf, some people have sensitivity issues and are grossed out by cum on hair/eyes, they are still allowed horny and covered in cum if they want to
tomiant@piefed.social · 2 pts · 232d
"Yes I had a question about tonight's bukkake, I am allergic to cum, do you have a vegan alternative?"
Let me tell you, I was involved in organizing gangbangs in a major city, this was not once a thing.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 232d
tbf, that picture likely had nothing to do with a bukkake, just a sad woman cleaning
robocall@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 233d
Now give your sister a hug, and tell her you love her
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 233d
Then cum on her face to make her feel seen.
thatradomguy@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 233d
Idk what the original context of the image was supposed to be but I don't even care tbh. 😂
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 233d
Mentally preparing herself before cleaning I reckon
slappyfuck@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 232d
I find this much more interesting than the meme. I’m wondering what exactly she is facing down there.
Xerxos@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 233d
He could be a good big brother and help her out /s
tomiant@piefed.social · 11 pts · 233d
The original comment said bog brother. I spent minutes on this image, MINUTES, I will not have it tarnished by edits.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 232d
https://www.sexylosers.com/comic/219/
Pacattack57@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 232d
They didn’t cum because she covered her eyes and hair. That’s the whole point isn’t it? AIM for the eyes
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 233d
Is it just my observation or are tattos a requirement for porn actors?
slappyfuck@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 232d
I think tattoos have become extremely commonplace, that’s all. I haven’t watched porn in many years, but I would guess it’s just a reflection of a general societal trend.
It shows up in the rantings and ravings of right wing nutjobs who lament these types of things. They once developed an AI to remove tattoos and make women dress more modestly, I have no doubt the porn is annoying them too.
Nomorereddit@lemmy.today · -1 pts · 232d
If you don’t watch porn, then you’re speculating. Porn aesthetics aren’t a simple mirror of “societal trends” they’re shaped by platform algorithms, niche markets, and performer branding.
Dragging in right-wing moral panic and some AI anecdote is just noise. Without firsthand exposure or actual data, this is guesswork, not insight.
stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 230d
a bukkake is crazy
also shouldn't it be nobody "came"? it'd be more funnier (incorrect grammar intended)
Etterra@discuss.online · -26 pts · 232d
It's probably because of the tattoos.
Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 232d
That's just like your opinion man. Tattoos do me in.
BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 232d
Etterra@discuss.online · 1 pts · 231d
Back atcha, but FR I don't think I could hog l him up with that many bunny tattoos.