Cracker Barrel will go back to old logo after conservative backlash

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/cracker-barrel-logo-rcna227389

192 points · 132 comments · view on lemmy.world

132 Comments

spicehoarder@lemmy.zip · 106 pts · 359d

Release the files cracker barrel logo

Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 86 pts · 360d (30 replies)

The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.

tal@lemmy.today · 44 pts · 360d (9 replies)

I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.

But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.

EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.

EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.

EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:

https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/

1000009253

errer@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 359d (5 replies)

I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…

ToastedRavioli@midwest.social · 14 pts · 359d (3 replies)

Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now

GuyFawkes@midwest.social · 8 pts · 359d

I hate you for pointing that out.

buddascrayon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 359d

Counts on hands... Oh yeah, it's over 10 years now isn't it?

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 359d

Officially 28 years ago

jj4211@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 359d

I think there's a mistake, other sources say 1977 instead of 1997..

jj4211@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 359d

According to another site, the logo was 1977, not 1997. Which tracks with another article mentioning a marketing person coming up with the design in the 70s

mememuseum@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 358d

If they'd just textured the background shape to actually look like a barrel it would be pretty good actually.

HeyJoe@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 360d

On the long drive to and from vacation last week I noticed the 2024-25 picture used a lot and I thought wait they already have a version without the other stuff and it looks fine so why the hell are they changing it again when its perfectly fine the way it is? My biggest complaint of the newest one was just that it featured no border. It already looked weird, but without that border, it just didn't work at all.

Naz@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 359d (2 replies)

Kinda wish the public had a similar outrage when Fruit of the Loom modernized their logo in 2000, lol

Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 359d

I'm more upset about Mr Pringle.

Lost not only his hair, but the twinkle in his eye, poor chap.

Zoomboingding@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 359d

I just wish they didn't try to gaslight humanity into believing there was never a cornucopia

oxjox@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 360d (12 replies)

How was it awful?

Could you tell me what the heck this yellow blob shape is supposed to be?

From a purely graphic design perspective, the classic logo is too busy and doesn't scale well. The only thing it has going for it is the weirdness of the shape and the distinct color combination. It's technically a really bad logo. You may not prefer the new logo but, technically, it's a whole lot better. It's far more adaptable to newer platforms while stilling being recognizable. Now, as far as being an effective representation of the brand and if that's a corporate concern, I don't know that I can comment on that.

Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 19 pts · 360d (1 reply)

In another post about this, someone posted a bunch of other fast food logos, and they all looked very much the same, especially in silhouette. They're all just a same-y blend of mediocrity, whereas the existing logo was at least unique.

McDonald's probably has the best and most distinctive logo out of anyone.

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -2 pts · 359d

Who cares

jordanlund@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 360d (2 replies)

The yellow blob is a pinto bean. :)

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 360d (1 reply)

I thought it was some splooge.

errer@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 359d

The barrel ain’t just full of crackers

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 359d (5 replies)

Yellow blob is obviously a speech bubble.

ToastedRavioli@midwest.social · 5 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Its not a speech bubble, its what the awful food will look like coming out on the other end of the tunnel

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 359d

Lmfao

oxjox@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 358d (1 reply)

I don't know if you're serious or not.

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 358d

I'm not. I know nothing about this brand or culture lmao

SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 359d

It's somebody who sees the white guy and a barrel and said them two together.

BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · -2 pts · 359d

100%, right here.

zd9@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 360d (2 replies)

Who gives a fuck? Let's focus on the fascist takeover happening in every city in the country, and the billionaires almost completely winning the war on the populace.

Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 360d (1 reply)

Jesus, we're allowed to think about other things every so often, it doesn't have to be US politics 24/7

zd9@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 359d

I mean, the headline literally talks about conservative snowflakes, it's kind of related

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 359d

It was fine, Jesus Christ

WanderWisley@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 359d (1 reply)

spicehoarder@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 358d
[ removed ]
JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 37 pts · 359d (6 replies)

I'm not conservative in the slightest and I thought the redesign was completely ass.

jj4211@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 359d (4 replies)

Yes, but did you go unhinged calling it "woke"? The logo was a poor fit and I could get behind it, but so many MAGAs losing it over calling a lame logo "woke"....

JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 359d (2 replies)

"woke"

lka1988@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 359d

Yes

GraniteM@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 358d

JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 359d
[ removed ]
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 359d

The whole restaurant is complete ass.

jordanlund@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 360d (8 replies)

I've never seen people freak out so hard over a LOGO change. Jesus, it's not like they changed the typeface to Comic Sans or Papyrus or some shit!

return2ozma@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 360d

Because everything in the United States has been turned into "us vs them" crap.

formergijoe@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 360d

Bunch of snowflakes wanting their safe space

ALLHAILHYPNOTOAD@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 359d
[ removed ]
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Nothing wrong with Comic Sans. It’s highly readable for many people.

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 359d

I'm this house we cryptographically decipher wingdings like god intended!

JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Jaguar cars: am I a joke to you?

jordanlund@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 359d

Jaguar was less about the logo and more about that whole marketing campaign. It was like they were doing a cologne commercial and left out the car completely. The logo change was the least of it.

When we did finally see the car, it looked like an AI generated concept, not an actual car. :(

RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 359d

It was really shit rebrand though

Zier@fedia.io · 35 pts · 360d (12 replies)

Thank god! Now can we get back to the important issues? How's that WAR ON CHRISTMAS going?

Kiernian@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 359d (2 replies)

The war on Christmas CANNOT END until Christmas ceases its illegal occupation of November.

We are once again calling on the Claus regime to return to their side of the borders outlined in the Black Friday agreement.

iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 359d

November? I think you forgot to include September and October.

Zier@fedia.io · 1 pts · 358d

There are xmas decorations in stores right now. And it was very funny to hear the Halloween decorations making spooky noises at them. I hate this badly written episode of Star Trek!

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 360d (1 reply)

I just want people to start complaining about "x-mas" again so I can explain very slowly what the Greek letter Chi is.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 360d

Good luck with that. The explaining part, I mean.

I've had xtians hound me on various forums for using their own abbreviation, LOL. Even after explaining it to them, they'd still get worked up into a poutrage, deny what I told them, which was obviously true, and, at least on Denver Post forums, run to the mods to try to get me banned and/or my posts taken down.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 359d (4 replies)

So the war on Christmas is odd on a theological and economic level. The secular (pagan?) Side is driven by corporations not the woke left. A fact often ignored by the evangelical right.

So what solution do they even want? A commercial with Jesus on the cross saying he thirts and having a Roman soldier pass him a chilled and refreshing coca cola?

Maybe a nativity where one of the wisemen is like and we got something for Joseph too and hand him a power saw?

Wtf

Zier@fedia.io · 7 pts · 359d (1 reply)

It started because Starbucks had a disposable cup without the words Christmas on it. It was a generic Holiday cup they used through Nov-early Jan. Suddenly we are under attack! Very stupid.

burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 359d

I think the anger over saying 'happy holidays' instead of 'merry christmas' predated that, because christians have found a way to get outraged over everything for a looong time. I was pretty happy just this week that dobson died, because focus on the family underpinned a lot of those sentiments that passed through the american christian sects.

ToastedRavioli@midwest.social · 2 pts · 359d

I thirt

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 359d

Not the route I thought you were going with that.

buddascrayon@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

I've already fired my first salvo. By now I would have had at least three or four gifts already purchased and ready for the Christmas season. I haven't even bothered. And I won't. It's going to be a lean Christmas and it's going to hurt the capitalist assholes who are fucking up our country.

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 359d

I'm still fighting the good didn't against it until Lowe's put up a Halloween display in fucking August!!! Now it's just about containment. If we can keep them in their own months I would be happy

iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works · 32 pts · 360d (23 replies)

Was it really conservative backlash? I don't think anyone liked it, lol.

formergijoe@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 360d (15 replies)

Non-conservatives give a shit about cracker barrel?

RagingRobot@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 360d (7 replies)

I gotta meet up with the old people in my family somewhere. I'm not having them in my house are you crazy

Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 360d (5 replies)

Have you tried literally anywhere else? Every few years my wife convinces me to try it again and it's always the worst. Are there really no local breakfast places around?

Fondots@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 360d (1 reply)

Some people out there are really reluctant to branch out and try anything different. There's a million places around me selling the same food but better, but some people just want to go to cracker barrel.

Old people especially, but also some people with, for example, autism, ARFID, etc. can be really picky about where they'll eat, and sometimes it's just not worth the aggravation of trying to get them to try something new.

Hell, I have some friends who aren't even particularly picky who can be reluctant to try out new places. Restaurants aren't cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you're not sure you're going to like.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

Restaurants aren’t cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you’re not sure you’re going to like.

That and sometimes you have to go to the same restaurant a few times until you find the dishes that are good there...

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 4 pts · 360d

Fortunately, I’ve got a few good diners to choose from

SculptusPoe@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

I don't know. I don't eat there often, but pretty much everything they make is good. I can't even think of another place that makes chicken and dumplings... For that style of food, I would always take a higher end one off restaurant in the Carolina. But for something ubiquitous, it is pretty much the only option, and it isn't as expensive as Shatley Springs or something.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 359d

Honestly, I would have tried it again more recently if it weren't for the fact that they don't seem to have any interest in accommodating vegetarians at all. Also, I think a few of them closed in Denver area.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

LOL, that's been the only reason I've ever set foot in one. People who were very much older in my extended family liked the place....and so for whatever reason, I kind of thought of the place like Grange halls - something the older bunch have an affinity for, but I don't quite understand how it fits into my life in the here and now. :/

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 359d

I'm a Leftist Progressive living in North Carolina, and I like Cracker Barrel

Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Uhhh, there's a shit ton of Cracker Barrels in NY, going to Cracker Barrel for family meet ups and shit was a staple in my family and made precious childhood memories for me, and we're black as hell. Plenty of non conservatives love CB. There's a shit ton black people makes jokes online rn about missing the "segregation" vibes of CB.

Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 359d

I will never forget their Coca-Cola fudge cake.

ganksy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 360d

Nope

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 358d

nope, because its not near where we live. Only cons ever cared about this.

RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 359d

People talked about here a lot, I had never even heard of it before

jordanlund@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 360d

I think I went there twice before they shut down here. I mean, it wasn't AWFUL. I'd rather eat at a local place though.

https://www.pignpancake.com/our-story.html

https://eatatelmers.com/about-us/northwest-favorite/

https://camp-18-seaside.com/

magnetosphere@fedia.io · 4 pts · 360d

Just from a design perspective, there was too much wasted space

RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 359d (1 reply)

The news sells better and is more engaging when you put it is conservative backslash instead of just overall negative reaction

Remoed@lemmings.world · 4 pts · 359d

Especially on this platform

oxjox@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 360d

Yes. It was.

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

I only learned about it when I saw headlines about the backlash that was costing them millions.

My first reaction after figuring out it was not the Onion was....are they still in business? I honestly didn't know they were still operating. I looked on the map in the Denver area and the one I thought was in Littleton/Lakewood area either is a figment of my imagination, or they closed.

RedditIsALostCause@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 360d

[Other Party]’s general population is totally upset about something [Our Party] thinks is good or even doesn’t give a fuck about!

We must be reactionary over the most trivial stupid shit and bicker and deflect from [List of Enormous Issues and Catastrophes], and create a new issue for everyone to point fingers about!

/s

Personally, I think it looks terrible and I’m a die-hard lefty/socialist/liberal whatever you wanna call me. I don’t eat there and don’t give a fuck about them, but this media attention over this “controversy” has pushed me to form an opinion on something I wouldn’t otherwise care about — and honestly if conservatives hate it, then fuck, I agree with them for once because it looks fuckin’ soulless and terrible lol.

jj4211@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 359d

The general reaction may have been negative, but the conservatives went unhinged accusing the new logo of being "woke"

hperrin@lemmy.ca · 29 pts · 359d

I will continue to not care at all about it. Release the Epstein files.

GuyFawkes@midwest.social · 28 pts · 359d

No bigger snowflake than a MAGAt.

ALLHAILHYPNOTOAD@lemmy.ml · 22 pts · 359d
[ removed ]
Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social · 20 pts · 359d

Wait a minute. The logo is literally a cracker and a barrel 🤣. I'm surprised conservatives are ok being made fun of.

dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 360d (3 replies)

Just what we needed. Conservatives feeling even more empowered. Goddamnit.

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 360d (2 replies)

Maybe this success will inspire them to redirect their attention from politics to corporate branding practices.

dohpaz42@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 360d

I wish they would target Netflix and their recent UI update next.

ganksy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 360d

Why? You want the Washington Redskins back

socsa@piefed.social · 19 pts · 360d

Called it. They new coke'd that shit.

TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 358d (2 replies)

I am so confused as to why anyone gives a fucking shit about this.

Wahots@pawb.social · 6 pts · 358d

People are bored because their lives are easy. That will change soon.

axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe · 2 pts · 358d

same thing happened with the sydney sweeney ad. all i care about is them titties

switcheroo@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 359d (2 replies)

Who gives a shit about a logo??? Companies can do whatever the hell they want with their logos so shut up about it and start asking: WHERE'S THE EPSTEIN FILES???

Nasan@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Probably not at Cracker Barrel, but I suppose anything's possible.

III@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 358d

Trump stored those stolen documents he was selling to the Saudis in a bathroom. You never know where he hides documents he absolutely has.

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 359d

Lol.

Boomer oriented company chooses to stay in business for a few more years until boomers are all gone.

I went into a Cracker Barrel once. 90% elderly.

darkdemize@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 360d

Huh. I guess crackers like representation too.

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 359d

Complained about the redesign, isn't Conservative How dare you insult me like this? I am an American and I will not stand for being called a Nazi.

RedditIsALostCause@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 360d (5 replies)

Conservative backlash? Are we really putting all the apparent public distaste for the rebrand on the conservatives? I personally haven’t seen any conservatives or conservative-coded people complain at all; in fact, I thought the “outcry” (more like grumbling imo) was bipartisan and something that progressives and conservatives both disliked.

But again, I feel as though in a reaching effort to make conservatives look even worse than they already do, many democrats and associated talking heads are forcing this story that conservatives are so pissed about it.

I’m left as hell and voted for Harris so I hope that gives some perspective when I say that I also think the logo and overall brand look like tasteless, soulless corporate slop. It’s what all corps have done and will always do, simplify and dilute any individuality to appeal to the broadest possible market possible, and we shouldn’t applaud that.

IDGAF about Cracker Barrel and never eat there, and were it not for media pundits accusing conservatives of being pissed, I don’t think I ever would’ve known. That said, if it’s gonna be pushed in my face for brand awareness and marketing, then yea, it looks like shit and I want to eat there even less than before.

Congrats everyone, you’re falling for engagement bait and doing the advertising for Cracker Barrel for free.

SculptusPoe@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 360d

Don't you know there are only two opinions in the world? Conservative and Liberal. Everything is neatly sorted into those two opinions. All questions, physical items, debates, people, opinions, foods, roller coasters, pickles, etc. All of it is Either Conservative or Liberal. Democrat or Republican. Whig or ...torry? I dont know. I mean, how could a rational human like fried chicken, grits, antiques, etching style line art, biscuits and old-fashioned candy without also hating Mexicans and hating killing babies?

frongt@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Yeah I don't think it's actually a Republican thing. Maybe their locations just overlap with Republican areas?

Personally I think the new logo is dumb, but I've also never even seen a Cracker Barrel in real life, let alone patronized one. I'm not even sure what their business is. Retail? Restaurant?

RedditIsALostCause@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 359d

It was both a retail store and restaurant. Both sections were “Southern Hospitality” themed minus any confederate or hateful shit. Think biscuits and gravy, maybe some bluegrass, farmin’.

I went a decent amount with my fam as a child and I always found it cozy and interesting. Never been as an adult.

III@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 358d (1 reply)

Uh oh, someone didn't read the article.

The new logo did not go over well in some spheres, and on social media, conservative critics accused the restaurant chain of abandoning its traditional values or of being “woke.”

and from the linked article that this is a follow up to:

The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., amplified a post on Wednesday suggesting that the logo change was led by CEO Julie Felss Masino to erase the American tradition aspect of the branding and make it more general, as a way of leaning into diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck added his commentary on Thursday, writing in a post on X, “Good morning @CrackerBarrel! You’re about to learn that wokeness really doesn’t pay.”

RedditIsALostCause@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 358d
[ removed ]
magnetosphere@fedia.io · 9 pts · 360d (5 replies)

The new logo did not go over well in some spheres, and on social media, conservative critics accused the restaurant chain of abandoning its traditional values or of being "woke."

When someone uses the word ‘woke’ as an unironic insult, I’ll probably think it’s stupid, but at least I understand what they’re saying. Until now, that is. What the fuck is “woke” supposed to mean in this context? What makes this bland logo change “woke”?

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 360d

ryper@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 359d

There was a man on the old logo and no man on the new logo. Totally woke.

ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one · 5 pts · 360d (1 reply)

What the fuck is “woke” supposed to mean in this context? What makes this bland logo change “woke”?

Woke is anything that I don't like.

jve@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 359d

ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 360d

They had some lgbt hires and dei stuff a few years ago and the ceo and is a woman so the new logo is clearly the end result of all that woke (reading: anything not catering to straight white males) nonsense

MNByChoice@midwest.social · 8 pts · 360d (1 reply)

conservatives are anti-progress.

Also, Cracker Barrel sucks.

_wizard@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 359d

Also my take. Who the fuck cares?

kaitco@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 360d

This was always the plan.

They only did the this to get their name in the news and get some people talking about them again to increase revenue.

myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 359d (2 replies)

The backlash from the racist bigots you mean. Where else are they going to go after church to be mean to the wait staff

Saffire@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 359d (1 reply)

The title already says Conservative though.

myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d

Yeah. But fuck em. Call em what they are.

lka1988@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 359d

Were it not for the whiny fucking losers and their incessant bitching and moaning over everything, I wouldn't have know nor cared.

I still don't care.

etchinghillside@reddthat.com · 5 pts · 360d (1 reply)

Hope they didn’t have too much of the rebrand printed and ready to go…

Whirlygirl9@kbin.melroy.org · 5 pts · 360d

Narrator: they did

HubertManne@piefed.social · 5 pts · 358d

oh man. so thankful. just biting my nails about the cracker barrel logo.

Today@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 360d

When my kids were young they started calling cracker barrel "the honky bucket". It just stuck as the name. I think they should add that to their logo.

GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 360d

🌨️

❄️

shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 360d

QuankyDanks@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 360d (1 reply)

I thought this was the onion 100%

CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 360d

I thought the same thing when I first saw the headlines about them losing millions over a logo change. The mind reels.

The occult community often compares sigils and corporate logos as being very much the same thing, but....DAMN. That's one hell of a spell that was cast over a whole lotta dumbfucks.

I frequent various chains, and I'm trying to think about the last time I really gave one fuck about any of their logos. I'm sure some of it works on a more subliminal and pernicious level, but have I ever sat back and really gave myself heartburn over a corporate logo? Hell to the fuck no.

Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 360d

Mm

Government bailout...

RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 359d

Go figure. The people that hate change hated it enough to force a corporation to keep their logo.

tover153@lemmynsfw.com · -1 pts · 359d (2 replies)

Well, that's the last time I visit a Cracker Barrel. Oh Well.

Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 359d (1 reply)

Why? Because they decided not to rebrand? Sounds like you just want an excuse not to go there. You don't need one.

Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social · 1 pts · 359d

No because the food is ass.