Given Trump's bullshit, frankly, I just want to come in here and appreciate the absolute beauty of our world and its neighbour. I really fear what's about to happen.
they fucked up the toilet within hours of launch. nasa if you have been reading me making fun of you I am available for consult on a design for a hose-based toilet that if it breaks, you've fucked up the entire spaceship on gods how did this fuck up.
i'm surprised they brought 10 days of shitbags but here we are
If you think about it, a spacecraft only really needs to handle about 1 atm of pressure, which isn’t much compared to something like a deep sea submersible that needs to handle 100+.
Yeah, they could probably even go a bit lower than sea level pressure.
Though even then, it would still be like everything outside was a giant vacuum cleaner. How thick would a pane of glass on earth need to be if you stuck a massive vacuum cleaner over it that managed a perfect seal around the window so that the window didn't shatter even if you bump it a bit on the other side?
I was going to add that a strong hurricane can result from just a 10% pressure difference, but I realized that it's a bit misleading because while that is accurate for the pressure driving it, the destruction that hurricanes cause from winds is more about the momentum of all that air moving to equalize the pressure, not the acceleration from pressure difference itself. It's probably easier to engineer a bay window for a spaceship than a bay window to watch a (strong) hurricane make landfall through. Other than all the space crap slamming into it, at least.
I think Fantasy World is the best one, if only for the memories of my mate being grounded for calling the 0898 number for the solution to some of the puzzles.
Fantasy World was the one I was thinking of. I had the ZX Spectrum version!
The Fantastic Adventures of Dizzy on MegaDrive I think is one I remember fondly as well - I had the 2-in-1 cart with Cosmic Spacehead which I also loved!
I felt bad for them that as soon as they got back in comm range they had to set up a video call and that fuckin blob was on the phone. The Canadian did slide in a nice comment about diversity before handing off the mic though, appreciated that energy
Glamour shot or our shield. Literally - the far side of the moon absorbs many small meteorites that might otherwise hit Earth. That's why it has no large mare, it's just oops all craters. Artemis II found 3 new craters since the last time the far side had been mapped in detail.
These types of photos always do remind me of the fact that we live in an incredibly hostile universe. Helps me to appreciate how lucky we are to have this watery rock with a big bubble around it to live on.
Yeah but the one time (we think we know of) that we collided with another planet, the moon didn't even show up until just after. Fucking slacker.
And ever since then, it's been edging farther and farther away, like it has better things to do than take meteors to the face for us (and asteroids to the ass). We need some sort of tether or leash to keep it where it is.
Which just happens to be when it's the same apparent size as the sun, a lucky coincidence for anyone who has had the pleasure of seeing one, because this might be the only place in the entire galaxy where such a thing even happens.
What's kind of crazy about the perceived distance thing is that timing of being in this planet now also plays a factor. 100 million years ago a 1ish% relative size larger might have made for far fewer annular eclipses. Or more, I can't find any info on that, but I expect fewer annular and more total eclipses. Of the 224 eclipses this century, 72 are annular and 68 total.
But it's all part of this scifi bonkers planet. Our star makes us have crazy light rivers in the sky at the poles because molten iron inside the planet is spinning faster than the outside of the planet to make giant magnetic currents. The crust isn't even solid, it's a slow moving chunky ice flow of silicates, like some busted-ass pie pulled straight from the oven. Huge deposits of dead trees and other early life got buried and remained intact as seams or seas of hydrocarbons, just hanging out. In some places the life that evolved here can die and get buried and some of the remains turned into stone versions of itself. We can bounce radio waves of the inside of the atmosphere and the magnetic currents for our convenience.
Sorry, but it always sends me down a rabbit hole of how weird this place is and we just get used to it.
And we "only" had to wait half a century since the last one, during which so much money was blown up in wars that it would have paid for this mission hundred-fold.
yeah but i've heard a nice explanation that basically the last 50 years were spent on developing IT, which we need for better rockets. so instead of flying with rockets directly in 1970, we paused, developed computers that can do meaningful and complex navigation, and then built rockets.
Before the Soviet space race started, NASA had plans to do a couple flybys then build a base that would become a shipyard for deeper space exploration so it’s kind of a “best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago” situation but still amazing to see every stage complete successfully. That’s great news for Artemis III
I know they have really high resolution cameras on board those space ships but I doubt even they would be able to get a clear picture of the White House from where they are in space.
Not arguing that PNG is the right choice, but you want something lossless for science purposes, and this is a science image.
You can tell roughly what order the impact craters were formed by seeing what overlaps what; looks like the small impacts mostly followed the big impacts. Maybe the earth's orbit cleared out the bigger stuff first? If you had a really good image, you might be able to work out the average impact angle, and therefore the average speed of impact, since we know the speed of the moon, and how they would intersect. Nothing's filled with lava like it has on the near side of the moon, which makes me think these have mostly happened later in the moon's life, when it's cooled down a bit.
I just love space, I've no education in it. I bet someone with a fancy moon science degree would be able to tell you a lot more, and they'd be poring over every pixel. Don't want any JPEGs getting in the way of that.
The short answer is size. Longer answer is because of how the compression works and it's not what it was designed for. PNG are more suited to graphics.
I've been using it as a sort of litmus test for AI images. Even at a high quality setting, AVIF compresses them down to almost nothing.
Something to do with the lack of natural "jitter" in AI images and the way AVIF has been designed to perfectly deal with this.
Oh guess the AI folks haven't yet realized that you can increase perceived accuracy by adding a small amount of random noise.
Which of course they didn't, because then they'd need to understand some things about images instead of just throwing whatever data they can find at it and hoping it figures it all out from that.
Though I'm not sure how much it applies to images, as the examples I've seen were audio. But it's cool to hear a low bitrate audio sample of someone talking unintelligibly and then play that same clip with random noise also playing and suddenly you can understand what is being said.
The diffusion models at least were basically designed to "remove noise from a random image until a real image emerged" so that actually makes a lot of sense, interesting
Chances are the program you're using supports all this crap, and ignores the extension anyway, because far too many people just rename files to "convert" them.
Only real way to be sure is to open it with a hex editor. The first few bytes will tell you what a file type really is.
It's probably the best open format for pictures, based on the AV1 codec. Better compression than jpeg and can do lossless with better compression than png as well.
Also.... Yeah your X argument regarding Y is hugely important and so your economic and societal views should be more important than knowing that people are starving and or dying somewhere in that blue ball, so don't do anything about it.
Like if you own 90% of all human resources, don't just give hungry people enough to eat. That makes sense. You are an awesome human being for figuring out how to take so much from everyone else...... ASSHOLE...... You know who you guys are.
I love Gil-Scot Heron, but I think space exploration is essential. Although perhaps he’s not discounting space exploration as a whole, but rather stating that it sucks that whities would rather leave the planet than help their fellow man.
I think we need to spend some more time looking down at what we can fix here before we can look to the stars with anything other than a colonizer mindset. Space is just going to be commodified for the ultra rich and any benefit the exploration of it might give will, as with all things, never actually “trickle down” to the poor of the earth.
Yeah, that’s the trajectory we’re on, for sure. But how long do we have until Earth is literally cooked?
This is the angle I take, and the reason I will always remain enthusiastic RE: space exploration.
However, I don’t go advocating for it in the same way I do more “surface-level” issues. My voice is better used in fixing the problems down here, yes, but I’m still supportive of space science, discoveries, and their ancillary contributions to science down here.
That's much bigger than "a basketball at arm's length," as was described by NASA. That's more like an oversized beach ball at arm's length for me, and I have a 7'6" wingspan. I'm 6'3" in height, and rather lanky.
someday we will be able to automate such tasks helping protect human lives and money. till that day brave men and women will have to brave the dangers of space to get pictures.
105 Comments
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 65 pts · 119d
I'm pretty sure this was created in a sound studio by Stanley Kubrick.
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 119d
As the launch was happening I said to my wife "AI must be making Kubrick's job so much simpler" and she just sort of glared at me...
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 28 pts · 119d
Like this
Or this
urandom@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 119d
I’ve made better screenshots in KSP
IndiBrony@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 119d
Given Trump's bullshit, frankly, I just want to come in here and appreciate the absolute beauty of our world and its neighbour. I really fear what's about to happen.
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 56 pts · 119d
Imagine being the furthest people away from Donald Trump.
merdaverse@lemmy.zip · 58 pts · 119d
MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net · 11 pts · 119d
I didn't know Mr. Hankey made the mission roster.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 119d
they fucked up the toilet within hours of launch. nasa if you have been reading me making fun of you I am available for consult on a design for a hose-based toilet that if it breaks, you've fucked up the entire spaceship on gods how did this fuck up.
i'm surprised they brought 10 days of shitbags but here we are
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 119d
Wait what. What happened to their toilet?
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 119d
they have to pee in bags for reasons. I don't think we got or will get a full explanation on how the shitter broke until splashdown
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 119d
Maybe that dehydrated food didn't agree with them. Imagine being that guy to have clogged the spaceship’s toilet for the entire trip
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 119d
How thick does that window need to be to handle the pressure without blowing out?
eleijeep@piefed.social · 6 pts · 119d
7
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 119d
Dammit! Smashes worthless spaceship and starts over
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 4 pts · 119d
There is almost no pressure in space.
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 119d
Exactly and that makes it harder to contain all the pressure inside the spacecraft.
Archelon@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 119d
If you think about it, a spacecraft only really needs to handle about 1 atm of pressure, which isn’t much compared to something like a deep sea submersible that needs to handle 100+.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 3 pts · 119d
That’s only fifteen PSI.
My tires have forty.
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 119d
Yeah, they could probably even go a bit lower than sea level pressure.
Though even then, it would still be like everything outside was a giant vacuum cleaner. How thick would a pane of glass on earth need to be if you stuck a massive vacuum cleaner over it that managed a perfect seal around the window so that the window didn't shatter even if you bump it a bit on the other side?
I was going to add that a strong hurricane can result from just a 10% pressure difference, but I realized that it's a bit misleading because while that is accurate for the pressure driving it, the destruction that hurricanes cause from winds is more about the momentum of all that air moving to equalize the pressure, not the acceleration from pressure difference itself. It's probably easier to engineer a bay window for a spaceship than a bay window to watch a (strong) hurricane make landfall through. Other than all the space crap slamming into it, at least.
IndiBrony@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 119d
Must be peaceful up there.
Side note: Dizzy is fucking great. I should play it again!
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 119d
I think Fantasy World is the best one, if only for the memories of my mate being grounded for calling the 0898 number for the solution to some of the puzzles.
IndiBrony@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 119d
Fantasy World was the one I was thinking of. I had the ZX Spectrum version!
The Fantastic Adventures of Dizzy on MegaDrive I think is one I remember fondly as well - I had the 2-in-1 cart with Cosmic Spacehead which I also loved!
FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 119d
I felt bad for them that as soon as they got back in comm range they had to set up a video call and that fuckin blob was on the phone. The Canadian did slide in a nice comment about diversity before handing off the mic though, appreciated that energy
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 119d
imagine watching the globe for explosions visible from space. that's gotta be worse than waiting for a headline.
generallynonsensical@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 119d
The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 119d
Apparently b-52s have already taken off from the UK. it's a 7 hour flight
generallynonsensical@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 119d
hansolo@lemmy.today · 37 pts · 119d
Glamour shot or our shield. Literally - the far side of the moon absorbs many small meteorites that might otherwise hit Earth. That's why it has no large mare, it's just oops all craters. Artemis II found 3 new craters since the last time the far side had been mapped in detail.
Rolder@reddthat.com · 12 pts · 119d
To be fair a lot of meteors hit earths atmosphere and disintegrate. Poor moon doesn’t have an atmosphere to protect it though
guitarfosec@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 118d
These types of photos always do remind me of the fact that we live in an incredibly hostile universe. Helps me to appreciate how lucky we are to have this watery rock with a big bubble around it to live on.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 118d
Just be glad you're not at the insect scale. Talk about hostile!
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 119d
Yeah but the one time (we think we know of) that we collided with another planet, the moon didn't even show up until just after. Fucking slacker.
And ever since then, it's been edging farther and farther away, like it has better things to do than take meteors to the face for us (and asteroids to the ass). We need some sort of tether or leash to keep it where it is.
Which just happens to be when it's the same apparent size as the sun, a lucky coincidence for anyone who has had the pleasure of seeing one, because this might be the only place in the entire galaxy where such a thing even happens.
hansolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 118d
The Moon was probably just scared of dinosaurs.
What's kind of crazy about the perceived distance thing is that timing of being in this planet now also plays a factor. 100 million years ago a 1ish% relative size larger might have made for far fewer annular eclipses. Or more, I can't find any info on that, but I expect fewer annular and more total eclipses. Of the 224 eclipses this century, 72 are annular and 68 total.
But it's all part of this scifi bonkers planet. Our star makes us have crazy light rivers in the sky at the poles because molten iron inside the planet is spinning faster than the outside of the planet to make giant magnetic currents. The crust isn't even solid, it's a slow moving chunky ice flow of silicates, like some busted-ass pie pulled straight from the oven. Huge deposits of dead trees and other early life got buried and remained intact as seams or seas of hydrocarbons, just hanging out. In some places the life that evolved here can die and get buried and some of the remains turned into stone versions of itself. We can bounce radio waves of the inside of the atmosphere and the magnetic currents for our convenience.
Sorry, but it always sends me down a rabbit hole of how weird this place is and we just get used to it.
merdaverse@lemmy.zip · 35 pts · 119d
That looks like a shoe print. Considering the size of it, it can only mean...
Big Foot confirmed!
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 24 pts · 119d
The proper terminology is moon yeti
ech@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 118d
The Abominable Moonman
titanicx@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 119d
Moti
Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 119d
And we "only" had to wait half a century since the last one, during which so much money was blown up in wars that it would have paid for this mission hundred-fold.
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 119d
yeah but i've heard a nice explanation that basically the last 50 years were spent on developing IT, which we need for better rockets. so instead of flying with rockets directly in 1970, we paused, developed computers that can do meaningful and complex navigation, and then built rockets.
FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 119d
Before the Soviet space race started, NASA had plans to do a couple flybys then build a base that would become a shipyard for deeper space exploration so it’s kind of a “best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago” situation but still amazing to see every stage complete successfully. That’s great news for Artemis III
Cliff@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 118d
Artemis III is not heading to the moon though.
testaccount789@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 119d
Plus it's done using re-used parts which will just become single-use: https://old-man-par.com/2026/01/21/previously-flow-components-of-artemis-ii/
Oldest one first flown on STS-5 in 1982.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 119d
Yeah but what about the wars????
How are we supposed to fund them if we're doing stuff that's good for all of mankind?!?!
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 119d
I think I've found my new wallpaper.
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 39 pts · 119d
Images.nasa.gov
rustydrd@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 119d
Nice job pointing the camera just so the Nazi base isn't visible.
Furbag@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 118d
I know they have really high resolution cameras on board those space ships but I doubt even they would be able to get a clear picture of the White House from where they are in space.
charonn0@startrek.website · 4 pts · 119d
Sarothazrom@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 118d
civilization collapses in the next 48h
these guys: um
ech@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 118d
https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/00d598da-983b-4367-8c93-511922dcae26.png
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 118d
I was just telling my wife how I could die happy if I had this experience.
yesman@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 119d
What the hell is an .avif format? Anyway, you can just save it as .png and that works.
PodPerson@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 119d
png is completely the wrong format for photos.
addie@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 119d
Not arguing that PNG is the right choice, but you want something lossless for science purposes, and this is a science image.
You can tell roughly what order the impact craters were formed by seeing what overlaps what; looks like the small impacts mostly followed the big impacts. Maybe the earth's orbit cleared out the bigger stuff first? If you had a really good image, you might be able to work out the average impact angle, and therefore the average speed of impact, since we know the speed of the moon, and how they would intersect. Nothing's filled with lava like it has on the near side of the moon, which makes me think these have mostly happened later in the moon's life, when it's cooled down a bit.
I just love space, I've no education in it. I bet someone with a fancy moon science degree would be able to tell you a lot more, and they'd be poring over every pixel. Don't want any JPEGs getting in the way of that.
someguy3@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 119d
Why's that?
PodPerson@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 119d
The short answer is size. Longer answer is because of how the compression works and it's not what it was designed for. PNG are more suited to graphics.
PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space · 11 pts · 119d
I've been using it as a sort of litmus test for AI images. Even at a high quality setting, AVIF compresses them down to almost nothing.
Something to do with the lack of natural "jitter" in AI images and the way AVIF has been designed to perfectly deal with this.
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 119d
Oh guess the AI folks haven't yet realized that you can increase perceived accuracy by adding a small amount of random noise.
Which of course they didn't, because then they'd need to understand some things about images instead of just throwing whatever data they can find at it and hoping it figures it all out from that.
Though I'm not sure how much it applies to images, as the examples I've seen were audio. But it's cool to hear a low bitrate audio sample of someone talking unintelligibly and then play that same clip with random noise also playing and suddenly you can understand what is being said.
qqq@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 119d
The diffusion models at least were basically designed to "remove noise from a random image until a real image emerged" so that actually makes a lot of sense, interesting
lena@gregtech.eu · 8 pts · 119d
It's a very efficient royalty-free codec: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVIF?wprov=sfla1
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 119d
It's a .webp file for me.
Chances are the program you're using supports all this crap, and ignores the extension anyway, because far too many people just rename files to "convert" them.
Only real way to be sure is to open it with a hex editor. The first few bytes will tell you what a file type really is.
deadcream@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 119d
Lemmy probably returns images in different formats depending on what client supports (and ones with better compression take precedence).
Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 119d
It's probably the best open format for pictures, based on the AV1 codec. Better compression than jpeg and can do lossless with better compression than png as well.
quips@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 119d
Jpegxl gang
varyingExpertise@feddit.org · 1 pts · 119d
Native iOS image format I think, AV1 derived?
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 119d
Best photo of the moon made by a regular camera.
Ain't no telescope gonna bring you this close.
Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 119d
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 119d
See? Earth is just a bent flat disk! Knew it!
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 119d
I cant see the elephants or the turtle.
ech@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 118d
That "highest resolution image of the moon" user on Reddit is gonna have to find a new gimmick.
Danarchy@lemmy.nz · 6 pts · 119d
Well they better give it back
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 119d
Why don't they call it "leaving" a dump? After all, you're not actually taking it anywhere!
titanicx@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 119d
You don't?
nosuchanon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 119d
WHERE ARE THE REBEL BASES!?
benderbeerman@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 118d
Rebels cum?
baduhai@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 119d
Where can I find a high res version of this?
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 119d
You’re in for a treat.
photos.nasa.gov
UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 118d
Lemmy hug of death?
baduhai@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 118d
I find that hard to believe. Prolly the entire world trying to look at the photos.
UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 118d
Yeah it was tongue-in-cheek... Sorry
Zacryon@feddit.org · 3 pts · 119d
That looks like a fluffy gray round bread.
Alpha71@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 119d
Photographed on a iPhone 17 Pro Max
altphoto@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 119d
I can see all the assholes from here!!
Also.... Yeah your X argument regarding Y is hugely important and so your economic and societal views should be more important than knowing that people are starving and or dying somewhere in that blue ball, so don't do anything about it.
Like if you own 90% of all human resources, don't just give hungry people enough to eat. That makes sense. You are an awesome human being for figuring out how to take so much from everyone else...... ASSHOLE...... You know who you guys are.
Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 119d
Whitey on the Moon
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 119d
I love Gil-Scot Heron, but I think space exploration is essential. Although perhaps he’s not discounting space exploration as a whole, but rather stating that it sucks that whities would rather leave the planet than help their fellow man.
Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 119d
I think we need to spend some more time looking down at what we can fix here before we can look to the stars with anything other than a colonizer mindset. Space is just going to be commodified for the ultra rich and any benefit the exploration of it might give will, as with all things, never actually “trickle down” to the poor of the earth.
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 119d
Yeah, that’s the trajectory we’re on, for sure. But how long do we have until Earth is literally cooked?
This is the angle I take, and the reason I will always remain enthusiastic RE: space exploration.
However, I don’t go advocating for it in the same way I do more “surface-level” issues. My voice is better used in fixing the problems down here, yes, but I’m still supportive of space science, discoveries, and their ancillary contributions to science down here.
Pherenike@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 119d
Well there you have it, the Earth IS round, can we please get over that debate now uncle Mike?
Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 119d
No stars! It's AI! /s
favoredponcho@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 118d
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 118d
That's much bigger than "a basketball at arm's length," as was described by NASA. That's more like an oversized beach ball at arm's length for me, and I have a 7'6" wingspan. I'm 6'3" in height, and rather lanky.
renormalizer@feddit.org · 3 pts · 118d
To be fair, they have the advantage of 400mm lenses. You can take a full-frame picture of a basketball from 10m away with those.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 119d
Not real. No elephants.
mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 118d
Sentinel Prime lurking
jobbies@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 118d
AI SLOP /s
biofaust@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 119d
A rat done bit my sister Nell...
mushroommunk@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 119d
Obligatory "dang it, I blinked".
But seriously though it's gorgeous and I love the work the crew is doing.
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 119d
AI... j/k.
danc4498@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 119d
Where’s the cheese?
HubertManne@piefed.social · 0 pts · 119d
someday we will be able to automate such tasks helping protect human lives and money. till that day brave men and women will have to brave the dangers of space to get pictures.
horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · -4 pts · 119d
Would an LLM have done it better though?
BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 119d
It would have bimbofied the moon and added the jade rabbit.
And then the algorithm would do the rest.
lath@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 119d
Are you sure? That they're still human?
aizawaA02@lemmy.zip · -13 pts · 119d
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 119d
the moon doesn't exist. what you're seeing in the night sky is a hologram that NASA is projecting on a big canvas each night to mess with your head.
aizawaA02@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 118d
Wow that is so wild. I did hear about the hologram theory. That is a good one.
Vupware@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 119d
I hope this is a joke for your sake. Otherwise you need to seek clinical help.