
"When someone says „Scientists do not want you to know“ you can dismiss everything from there on. Scientists want you to know. They are desperate that you know. They can’t shut up about what they found out and want you to know."
https://ohai.social/@jascha/116165169216167770

"When someone says „Scientists do not want you to know“ you can dismiss everything from there on. Scientists want you to know. They are desperate that you know. They can’t shut up about what they found out and want you to know."
17 Comments
Una@europe.pub · 36 pts · 192d
Scientists do not want you to know but you can become a cat by meowing loud enough.
Zorque@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 192d
Nya
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 192d
Username checks out. The profile pictures, however, do not. Is that a quokka?
Una@europe.pub · 6 pts · 192d
It is Evil kitty
They sound like "awawa" and like they are yelling.
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 192d
Scientists don't want you to know what kind of underwear they're wearing
_stranger_@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 192d
Of course, that would ruin the double blind study on underwear preference.
Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 191d
Waaaait... double blind?
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 186d
This explains the crabs…
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 191d
IT IS FRILLY AND PINK
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 192d
It’s all fun and games until the scatologist shows up.
Then it’s all poop jokes.
JargonWagon@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 191d
Do scientists want us to know about the misuse of p values in their research papers?
chuckleslord@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 191d
Yes. You think the average scientist wants to be wasting their time creating catch-all experiments in order to get published so they can secure more grants? Of course not, they want to follow their curiosity to answer big questions or fail to get the answers but answer other questions. This model wastes everyone's time for extremely small gains. But it's all about stakeholder's investments.
LilithElina@literature.cafe · 5 pts · 191d
Probably not, but we (and many scientists) know about it anyway.
Inucune@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 191d
Scientist don't want you to ask questions about mouse 40 that spontaneously combusted during the cancer drug trial. Their funding depends on noone discussing mouse 40.
reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 190d
"After excluding outliers, we found no signs of spontaneous combustion as a side effect"
laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 191d
Scientists do not want you to which arm of the study you’re in.
daannii@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 191d
Also ain't none of them conspiring together to hide the truth.
Most scientists are incredibly competitive. And often try to 1-up each other with research to prove the other scientist is wrong. Or at least partially wrong.
That's what they live for.
LilithElina@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 191d