many enthusiast keyboards are “tenkeyless” precisely because the numpad is too far from the home row to be actually useful when you get efficient typing patterns worked out
i have a tenkeyless and use programmers dvorak (which is honestly imo pretty brain dead for its use of the num row and still is “fine” for numbers): you get used to it very quickly, and typing numbers with the numpad as an efficiency improvement is more than made up for by using both hands on the num row, and by it being far closer to the home row
Num row is plenty efficient. It takes some practice but is probably more efficient for typing mixed strings of letters and numbers, which is more common than long strings of numbers. As for flying, I dunno, same way anyone flies. Throw yourself at the ground and miss.
Num pad is much faster for clean numbers than num row because you can use the thumb on zero, allowing you to use all 5 fingers without ever moving the hand.
However the secret to achieve true mad man number typing speeds is to use both hands.
Num row is for the left hand. Num pad is for the right hand.
This can be optimized by positioning your left hand on 1 to prepare yourself for Benford's Law which tells us that a majority of numbers start with 1.
Actual numbers also includes many zeros (but rarely starts with one). The fat zero key on num pad has room for two fingers, just saying.
Eight fingers with both hands vs four and a dedicated thumb for zero? The number of fingers isn't the limiting factor anyway. Like I said, if you're not typing exclusively numbers, the numrow is fine because it allows you to type numbers and letters without repositioning your hands.
actually one of my grandparents was a typist at an accounting firm, and apparently num row is far more efficient for numbers in generally because you use 10 fingers and your thumbs are close to your “new home row” (aka the number row while you’re typing numbers), and whilst possible you’d never use both hands in the num pad because it’d be awkward and probably damaging to your wrists, and you’re rarely typing just numbers so having the num row closer to the home row is part of the efficiency calculation
… if we’re being pedantic, which we absolutely are
that TV is a prime candidate for /tvtoohigh and also needs its own sub/comm for /tvwaaaaaytooclose, despite the mild “improvement” to the original image
45 Comments
inlandempire@jlai.lu · 119 pts · 210d
How do i delete an image from my brain
hansolo@lemmy.today · 31 pts · 210d
Drink that trough of vodka
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 210d
Find a worse one.
TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 210d
lena@gregtech.eu · 3 pts · 209d
Ah, a recursive solution. Elegant!
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 210d
Bat to the head.
ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 210d
Well the first step is upvoting it. I'm not sure what the second step is, but just go ahead and start on step one until step two is clearly defined.
TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 210d
Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 210d
TMI, TMI!
Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 68 pts · 210d
Oh thats nasty. A keyboard without a numpad? really?
zammy95@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 210d
I really like the idea of compact keyboards but like... I can't imagine not having my numpad, so I guess it just isn't meant to be.
sem@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 209d
Some keyboards let you hold down a FM key to use some normal keys as a numpad, but not enough.
pupbiru@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 209d
many enthusiast keyboards are “tenkeyless” precisely because the numpad is too far from the home row to be actually useful when you get efficient typing patterns worked out
i have a tenkeyless and use programmers dvorak (which is honestly imo pretty brain dead for its use of the num row and still is “fine” for numbers): you get used to it very quickly, and typing numbers with the numpad as an efficiency improvement is more than made up for by using both hands on the num row, and by it being far closer to the home row
aoidenpa@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 210d
How do they move diagonally in a roguelike game?
Thalfon@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 209d
With HJKLYUBN unlike these modern savages with their arrow keys.
Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 209d
How do they fly, or efficiently enter strings of numbers?
kogasa@programming.dev · 2 pts · 209d
Num row is plenty efficient. It takes some practice but is probably more efficient for typing mixed strings of letters and numbers, which is more common than long strings of numbers. As for flying, I dunno, same way anyone flies. Throw yourself at the ground and miss.
bstix@feddit.dk · 5 pts · 209d
Num pad is much faster for clean numbers than num row because you can use the thumb on zero, allowing you to use all 5 fingers without ever moving the hand.
However the secret to achieve true mad man number typing speeds is to use both hands. Num row is for the left hand. Num pad is for the right hand.
This can be optimized by positioning your left hand on 1 to prepare yourself for Benford's Law which tells us that a majority of numbers start with 1.
Actual numbers also includes many zeros (but rarely starts with one). The fat zero key on num pad has room for two fingers, just saying.
kogasa@programming.dev · 2 pts · 209d
Eight fingers with both hands vs four and a dedicated thumb for zero? The number of fingers isn't the limiting factor anyway. Like I said, if you're not typing exclusively numbers, the numrow is fine because it allows you to type numbers and letters without repositioning your hands.
pupbiru@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 209d
actually one of my grandparents was a typist at an accounting firm, and apparently num row is far more efficient for numbers in generally because you use 10 fingers and your thumbs are close to your “new home row” (aka the number row while you’re typing numbers), and whilst possible you’d never use both hands in the num pad because it’d be awkward and probably damaging to your wrists, and you’re rarely typing just numbers so having the num row closer to the home row is part of the efficiency calculation
… if we’re being pedantic, which we absolutely are
TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 210d
I tried it and agree that's that grossest thing here.
dingleberrylover@lemmy.world · 62 pts · 210d
Top tier shit post
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 40 pts · 210d
Dr. Suess legs.
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 210d
The Lorax runs Arch.
troot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 39 pts · 210d
Ok but... what the fuck is on the screen?
Oka@sopuli.xyz · 24 pts · 210d
FNAF Erotica, I think
some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 209d
Nevermind that, what's in the glass? Water? Vodka?
bob_lemon@feddit.org · 1 pts · 209d
Gin
myrrh@ttrpg.network · 26 pts · 210d
bleistift2@sopuli.xyz · 19 pts · 210d
If this is you, I applaud your dedication.
Cantaloupe@fedioasis.cc · 20 pts · 210d
pupbiru@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 209d
that TV is a prime candidate for /tvtoohigh and also needs its own sub/comm for /tvwaaaaaytooclose, despite the mild “improvement” to the original image
diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 209d
M137@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 209d
ಠ_ಠ
ekZepp@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 210d
rogsson@piefed.social · 9 pts · 210d
My brain broke of everything going on in the pic
zebidiah@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 210d
10/10 shitpost
You gotta respect committing to the bit that hard...
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 209d
djmikeale@feddit.dk · 8 pts · 210d
Incredible. Looking forward to following your future endeavours
Mwa@thelemmy.club · 6 pts · 209d
the FNAF video on the screen 💀
toynbee@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
I have that same keyboard.
Or had. My wife absconded with it.
myrrh@ttrpg.network · 5 pts · 210d
toynbee@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 210d
That would be impressive.
bootleg@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 210d
...
mastertigurius@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 210d
Did Chewbacca get drunk and play with the trimmer?
horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 210d
Strimmer more like.
orochi02@feddit.org · 1 pts · 210d
Hated This Trend and hate it even more now
PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 210d
Sir! Bravo!
homes@piefed.world · 1 pts · 210d
When I get bored in the shower, I have better ways to amuse myself